PDA

View Full Version : Trump is NOT impeached!



EE_
19th December 2019, 07:02 PM
House-Senate Impeachment Impasse Would Mean Trump Wasn't Impeached At All: Harvard Law Prof
by Tyler Durden
Thu, 12/19/2019 - 20:25

While Nancy Pelosi threatens to withhold articles of impeachment passed Wednesday night by the House, Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman says that President Trump isn't technically impeached until the House actually transmits the articles to the Senate.


Feldman, who testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee's impeachment proceedings earlier this month, argues in a Bloomberg Op-Ed that the framers' definition of impeachment "assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote," and that "Strictly speaking, "impeachment" occurred – and occurs -- when the articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate for trial. And at that point, the Senate is obliged by the Constitution to hold a trial."

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.

As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message. -Noah Feldman

Pelosi, meanwhile, won't transmit the articles until the Senate holds what she considers a "fair" trial.

Roughly modeled after England's impeachment procedures, the framers in Article I of the constitution gave the House "the sole power of impeachment," while giving the Senate "the sole power to try all impeachments."

Article II outlines says the president "shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

There's more:

But we can say with some confidence that only the Senate is empowered to judge the fairness of its own trial – that’s what the “sole power to try all impeachments” means.

If the House votes to “impeach” but doesn’t send the articles to the Senate or send impeachment managers there to carry its message, it hasn’t directly violated the text of the Constitution. But the House would be acting against the implicit logic of the Constitution’s description of impeachment.

A president who has been genuinely impeached must constitutionally have the opportunity to defend himself before the Senate. That’s built into the constitutional logic of impeachment, which demands a trial before removal.

To be sure, if the House just never sends its articles of impeachment to the Senate, there can be no trial there. That’s what the “sole power to impeach” means.

In closing, Feldman says "if the House never sends the articles, then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached," adding "And that’s probably not the message Congressional Democrats are hoping to send."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-senate-impeachment-impasse-would-mean-trump-wasnt-impeached-all-harvard-law-prof

midnight rambler
19th December 2019, 07:09 PM
The Dumborats are so fucking stupid.

woodman
19th December 2019, 08:06 PM
The Dumborats are so fucking stupid.
Wasn't it Pelosi who said "We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it."?

Dachsie
19th December 2019, 08:15 PM
Pelosi, meanwhile, won't transmit the articles until the Senate holds what she considers a "fair" trial.

huh?

midnight rambler
19th December 2019, 08:29 PM
The Senate SOLELY gets to decide what is "fair," NOT the Dumborats. Pelosi has been smoking crack.

Dachsie
20th December 2019, 04:47 AM
If the Democrats are committing suicide as they appear, they have an ulterior deliberate purpose for doing so.

This is a trick and a trap and a dishonest manipulation by all of our "elected representatives" done for their own selfish, manipulative and deceptive reasons, and this will work to their own advantage no matter how this plays out.

woodman
20th December 2019, 04:58 AM
If the Democrats are committing suicide as they appear, they have an ulterior deliberate purpose for doing so.

This is a trick and a trap and a dishonest manipulation by all of our "elected representatives" done for their own selfish, manipulative and deceptive reasons, and this will work to their own advantage no matter how this plays out.
I think the same. Those in power have kept their power by being master manipulators.

Amanda
20th December 2019, 05:49 AM
Yes, this whole thing is beyond strange. Sundance says the democrat SNAKES have been working with lawyers from Lawfare. Looks like they are up to something, but kind of strange their own jewish witness, Feldman is saying this.

Also found this in the comments at zerohedge:


3 of 6[/B] House committees working on impeachment were headed by Jews, who are 2.5% of the population.
As were both staff counsel for (((Schiff))) and (((Nadler))).
As were 2/3 "law experts" called by Demsheviks.
We had (((Vindman))) whose career path was likely enhanced by being one of about ten American Jews in the US Army (more US Jews join the IDF than the US Army - but 'dual loyalty' is a "canard," remember)
We had (((Sondland))) who simply bought his ambassadorship.
We had the Russia-hating neocon crypto-Jew Fiona Hill
And Lawfare is Jewish through and through.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group]

Also, last night, Laura Ingraham said something about if the Republicans take back the house, which they better do FOREVER, then they can vote to have this whole impeachment scam expunged. Haven't heard anyone else say that, but thought it was interesting.

Dachsie
20th December 2019, 06:05 AM
"Also, last night, Laura Ingraham said something about if the Republicans take back the house, which they better do FOREVER, then they can vote to have this whole impeachment scam expunged. Haven't heard anyone else say that, but thought it was interesting."



