false flag challenge

[cheka.]

imo, the opening act was the nz event. getting the audience lathered up for an american fflag and then gun grabber megaphone blaring from nyc/dc

the challenge: which state will host the next american fflag? the favorites are florida and california. those two hives have been the most active over last several years. the cali hive crossed into nevada for the paddock thing - so surrounding states of cali/fla are good bets too. ny is always a threat - as it has the greatest number of vipers

my pick -- arizona. i think it a nice target for the cali hive for several reasons. specific city is hard -- dont know which az city is most skyped up ???

[Jewboo]

the challenge: which state will host the next american fflag? the favorites are florida and california. those two hives have been the most active over last several years.



https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5b/Jewish_population_in_the_USA_in_2000.svg/1684px-Jewish_population_in_the_USA_in_2000.svg.png

Huge jew support structures for Mossad to utilize during their false flags.

[Bigjon]

Your new hometown Boise looks like a hotbed.
Just sayin.

[JDRock]

imo, the opening act was the nz event. getting the audience lathered up for an american fflag and then gun grabber megaphone blaring from nyc/dc

the challenge: which state will host the next american fflag? the favorites are florida and california. those two hives have been the most active over last several years. the cali hive crossed into nevada for the paddock thing - so surrounding states of cali/fla are good bets too. ny is always a threat - as it has the greatest number of vipers

my pick -- arizona. i think it a nice target for the cali hive for several reasons. specific city is hard -- dont know which az city is most skyped up ???
where ever jon podesta visits next.

[monty]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5b/Jewish_population_in_the_USA_in_2000.svg/1684px-Jewish_population_in_the_USA_in_2000.svg.png

Huge jew support structures for Mossad to utilize during their false flags.


Las Vegas is on par with Hollywood.

[monty]

Open letter to the gun grabbers, judges and lawmen

An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen

1 HOUR AGO · PUBLIC


Senator Lindsey Graham has announced that the Senate Judiciary Committee soon will be conducting hearings on Senator Marco Rubio’s Senate Bill 7, the Extreme Risk Protection Order and Violence Prevention Act of 2019, otherwise known as a national “red flag” gun confiscation bill.

I know I am speaking for tens of thousands of my fellow Montanans and tens of millions of my fellow Americans when I say what I’m about to say.

“Red flag” gun confiscation laws violate every principle of liberty upon which our country was founded. There is no due process associated with “red flag” laws. A judge’s order to seize the firearms from an American citizen who has not been accused of a crime, charged with a crime, convicted of a crime—or who never even threatened to commit a crime—based on the accusation of a single individual is anything but due process.

Our accuser could be a disgruntled employee, a bitter ex-spouse or relative, a vengeful neighbor, an anti-gun liberal or even an anti-gun policeman. By definition, “red flag” laws use mere suspicion of what one “might” do as justification to seize a person’s firearms. Tactics such as these have been used in virtually every despotic regime of history. In the name of protecting society, the rights and liberties of individuals were denied. Eventually, these repressive governments included political or religious persuasion as triggering “red flags,” which led to their disarmament—all in the name of public safety, of course.

You know as well as I do that when the rights of ONE American are abridged, the rights of ALL Americans are abridged. This is not yet a communist nation where the rights of the state—or even the rights of a majority of citizens—supersede the rights of the individual.

Furthermore, it is a fallacy to suggest that a mental health diagnosis, by itself, indicates that someone is automatically a threat to himself or others. Dr. Ann Bukacek, a highly-respected medical doctor in the community in which I live, recently wrote:

Mental health diagnoses given by physicians or other mental health care workers do not predict firearm violence. As a physician for over 30 years who has treated many patients with mental health diagnoses and some autistic spectrum patients, I have not had one of those patients commit an act of gun violence. I did have a patient who bludgeoned a man to death with a blunt object, and that patient carried no mental health diagnosis. Psychopaths with no conscience, especially the more intelligent ones, usually escape detection and/or a particular diagnosis.
This doctor’s examination of the issue reflects reality.

