Unabashed commie is sworn into Arizona Senate seat

[midnight rambler]

Look at your future America, you are to be lorded over by godless reprobates who espouse leftist violence. Bonus: she's very proudly AC/DC.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/04/democrat-sen-kyrsten-sinema-refuses-take-oath-office-bible/

[madfranks]

I'm not sure if it is official policy to be sworn in on a Bible or not, but if it was, they should not have sworn her in at all, and accepted her refusal to be sworn in on the Bible as her resignation from office. I bet though, that they just cucked over like they always do and bent over backwards to accommodate this perverted bitch's demands.


Kyrsten always gets sworn in on a Constitution simply because of her love for the Constitution

That is a lie. It's because she hates the Bible and the Laws of God.

[monty]

Look at your future America, you are to be lorded over by godless reprobates who espouse leftist violence. Bonus: she's very proudly AC/DC.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/04/democrat-sen-kyrsten-sinema-refuses-take-oath-office-bible/

Even though she is a godless AC/DC leftist the Constitution supports her.

Actally the blame goes to her her voters, if indeed she was elected honestly.

but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification . . .

Art. VI Cl. 3

Article 6, Clause 3. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United ...

[Jewboo]

https://www.storemypic.com/images/2016/11/13/kyrsten-sinema-i-remember-when-i-was-a-young-quote-on-storemypic-29d95.png

Fred's degree?

:D

[End Times]

https://www.storemypic.com/images/2016/11/13/kyrsten-sinema-i-remember-when-i-was-a-young-quote-on-storemypic-29d95.png

Fred's degree?

:D

Uh, no. I do not have a Social Work degree. I believe in the original form of Social Work, which was to help people help themselves, pointing them to better ways of living and/or resources that could help them improve themselves. "Social Work" since World War II, and especially since the '70s, has been a front for ideological-based (i.e., Marxist) "social change." My degree did qualify me for my positions, but is far more "science-based" than the typical Social "Sciences" degree...my degree's field originally served humanity, as well.

[End Times]

That is a lie. It's because she hates the Bible and the Laws of God.

To be fair, she didn't specify which Constitution:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Soviet_Union

[Neuro]

To be fair, she didn't specify which Constitution:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Soviet_Union

That type of chutzpah would actually be respectable if she had the ballz for it.

I read yesterday somewhere that 4 presidents so far hadn’t been sworn in on the Bible... Probably a long time ago since that last happened...

[End Times]

I read yesterday somewhere that 4 presidents so far hadn’t been sworn in on the Bible... Probably a long time ago since that last happened...

John Quincy Adams (book of law)
Franklin Pierce (book of law)
Teddy Roosevelt (nothing)
Johnson (Catholic missal instead *; no Bible available in the rush)




* http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/M%20Disk/Manchester%20William%20Unclassified%20Part%203/Item%2024.pdf

[woodman]

Johnson (Catholic missal instead *; no Bible available in the rush)




* http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/M%20Disk/Manchester%20William%20Unclassified%20Part%203/Item%2024.pdf


So they say. It was probably a Talmud.

[Horn]

I know women are relatively new to the political scene, but from what I've seen most are giving women a bad name in politics.

So much so that I see a future for women at home in the kitchen.

[midnight rambler]

I know women are relatively new to the political scene, but from what I've seen most are giving women a bad name in politics.

So much so that I see a future for women at home in the kitchen.

Do you know why women don't need a wrist watch?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Because there's a clock on the stove.

[Neuro]

So they say. It was probably a Talmud.

Hmmm is swearing in on a book dedicated to deception and taking the power from most people of the world actually work, when taking the oath of office?

[Horn]

Do you know why women don't need a wrist watch?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Because there's a clock on the stove.

Don't get me started on women reading borders at maps.

[cheka.]

'they' seem to like to place women in positions of power. esp middle age women who are losing estrogen and now dealing with the higher expression of testosterone. many don't know how to cope with the aggressive/cold nature of testosterone.

uncaring, hateful, aggressive are traits that they want in their puppets. twisted middle aged women are perfect candidates. now add black/mexican/muzzie women = best of breed

[Cebu_4_2]

There is at least one other reason Sinema refused to place her hand on the Bible. According to the Pew Research Center for Religion and Public Life, the Arizonan is the only member (http://www.pewforum.org/2019/01/03/faith-on-the-hill-116/)of the Senate who does not identify as a member of a religion.

Sinema, who started her political career as a member of the Green Party, also identifies as bisexual. She is only the second member of the Senate to identify as LGBTQ.

Despite her current claim to love the U.S. Constitution, in her work with left-wing groups in the early 2000s, Sinema was far less solicitous of the law of the land. In fact, she was quoted in 2002 as saying she thought it was acceptable that anarchists and Antifa types perpetrated violence, carried weapons, and destroyed property in pursuit of the extremist goals.

“When AAPJ attended May Day (sponsored by the Phoenix Anarchist Coalition), we knew that their guidelines differ from ours,” the Washington Examiner wrote (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kyrsten-sinema-in-2002-itd-be-inappropriate-to-condemn-destruction-of-property-by-anarchists) of an email Sinema sent in 2002. “They are okay with weapons and property destruction in some instances, and so those of us who chose to attend the event knew that it would be inappropriate to ask someone to not destroy property or to carry a weapon.”