5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells

[Amanda]

https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/5g-technology-and-induction-of-coronavirus-in-skin-cells/271343

Posted: July 22, 2020 (https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/5g-technology-and-induction-of-coronavirus-in-skin-cells/271343)
Categories: News (https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/category/news)
5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells
PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/)
In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure.
This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells.
See it here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/

[Amanda]

https://thefreedomarticles.com/5g-induces-coronaviruses-study-shows-millimeter-wave-dna-influence/
(https://thefreedomarticles.com/5g-induces-coronaviruses-study-shows-millimeter-wave-dna-influence/)
5G Induces Coronaviruses: New Study Models Millimeter Wave Influence on DNA

AT A GLANCE...



THE STORY:A new study published at the NIH PubMed site on July 16th 2020, and published earlier elsewhere in June 2020, mathematically models how the millimeter waves of 5G tech could induce the body to create coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2 / COVID.
THE IMPLICATIONS:Why have authorities desperately tried to silence those pointing out the 5G-coronavirus connection? Why are we worried about supposedly contagious surfaces when battlefield technology is being rolled out worldwide that can penetrate and manipulate our very DNA?


5G induces coronaviruses

according to a new study just published on the US NIH (National Institute of Health) website PubMed.gov and published earlier elsewhere. The study, entitled 5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/) (full version here (https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FIORANELLI.pdf)), comes to the shocking conclusion – shocking from a mainstream scientific viewpoint – that 5G technology can instigate the body to produce viruses as a cellular response. Guess what? The 5G millimeter waves (so-called because they operate in extremely high frequencies where there is less than a millimeter between the wave peaks) can make the body produce not just any class of viruses but actually coronaviruses! This research peels back another layer of Operation Coronavirus, affirming the coronavirus 5G connection (https://thefreedomarticles.com/coronavirus-5g-connection-coverup-vaccines-transhumanism/) that I and others were warning about in February when this entire plandemic got off the ground.

Research Spells Out How EMF in the Form of 5G Induces Coronaviruses

I will reproduce the entire abstract of the study here:
“In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells.”


In plain English, this is what it says: DNA is constructed from electrons and atoms which can be influenced by external EM waves. These waves produce holes in the cells. The body creates hexagonal and pentagonal DNA bases to fill these holes, and these bases can join together to make virus-like structures such as coronaviruses within our cells. This builds on the previously known fact that 5G acts upon the body’s cells like a transmitter, and these cells in turn (especially the skins cells) act like antennae, absorbing signals and adjusting themselves based on those signals. This is, quite literally, mass programming.
5G Has Very Short Wavelengths, Allowing it to Penetrate Cells and Influence (Control) DNA

The study continues by outlining the exact method by which 5G induces coronaviruses:


“Thus, a DNA could emit some waves and interact with external waves. However, most waves have a length more than the size of cells and pass them without any effect. Only limited waves with lengths smaller than millimeter could penetrate into cell membrane and interact with DNA inductors. These wavelengths could be observed in 5G technology. Thus, towers in this technology could exchange waves with DNAs within cells and produce various types of diseases such as COVID-19. In this study, we propose a mechanism for exchanged waves between towers and host cells to obtain effective wavelengths. In our method, skin cells act as dermatologic antenna, take waves in 5G technology and transfer them to host cells. Then, DNAs within host cells interact with these waves and move. By motions of a DNA, some hexagonal and pentagonal holes emerge. To fill these holes, some bases are constructed within cells. These holes join to each other and form RNAs of COVID-19.”


This is scary enough, however the bigger picture is even worse. The tiny waves of 5G can accomplish what other EMF technology (4G and below) cannot do, by penetrating the cell membrane and interacting with our DNA inductors. We’re talking about the power to influence and manipulate our very DNA here:
“An antenna could take waves in which their wavelengths are equal to its size. Thus, millimeter waves in 5G technology could be taken more by dermatologic antennas. These waves could pass the cell membranes, enter the nucleus and interact with DNAs. Previously, it has been shown that a DNA could act as the inductor and receiver or sender of waves. Thus, a DNA within a dermatologic cell like a keratinocyte receives external waves and sends them to DNAs of other cells like melanocytes. Waves in 5G technology and higher technologies could contribute in gene expressions, turn on some genes and turn off others.”