Besides, under these “red flag” laws, exactly who is it that determines that someone is “crazy”? Is it one judge, who bases his or her conclusion on the accusations of just one individual? Is it up to politicians or government bureaucrats to define who is and who is not “crazy”?

There are some people who believe that anyone who would even own a firearm is “crazy.” Others believe one’s political or religious beliefs qualify him as “crazy.” Heck! We have all read the documentation of various governments (local, State and federal) that have assigned all kinds of “crazy” (even “dangerous”) definitions against people based on their interpretation of Bible prophecy or their association with political candidates such as former Congressman Ron Paul or their opposition to politically correct ideologies, etc.

Does the judge who issues a warrant to seize a person’s firearms under a “red flag” law provide the accused with an opportunity to defend himself BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No. Does the judge provide an opportunity for a close examination of the accusations against the accused (including investigating the accuser) BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No. Does the judge allow the accused to face his accuser BEFORE violating his constitutional and Natural rights? No.

“Red flag” laws turn the Bill of Rights and the fundamental legal doctrine that a man is innocent until proven guilty completely upside down. “Red flag” laws are a mockery to every constitutional principle of liberty since the Magna Carta. Seizing a citizen’s firearms by force (and thereby rendering him defenseless) without a crime being committed—or even the accusation of a crime being made—is old-fashioned TYRANNY. Such an act presumes a person is guilty until proven innocent.

Then there is this: After the guns are seized, it could take years for the victim to prove his innocence (or competence) and have his guns returned—and in what condition would they be when (and IF) returned?
Furthermore, will you legislators, judges and police officers who collaborate to strip an innocent person’s ability to defend himself accept any responsibility when the real bad guys take advantage of this person’s vulnerability and invade his home and bludgeon or rape or even kill his family? Of course you won’t. But mark it down: You will be held responsible in the eyes of Almighty God—and in the eyes of the citizens you have victimized.

And are you really going to try and tell us that police officers are more competent and mentally stable than the rest of us? Are you kidding? The examples of improper, unsafe, careless and even homicidal acts of cops with guns are ubiquitous.

It was an FBI agent who was armed at a nightclub in Denver and then started gyrating and dancing like a madman until his handgun fell on the floor, discharged and wounded a fellow patron. But no official even questioned this officer’s fitness to possess a firearm—even AFTER that event took place.

Then there is the case of the Dallas police officer who walked into the wrong apartment and shot and killed the man who lived inside. Where was the “red flag” regarding this officer? And what about the two police officers in St. Louis who used a revolver to play Russian roulette, and one of the two wound up shooting and killing the other one? Why wasn’t a “red flag” raised about these nincompoops? These stories could go on forever.

Where are the “red flag” laws for the policemen and sheriff’s deputies in this country? The only difference between them and the rest of us who are being victimized by these draconian “red flag” laws is that they wear badges, and we do not—and the other difference is the vast majority of private citizens who carry firearms are not nearly as stupid and incompetent as the policemen mentioned above.

So much for equal justice under the law.

It has taken many of us a lifetime of hard work and labor to be able to obtain our gun collections; we have successfully passed FBI background checks and local and State requirements and obligations for responsible gun ownership, yet our guns are going to be confiscated overnight on the word of someone (an anonymous someone, at that) who claims we “might” be unsuitable to own a gun? Again, such an act turns American history and our Bill of Rights upside down.

Kris Kobach is the former Secretary of State of Kansas. He is a former professor of constitutional law at UMKC School of Law. He wrote an excellent analysis of the constitutional violations of these “red flag” laws:

1. The seizure of guns without any hearing at all. The laws all contain an ex parte provision that allows the state to temporarily seize a person’s guns without even notifying the gun owner or giving him a chance to be heard. This is the quintessential denial of due process. The Fourth Amendment makes clear that a person cannot be denied of liberty (to exercise one’s constitutional right to bear arms) without due process of law. This confiscation is “temporary,” but it can easily lead to long-term or permanent confiscation.

