PDA

View Full Version : "Austin protest shooting victim remembered for devotion to fiancée, racial justice"



Dachsie
28th July 2020, 05:40 PM
Dachsie comments: I have bolded the area that differs about 180 degrees to the way Mike Bara described this on last nights Real Deal Report show*.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74KTD4_E3N4


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74KTD4_E3N4

look at 2:09 on video track to hear Mike Bara's version of what happened in this incident.

The alleged "victim", Foster, shot an unknown or unnamed car that was driving by and came upon a protest 5 times and missed 5 times with an AK47 described in the Statesman story posted here as "an assault rifle."
The shooter in the car shot back 3 times and killed Foster. I gather that the driver of the vehicle who shot Foster drove away and has not been apprehended by Austin police.

Notice how the Austin Statesman tells a completely different story. This is pretty horrible incident.

I do not know what truly happened and of course I want truth and justice, but in this very blue city, and if Mike Bara's version of what happened is the truth, I'm not holding my breath.





...https://www.statesman.com/news/20200725/austin-protest-shooting-victim-remembered-for-devotion-to-fianceacutee-racial-justice...

racial justice
By Katie Hall
@Katie_Statesman
By Danny Davis
@aasdanny
Posted Jul 25, 2020 at 10:29 PM Updated Jul 27, 2020 at 9:54 AM

Garrett Foster, who was shot to death during a downtown Austin protest Saturday night, was remembered as a man dedicated to exercising his Second Amendment rights, stamping out racial injustice and caring for his fiancée, according to family and friends.

The incident leading up to the 28-year-old’s death began about 9:50 p.m. when a driver on Fourth Street honked his horn and turned right onto Congress Avenue where there was a crowd of protesters, Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said Sunday.

Several protesters — including Foster, who was holding an assault rifle — approached the car, Manley said. He said the driver reported that Foster pointed the weapon at him. The driver then pointed his handgun outside the window, fired multiple shots and drove away, Manley said.

Someone else in the crowd opened fire on the car as it drove off, Manley said.

First responders performed CPR on Foster, but he died at Dell Seton Medical Center less than an hour after the shooting, officials said.
Related content
Texas law gives no simple answer in Garrett Foster killing at Austin protest
July 27, 2020

No other injuries were reported.

Austin police said they detained the person who fired the fatal shots and he cooperated with investigators. He has been released, along with the second shooter, Manley said.

Witnesses who attended the protest told the American-Statesman that the driver appeared to drive into the crowd and came to a stop when the vehicle hit an orange barrier. They also said Foster had his weapon pointed down.

Manley would not say why the driver was originally at the scene of the protest.

In a Facebook Live video of the hourslong march, a car’s honking is heard before two volleys of gunshots, a total of eight rounds, are unleashed. Several screaming protesters immediately take cover.

embedded videos and clips throughout article

racial justice
By Katie Hall
@Katie_Statesman
By Danny Davis
@aasdanny
Posted Jul 25, 2020 at 10:29 PM Updated Jul 27, 2020 at 9:54 AM

Garrett Foster, who was shot to death during a downtown Austin protest Saturday night, was remembered as a man dedicated to exercising his Second Amendment rights, stamping out racial injustice and caring for his fiancée, according to family and friends.

The incident leading up to the 28-year-old’s death began about 9:50 p.m. when a driver on Fourth Street honked his horn and turned right onto Congress Avenue where there was a crowd of protesters, Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said Sunday.

Several protesters — including Foster, who was holding an assault rifle — approached the car, Manley said. He said the driver reported that Foster pointed the weapon at him. The driver then pointed his handgun outside the window, fired multiple shots and drove away, Manley said.

Someone else in the crowd opened fire on the car as it drove off, Manley said.

First responders performed CPR on Foster, but he died at Dell Seton Medical Center less than an hour after the shooting, officials said.
Related content
Texas law gives no simple answer in Garrett Foster killing at Austin protest
July 27, 2020

No other injuries were reported.