This echoes what I wrote in the 2017 article 5G and IoT: Total Technological Control Grid Being Rolled Out Fast (https://thefreedomarticles.com/5g-iot-technological-control-grid/) where I referenced the research of Israeli scientist Dr. Ben-Ishai, who showed that our sweat ducts work like helical antennas, absorbing energy and EM frequencies between 75-100 GHz, part of the range used by 5G.

5G Induces Coronaviruses – Further Implications

So what are the implications of this study? There are many. Firstly, if 5G can be weaponized and aimed at people, firing EMF and manipulating their DNA to produce coronaviruses, then the external threat is not some new killer virus, but rather destructive battlefield technology disguised as telecommunications technology. Anyone still looking at airborne particles and worried about contaminated surfaces is missing the point completely. Secondly, building upon the first point, if the NWO (New World Order) controllers running this agenda have the power to induce people to make coronaviruses, or even a specific strain like SARS-CoV-2 (assuming it exists), then there is no ‘contagion’ or viral spread as such. Some such as Dr. Stefan Lanka (https://thefreedomarticles.com/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-reveals-virus-misconception/) believe contagion itself is a myth. Either way, there is no medical or legal justification for shutting down small businesses, quarantining and isolating people, forced mask wearing and social distancing, because in this scenario some new virus is not being spread; people are being induced to create it inside their own bodies.

Thirdly, this research further bolsters the idea that the COVID phenomenon is linked to oxygen shortage (aka hypoxia or under oxygenation). This is explained in several ways, e.g. by the theory of Dr. Robert Young that COVID is actually blood coagulation (https://thefreedomarticles.com/doctor-reveals-corona-effect-blood-coagulation/), and by the 5G 60GHz effect on oxygen molecules. To recap, it is a fact that the 60 GHz band (used by 5G) affects oxygen. For instance, these technology/telecommunications websites (here (https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/fixed-wireless-communications-at-60ghz-unique-0001), here (https://www.everythingrf.com/community/why-is-the-60-ghz-band-not-good-for-long-range-communications) and here (https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/35234)) explain how oxygen absorbs a very high percentage (98% on one website) of 60 GHz waves, therefore making it undesirable and ineffective for radio and communication. That analysis, of course, is from the viewpoint of efficient telecommunication. However, my viewpoint is the opposite; I am coming to the topic looking at it from a health perspective, so I don’t care how much O2 is impeding telecommunications, I care about how much the 60 GHz is impeding my ability to breathe! Dana Ashlie (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtfqUtW_8AA) explains in this February 2020 video (around the 11:00 mark) that when the O2 molecules absorb the 60 GHz waves, it affects the spin of their electrons. Changes to these spin frequencies in turn have impacts on human biology. It reduces the oxygen molecules’ ability to fully bind with and saturate the hemoglobin in our blood, thus preventing us from fully uptaking oxygen, thus depriving us of fully oxygenating ourselves. With lower oxygen levels, our energy and immunity falls, and we become weaker.

With this new information, think back to some of the headlines from January, e.g. Huawei Builds 5G Base Stations to Help Fight Corona Virus (https://www.somagnews.com/huawei-builds-5g-base-stations-help-fight-corona-virus/). Did you catch that – to “help” fight coronavirus?! It’s a sick joke. The cause of our problems is again presented as the solution.

Final Thoughts

This research is another crucial piece of the puzzle. We have known for awhile now that artificial EMF is causing great harm (https://thefreedomarticles.com/aluminum-fluoride-glyphosate-emf-deliberate-concoction-pineal-gland/) to us. We have also known for awhile that 5G is extremely dangerous (https://thefreedomarticles.com/5g-danger-13-reasons-health-disaster/) in many ways, including hijacking our sweat duct antennae, bombarding us with pulsed waves (more damaging than continuous wave radiation), amplifying DNA damage via VGCCs, promoting deep EMF penetration and having mutagenic and carcinogenic effects, being emitted from a phased array structure that has been used for crowd dispersal. This research is more evidence that we are being deliberately poisoned, and that tales of species-jumping bat viruses from China are a red herring. We must continue to be vigilant in opposing 5G in all its forms, and doing what we can in our local area to prevent the 5G rollout.

