Is the clot shot gene therapy or not??

[midnight rambler]

I got into an argument today with someone over whether the depop shot is gene therapy. I've been unable to find any conclusive, reliable answer(s) in a quick web search, all info seems to be divided between the two camps.

Can someone please give me some direction?

TIA

[ziero0]

"Can someone please give me some direction?"

To All Whom These Presents Come - Greetings. The author of this Notice, Midnite Rangler, is seeking facts capable of proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that COVID related vaccines and boosters have no function in altering DNA or genes in the pricked recipient. Anyone possessing such information must contact Midnite at ________ by February 15th or be barred from future responses on the same topic. [Note: names have been altered to protect the not so innocent or partially guilty]

Run that in the legal section and see what response you get.

Notice is the first part of due process and endows Honored Recipient with an opportunity and right to inquire and if they choose not to exercise that right and opportunity it means they agree. Get the entire Public Domain to agree and see if you now have something akin to a FACT.

Of course you must look logically at the question posed. If nobody can prove there is no DNA or genes altering then doesn't it follow that there IS DNA or genes altering?

Proofs of negatives are difficult.

[vacuum]

It is


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qowDwaYx7vI

[ImaCannin]

What exactly is gene therapy?

[midnight rambler]

What exactly is gene therapy?

On Moderna’s website they call the depop shot “an operating system” (like for a computer).

Pfizer CEO refers to it as “gene editing”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PPclXdGmHGSN/

[vacuum]

Think of it like this.

In the past, with traditional vaccines, they would take preexisting organisms (packages of genetic code) and’s give that to your body to develop an immunity against.

With mRNA, they no longer are running code from nature on your body, but rather they are running their own arbitrary code on your body. Just like software, they can put both malicious code as well as good code in the same software payload.

Would you let someone run arbitrary closed source proprietary code on your computer? Why would you let it be run on your body? If it’s from a natural source like a dead virus then at least the likelihood of malicious back doors is low.

[steel_ag]

20211230162449170_AFLDS amicus brief in support of emergency applications re OSHA ETS cases.pdf (supremecourt.gov) (https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A243/207048/20211230162449170_AFLDS%20amicus%20brief%20in%20su pport%20of%20emergency%20applications%20re%20OSHA% 20ETS%20cases.pdf)

[dys]

I wish I had more time to devote to this- VERY short on time these days.

Here is how you can prove it-

1. Read one of Pfizer or Moderna MRNA patents. In the patents, they explicitly admit that they use CRISPR CA-9 technology.
2. Now watch a video right from Moderna or Pfizer or what CRISPR technology is. They admit that it's gene editing tech! The videos are still out there but they probably won't be for long. While you are at save it the proof somewhere where it won't get memory holed.

Yes, I've done this before but I never organized it like I should have.

Peace out, cub scout.