Austin police said they detained the person who fired the fatal shots and he cooperated with investigators. He has been released, along with the second shooter, Manley said.

Witnesses who attended the protest told the American-Statesman that the driver appeared to drive into the crowd and came to a stop when the vehicle hit an orange barrier. They also said Foster had his weapon pointed down.

Manley would not say why the driver was originally at the scene of the protest.

In a Facebook Live video of the hourslong march, a car’s honking is heard before two volleys of gunshots, a total of eight rounds, are unleashed. Several screaming protesters immediately take cover.


Manley is asking for the public’s help with providing footage or accounts of the incident by calling the Crime Stoppers anonymous tip line at (512) 472-8477 or emailing homicide.apd@austintexas.gov.

“We are heartbroken over the loss of Mr. Foster last night. It is actively being investigated ... in conjunction with the Travis County district attorney’s office,” Manley said.

Racial justice important to victim

Foster grew up in Plano and had been living in Austin with his fiancée, Whitney Mitchell, for about two years. Mitchell was at the protest in a wheelchair with him at the time, and the two had been to such events in downtown Austin against police violence for months, according to protesters and Foster’s family.

Mitchell is Black and Foster is white, and issues of racial injustice were incredibly important to him, his family said.

“They’ve experienced so much hate just for their relationship in general,” said his sister, Anna Mayo. “From day one, he’s fought to end that.”

Mitchell and Foster started dating about a decade ago. Foster enlisted in the U.S. Air Force in his late teens and had to leave for basic training two months after Mitchell had all four of her limbs amputated after she developed a medical condition that led to sepsis.

Foster worked in the Air Force as a flight mechanic until he was 19, when he was discharged to be Mitchell’s full-time caretaker, his family said.

“That time when he was gone was so detrimental to both of them, because they were very much in love, and he had cared for her so well,” his aunt Karen Sourber said. “He’s been her primary caretaker ever since. He just loved her unconditionally and took care of everything.”

Protesters said they got to know the couple well throughout the many protests this summer.

“A lot of us haven’t slept — I haven’t been asleep,” protester Julian Salazar, who witnessed the shooting, said Sunday morning. “It’s been heartbreaking. A lot of us are angry, depressed, sad to learn that his (fiancée) now is going to be struggling. The one person she had here in Austin, who was always going to be there for her, is now gone.”

Foster often talked to protesters about his rifle, which he brought to the protests, Salazar said. Mayo said Second Amendment rights were important to him.

“My brother would have never, ever pointed a gun at somebody,” Mayo said. “He always carried his guns with him. He had a license to carry in Texas — we’re an open carry state. He always would exercise his right to carry, but he would never threaten somebody. He was one of the most kindhearted people — that was the whole reason he was out there.”

As of 6 p.m. Sunday, a GoFundMe page for Foster’s funeral expenses and for Mitchell’s care had raised more than $90,000.

Protesters shaken

By early Sunday morning, about 50 protesters had returned to Austin police headquarters, where protesters had convened hours earlier. Mitchell joined the protesters and was visibly grieving. Protesters surrounded her to give her their condolences while chanting Foster’s name.

“It made our message that much more meaningful for us. ... We’ve got a brother that was stripped from us,” a protester told the Statesman outside of police headquarters; he declined to provide his full name, as many protesters have done, citing fear of retaliation. “The fact that you can go from being five feet away from this man at the beginning of the march, him marching, him yelling, him chanting to being lifeless. It’s a messed-up reality.”

Protesters have taken to Austin streets regularly over the past several weeks to oppose what they say is local police brutality against people of color.

Recent cases of Austin officers using force include the fatal shooting of Michael Ramos, a 42-year-old half Black and half Hispanic man, by Austin police as he pulled out of an apartment complex parking lot on South Pleasant Valley Road in April.

Javier Ambler II died last year in North Austin after Williamson County sheriff’s deputies used a stun gun on him despite his calling out to officers that he had congestive heart failure and couldn’t breathe.

