A Commie goes on a rant

[midnight rambler]

Not a big Rahm Emmanuel fan however he got it right on Robert Francis, he is a snot-nosed punk.

https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/beto-orourke-goes-off-on-gun-control-at-debate-hell-yes-were-going-to-take-your-ar-15-your-ak-47/

[C.Martel]

I thought it was going to be Bernie Sanders debate mumbo-jumbo. lol

Dems are going to lose because they are out of touch insane politicians. Voter may even recall why they voted for trump in the trump vs commie up-coming debates.

Yang is the only chance they have to beat trump. Biden is stiff and old. Sanders is a commie out to give more free stuff to niggers who made mistakes. Warren wants reparations for blacks. Each want to end the 2nd amendment.

I am done with twitter, you type '@' and twitter forces/vomits up two niglets of "Diamond and Silk", the names are psy-ops in and of themselves. Twitter is promoting trump's two nigger cunts in every message. Shows the jew's agenda, the nigger jew and the nigger negro alliance. Twitter is part of this nigger alliance. The default twitter screen has a nigger, this is programming the masses to love the niglets and niggers.

[ziero0]

‘Hell Yes, We’re Going to Take Your AR-15, Your AK-47!’

So perhaps you might want to consider bonding it?

[ziero0]

So perhaps you might want to consider bonding it?

Hopefully I have made it clear to everyone here that the THING isn't what is being seized. What is seized is your right to possess that thing. They don't want to outlaw AK47s and AR15s. They just want to make it impossible for you to have one.

Bonding is a simple process. Get yourself $21 silver dollars and bond it to your arsenal.

[old steel]

Hopefully I have made it clear to everyone here that the THING isn't what is being seized. What is seized is your right to possess that thing. They don't want to outlaw AK47s and AR15s. They just want to make it impossible for you to have one.

Bonding is a simple process. Get yourself $21 silver dollars and bond it to your arsenal.

Anyway to walk us though this process or perhaps a link that explains it?

[monty]

Anyway to walk us though this process or perhaps a link that explains it?
Here is a sample on Scribd

https://www.scribd.com/doc/314129757/Silver-Bond-Sample

[ziero0]

Anyway to walk us though this process or perhaps a link that explains it?

Hall's Clerks Praxis circa 1809 ... can be found on google books. Bonds are important to maritime law.

[monty]

Hall's Clerks Praxis circa 1809 ... can be found on google books. Bonds are important to maritime law.
Thanks. I downloaded a .pdf to my library

[ziero0]

Thanks. I downloaded a .pdf to my library

Bonds cover THINGS. Not being a THING I don't believe I need one but the entity created by the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a THING. I see no reason why a bond cannot apply to such a thing or any THING for that matter.

Deaths attributed to THINGS are subject to the law of Deodand ... the THING is forfeited to the crown and used for pious purposes.

https://books.google.com/books?id=t6RFAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP365&dq=deodand&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj21ou19NDkAhW2IzQIHdr5AsQQ6AEwAHoECAMQA g#v=onepage&q=deodand&f=false

Reification would substitute a bond for the THING itself. Isn't this what the BIRTH CERTIFICATE does?

[midnight rambler]

Bonds cover THINGS. Not being a THING I don't believe I need one but the entity created by the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a THING. I see no reason why a bond cannot apply to such a thing or any THING for that matter.

Deaths attributed to THINGS are subject to the law of Deodand ... the THING is forfeited to the crown and used for pious purposes.

https://books.google.com/books?id=t6RFAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP365&dq=deodand&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj21ou19NDkAhW2IzQIHdr5AsQQ6AEwAHoECAMQA g#v=onepage&q=deodand&f=false

Reification would substitute a bond for the THING itself. Isn't this what the BIRTH CERTIFICATE does?

So what is the 'thing' that an officeholder's bond covers?

[vacuum]

I'm actually starting to like O'Rouke. I am considering on voting for him in the primaries.

There is not a single 2020 candidate, either on the democrat side or the republican side, who would be better for gun owners.

The absolute backlash to his tactics would probably destroy democrats in the house and senate for a good 15 years. Either that or simply cause an uprising.

I'm not joking, O'Rouke is great for us.

[ziero0]

So what is the 'thing' that an officeholder's bond covers?

The bond indemnifies the state for any damage the officeholder might incur. It also limits the liability of the officeholder to the amount or value stipulated in the bond. As such a bond is insurance (another aspect of maritime law). Limited liability goes by another name -IRRESPONSIBILITY.

That said ... consider the bond to be an OFFER in a contract. It is also a necessity for a de jure officeholder but obviously not needed for a de facto officeholder. This individual intends the state to be 100% responsible for his actions. He is after all a true WELFARE recipient.

[midnight rambler]

Limited liability goes by another name -IRRESPONSIBILITY.


Indeed. That's a keeper.

[midnight rambler]

I'm actually starting to like O'Rouke. I am considering on voting for him in the primaries.

There is not a single 2020 candidate, either on the democrat side or the republican side, who would be better for gun owners.

The absolute backlash to his tactics would probably destroy democrats in the house and senate for a good 15 years. Either that or simply cause an uprising.

I'm not joking, O'Rouke is great for us.

I like that thought, it's really a great idea. However, we all know that Beta has a snowball's chance in Hell of getting the Dimorat nod for POTUS and this rant of his just sealed his fate. If anything I think Beta is seeking to get the credit for moving the Overton window. Not a Rahm fan whatsoever but Rahm nailed it - Beta IS a snot-nosed punk and this display of his proved it.