2. Based on the testimony of one unrelated person. The confiscation order can be based on the testimony of only one person claiming that the gun owner poses a risk to the safety of himself or others. The law [proposed in Kansas] deceptively says that it has to be the testimony of a “family member.” But “family member” is defined to include “former dating partners” and anyone who has ever lived with the defendant. So a jilted former boyfriend or girlfriend, or even a roommate from years ago, could easily set in motion the disarming of a lawful gun owner.

3. Using a very low standard of proof. The standard for obtaining an ex parte order against a gun owner is absurdly low – one need only show “reasonable cause” to believe that the person may pose a risk. That’s even lower than the “probable cause” standard for obtaining a search warrant. In addition, the judge is forced to rush his decision and issue the confiscation order on the same day of the ex parte hearing. Within two weeks of the ex parte hearing, a hearing with the gun owner present must occur; the purpose is to put in place a long-term confiscation order. But even at that hearing, the standard of proof is far below the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard used in criminal trials. Rather, it need only be shown by “a preponderance of evidence” that the person poses a risk of injury to self or others.

What kind of evidence? Things like the “reckless storage” of firearms and drinking habits can be considered. If you keep a handgun in the bedside table and drink beer regularly, you may [be] in trouble.

4. Shifting the burden of proof to the gun owner. The long-term confiscation order lasts up to a year, but may be renewed indefinitely. Once it is in place, it becomes very difficult to remove. To have the confiscation order lifted, the gun owner must prove he does not pose a threat to himself or others. Proving a negative is nearly impossible. Adding insult to injury, the bill even authorizes local law enforcement to charge the gun owner a storage fee for confiscating and storing his guns.

The implementation of “red flag” laws (at any level) is unconscionable and totally unacceptable. And I am here to warn you that there are millions of Americans who will never submit to such oppression. None of us wants to see acts of violence committed against law enforcement personnel in America, but when law enforcers begin carrying out these draconian “red flag” laws, they will begin lighting the matches of resistance in the hearts of freedom-loving people in this country like hasn’t been seen in over 150 years.

We have already heard about Gary Willis, the Maryland man who was killed by police officers in his own home as they attempted to carry out a “red flag” order to seize his guns. This man had committed no crime; he had not been accused of committing a crime; he was given no hearing and no due process. Mr. Willis did not attempt to harm the officers; he merely resisted their efforts to disarm him, and he was killed on the spot—in his own home—by police officers who had taken an oath to protect the liberties of this poor innocent man.

I assure you, Mr. Willis will not be the last American to resist the attempted confiscation of his firearms.

Do you legislators, judges, county sheriffs, chiefs of police, sheriff’s deputies and city policemen not realize that “red flag” laws are tantamount to a declaration of war against the American people? Are you so far removed from “the laws of Nature and Nature’s God” that you cannot see this? Do you not realize that in spite of all of Great Britain’s abuses of power, our colonist forebears did not openly rebel against the Crown until King George sent troops to Lexington and Concord to confiscate the colonists’ firearms? You do understand that, right? And you do understand, do you not, that the blood of the colonists flows in the veins of we Americans?

At what point do the American people come to believe that you truly do NOT wish to honor your oath to the Constitution or behave in a manner that truly honors America’s Second Amendment and the heritage of liberty that we all share as Americans? At what point do we Americans lose all respect for our civil magistrates and peace officers? For many Americans, that point will come when policemen bang on their doors at 5am and attempt to seize their guns.

Do you not realize that every single instance of an innocent person being subjected to a “red flag” gun confiscation order will only magnify and strengthen the resentment and animosity in the hearts of the community against these laws—and against the ones who are creating and implementing them? Do you not understand that this is a powder keg that could explode into all-out rebellion at any time? Do you want that? I don’t want that! I don’t want that for my wife and me, my children and grandchildren, my friends or my community.

Why would you legislators, judges and policemen even think about doing such a thing?