Outgoing Travis County District Attorney Margaret Moore said Wednesday that she was going to forgo taking Ramos’ and Amblers’ cases to a grand jury, instead leaving that decision to the next district attorney. Moore had previously planned to present the cases to a special grand jury next month.

Protesters out of police headquarters on Sunday added Foster’s name to the list of people they say deserve justice.

“What needs to happen tonight is that people need to understand that just because Austin calls itself progressive, just because Austin calls itself liberal, if that is not reflected in the actions of the city, then that is not the truth, and we must live within the truth,” a protester said.

Warning: The video below contains graphic images and language.


UPDATE (10:50 p.m.): A vigil honoring Foster drew several hundred people to downtown Austin on Sunday night.

Staff writer Tony Plohetski contributed to this report.

_____________

midnight rambler
28th July 2020, 06:15 PM
That guy is a complete moron. The shootee did NOT have a "machinegun" he had a semi-auto AK-47 variant which is very similar to an AK-47 machinegun except that a real AK-47 machinegun is capable of both semi-auto and full auto fire. Then he says that the useful idiot with the AK opened fire on the motorist when the useful idiot never managed to get a shot off. What a derelict idiot, I'm guessing he doesn't even own a gun.

Dachsie
28th July 2020, 06:35 PM
That guy is a complete moron. The shootee did NOT have a "machinegun" he had a semi-auto AK-47 variant which is very similar to an AK-47 machinegun except that a real AK-47 machinegun is capable of both semi-auto and full auto fire. Then he says that the useful idiot with the AK opened fire on the motorist when the useful idiot never managed to get a shot off. What a derelict idiot, I'm guessing he doesn't even own a gun.

I agree with I did not like Mike Bara's presentation and I take your info for true about the AK 47.

How do you know the motorist never managed to get a shot off. How do we know the motorist shot 3 times? How do we know the motorist got away?

I just do not know but the fact that the two versions of what happened differed so extremely is what made me think all sides do not seem to be reporting objectively and accurately.

Sad to say, The Real Deal Report show and website and soon-to-be new independent video platform is not shaping up to provide what I consider to be objective accurate quality journalism and commentary.

Mike Bara constantly throughout each show asks the question that so many of us are asking "why isn't Trump doing something." It is to the extent that it looks like he is trying to rouse anger and emotions in the audience, for what reason I do not know.

My main feeling is that there is no constructive information to suggest action we can take. It is basically the "ain't it awful" game and "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" or "Bring it on" popular schticks.

I really had never heard of any of these guys before except Dr. James Fetzer . I do not know why Dr. Fetzer left Revolution Radio show and now is moving to shows of his where there are no callers participating. Dr. Fetzer mainly just reads about different news stories and asks for the other two reporters' responses.

RealDealMedia.com is the website and it is shaping up to look nice but still no independent video platform capability.

Dachsie
28th July 2020, 07:17 PM
I agree with I did not like Mike Bara's presentation and I take your info for true about the AK 47.

How do you know the motorist never managed to get a shot off. How do we know the motorist shot 3 times? How do we know the motorist got away?

I just do not know but the fact that the two versions of what happened differed so extremely is what made me think all sides do not seem to be reporting objectively and accurately.

Sad to say, The Real Deal Report show and website and soon-to-be new independent video platform is not shaping up to provide what I consider to be objective accurate quality journalism and commentary.

Mike Bara constantly throughout each show asks the question that so many of us are asking "why isn't Trump doing something." It is to the extent that it looks like he is trying to rouse anger and emotions in the audience, for what reason I do not know.

My main feeling is that there is no constructive information to suggest action we can take. It is basically the "ain't it awful" game and "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" or "Bring it on" popular schticks.

I really had never heard of any of these guys before except Dr. James Fetzer . I do not know why Dr. Fetzer left Revolution Radio show and now is moving to shows of his where there are no callers participating. Dr. Fetzer mainly just reads about different news stories and asks for the other two reporters' responses.

RealDealMedia.com is the website and it is shaping up to look nice but still no independent video platform capability.


