PDA

View Full Version : The Declaration of Independence: The US CONstitution FLAW



iOWNme
5th April 2010, 07:39 PM
The declaration of Independence is a wonderfully written, well thought out, inspirational piece of human history. Just reading it can give you tingles in your freedom bone. it is eloquent and proper, yet forceful and just.

However, i have come to the conclusion that the founders intentionally subverted the very document they created.

Quoted:


When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,[71] that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.


So we can see here, the founders are listing Despotic forms of Government and Tyranny as the absolute enemy of free men. They go on to list some examples of what Despotism and Tyranny looks like:



He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such disolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
- For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
- For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
- For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
- For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
- For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
- For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
- For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
- For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
- For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

Notice they list the King being able to "suspend our own Legislatures, and declaring himself invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever", as Despotism and Tyranny. Did you get that? Despotism and Tyranny are found when " the power to legislate in all cases whatsoever" is given to the 'King' or 'Government'.

That is why they listed these things to the 'candid world'. When you give the 'power to legislate in all cases whatsoever', there is no Magna Carta, no creator endowed unalienable rights, etc. Whatever the body decides is Law, is Law. That is why they left the King.....


Lets move on to the US CONstitution. Lets see just what powers the founders decided to give to CONgress:

Preamble:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The Preamble does not grant any particular authority to the federal government and it does not prohibit any particular authority. It establishes the fact that the federal government has no authority outside of what follows the preamble, as amended.

Lets move right on into Article 1, Sec 8, where CONgress derives its powers from:



Section 8: The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;

To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;

To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;

To establish post offices and post roads;

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;

To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;

To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;

To provide and maintain a navy;

To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;—And

To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.


Something that we have all read a thousand times. Its right in front of your face:

"The power to legislate in all cases whatsoever."
" The power to lay and collect taxes".

Example: CONgress imposes taxes upon Washington DC, yet Washington DC HAS NO REPRESENTATION. No Senator's. No Congressman. They vote for President, but have no representaion for their taxation. Where does CONgress get the authority to do this.........?

"The power to legislate in all cases whatsoever."

Despotism and Tyranny. Taxes without representation.

jetgraphics
10th April 2010, 05:13 PM
You may be surprised to learn that the U.S. government is a corporation, a foreign corporation, with respect to the States united.

What it does within its own territorial boundaries is FOREIGN to the United States of America.

Congress is sovereign over the District of Columbia, and all Federal territories and possessions.

Only in the States united (*USA), are the people sovereign, guaranteed their republican form of government.

----------
FEDERAL CORPORATIONS - The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.
- - - Volume 19, Corpus Juris Secundum XVIII. Foreign Corporations, Sections 883,884

Who are the "People of the United States", mentioned in the Preamble?


"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do, they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain. . . ."
- - -Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. Mayor and Alderman, City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438,
520 (1854) Supreme Court of Georgia

The private people are not party to the compact, created by the "People of the United States".

Our government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.
Glass vs The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)


Articles of Confederation (1777)

Article I. The Stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America".

Article II. Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

U.S.A. = 50 States united
U.S. = Federal government (foreign corporation)

STATE - The section of territory occupied by one of the United States.
-One of the component commonwealths or states of the United States of America.
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.1407

Washington, D.C. is a STATE of the United States, in Congress assembled.

Your home state is one of the component commonwealths or states of the United States of America.

"The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government and not for the government of the individual States."
- - -John Barron v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 7 Peters 204, (1822).

[Exuberant Expletive Deleted]

Carl
15th April 2010, 10:06 AM
Something that we have all read a thousand times. Its right in front of your face:

"The power to legislate in all cases whatsoever."
" The power to lay and collect taxes".


Despotism and Tyranny. Taxes without representation.


You're misguided on both counts.

You emphasis should be on where they are authorized to "exercise exclusive legislation".

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;

As for the taxes, you have representation in the senate, the house and within you respective states.

If you want to concern yourself with unlawful taxation, then look at all the taxes you'll be paying coming through the Federal Reserve.

Carl
15th April 2010, 10:53 AM
As for taxes and Constitutional original intent: Section 8: The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


As a matter of practical expediency; the power of federal taxation for the raising of public revenue is exercised almost entirely by the levy and collection of duties, imposts, and excises. These are merely different forms of taxes. " Duties and imposts" cover levies on imports and exports of commodities; and the power to levy these, in its discretion, is restricted only by two clauses, the one included in the general provision already quoted that they shall be uniform; and the other in the clause providing that, "No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state" (Art. I, § 9, ¶ 5). In the exercise of the power to levy and collect duties and imposts, import duties are levied which are either (1) specific, that is, in accordance with quantity, or (2) ad valorem, that is, in accordance with value, upon very many classes of goods brought from foreign countries; and from this source a large portion of the revenue of the United States government is derived. The extent to which this taxing power shall be carried, and the methods in which it shall be exercised, are peculiarly within the discretion of Congress, and as the states cannot levy taxes on imports or exports, as already indicated, this is a source of revenue available only to the United States.