In the name of all that we hold dear, in the name of the brave men at Lexington Green and Concord Bridge, in the name of every American who has given his life in defense of the principles contained in our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights—including many of our brave police officers and sheriff’s deputies—and in the name of the Natural Laws of our Creator, please STOP this madness before you literally tear our communities and our country apart.

As a legislator, you must not pass any semblance of a “red flag” law; as a judge, you must not issue a gun confiscation warrant on the basis of a “red flag” law; as a sheriff or chief of police, you must not order your officers to confiscate a citizen’s guns on the basis of a “red flag” warrant; and if you are a sheriff’s deputy or city policeman, you must not obey an order to confiscate your fellow citizens’ guns on the basis of a “red flag” law.
I beg you to realize what you are doing. I beg you to refuse to participate in this madness. I beg you to join your fellow churchmen, clubmen, neighbors, friends and townsmen and help us turn back this dastardly attempt to transform our constitutional republic into another repressive regime that, in the end, would require The People to tear it down.

Again, I beg you to think about what you are doing, about the pain you are causing, about the lives you are ruining and about the potential harm you are inflicting on our country.

“Red flag” laws are on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of our Constitution, the wrong side of liberty and on the wrong side of the laws of God.

Dr. Charles O. “Chuck” Baldwin

2008 Constitution Party nominee for President of the United States

Veteran pastor of 43 years tenure and currently the pastor of Liberty Fellowship in Kalispell, Montana

Nationally syndicated columnist for twenty years

Nationally syndicated radio talk show host

Honorary deputy sheriff in Escambia County, Florida

Prison chaplain, Century (FL) Correctional Institution

Regional Vice President, Trinity Baptist College, Jacksonville, Florida

Dr. Chuck Baldwin © 2019 | ChuckBaldwinLive.com

[cheka.]

at this point it looks like the dredging up the parkland ff or hoax. the two suicides claim....and remember, the parkland gun grabber activists visited christchurch months before the event

score one for whoever voted florida

[Half Sense]

dunblane
port arthur
christchurch

canada is next

[BrewTech]

This is not yet a communist nation where the rights of the state—or even the rights of a majority of citizens—supersede the rights of the individual.

Hey Chuck! Can I talk to ya for a sec? Yeah, about that whole "this is not yet a communist nation" thing...

[monty]

Would Zionist Israhell sink a U.S. Ship and blame Iran? That was the topic of the discussion on True News yesterday.



http://youtu.be/9hUZuwA8kCM

https://youtu.be/9hUZuwA8kCM

[monty]

Your new hometown Boise looks like a hotbed.
Just sayin.


My birth city, Las Vegas looks even worse.

[cheka.]

My birth city, Las Vegas looks even worse.

several years ago it had a full blown barrio on the (west?) side. can only imagine what that side of town looks like today. booming businesses of tire shops, liquor stores, check cashing shops....

[monty]

several years ago it had a full blown barrio on the (west?) side. can only imagine what that side of town looks like today. booming businesses of tire shops, liquor stores, check cashing shops....

I saw that a few years ago driving through Las Vegas. Although I was born there I have never lived there.

[Neuro]

Would Zionist Israhell sink a U.S. Ship and blame Iran? That was the topic of the discussion on True News yesterday.



http://youtu.be/9hUZuwA8kCM

https://youtu.be/9hUZuwA8kCM

According to RT, mossad warned Bolton that “Iran”, are about to strike a US target...

on vague Mossad tip-off when it sent strike group to Middle East – report

Published time: 7 May, 2019 05:03 Edited time: 7 May, 2019 09:41
A US aircraft carrier group and bomber task force were deployed to the Middle East after a tip-off on a “credible threat” from Iran, which came, conveniently vague and timely, from Israeli spy agency Mossad, it has been reported.
At an April 15 meeting in Washington, Israeli National Security Council chief Meir Ben-Shabbat passed along a warning to US National Security Advisor John Bolton, senior Israeli officials told Axios. The information Bolton received was left vague: the attack could hit a US target in the Persian Gulf, or maybe Saudi Arabia, or maybe the UAE.