Guess I am getting off topic of the Austin shooting incident but I do not feel like starting a new thread and this is related to my doubts about the new Real Deal Report show and platform.

The Real Deal Report of 7-28-20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzPnYzJ9abk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzPnYzJ9abk

I stopped listening to this show after the Tucker Carlson clip that Dr. Fetzer introduced.

The Real Deal Report of 7-28-20 contained a video clip of Tucker Carlson and it was shown to demonstrate the strong words Tucker Carlson used about the media for not reporting about all the heavy violence going on last weekend in Portland and other places. So far, so good, but then at 5:39 on that show video Tucker slipped in this comment...

"Oh, intensified. Just like the World Trade Center collapsed when a commercial airlines flight intensified."

That's the big shoe drop.

Carlson has always held the official narrative position and interpretation on 9-11-01 and he had to slip in that comment to reinforce his position on 9-11. I dare say Fox News also has always had the wrong take on 9-11 and still does and wants to keep slipping in commentary to let their position be known that they are one hundred percent in with the official narrative of every big event, including 9-11 and the current violence in the streets.

I also think Carlson is wrong about the real definition of "violence". Violence does not only mean physical violence and fighting in the streets. There is psychological psyop violence that exerts very real violence and harm on people's psyches. Introducing fear and panic and disorder and anarchy all based on psyop manipulations of our "deep state" entities is just as wrong as doing physical violence. There is nothing patriotic and "truthful" about that.

midnight rambler
28th July 2020, 09:44 PM
How do you know the motorist never managed to get a shot off. How do we know the motorist shot 3 times? How do we know the motorist got away?

I know a cop who was on the scene early on, didn't witness it but was there pretty quickly. Motorist shot a .45 revolver five times hitting the peaceful protester three times. Multiple witnesses said the peaceful protester raised his gun on the motorist who then drew his revolver and got off five quick shots. Motorist then drove off, called 911 and turned himself in. Motorist is a sgt. in the army and lives on base.

Dachsie
7th August 2020, 01:00 PM
Am gradually trying to get the whole factual story of what exactly happened in this shooting incident.

Here is a short video that fills in a few of the blanks.

The person who shot and killed the protester was DANIEL PERRY. He turned himself in immediately and I think he is still in custody of police but I really do not know his status at this time and none of our local newspaper or media is reporting on this whole case now.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynoFIRcau4w

11:12 video runtime

Texas Trumps BLM/Antifa | First Five 8.3.20
635 views
•Aug 4, 2020
116
0
Share
Save
America Can We Talk?
Texas Trumps BLM/Antifa

Follow Debbie Georgatos!

WEBSITE: http://americacanwetalk.org

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/AmericaCanWe...



America Can We Talk is a show with a mission — to speak up for the extraordinary and unique greatness of America. I talk about the top issues of the day facing America, often with insightful guests, always from the perspective of furthering that mission, and with the goal to inspire listeners to celebrate and embrace the liberty on which America was founded.

midnight rambler
7th August 2020, 02:09 PM
Daniel Perry was questioned by APD for several hours that night and then released, he was never arrested/jailed. Perry is now restricted to post (Ft. Hood).

Dachsie
7th August 2020, 02:25 PM
Daniel Perry was questioned by APD for several hours that night and then released, he was never arrested/jailed. Perry is now restricted to post (Ft. Hood).

Interesting information. Would appreciate source if you recall.

There are many ways to interpret this incident and each way deserves full study and reporting, just as was true for 9-11-01 but did not really happen as fully as it should have.

midnight rambler
7th August 2020, 02:55 PM
An APD cop who was on scene is the source for Perry being questioned and released, the nooz media stated he was restricted to post at Ft. Hood.

Dachsie
11th August 2020, 04:28 PM
"Austin City Council Officially Calls For Blowing Up Police Station As Symbol Of Ending Police Hate"
infowars.com

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/news/images/austin-city-council-officially-calls-for-blowing-up-police-station-as-symbol-of-ending-police-hate.jpg

A radical new budget proposal by the Austin, Texas, City Council calls for a controlled demolition of the police department’s current headquarters in a symbolic gesture towards Black Lives Matter and defund police protesters.