[monty]

I sent the link to my daughter. Later I expressed my doubts to her because the article says “editorial”. She did some searching the web and sent me this link

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/313088-pubmed-pseudoscience-5g-coronavirus

[Amanda]

I sent the link to my daughter. Later I expressed my doubts to her because the article says “editorial”. She did some searching the web and sent me this link

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/313088-pubmed-pseudoscience-5g-coronavirus

Okay, I really don't know what to say. I kind of thought the whole thing made sense, given what Dr. Kaufman has been saying about exsomes, and that what they really identified was an exosome, which is what the body releases when exposed to toxins, including EMF. (And I know in the Jeanine Roberts' book Fear of the Invisible, which is all about the scientific fraud in virology, including the scams about the HIV and polio viruses, there's a section that says something like "we have misconcieved the virus...scientists have long known that the way to create viruses in the laboratory is to expose them to toxins and stress"--again fitting with what Dr. K says about exosomes)

But what's really interesting to me is that the original info in the link at fromthetrenchesworldreport is now different--when you click on it, it says "WITHDRAWN"--it didn't say that when I posted it here on 7/22.

[BrewTech]

We really have to be exceptionally careful with our sources. Just because something sounds "sciency" and reinforces one's current belief system doesn't mean it should be spread far and wide. "Poisoning the well" is a real thing, and it looks like the bad guys have gotten A LOT better at it over time.

Stop giving them ammo!

[monty]

Okay, I really don't know what to say. I kind of thought the whole thing made sense, given what Dr. Kaufman has been saying about exsomes, and that what they really identified was an exosome, which is what the body releases when exposed to toxins, including EMF. (And I know in the Jeanine Roberts' book Fear of the Invisible, which is all about the scientific fraud in virology, including the scams about the HIV and polio viruses, there's a section that says something like "we have misconcieved the virus...scientists have long known that the way to create viruses in the laboratory is to expose them to toxins and stress"--again fitting with what Dr. K says about exosomes)

But what's really interesting to me is that the original info in the link at fromthetrenchesworldreport is now different--when you click on it, it says "WITHDRAWN"--it didn't say that when I posted it here on 7/22.


I suspect there is some truth in the paper. This reminds me of my father’s advice growing up, “believe none of what you read and half of what you see”.

[monty]

We really have to be exceptionally careful with our sources. Just because something sounds "sciency" and reinforces one's current belief system doesn't mean it should be spread far and wide. "Poisoning the well" is a real thing, and it looks like the bad guys have gotten A LOT better at it over time.

Stop giving them ammo!

True. And too often I have been guilty of jumping the gun.

[Amanda]

I suspect there is some truth in the paper. This reminds me of my father’s advice growing up, “believe none of what you read and half of what you see”.

I'm going to send all of this to Fetzer--he should have some idea of how this works, and what authors have to go through for something to be posted at pubmed and to be ready for publication, and then suddenly withdrawn when the info is not convenient to the narrative.

[monty]

https://twitter.com/0ctoberreignz/status/1286733461513031685?s=21

People Are Complaining That The
Info Dealing With The (BIG 57) Has
Vanished From NIH, Within The Past
Few Hours - NOT ANYMORE - Here Is
The Archive

[Amanda]

Copying here, just in case:

http://archive.is/uv4GY#selection-93.0-169.1086
5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells.


PMID: 32668870 (https://archive.is/o/uv4GY/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32668870)Jul 17, 2020 

Fioranelli, M; Sepehri, A; Roccia, M G; Jafferany, M; Olisova, O Y; Lomonosov, K M; Lotti, T 
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents


Full Text (https://archive.is/o/uv4GY/https://doi.org/10.23812/20-269-E-4)
Treatment •
Mechanism

 (https://archive.is/o/uv4GY/https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=New+coronavirus+publication+on+%2523lit covid+:+https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/publication/32668870) (https://archive.is/o/uv4GY/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/publication/32668870)

In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells.

[JohnQPublic]

The article is not available anywhere I can find. Only the abstract.

EDIT: Google cache currently has it still: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:E498yql5LKsJ:https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FIORANELLI.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

[keehah]

5G Technology and ... skin cells


Well concern of an effect on skin cells that makes more sense than most of the scientifically illiterate 5G fear mongering found on the net. While I've read the 5G literature on effects on cell oxygen transport, seems like it could be legit (as reported in lab testing) I never thought much of the related to flu hoax fear mongering about it affecting lung oxygen uptake since 5G is not expected to penetrate that far into the body.