“It is still unclear to us what the Iranians are trying to do and how they are planning to do it,” one of the senior officials said, but added it was “clear” that an unspecified event would take place sometime in the future, which would have unstated consequences.

Also on rt.com US deploys aircraft carrier & bombers to Middle East in ‘message’ to Iran – Bolton
The Axios report was corroborated by a separate report from Israel’s channel 13 journalist Barak Ravid, who claimed that Israel had handed over information to the US about an alleged Iranian plot to target US interests in the Gulf.

However elusive the bait, Washington eagerly dashed to bite, deploying the USS ‘Abraham Lincoln’ carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the Middle East, in a maneuver that just happens to play right into Israel’s hands.


'Lured into war'? Iranian FM warns Trump could be duped into crisis by hawkish 'B-team' 'Lured into war'? Iranian FM warns Trump could be duped into crisis by hawkish 'B-team'
Under the Trump administration, the US has been parroting Israel’s hardline policies towards Iran, the Jewish state’s regional archrival, first withdrawing from the landmark 2015 nuclear deal and then hitting Tehran with fresh rounds of sanctions. Last month, Washington went as far as to formally designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a “terrorist organization.” Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu laid bare his relationship with US President Donald Trump, saying the terrorist listing was done at Netanyahu’s “request.”

Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan did not specify from where he received the valuable intelligence, tweeting only that the deployment of the strike group “represents a prudent repositioning of assets in response to indications of a credible threat by Iranian regime forces.”

The Mossad doesn’t have the most trustworthy record when it comes to intelligence on Iran. It was likely the Mossad who, in 2004, passed fabricated documents to Iranian opposition group the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) which falsely portrayed Iran’s civilian nuclear energy program.

[monty]

According to RT, mossad warned Bolton that “Iran”, are about to strike a US target...

on vague Mossad tip-off when it sent strike group to Middle East – report

Published time: 7 May, 2019 05:03 Edited time: 7 May, 2019 09:41
A US aircraft carrier group and bomber task force were deployed to the Middle East after a tip-off on a “credible threat” from Iran, which came, conveniently vague and timely, from Israeli spy agency Mossad, it has been reported.
At an April 15 meeting in Washington, Israeli National Security Council chief Meir Ben-Shabbat passed along a warning to US National Security Advisor John Bolton, senior Israeli officials told Axios. The information Bolton received was left vague: the attack could hit a US target in the Persian Gulf, or maybe Saudi Arabia, or maybe the UAE.

“It is still unclear to us what the Iranians are trying to do and how they are planning to do it,” one of the senior officials said, but added it was “clear” that an unspecified event would take place sometime in the future, which would have unstated consequences.

Also on rt.com US deploys aircraft carrier & bombers to Middle East in ‘message’ to Iran – Bolton
The Axios report was corroborated by a separate report from Israel’s channel 13 journalist Barak Ravid, who claimed that Israel had handed over information to the US about an alleged Iranian plot to target US interests in the Gulf.

However elusive the bait, Washington eagerly dashed to bite, deploying the USS ‘Abraham Lincoln’ carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the Middle East, in a maneuver that just happens to play right into Israel’s hands.


'Lured into war'? Iranian FM warns Trump could be duped into crisis by hawkish 'B-team' 'Lured into war'? Iranian FM warns Trump could be duped into crisis by hawkish 'B-team'
Under the Trump administration, the US has been parroting Israel’s hardline policies towards Iran, the Jewish state’s regional archrival, first withdrawing from the landmark 2015 nuclear deal and then hitting Tehran with fresh rounds of sanctions. Last month, Washington went as far as to formally designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a “terrorist organization.” Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu laid bare his relationship with US President Donald Trump, saying the terrorist listing was done at Netanyahu’s “request.”

Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan did not specify from where he received the valuable intelligence, tweeting only that the deployment of the strike group “represents a prudent repositioning of assets in response to indications of a credible threat by Iranian regime forces.”

