Is HIV to AIDS what SARS CoV2 is to Covid- Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Kelly Brogan (Both scams)

[Amanda]

In this special report, Dr Kelly Brogan and colleagues assert that the notion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing “COVID” is a recapitulation of the international infectious disease coup that took hold in the 1980s, namely, that HIV causes AIDS.
The aim here is to present findings to propose that AIDS was essentially a dress rehearsal for the present entrapment of citizens worldwide using the dominant COVID narrative.

Is HIV to AIDS what SARS CoV2 is to COVID?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/kajabi-storefronts-production/sites/53102/downloads/0Fl6sg7RNqmqBNZlUwsw_COVID_HIV.pdf?utm_campaign=So lo%20Newsletter%3A%20Is%20HIV%20to%20AIDS%20what%2 0SARSCoV-2%20is%20to%20COVID%3F%20%28SzCHM3%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_kx=w8SsGivfwPILzFyk_0U-FBuJHWbkCJphBKOzp-7fpdlgPEucfiEXAGZO_b2z9hHy.K2vXAy

[Amanda]

In this special report, Dr Kelly Brogan and colleagues assert that the notion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing “COVID” is a recapitulation of the international infectious disease coup that took hold in the 1980s, namely, that HIV causes AIDS.
The aim here is to present findings to propose that AIDS was essentially a dress rehearsal for the present entrapment of citizens worldwide using the dominant COVID narrative.

Is HIV to AIDS what SARS CoV2 is to COVID?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/kajabi-storefronts-production/sites/53102/downloads/0Fl6sg7RNqmqBNZlUwsw_COVID_HIV.pdf?utm_campaign=So lo%20Newsletter%3A%20Is%20HIV%20to%20AIDS%20what%2 0SARSCoV-2%20is%20to%20COVID%3F%20%28SzCHM3%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_kx=w8SsGivfwPILzFyk_0U-FBuJHWbkCJphBKOzp-7fpdlgPEucfiEXAGZO_b2z9hHy.K2vXAy




I'm still reading this (also has embedded videos to watch), but this caught my eye:

Contrary to public pronouncements, neither AIDS nor COVID-19 are new diseases.In late 1980 and early 1981, UCLA researcher Michael Gottlieb inexplicably initiated a campaign to promote the belief that there was a "new" contagious disease spreading among gay men—based on a mere 5 cases! Common "lifestyle" factors were summarily dismissed, most notably the frequent use of nitrite inhalants ("poppers"), a recreational drug widely used by gay men, including all 5 of these first reported "AIDS" cases. Gottlieb's efforts to lobby the CDC and news media to support his single-minded "viral causation" campaign proved highly successful, and he helped launch the multi-trillion dollar "AIDS" industry


So, it looks like it was a jewish guy who launched this HIV scam that has turned into a multi-trillion dollar racket.

[Cebu_4_2]

My boy got AIDs Auto Immune Disorder right after his MMR injections. I think the classifying it as a gay disease pushed some agenda back then. My son was 4 years old at the time. If I did not interject with another option of cure he would have been dead many years ago. I used herbs to correct the bleeding and stabilize his platelets. It has not a fun time and to this day haunts me.

[woodman]

My boy got AIDs Auto Immune Disorder right after his MMR injections. I think the classifying it as a gay disease pushed some agenda back then. My son was 4 years old at the time. If I did not interject with another option of cure he would have been dead many years ago. I used herbs to correct the bleeding and stabilize his platelets. It has not a fun time and to this day haunts me.
I noticed my older boy get damaged from the MMR; early 80's. This is when they started ramping up the vaccinations for children. This system is evil.

[keehah]

A lot of similarities between the rollout of AZT and Covid vaccines.

They're first go round of scamdemic toxic drug approval.

Spin.com: AIDS and the AZT Scandal: SPIN’s 1989 Feature, ‘Sins of Omission’ (https://www.spin.com/featured/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission/)

October 5 2015
At the end of 1989, two years after we had started the highly controversial AIDS column in SPIN, we published an article by Celia Farber called “Sins of Omission” about the truly bad and corrupt science surrounding promoting AZT as a treatment for the syndrome of diseases.

Celia was the editor and frequent writer of the column and unearthed hard evidence of the cold-bloodedness of the AIDS establishment pushing a drug that was worse than the disease, and killed faster than the natural progression of AIDS left untreated...

Many times over the years since, people have come up to me and said that reading this article saved their lives, that they either stopped taking the drug and their health improved vastly, or they never took it because of what we reported. Nothing ever made me prouder. — Bob Guccione Jr., founder of SPIN, October 3, 2015

[This story was originally published in the November 1989 issue of SPIN. In honor of SPIN’s 30th anniversary, we’ve republished this piece as part of our ongoing “30 Years, 30 Stories” series.]

On a cold January day in 1987, inside one of the brightly-lit meeting rooms of the monstrous FDA building, a panel of 11 top AIDS doctors pondered a very difficult decision. They had been asked by the FDA to consider giving lightning-quick approval to a highly toxic drug about which there was very little information...

Powerful, but unspecific, the drug was not selective in its cell destruction....

Newspapers across America banner-headlined that AZT had been “proven to be effective in HIV antibody-positive, asymptomatic, and early ARC patients,” even though one of the panel’s main concerns was that the drug should only be used in a last-case scenario for critically-ill AIDS patients, due to the drug’s extreme toxicity. Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was now pushing to expand prescription.

The FDA’s traditional concern had been thrown to the wind. Already the drug had spread to 60 countries and an estimated 20,000 people. Not only had no new evidence allayed the initial concerns of the panel, but the follow-up data, as Dr. Brook predicted, had fallen by the wayside. The beneficial effects of the drug had proven to be temporary. The toxicity, however, stayed the same.

The most serious problem with the original study, however, is that it was never completed. Seventeen weeks into the study, when more patients had died in the placebo group, the study was stopped, five months prematurely, for “ethical” reasons: It was considered unethical to keep giving people a placebo when the drug might keep them alive longer...

The majority of those in the AIDS-afflicted and medical communities held the drug up as the first breakthrough on AIDS. For better or worse, AZT had been approved faster than any drug in FDA history, and activists considered it a victory. The price paid for the victory, however, was that almost all government drug trials, from then on, focused on AZT — while over 100 other promising drugs were left uninvestigated.

[Amanda]

Another truth-teller on the HIV/AIDS scam:

Dr. David Rasnik

Saputo interviewed David Rasnick, PhD on HIV and AIDS


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcCneCcxUwY

[C.Martel]

The Origin of HIV Aids The best documentary Channel 4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzwTb5E8JtU