“We should expedite the demolition of the APD Headquarters by directing the City Manager to move all remaining APD staff out of the existing headquarters building and into other underutilized city facilities,” reads the proposal submitted Monday by Council Member Jimmy Flannigan.

https://assets.infowars.com/2020/07/apd-graphic235.jpg

The existing APD property, prime real estate situated in the heart of Austin, would then be used to highlight black inequity and support the black community, the proposal states.

“That property… should be dedicated to addressing historic economic inequities in the black community and supporting future black community economic success,” states Flannigan’s proposal. “A community-led effort should be initiated to determine the specifics on how such a valuable property could be leveraged, and possibly serve as a gateway to East Austin.”

According to the proposal, the demolition would be accompanied by a restructuring which would turn over control of patrol and all other divisions to civilians chosen by the mayor and city council.


08/10/2020
Categories: Breaking News

Dachsie
14th August 2020, 01:53 AM
Austin "officials" tell the people how much public safety matters to them.

https://patch.com/texas/downtownaustin/austin-city-council-approves-150m-cut-police-budget

Austin City Council Approves $150M Cut To Police Budget
Unanimous approval of the $4.2B municipal budget acquiesces to growing calls for police reform amid continuing civil unrest.
By Tony Cantu, Patch Staff Patch Staff Badge
Aug 13, 2020 11:55 am CT | Updated Aug 13, 2020 5:19 pm CT
Unanimous approval of the $4.2B municipal budget acquiesces to growing calls for police reform amid continuing civil unrest.
Unanimous approval of the $4.2B municipal budget acquiesces to growing calls for police reform amid continuing civil unrest. (Shutterstock)

AUSTIN, TX — The Austin City Council unanimously approved on Thursday a $4.2 billion municipal budget that calls for $150 million in cuts to the Austin Police Department.

The budget approval came after city council members listened to about four hours' worth of testimony from more than 200 residents, most of whom called for cuts to the $442 million police budget amid ongoing civil unrest calling for law enforcement reform.

The $150 million police budget cut is a far cry from an original proposal by City Manager Spencer Cronk to cut a mere $11.3 million from the police budget. All told, the approved police budget totals about $290 million — down from $434 million before the cuts.

The budget cut comes amid ongoing civil unrest sparked in late May as protesters decry police brutality. The death of George Floyd in Minneapolis after an officer knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes sparked nationwide protests, including in Austin. But locally, activists already had galvanized after the death of Michael Ramos, 42, who was fatally shot by police after a brief confrontation in South Austin despite having shown them he was unarmed at the time.

Calls for police reform were bolstered after police used beanbag projectiles and pepper spray to disperse peaceful protests outside police headquarters on May 30. Two young men were seriously hurt by the non-lethal projectiles after being hit in the head with the munitions and subsquently hospitalized. Police Chief Brian Manley acknowledged that officers fired the same projectiles as they carried one of the injured men for ambulance transport after having been directed to move the injured protester by police themselves. Calls for Manley's resignation continue among some following that demonstration of police force.

The General Fund budget is $1.1 billion while the Capital Budget includes $1.2 billion in planned spending. In approving the budget, council moved to introduce changes to public safety in Austin by reallocating police funding to health, housing and critical social services.

Among the approved cuts to police funding:

A $20 million cut primarily taken from cadet classes and overtime in a move to reinvest in permanent supportive housing and services, EMS for COVID-19 response, family violence shelter and protection, violence prevention, workforce development and a range of other programs.
Transfer of police functions (and related funding of nearly $80 million) out of the department over the course of the fiscal year. These include Forensics Sciences, Communications/911 call center, strategic support, and internal affairs.
Create a Reimagine Safety Fund to divert almost $50 million from APD toward alternative forms of public safety and community support, to be delivered from outside APD, as determined through the year-long reimagining process.