Yet I never saw any 5G fear propaganda mentioning home wifi. The biggest 5G threat to the average person is from the new smaller wave household wifi IMO. Almost all new wifi routers now sold are duel band, 3G and 5G. Someone in my building bought a new duel band wifi a year and a half ago (previously had a single 3G wifi) and with my 2-8G detector I noticed a 300-600% increase in total radiation in the third of my residence nearest their wifi. This person has it on all the time and 6 feet way in their main living room seat my conservative industry approved detector places the radiation load in the highest warning red zone (>6V/m). Person did not care at all, even though I did and they do not need 5G and now I consciously spend less time in the half of my residence nearest their wifi.

Also my laptop a foot away pings red zone detected wifi radiation levels (>6V/m) 5-15% of the time even when not actually transferring data with a router!


thefreedomarticles.com

5G Has Very Short Wavelengths, Allowing it to Penetrate Cells and Influence (Control) DNA


Incorrect. Longer wavelengths allow more penetration.



Edited to add: A fraction of the radiation will penetrate significantly. My instrument (https://www.amazon.ca/Acousticom-RF-Detector-200MHz-Shielding/dp/B00LJ7YOTQ) indicates a floor and ceiling reduces the combined 3 and 5G router strength by an order of magnitude (~90%). A concrete block wall (and drywall and plywood) by near two orders of magnitude (95-97%)

[Amanda]

Well concern of an effect on skin cells that makes more sense than most of the scientifically illiterate 5G fear mongering found on the net. While I've read the 5G literature on effects on cell oxygen transport, seems like it could be legit (as reported in lab testing) I never thought much of the related to flu hoax fear mongering about it affecting lung oxygen uptake since 5G is not expected to penetrate that far into the body.

Yet I never saw any 5G fear propaganda mentioning home wifi. The biggest 5G threat is from the new smaller wave household wifi IMO. Almost all new wifi routers now sold are duel band, 3G and 5G. Someone in my building bought a new duel band wifi a year and a half ago (previously had a single 3G wifi) and with my 3-8G detector I noticed a 300% increase in total radiation in the area of my residence nearest the wifi. This person has it on all the time and 6 feet way in their main living room seat my conservative industry approved detector places the radiation load in the highest warning red zone (>6V/m). Person did not care at all, even though I did and they do not need 5G and now I consciously spend less time in the half of my residence nearest their wifi.

Also my laptop a foot away pings red zone detected wifi radiation levels (>6V/m) 5-15% of the time even when not actually transferring data with a router!


Incorrect. Longer wavelengths allow more penetration.


@Keehah-- maybe let the author know here: https://thefreedomarticles.com/5g-induces-coronaviruses-study-shows-millimeter-wave-dna-influence/

[osoab]

I sent the link to my daughter. Later I expressed my doubts to her because the article says “editorial”. She did some searching the web and sent me this link

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/313088-pubmed-pseudoscience-5g-coronavirus


Okay, I really don't know what to say. I kind of thought the whole thing made sense, given what Dr. Kaufman has been saying about exsomes, and that what they really identified was an exosome, which is what the body releases when exposed to toxins, including EMF. (And I know in the Jeanine Roberts' book Fear of the Invisible, which is all about the scientific fraud in virology, including the scams about the HIV and polio viruses, there's a section that says something like "we have misconcieved the virus...scientists have long known that the way to create viruses in the laboratory is to expose them to toxins and stress"--again fitting with what Dr. K says about exosomes)

But what's really interesting to me is that the original info in the link at fromthetrenchesworldreport is now different--when you click on it, it says "WITHDRAWN"--it didn't say that when I posted it here on 7/22.

I'm still reading but, this is where I start to question the paper. They are not discussing the current reasoning regarding emf.


With respect — and this bit, I explicitly ran past Ms. Hall — that is not the question. The question is whether any radio wave or signal has been shown to help any type of virus colonize the human body. The answer, up until the torrent of stupidity that is the 5G-coronavirus conspiracy theory, was no. And since the 5G-coronavirus conspiracy theory is literally ascientific bullshit, the answer remains no. Viruses turn human cells into factories to replicate more of themselves. This is literally how viruses work. A virus that requires a radio signal as a vital intermediary (which is what the authors’ claim, given that they identify 5G as “play(ing) the main role”) is a shit virus.

They are looking at that the emf is "helping" the virus. The 5G theory is that it is the causation. The virus is the expression of the 5G exposure.

and then they jumped the shark.



