Duly Processed

[ziero0]

Due process has two parts: notice and opportunity to INQUIRE. Court occurs after due process. Notice occurs in the side of the road. Due process is complete when the first statement that doesn't involve inquiry is made.

A little history. Common Law pleading was on its way out in 1850. It was replaced with code pleading for 100 years. Around 1950 code pleading was replaced with notice pleading. This is the same notice that constitutes the first element of due process.

You get notice many times but fail to recognize it. Take any sign. WELCOME TO Missouri for example. The sign is going to have a border so you are only in Missouri if you can jump into the sign within that border.

My rule on signs is they communicate someone's belief in the existence of something not real. A legal fiction. Later when a marked bubble gum machine pulls you over for 56 in a 55 zone and writes you a ticket because the guy in the uniform believes you to be in Missouri you traverse due process by making a statement (I wasn't speeding) rather than questioning where the supposed crime occurred.

Society appears to have resigned itself to legal fictions. Legal fictions have no gender. Legal fictions are persons. They do not exist without notice. They don't smell. They don't do a no 2 in the bathroom or the woods. They are mental constructs but they all have NOTICE as a prerequisite to EXISTENCE. And it is vital that INQUIRY not be traversed.

COVID is notice. It doesn't exist. Has never existed. Will never exist. But let's put on a mask and PRETEND that it exists.

[keehah]

apnews.com/article/mar-a-lago-tucker-carlson-pandemics-entertainment-ap-top-news (https://apnews.com/article/mar-a-lago-tucker-carlson-pandemics-entertainment-ap-top-news-2b6d1118e69841ebdfd722fbd99e21e0)

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/ (https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/)

thebalancemoney.com/fundamentals-of-the-2020-market-crash (https://www.thebalancemoney.com/fundamentals-of-the-2020-market-crash-4799950)

Karl Marx explained a dialectic of degenerative socialism between a natural law based capitalism (https://www.britannica.com/topic/animal-social-behaviour/Territoriality) and a big government's legitimized fiction of corporatism.

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch27 (https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch27.htm)

[keehah]

Resources and labour can be productive.

Fiat currency and corporatism are duly processed?

[ziero0]

"Karl Marx explained a dialectic of degenerative socialism between a natural law based capitalism and a big government's legitimized fiction of corporatism."

Marx published his ideas on 1846. He could not have made any observations on any form of capitalism because that word did not materialize until 1854.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/capitalism#etymonline_v_27665

[monty]

Resources and labour can be productive.

Fiat currency and corporatism are duly processed?


https://constitutionalmilitia.org/bills-of-credit-outlawed-by-the-constitution/


As Justice Stephen Field recognized, “For nearly three-quarters of a century after the adoption of the constitution, and until the legislation during the recent civil war, no jurist and no statesman of any position in the country ever pretended that a power to impart the quality of legal tender to its notes was vested in the general government (https://constitutionalmilitia.org/general-government-vs-federal-government/) There is no recorded word of even one in favor of its possessing the power. All conceded, as an axiom of constitutional law, that the power did not exist.”[11]

11. Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884) (J. Field, dissenting opinion) (emphasis supplied).

[keehah]

Thank you for the correction ziero0. Duly processed.

forbes.com/...the-sad-decline-of-the-word-capitalism (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alejandrochafuen/2013/05/01/the-sad-decline-of-the-word-capitalism/?sh=1de1ee7ba712)

In his great treatise, Human Action (http://mises.org/books/humanaction.pdf), Mises recognized that “the system of free enterprise has been dubbed capitalism in order to deprecate and to smear it.” He chose nevertheless to keep the word and redeem it.

Although Karl Marx did not create the word, it was after his work “Das Kapital” (1867) when the term “capitalism” began to be widely used to describe an economic system based on private property as the means of production. Marx remains the great labeler: “capital,” “the capitalist” and “the capitalist system of production” appear repeatedly in his writings.

Ludwig von Mises was never shy about engaging in intellectual battles with the other side on their turf and with their choice of words. He wrote that the concept of capitalism “if it means anything, it means the market economy” and that modern capitalism is “essentially mass production for the needs of the masses.” Audiences view terms such as “a system of free enterprise,” the “market economy,” and “mass production for the needs of the masses,” much more favorably than “capitalism.”...

Scholars from think tanks and the academy made important contributions to refocus the definition of the word and move it beyond the material aspects of economics. Israel Kirzner finds that discovery, or the unforeseen way to create wealth, is the essence of capitalism. The American Enterprise Institute’s Michael Novak finds that the human mind is the treasure and foundation of capitalism. He makes an effort to use as root the Latin word caput, or head. Discovery, innovation, creativity are the essence of capitalism while the private ownership of the means of production provides its environment but not its ends. “The distinctive, defining difference of the capitalist economy is enterprise: the habit of employing human wit to invent new goods and services, and to discover new and better ways to bring them to the broadest possible public,” says Novak.

Unfortunately, Kirzner and Novak are in the minority. Until their arguments crowd out the others, more allies of freedom will avoid the term... Intellectuals seem obliged to use adjectives: “state capitalism” and “crony capitalism” for the bad; “conscious” or “democratic” for the good. The great investor, Sir John Templeton, decades ago began using the term “people’s capitalism” for a system which allows and encourages wide dissemination of property and wealth. That also has power. His son, Dr. Jack Templeton, correctly points out that capitalism was seldom used during the era of the ascendancy of free enterprise ideas from the Founding Fathers through the beginning of the 20th century.
wiktionary.org/wiki/capital (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/capital)

Noun...From Middle English capital, borrowed from Latin capitālis (“of the head”) (in sense “head of cattle”), from caput (“head”) (English cap). Use in trade and finance originated in Medieval economies when a common but expensive transaction involved trading heads of cattle.

Compare chattel and kith and kine (“all one’s possessions”), which also use “cow” to mean “property”.

[ziero0]

Thank you for the correction ziero0. Duly processed.

forbes.com/...the-sad-decline-of-the-word-capitalism (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alejandrochafuen/2013/05/01/the-sad-decline-of-the-word-capitalism/?sh=1de1ee7ba712)

wiktionary.org/wiki/capital (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/capital)

The Hegelian dialect is to create the problem for which you already have a solution designed. The solution isn't a goal without the problem. Pretend that your solution is to drive a Ferrari at 200+ mph on a racetrack. The problem is how to become such a bad ass driver where this is the only solution.

[keehah]

The problem is how to become such a bad ass driver where this is the only solution.

Like a BRICS alliance?

reuters.com/markets/europe/qe-sceptics-fear-fed-is-hole-2023-03-22/ (https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/qe-sceptics-fear-fed-is-hole-2023-03-22/)

FederalReserveBoston: FedNow: Thoughts on the Team

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUkC7hIUFuI
2:13