The Mossad doesn’t have the most trustworthy record when it comes to intelligence on Iran. It was likely the Mossad who, in 2004, passed fabricated documents to Iranian opposition group the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) which falsely portrayed Iran’s civilian nuclear energy program.
one more Satanyahoo lie

[monty]

True News, May 13, will a false flag bait America into a war?



http://youtu.be/7DGOa1VKBrQ

https://youtu.be/7DGOa1VKBrQ

[Neuro]

True News, May 13, will a false flag bait America into a war?



http://youtu.be/7DGOa1VKBrQ

https://youtu.be/7DGOa1VKBrQ

Yes I am afraid so, and this time it will mean the start of WWIII. Nice knowing you guys...

[monty]

I Trump says Military Industrial Complex is Pressuring Him Into Going to War.

He shouldn’t be surprised because he has surrounded himself with a bunch of Israeli war-hawk dual citizens.

It is difficult for me to understand his actions as President. The guy seems to be wishy washy. It appears to me he won’t stand up to the corrupt judges and do his job nor will he stand up to his corrupt advisers.



http://youtu.be/08j-kaXHobY

https://youtu.be/08j-kaXHobY

[woodman]

I Trump says Military Industrial Complex is Pressuring Him Into Going to War.

He shouldn’t be surprised because he has surrounded himself with a bunch of Israeli war-hawk dual citizens.

It is difficult for me to understand his actions as President. The guy seems to be wishy washy. It appears to me he won’t stand up to the corrupt judges and do his job nor will he stand up to his corrupt advisers.



http://youtu.be/08j-kaXHobY

https://youtu.be/08j-kaXHobY

I pay little attention to the news, so I don't know anything about this. It is amazing that he would make this statement. Just how are they pressuring him? Shouldn't he, as president, be the one doing the pressuring? This is his job.

[monty]

I pay little attention to the news, so I don't know anything about this. It is amazing that he would make this statement. Just how are they pressuring him? Shouldn't he, as president, be the one doing the pressuring? This is his job.

That is my opinion also. He is supposed to be the boss, the buck should stop at his desk.

Another thing, unrelated to Trump feeling pressured, shouldn’t it be unconstitutional for a dual citizen to hold an office in the national government? I heard this question asked earlier today in another video presentation. My feeling is yes, it should be. Anyone in government should be loyal to the country and have no ties to another country.

[woodman]

That is my opinion also. He is supposed to be the boss, the buck should stop at his desk.

Another thing, unrelated to Trump feeling pressured, shouldn’t it be unconstitutional for a dual citizen to hold an office in the national government? I heard this question asked earlier today in another video presentation. My feeling is yes, it should be. Anyone in government should be loyal to the country and have no ties to another country.


Absolutely. I have long been outraged that dual citizens are allowed to have positions in our government. Hell, there is no reason at all for dual citizenship to exist. Being a citizen of a country should be an exclusive thing. How does one know who's side they are on?

[woodman]

Absolutely. I have long been outraged that dual citizens are allowed to have positions in our government. Hell, there is no reason at all for dual citizenship to exist. Being a citizen of a country should be an exclusive thing. How does one know who's side they are on?


Of course this means all Jews would lose the ablilty to infuence our government except through purely financial means. It would be a far better world.

[PatColo]

Of course this means all Jews would lose the ablilty to infuence our government except through purely financial means. It would be a far better world.


Imagine if there were a bunch of izzy/USA dual citizen MAGAs who could serve in the izzy knesset? Or be their PM?? People whose first filter in voting on legislation was, "IS IT GOOD FOR USA, & ONLY USA, IZZY BE DAMNED?"

Coz we presently have the reverse of that ^ sitch, & izzy prohibits turning this current malevolent sitch right side up again.


Israel Allows No Dual Citizens in Its Government. Why Does America? (http://educate-yourself.org/cn/israelnodualcitizensallowed08dec08.shtml)