Coronavirus loomed large in budgeting process

The specter of coronavirus also loomed large in the budget-making process. The approved budget ensures the city continues investing in key council priorities and implementing council-approved COVID-19 spending framework to support Austin families and businesses, "...while remaining consistent with responsible budgeting practices that have enabled the city to mitigate the impacts of anticipated revenue losses caused by the pandemic," Cronk explained.

"In just a few short weeks the city and council have worked together to come up with solutions to the challenges we face as a community," the city manager said in a prepared statement. "This budget takes us forward as a city, but I've also been clear we'll have to come back and make adjustments, not only because of the COVID-19 pandemic, but because of our desire to truly reimagine public safety."

The approved budget assumes a property tax rate of 53.35 cents per $100 of taxable value. That comprises a rate of 44.60 cents for city operations — an increase of 0.29 cents from the FY 2019-20 tax rate and a 3.5 percent increase above the no-new-revenue Operations and Maintenance rate – plus an additional 8.75 cents for the Project Connect transportation initiative, a citywide traffic-easing rapid transit system.

Election called for "Project Connect"

Council called for a Nov. 3 election to seek voter approval for the additional taxes to fund Project Connect. If voters accept the proposed tax rate of 53.35 cents in November, the city tax bill for the typical homeowner — defined as the owner of a median-valued ($326,368) non-senior home — would be $1,741.17 per year or $145.10 per month. This would be an increase of $332.39 per year or $27.70 per month.

Under the adopted budget, typical rate payers will see their Austin Energy bills go down and their Austin Water bills frozen, the city manager noted. Austin Resource Recovery charges will increase, by just over $31 per year, to pay for the citywide implementation of curbside organic materials collection. Taken together, the combined impact of tax, rate and fee changes would represent an increase, for the typical ratepayer, of 7.9 percent — an additional $325.20 per year or $27.10 per month. Thursday's approval of city tax and spending plans for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, 2020 comes after several months of stakeholder engagement — including an online survey that attracted unprecedented levels of participation, with 37,000 responses compared with the usual 2,000-3,000.

Officials explained this is the third year in which the proposed budget was organized by outcome area, and not strictly by city department, to reflect the priorities of the Austin community, using council's adopted Strategic Direction 2023 as a guide. The outcomes are Culture & Lifelong Learning, Economic Opportunity & Affordability, Government That Works for All, Health & Environment, Mobility, and Safety. Council began their deliberations on Wednesday working from the city manager's proposed budget, (snapshot summary here) which included the following commitments, now part of the adopted budget:

$60.9 million to strengthen the city's commitment to end homelessness in Austin through housing displacement prevention, crisis mitigation, and re-empowerment efforts.
Additional $3.5 million in low interest loans to small businesses through the Family Business Loan Program.
$735,000 to enhance the city's open-data portal, increasing transparency for Austin residents.
$1.5 million for improvements to the Asian American Resource Center, Carver Museum, and Mexican American Cultural Center.
$423,000 and 6 new positions to fully implement the citywide curbside organic materials collection program.
$14.7 million for sidewalk improvements and $2.3 million for pedestrian safety including hybrid beacons, audible crosswalk indicators, and more visible signs and markings.
$5.1 million for crisis response and victim services.

Reactions to police budget cuts flow in

In a prepared statement following budget approval, city council member Greg Casar lauded efforts to reinvest in public safety alternatives. "Today's budget vote is unprecedented in Texas," he said. "We've begun a transformational change away from mass incarceration and toward real community safety. We know that we cannot simply police away our community's challenges.

"Thousands of Austinites demanded we invest deeply in the public health and safety of our community. Today, we chose to create a safer city. We're opening a new family violence shelter; we're hiring mental health crisis teams; we voted to get hundreds more people out of homelessness; we funded gun violence prevention programs. Today, our city did the right thing."

After the vote was taken, Austin Mayor Steve Adler called the measure "the most forward looking budget" in memory.