Imagine a bacteria that could only kill you if you like Nickelback. There are not enough Nickelback fans for that to be an effective evolutionary strategy, yet there are somehow far more Nickelback fans (https://www.wsj.com/articles/who-likes-nickelback-nobody-except-for-millions-1452894762) in the United States than people living in range of effective 5G service.

and then this.


If you run into any dermatologists pretending they have the qualifications to moonlight as signal engineers and infectious disease experts outside the explicit realm of dermatology, kindly do us all a favor and tell them to shut the fuck up.

Scholarly....

[Tumbleweed]

Okay, I really don't know what to say. I kind of thought the whole thing made sense, given what Dr. Kaufman has been saying about exsomes, and that what they really identified was an exosome, which is what the body releases when exposed to toxins, including EMF.

I've been wondering more about the exosomes mentioned. About five years ago when I had my heart bypasses the cardiologists seemed to be somewhat concerned about people with heart disease having root canals. At the time I had a root canal so I started looking in to it. I found a book written by a dentist and a cardiologist that said a dead tooth with a root canal can leak exosomes in to the blood stream and that can lead to inflammation in the arteries in the heart. The inflammation will be plastered over with plaque that leads to blockage of the arteries.

I refused to have another root canal done later when my dentist suggested doing one. I had the tooth pulled instead and also had the one I already had pulled. I'll post a link to the book I read on them below.


https://www.amazon.com/Toxic-Tooth-canal-could-making/dp/0983772827

[monty]

Last American Vagabond correspondent Derrick Broze has written a pretty good analysis of the PubMed editorial.

Does A Newly Published Study Prove The 5G-COVID19 Connection? (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/does-a-newly-published-study-prove-the-5g-covid19-connection/)

July 24, 2020 (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/does-a-newly-published-study-prove-the-5g-covid19-connection/) Derrick Broze (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/author/derrick-broze/)

https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FINAL-5G-CV-1200x642.jpg

A newly published editorial posits that there exists a connection between millimeter waves used by 5g technology and COVID-19. Is this the smoking gun or something else entirely?

A recently published editorial has caused controversy as supporters claim it proves a connection between 5G and COVID-19, and detractors allege pseudoscience. The editorial, 5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells (https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FIORANELLI.pdf), was published in the Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents (https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/category/journals/journal-of-biological-regulators-and-homeostatic-agents/) and published on the PubMed research database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/).


Websites interested in promoting the 5G-COVID-19 connection promoted the editorial – usually by referring to it as a study. For example, Infowars went with the all-caps headline, NIH ADMITS 5G CAN ACTUALLY CREATE CORONAVIRUS WITHIN HUMAN CELLS. Meanwhile, those with an interest in dismissing research about the dangers of 5G (and other taboo topics) raced to attack the editorial and label anyone considering such heresy a conspiracy theorist. ExtremeTech jumped in with PubMed Leaps Into Pseudoscience, Links 5G, Coronavirus. I don’t recommend wasting your time with either of these pieces.


The main theory – and let’s be clear, it is a theory – is that 5G millimeter waves can be “absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells.” The researchers go on to describe a mechanism they believe could trigger a coronavirus within human cells. As noted above, the premise has been controversial.


Since first being published the editorial has been removed from the Journal’s website, however, an archive exists (https://archive.is/lwrOz). PubMed also now lists the paper as “Withdrawn” (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/), with the Abstract stating, “Ahead of Print article withdrawn by publisher.”


Before we get into the specifics and dissect how credible the theory is, I should acknowledge that I have written and produced a documentary exploring the dangers of 5G technology (https://www.theconsciousresistance.com/trojanhorse%20). I have also spent a considerable amount of time researching (https://theconsciousresistance.com/the-speculation-around-coronavirus-and-5g/) the alleged connection (https://theconsciousresistance.com/fact-checking-the-5g-coronavirus-hypothesis/) between COVID-19 and 5G. Ultimately, I have not found a strong enough evidence to draw such a conclusion. Regardless, upon discovering this publication I approached it with an open mind. Here’s what I found:
The “Bad”

The researchers describe the structure of DNA as “inductor-like” and divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. These inductors, the researchers write, act as “an electronic device within a cell” and interact with external electromagnetic waves. When the wave passes through a cell and nucleus membrane, it activates “an extra magnetic field within the DNA.” The shape of the waves “are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source.” The waves cause holes in “liquids within the nucleus” and in response “some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced.”


