View Full Version : Diversity is NOT a strength
madfranks
2nd October 2019, 04:04 PM
Here's a fun little exercise, to study the roots of the words Diversity and Divided. Here, from the online etymology dictionary, which is the Internet's go-to source for quick and reliable accounts of the origin and history of English words, phrases, and idioms, we have the following:
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=diverse
divers (adj.)
late 13c., "separate, distinct; various;" late 14c., "different in kind or character" (the sense now in diverse), from Old French divers (11c.) "different, various; singular, odd, exceptional; wretched, treacherous, perverse," from Latin diversus "turned different ways," in Late Latin "various," past participle of divertere "to turn in different directions," from assimilated form of dis- "aside" (see dis-) + vertere "to turn" (from PIE root *wer- (2) "to turn, bend").
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=divide
divide (v.)
early 14c., "separate into parts or pieces," from Latin dividere "to force apart, cleave, distribute," from assimilated form.
These two words share the same root, and they mean the same thing. And we all know what Jesus said about a diverse house: "Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand." (Matthew 12:25)
So diversity is NOT our strength, in fact it divides and separate us, and causes conflict. This is apparent to everyone who spends any time in a diverse neighborhood or city. The utopian dream of all races perfectly getting along only exists in TV and the media.
monty
2nd October 2019, 05:27 PM
The first Congress didn't think diversity was so hot.
The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were "free white person[s]... of good character". It thus excluded Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children "shall be considered as natural born citizens," the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States."Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
I believe the actual Act read " free white men"
Ares
3rd October 2019, 05:47 AM
I see it as modern day propaganda. If diversity was really our strength it would be self evident and not having to be repeatedly endlessly. That right there more than anything tells me its not a strength but a division tactic.
BrewTech
3rd October 2019, 06:10 AM
I see it as modern day propaganda. If diversity was really our strength it would be self evident and not having to be repeatedly endlessly. That right there more than anything tells me its not a strength but a division tactic.
Truth is indeed self-evident, and does not require constant defense and/or reinforcement.
madfranks
3rd October 2019, 01:31 PM
I see it as modern day propaganda. If diversity was really our strength it would be self evident and not having to be repeatedly endlessly. That right there more than anything tells me its not a strength but a division tactic.An excellent point, and one that's really easy to counter people with. Thanks!
ziero0
3rd October 2019, 06:51 PM
Why not go back to the source?
Leviticus 19:19 says, “Keep my decrees. Do not mate different kinds of animals. Do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material.”
Deuteronomy 22:9–11 commands, “Do not plant two kinds of seed in your vineyard; if you do, not only the crops you plant but also the fruit of the vineyard will be defiled. Do not plow with an ox and a donkey yoked together. Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together.”
Stop Making Cents
3rd October 2019, 06:59 PM
The first Congress didn't think diversity was so hot.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
I believe the actual Act read " free white men"
Obvious that the intent of our Founders has been twisted by the leftists beyond recognition. We all know Barry Soetero was not a natural born citizen, but by the founders' intent laid out in this Naturalization Act, he wasn't even a citizen, much less natural born.
It specified that the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.
monty
3rd October 2019, 07:20 PM
Obvious that the intent of our Founders has been twisted by the leftists beyond recognition. We all know Barry Soetero was not a natural born citizen, but by the founders' intent laid out in this Naturalization Act, he wasn't even a citizen, much less natural born.
It specified that the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.
https://mobile.twitter.com/zod14_/status/1179891405604507648?s=21
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1177833206881673216/ExBtoUHW_reasonably_small.jpg
(https://mobile.twitter.com/Zod14_)
9 : “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us than hostile armies. They are a thousand times more dangerous for our liberties and for the great cause we have embraced......”President Gen. George Washington
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EF_Q-gxXoAcFFVv?format=jpg&name=medium
(https://mobile.twitter.com/Zod14_/status/1179891405604507648/photo/1)
Neuro
4th October 2019, 05:12 AM
Unity is strength. Everyone co-operating towards a common goal. Diversity means you are fighting to achieve different goals. Like Bosnia-Herzegovina or Rwanda in the -90’s, Iraq in -00’s, Libya and Syria in the -10’s...
madfranks
4th October 2019, 02:45 PM
Unity is strength. Everyone co-operating towards a common goal. Diversity means you are fighting to achieve different goals. Like Bosnia-Herzegovina or Rwanda in the -90’s, Iraq in -00’s, Libya and Syria in the -10’s...
Exactly, which is why it's kind of perplexing how anyone would ever even think that diversity is strength. In every practical situation you can think of, the strongest is the most unified.
midnight rambler
4th October 2019, 04:04 PM
What you got against nigga culture you white supremacist cracka??
osoab
8th October 2019, 02:42 AM
New Peer-Reviewed Danish Academic Study Finds Diversity Is Not A Strength (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/new-peer-reviewed-danish-academic-study-finds-diversity-not-strength)
madfranks
8th October 2019, 07:48 AM
New Peer-Reviewed Danish Academic Study Finds Diversity Is Not A Strength (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/new-peer-reviewed-danish-academic-study-finds-diversity-not-strength)
What a timely article!
ziero0
8th October 2019, 10:14 AM
International law is the law between Christian nations. No diversity to be found there.
madfranks
8th October 2019, 12:22 PM
International law is the law between Christian nations. No diversity to be found there.And this is probably why Joe Biden said we need to get rid of common English law and jurisprudence. Because it's not diverse enough.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/04/03/when_you_dont_appreciate_your_civilization_139941. html
This is English jurisprudential culture, a white man's culture. It's got to change. It's got to change.
ziero0
8th October 2019, 12:49 PM
And this is probably why Joe Biden said we need to get rid of common English law and jurisprudence. Because it's not diverse enough.
Biden has past history as a plagiarist. There is little honor to be found in such.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.