Chas Moore, founder of the Austin Justice Coalition — a group that has spearheaded calls for local police reform and has organized several protests — said the cuts represented a victory for his members.

"This is the first of many victories for this next year," Moore said in a prepared statement. "And we are just getting started. Structural change is hard. Ending racism is even harder. We are fighting long established interests, and our voices and engagement are required in this transformation of our collective values."

But he said fellow activists cannot let up or rest on their laurels: "The decoupling and the effort to reimagine public safety will take place over the coming year by a thousand small decisions," Moore said. "I hope that the thousands of people who have protested in the streets, sent emails and made phone calls over the past two, three months will stay involved and help us get the structural change we want and so desperately need."

Kathy Mitchell of Just Liberty was more tempered in response, saying the initial divestments were smaller than had been hoped: "The $20-plus million in immediate divestment is of course less than we hoped Council could cut," she said in a prepared statement. "But it was enough to fund a big expansion of EMS services, fully fund alternative first responders for mental health related calls, provide a much needed shelter for victims of family violence, increase homeless services, offer programs to support people trying to reintegrate after incarceration, add new violence prevention services and give harm reduction a chance to help people struggling with addiction, and I expect many Austininites will want to have a party the day that downtown police headquarters finally comes down."

Chris Harris, the director of Criminal Justice Programs at Texas Appleseed, also had hoped for deeper cuts in police funding: "While many hoped to cut 25 percent to 50 percent of the police budget, this divestment is similar to what other cities are doing," he said in a prepared statement. He ticked off a list of cities implementing similar cuts: New York cut 8.5 percent; San Jose, Californais, with a 3 percent budget reduction; Seattle with a 2.5 percent cut.

"On the other hand," Harris noted, "Houston increased their police budget 2 percent, Phoenix by 3 percent and San Diego by 5 percent. Austin is cutting about 4.5 percent, but also has created the opportunity for additional cuts over the coming months, so it's in a position to be a leader nationally in responding to these protests if City Council retains its commitment to racial justice and reimagining public safety."

Emily Gerrick of the Texas Fair Defense Project was similarly forward-thinking in her assessment: "Everything the city invested in today — from public health and emergency medical services to survivor support and violence prevention — would not have been funded without immediate cuts to the police department's bloated budget," she said in a prepared statement. "Each of these investments has the potential to improve public safety for all Austinites, unlike the current APD strategy of severely over-policing people of color and causing intergenerational harm to entire communities."

Moore noted how the revised budget creates separate funds for many police divisions that will be moved out of the department over the first two quarters, and budget amendments will be brought forward at the latest mid-year.

"It is a victory that the crime lab, 911 dispatch, internal affairs and many support services will be rapidly moved out of the police department," he said. "There is no doubt that we send police to calls where we don't need them because the police department runs the call center. There is no doubt that internal affairs has failed to hold officers accountable for misconduct. Police mismanagement ruined the crime lab. We're on a path to fixing structurally some of the biggest problems we've encountered with policing."

State attorney general not happy

But not everyone was happy with the council action. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a statement late Thursday afternoon calling the budget cut on police funding as an "attack," while suggesting the move was driven by political expediency.

"The unwarranted attack by the Austin mayor and city council on their police department's budget is no more than a political haymaker driven by the pressures of cancel culture," he said in a prepared statement. "Unfortunately, the targets of this 'cancelling' are the brave men and women who selflessly put their lives on the line to keep our families safe. The city council's action to slash funding disregards the safety of our capital city, its citizens, and the many guests who frequent it."

Claiming the city is beset by "widespread crime" — an assertion largely debunked in studies comparing the local crime rate with others large cities — Paxton urged council to reconsider its stance: "The City of Austin already struggles to combat widespread crime, violence and homelessness. In light of rising violent crime rates in many cities across the country as well the majority of Austinites opposing defunding police, the mayor and the city council should immediately reconsider this ill-advised effort at virtue signaling; which will endanger lives and property in Austin."