The researchers state, “These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells.”


The researchers claim that “decreasing the wavelength” waves from 5G towers could have “more effect on evolutions of DNAs within cells.” This happens because the “dermatologic cell membranes” act as antennas. They state that one of these antennas could only “take waves” which are not larger than the cell. Therefore, they conclude, “in the next generation of mobile technology, emitted waves of towers will have more effects on biological cells.”


I completely agree with that conclusion. However, understanding the dangers and concerns around 5G does not require one to ascribe to the now withdrawn editorial. This crux of the theory is that COVID-19 could be a “virus-like structure” created within cells as a response to 5G millimeter waves. You will note in the paragraph above the entire theory hangs on the idea that the base could join to each other and then proceed to form “virus-like structures.” The editorial largely appears to depend on several such assumptions.


The researchers go on to frame their arguments and present equations to prove the probability of this reaction. In between equations, another assumption is presented:
“We should then calculate magnetic energies and magnetic fields. We assume that a DNA acts like an inductor and thus, we write the following equation for its magnetic fields….”

As mentioned above, the paper was withdrawn by the journal and delisted on PubMed. Some will present this as evidence of censorship of truthful information the establishment would rather you not see. This is a valid concern, as the world of scientific research is not beyond corruption and state/corporate influence. However, once again, assumptions are not evidence. Censorship alone does not prove a paper, video, article, study, etc., is factual. Sometimes, bad research is actually removed because it is bad research. I think this is one of those times.


Besides basing the editorial on assumptions, the paper itself is crude. Grammar and syntax are clumsy at times. For example, the researchers note the obvious with, “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is the main problem this year involving the entire world.” Other sentences are also obvious and awkward. “To date, many scientists have tried to find a method to cure this disease; however, without success.”


It’s hard to see how this piece was published on a peer-reviewed journal and then accepted onto PubMed. The journal is indexed on PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/), a free full-text archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM). It is this connection to the NIH which led to some social media users and alternative media pundits claiming the NIH had admitted 5G caused COVID-19. To make this clear, that is not what happened.


Elisabeth Bik, a Dutch microbiologist and scientific integrity consultant who runs the blog Scientific Integrity Digest, described some of the weaknesses of the editorial.


“How did the authors prove this extraordinary claim? Well, they don’t. The paper does not include any experiments. It is listed as an Editorial, and it includes a lot of clunky cartoons and impressive formulas, but there is no proof. It is just a wacko hypothesis,” she writes (https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2020/07/23/worst-paper-of-2020-5g-and-coronavirus-induction/).


Bik also notes various issues with the journal publishing the editorial. For example, their website (https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/)notes most papers do not have a link to the full text or a PDF (https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FIORANELLI.pdf). There does not appear to be a way to read many of the papers listed. The Editorial Board (https://www.biolifesas.org/biolife/editorial-board/) is not searchable and some of the Editors appear to be dead. These include, “S. Pestka, USA,” who is likely Sidney Pestka (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Pestka), a biochemist/geneticist who died in 2016. Bik also found that G. Bonadonna (https://www.nursingcenter.com/journalarticle?Article_ID=3220904&Journal_ID=401957&Issue_ID=3220831%23:~:text=Gianni%2520Bonadonna%25 2C%2520MD%252C%2520whose%2520revolutionary,at%2520 the%2520age%2520of%252081.) died in 2015 and V. Bocci (https://www.wfoot.org/velio-bocci-has-passed-away/)died in 2019. Finally, JW Mier, was implicated in a research misconduct case (https://retractionwatch.com/2019/10/15/cancer-lab-at-harvard-subject-of-inquiry/).


Bik ends her review of the editorial by calling for the journal to be banned from PubMed She calls the publication of the editorial “a serious problem” because it shows PubMed can be “used and misused by all kinds of people to support their conspiracy theories.”


The Last American Vagabond has contacted lead author Massimo Fioranelli (https://www.massimofioranelli.com/) to provide the researchers an opportunity to comment on the criticisms of their editorial. We will provide updates as they happen.