They levied taxes on "things" not people.



.

iOWNme
16th April 2010, 05:58 AM
You're misguided on both counts.

You emphasis should be on where they are authorized to "exercise exclusive legislation".

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;

As for the taxes, you have representation in the senate, the house and within you respective states.

If you want to concern yourself with unlawful taxation, then look at all the taxes you'll be paying coming through the Federal Reserve.

So in this line of thinking, the 'power to legislate in all cases whatsoever', isnt a form of tyranny, because of the geographical location of said power? I will have to disagree. Especially again, since they laid out what tyranny was in the Dec.

I was merely pointing out, that the founders described to a candid world what the definition of tyranny is. They then proceeded to give the exact same power to the CONgress. How can there be a BOR, or US CON, when the CONgress can 'exercise the power to legislate in all cases whatsover'?

Yes, i know i have representation. And the people of the District? Where are their CONgressman?

Carl
16th April 2010, 10:34 AM
So in this line of thinking, the 'power to legislate in all cases whatsoever', isnt a form of tyranny, because of the geographical location of said power? I will have to disagree. Especially again, since they laid out what tyranny was in the Dec.
No, the "geographical location of said power" is totally irrelevant to the subject at hand.

The constitution clearly delineates exactly where their authority to legislate is exercisable and establishes clear limits to the subject matter under their purview.


Tyranny arises when they violate their constitutional limits and proceed to legislate freestyle.


.

iOWNme
17th April 2010, 07:04 AM
Tyranny arises when they violate their constitutional limits and proceed to legislate freestyle.
.

Which is exactly what they do!

But the Declaration of Independence says Tyranny is defined as 'The powers to legislate in all cases whatsoever'. (No Magna, No Articles, No US CON- ALL CASES WHATSOEVER) Sounds like Tyranny to me....

And to think they chose to use the exact same words, as they used to describe to the candid world, what Tyranny and Despotism looks like.

Carl
17th April 2010, 07:58 AM
But the Declaration of Independence says Tyranny is defined as 'The powers to legislate in all cases whatsoever'. (No Magna, No Articles, No US CON- ALL CASES WHATSOEVER) Sounds like Tyranny to me....

And to think they chose to use the exact same words, as they used to describe to the candid world, what Tyranny and Despotism looks like.

If you desire to continue to misconstrue what you read in order to make your point, in spite of the clarification provided, then I guess we've reached an impasse on this topic.

.

iOWNme
17th April 2010, 08:06 AM
But the Declaration of Independence says Tyranny is defined as 'The powers to legislate in all cases whatsoever'. (No Magna, No Articles, No US CON- ALL CASES WHATSOEVER) Sounds like Tyranny to me....

And to think they chose to use the exact same words, as they used to describe to the candid world, what Tyranny and Despotism looks like.

If you desire to continue to misconstrue what you read in order to make your point, in spite of the clarification provided, then I guess we've reached an impasse on this topic.

.


How am i the one who has misconstrued? I am only reading the words they wrote. No secrets. No analyzing. No hidden meanings, etc. Its right in front of us. Whether you agree or not, you cannot deny the exact phrases were used, and the Founders werent exactly uneducated men.

Clarification provided? As if you Carl, have the exact answer here? Really? This is a discussion based on events that took place hundreds of years ago. And you have somehow obtained the undivided truth in this matter? Honestly, we both just have opinions on it, neither of us have the almighty answer here.

I like discussing things with you, as we seem to have different viewpoints. If i only read and responded to things i agreed with, how would i continue to grow and learn? The answer is i couldnt. We all constantly need to have our views challenged, and questioned. It keeps us thinking and on our toes.

PEACE

Carl
17th April 2010, 11:19 AM
How am i the one who has misconstrued? I am only reading the words they wrote. No secrets. No analyzing. No hidden meanings, etc. Its right in front of us. Whether you agree or not, you cannot deny the exact phrases were used, and the Founders werent exactly uneducated men. CONTEXT IS EVERYTHING.

When you omit context, you can construe any group of words to mean anything you desire, to any end you desire.

The context for the words in question was there for you to read and I even pointed it out to you. Yet, you continue to chose to ignore it and continue to insist that your out of context representation of the words in question is indeed correct.

What can I say? You're entitled to cling to your opinion, even when it has been proven to be based upon a mischaracterization of the text in question.