Rand Paul outs Justice Roberts!

[EE_]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=293&v=khloPIKjS1k&feature=emb_title

[Amanda]

Good for Rand!! It's about time somebody called out the conspiracy and plotting behind the scenes.

In case this hasn't been posted here, this one is definitely worth a read IMO:


Whistleblower Was Overheard in '17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trumphttps://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/01/22/whistleblower_was_overheard_in_17_discussing_with_ ally_how_to_remove_trump_121701.html

By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations (https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/search/?q=Paul+Sperry)
January 22, 2020


Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella – the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous “whistleblower" who touched off Trump's impeachment – was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.



Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom Ciaramella was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues. And both expressed anger over Trump’s new “America First” foreign policy, a sea change from President Obama’s approach to international affairs.


“Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him,” said a White House colleague who overheard their conversation.


“They weren’t just bent on subverting his agenda,” the former official added. “They were plotting to actually have him removed from office.”


Misko left the White House last summer to join House impeachment manager Adam Schiff’s committee, where sources say he offered “guidance” to the whistleblower, who has been officially identified only as an intelligence officer in a complaint against Trump filed under whistleblower laws. Misko then helped run the impeachment inquiry based on that complaint as a top investigator for congressional Democrats.

[Dachsie]

I appreciate the reposting of this video

Sen Rand Paul R-KY on the Senate floor right now with his impeachment trial speech;
14,200 views
•Feb 4, 2020
318 0 Share
0.28 hiccup

4:54 runtime
Save

facts over feelings
Rand Paul just read aloud his question on the Senate floor that names the alleged. Roberts declined to read the question during the trial. Paul says he’s not outing the bc he doesn’t know who it is.
Category
Education


HOWEVER,

Rand Paul outs Justice Roberts! Is not an objective title in my opinion.

Rand Paul only in passing refers to the "Chief Justice" but does not say the name Chief Justice Roberts, does not say NAME.

Rand Paul in essence is another political opportunist and grand-stander calling for another investigation to overhaul the system. How many times have we heard similar calls from so called true patriot congress members of last few years?

Another problem with this YouTube video is that it had a break, a hiccup, or silent second or two, right at about 0.28 seconds in video track. I have to assume YouTube did that or maybe the channel owner, did that on purpose, so as not to have the name of the whistleblower, Ciaramella, not play because YouTube puts a strike against the channel owner on anything where that forbidden name is enunciated.

So that is the second point in this supposed important action by Rand Paul where it is weakened by not saying the given real name of a main protagonist in the story and this posting here.

EVERY blankety blank one of those congress members have kicked the American people in the face because they have failed and failed again to put any of the top deep state crooks in prison. They are all do-nothing manipulators and dishonest people in my opinion.

[EE_]

I appreciate the reposting of this video

Sen Rand Paul R-KY on the Senate floor right now with his impeachment trial speech;
14,200 views
•Feb 4, 2020
318 0 Share
0.28 hiccup

4:54 runtime
Save

facts over feelings
Rand Paul just read aloud his question on the Senate floor that names the alleged. Roberts declined to read the question during the trial. Paul says he’s not outing the bc he doesn’t know who it is.
Category
Education


HOWEVER,

Rand Paul outs Justice Roberts! Is not an objective title in my opinion.

Rand Paul only in passing refers to the "Chief Justice" but does not say the name Chief Justice Roberts, does not say NAME.

Rand Paul in essence is another political opportunist and grand-stander calling for another investigation to overhaul the system. How many times have we heard similar calls from so called true patriot congress members of last few years?

Another problem with this YouTube video is that it had a break, a hiccup, or silent second or two, right at about 0.28 seconds in video track. I have to assume YouTube did that or maybe the channel owner, did that on purpose, so as not to have the name of the whistleblower, Ciaramella, not play because YouTube puts a strike against the channel owner on anything where that forbidden name is enunciated.

So that is the second point in this supposed important action by Rand Paul where it is weakened by not saying the given real name of a main protagonist in the story and this posting here.

EVERY blankety blank one of those congress members have kicked the American people in the face because they have failed and failed again to put any of the top deep state crooks in prison. They are all do-nothing manipulators and dishonest people in my opinion.

Here's the missing clip. Start at 6:35 no big deal


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP70YVPw_YY

[Dachsie]

EE said
"Here's the missing clip. Start at 6:35 no big deal

https://www.youtube.com/"

I do not find the missing clip at the url you provided.

I stand by every statement I made with one exception.

It sounded as though I expected the congress to put crooks in prison. In fact, only has the power and authority to REFER a matter to the DOJ for possible criminal prosecution by the DOJ.

The congress does not even bother to refer all the crookedness we have had verified to us over the last few years to the DOJ. Not that the DOJ is not also crooked and would actually conduct and honest prosecution.

And the beat goes on.

I know how we want to support the Pauls and I know how we want to stand behind president Trump, but the truth is the truth.

The Pauls, father and son, are just using or capitalizing on different political matters right now in their commentary in the news, as do all politicians. The name of the game is to use everything to your personal political advantage to get votes and donations.

[monty]

Daschie:
HOWEVER,

Rand Paul outs Justice Roberts! Is not an objective title in my opinion.

Rand Paul only in passing refers to the "Chief Justice" but does not say the name Chief Justice Roberts, does not say NAME.

Nor in my opinion either. I expected information that would bring impeachment proceedings for Justice Roberts.

[Neuro]

And the original video went into the memory hole