While I agree with the overall sentiment that the paper is lacking in evidence and heaving in assumptions, I do not agree with the “conspiracy theorist” label. TLAV readers will be familiar with the ways in which this pejorative is used to demean and diminish an individual’s credibility. I know for a fact that my legitimate questions about the safety of 5G have me labeled as a conspiracy theorist or tinfoil hat enthusiast by a certain crowd. My fear is that the legitimate concerns around 5G are being drowned out by the pursuit of a link between 5G and COVID-19.
The Good

The editorial was not without merit. The researchers are spot on when they state “it has been known that some waves in 5G technology have direct effects on the skin cells.” As far back at the 1970’s it has been known by the Russian and American governments that millimeter waves have a variety of impacts on wildlife, humans, and the environment. Organizations like the Environmental Health Trust (https://ehtrust.org/), 5G Crisis (https://www.5gcrisis.com/) with Americans for Responsible Technology, and other groups do a great job documenting the available credible research on the dangers of 5G and electromagnetic frequencies in general. In fact, credible research on the dangers of 5G was published as recent as May 2020 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842742030028X).


The researchers acknowledge these dangers, stating “many researchers have considered the effects of 5G technology on human health. For example, it has been shown that 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, but will have adverse systemic effects as well.” These are true statements and the wider scientific community desperately needs to recognize this.


Another interesting aspect of the editorial’s theory is the potential connection between what the researchers describe and what has been proposed by independent researchers like Dr. Andrew Kaufman (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BSWt5L97VE). What the editorial describes as “virus-like structures” sound similar to what Kaufman has described (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsjSuqCj3Bo) in the form of exosomes. Exosomes are defined as “membrane-bound extracellular vesicles” which are produced in certain cells. Kaufman and other researchers propose that the body is not being attacked by an external virus, but rather, the body is experiencing exosomes excreting from cells. It is believed that these exosomes are a response to external, environmental stimuli. In the editorial, the researchers claim that this stimuli is millimeter waves for 5G technology. The importance of this point will depend on your view of the editorial and Kaufman’s work.


Finally, the theory that millimeter waves, or electromagnetic frequencies in general can cause a reaction is not unheard-of. In fact, it’s not even entirely outlandish to propose that exposure to EMFs could create a viral reaction. In 1997, a peer reviewed study was published entitled, Exposure to a 50 Hz electromagnetic field induces activation of the Epstein-Barr virus genome in latently infected human lymphoid cells (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9276003/). As it sounds, the researchers found that exposing a human lymphoid cell infected by the EBV genome to a 50 Hz EMF “resulted in an increased number of cells expressing the virus early antigens.” The researchers conclude that this is “additional evidence that DNA can be modulated by a magnetic field.”


Clearly, there is a need for more research on how DNA is affected by electromagnetic frequencies and fields. The editorial’s weak points should not take away from efforts to understand how our bodies and genetic material itself is altered by exposure to technologies which are now ubiquitous in modern life.
Conclusion

Overall, the editorial does not qualify as a debate-ending smoking gun which will cause a mass awakening. Instead, it seems to be yet another divisive topic which will be used by smug and dogmatic believers in the Scientific establishment to malign so-called “conspiracy theorists.” At the same time, the editorial’s removal will only further entrench the idea into the heads of true believers who take it as confirmation that the 5G-COVID-19 theory is correct and thus is being silenced by the predator class. As usual, it appears the truth is much more nuanced.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.
https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.194.30/cm2.2c3.myftpupload.com/wp-content/plugins/patron-button-and-widgets-by-codebard/images/become_a_patron_button.png (https://www.patreon.com/TheLastAmericanVagabond?utm_content=post_button&utm_medium=patron_button_and_widgets_plugin&utm_campaign=&utm_term=&utm_source=https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/does-a-newly-published-study-prove-the-5g-covid19-connection/)

[PatColo]

2m clip of Swedish woman claiming...
https://twitter.com/fionamflanagan1/status/1287481767671332865




Fiona Marie Flanagan
@fionamflanagan1 (https://twitter.com/fionamflanagan1)
3h (https://twitter.com/fionamflanagan1/status/1287481767671332865)
This lady is telling us that 5G genocide is happening in Sweden right now

Is this why they didn’t lock down?
Patients in respiratory distress from 5G radiation are being DENIED OXYGEN , allowed to crash and then vented !

[ImaCannin]

This is a series of videos that go into depth how the Cov/five ghee fit together.

#1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mWcUoESRO0c5/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mWcUoESR O 0 c5/ AI keeps putting the Afro guy in there

#2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7NuuW1b9Z9rR/

#3
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4iFI8whxumKJ/

#4
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9z0E4ZxaQbbr/

#5
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GbM7IvvM7QgW/