If that indeed is an option for the Republicans, to vote to have the whole impeachment scam expunged, then likewise, the Republicans are deliberately choosing to not exercise that option.

I guess I am not seeing any Democrat or Republican or independent take any action or take any deliberate inaction that works to preserve our democratic constitutional republic nor to take or abstain from any action in support of the true will of we the people and promote and protect the common good of the USA and its citizens.

God's will will be done.

Jewboo
20th December 2019, 07:55 AM
Yes, this whole thing is beyond strange.

Kaminski tells us everything we need to know HERE (https://www.johnkaminski.org/index.php/john-kaminski-american-writer-and-critic-2/234-they-re-tearing-america-apart-deliberately).

:(

PatColo
20th December 2019, 12:10 PM
supposedly... see comments:
https://twitter.com/BellaBe11395785/status/1207798216512753666 (https://twitter.com/BellaBe11395785/status/1207798216512753666)



Hey Snowflakes.
IF Trump is impeached in the house and not the Senate he can run 2 more times. Constitution says that if a President is impeached by the house but not convicted by the Senate. The 1st term is nullified and they are eligible to run for office 2 more times.
MAGA .

Cebu_4_2
20th December 2019, 06:07 PM
At 70 does he want to?

Neuro
21st December 2019, 08:07 AM
Pelosi, meanwhile, won't transmit the articles until the Senate holds what she considers a "fair" trial.

huh?

She must be chronologically challenged, there can be No trial of any sort without her transmitting the request from the house to start impeachment trials

monty
21st December 2019, 08:33 AM
She must be chronologically challenged, there can be No trial of any sort without her transmitting the request from the house to start impeachment trials

Maybe she plans on holding out until there is a democrat majority in the Senate :|~

woodman
21st December 2019, 03:17 PM
Kaminski tells us everything we need to know HERE (https://www.johnkaminski.org/index.php/john-kaminski-american-writer-and-critic-2/234-they-re-tearing-america-apart-deliberately).

:(

A very good article by Kaminski. I am starting to believe that the whole impeachment drive was done purposefully and with Trump's blessing and also the blessing of Trumps bosses (no, not the American people, the Jewish oligarchs) in order to carry out his EO on Anti-semitism without an outcry from those who would ordinarily cry foul. This along with his recent betrayals on Palestinians, Jewish settlements and the Golan Heights and also the US Embassy are far more significant than most people realize.

Jewboo
21st December 2019, 03:20 PM
Kaminski tells us everything we need to know HERE (https://www.johnkaminski.org/index.php/john-kaminski-american-writer-and-critic-2/234-they-re-tearing-america-apart-deliberately).

:(


Pelosi (https://jewishjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/pelosi-schumer-iac.jpg) business-as-usual still formally invited Trumpstein to give his business-as-usual State Of The Union Address on teevee in her chamber...lol.

LOOK AT ALL THESE GOYIM FOOLS ON DECEMBER 21st (https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1576962531814.png)

:rolleyes:

Cebu_4_2
21st December 2019, 07:53 PM
Way too much hatred against Trump for him to simply be their ally. I'm always hopeful but if he was simply a distraction for the Goy they would unite more so not impeach him. I think after reelection and or after impeachment fails heads are going to roll big time. The Jew angle is just that, an angle. Perhaps there are good Jews and bad Jews and they themselves are at some internal war IE Palestine etc. There is a lot going on behind the scenes and we cant see behind the curtain and even if we could there is most likely so much that we simply couldn't comprehend what it is and how to play it.

Neuro
22nd December 2019, 04:20 AM
Maybe she plans on holding out until there is a democrat majority in the Senate :|~

Hmmm yes... Like an insurance to have him potentially removed after winning a second term. That is certainly a possibility...

madfranks
26th December 2019, 12:02 PM
Pelosi, meanwhile, won't transmit the articles until the Senate holds what she considers a "fair" trial.

huh?

The narrative they're running with is that since the Senate is mostly republican, they cannot be counted on to be fair. Seriously, that's their argument. How can they be so ridiculously dense as to not see that the same argument would nullify their own impeachment vote? I.e. the House vote was not fair because it was mostly democrat. Wow, see how hard that was?

They called for Mitch McConnel to recuse himself from the Senate trial (if it happens) because he thinks the House impeachment vote was politically motivated (news flash: it was). People all over social media are now comparing the republican majority Senate to a citizen jury, claiming that jurors have to be unbiased. This was totally out of left field, nobody compared the democrat majority House to a citizen jury pool. So why don't they apply that standard to all the House democrats who literally began their impeachment push THE SAME DAY the president won the election? It's almost as if the dems don't actually hold to any values or standards at all, but make up whatever they can think of to push their totalitarian agenda!