PDA

View Full Version : Occupied Washington DC



MarketNeutral
10th April 2010, 02:49 PM
As a visitor to our nation's capital, I cannot tell you how disconcerting it is to step off the metro and find yourself face to face with a F-35 fighter jet. Where you would normally expect to find ads for cell phones or museum exhibitions, Washington's subway, the second busiest in the country, instead displays full color backlit billboards for some of the most deadly – and expensive – weapons systems ever produced.



The ads for such companies as Lockheed Martin, the world's largest weapons producer, Goodrich, KBR, AGI, BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman can be found in many of the metro stations in the Washington metropolitan area. Not surprisingly, the heaviest concentration is at Pentagon City and near government offices at the Federal Center and Capitol South stations. Undoubtedly, the ads aim to influence key decision-makers, but they also serve the purpose of selling to the general public the concept that only our superior military prowess can protect us from a hostile world.



The billboards range from explicit ads for attack helicopters and combat vehicles to more subtle billboards for companies such as little-known DRS, owned by Italian weapons maker Finmeccanica and 26th among the top 100 Pentagon contractors, or for "rugged" Dell computers designed to meet Defense Department specifications for military-use.



Far from subtle is Northrop Grumman's marketing approach in the Capitol South metro station, the closest to Congress. In an all out assault on the visual senses, the station has been literally festooned by the country's third largest military contractor. Apparently considering the usual ad space along the tracks to be insufficient, Northrop Grumman ads can also be found on all four sides of columns installed near the turnstiles, on banners strung up along the railings upstairs and even on the floor just before the escalators. CBS Outdoor, responsible for the ad space in DC metro stations, claims that "Capitol Hill Station Domination is an impactful way to get your message in front of the Congress and decision-makers in DC."



An estimated 17,000 Capitol South metro passengers are confronted daily with Northrop Grumman Global Hawks and X-47 Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles, which boast a 4500-pound weapons bay, E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes, Viper Strike-armed Fire Scout unmanned helicopters and E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar Systems (STARS), all designed "for an unsafe world." According to the centrist Brookings Institute, 90% of drone casualties in "targeted" strikes in Pakistan have been innocent civilians. Yet ads for these systems, which carry price tags ranging hundreds of millions of dollars when factoring in development costs, are on full display.



Perhaps most startling of all the Capitol South billboards is the ominous scene of a bombed out apartment building above the slogan "By the time you find the threat, we've already taken it out of the picture." Northrop Grumman fails to fill us in on what happened to the people living in those apartments.



Following the trend of major defense companies wishing to cozy up to powerbrokers in Congress and at the Pentagon, Northrop Grumman recently announced plans to relocate its California headquarters to the DC area. Officials from Washington, Virginia and Maryland have been falling over themselves trying to influence the decision of the $34 billion company. The District of Columbia has gone as far as offering a $25 billion incentive package for what Northrop Grumman estimates to be a measly 300 jobs, which will be filled primarily by company executives moving from Los Angeles!



The defense contractor presence on the DC metro is but one example of the ubiquitous signs of militarism in Washington. Standing out like sore thumbs, military personnel dressed in camouflage can be seen everywhere from the food court at the shopping mall to the line at the bank. Combat fatigues were ordered everyday wear for all service members, including those with desk jobs, following the September 11, 2001 attacks. I asked several camouflaged service members the reason behind the combat uniforms and all sheepishly replied that is was in support of the "troops in the field." One woman told me, "That's a good question. You feel kind of funny wearing this." Looking down at her desert boots, she said, "It's not exactly office wear." But it is a clear and constant reminder that the nation continues to be on a war footing.



Signs calling for support of the troops can be found on everything from restaurant walls to dump trucks. Cheering on the "troops in the field" is also the Liberty gas station on Columbia Pike in Arlington. Directly above the gas pumps is a red, white and blue sign that reads "Support Our Troops." This is either the result of disturbingly twisted logic or an astonishingly candid call for protecting U.S. access to Middle East oil reserves.



Walking the halls of Congress, you will find memorials at the offices of many representative and senators for the fallen troops from their district or state. What you will not find are any memorials for the 2,200 veterans who died in 2008 as a result of a lack of health insurance.



At Union Station, Amtrak passengers should not be surprised if a soldier or two cut in line. Signs in the station invite uniformed military personnel to skip to the head of the ticket line. According to Amtrak, which is the only Department of Defense approved rail passenger carrier in the US, it is a way for the company to "extend their thanks." That's all and good but why wouldn't Amtrak want to do the same for teachers, healthcare professionals, firefighters, librarians or non-profit volunteers?



Much of this is not necessarily new; the militarization of our society has been progressing for decades, permeating our schools, research and development programs, law enforcement and culture. And despite the heavy concentration in Washington DC, the phenomenon is certainly not limited to the nation's capital. The signs of militarism in our country are ever-present to the point of becoming virtually invisible, while subconsciously persuading us to accept violence and war as not only a suitable solution to conflict, but the only one.



The fighter jets and missile-firing drones are anything but invisible to the people in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Let's rebel against their apparent "normalcy" here in the US. As a start, contact Dan Langdon, CBS Outdoor's Vice President and Regional Manager letting him know that ads for deadly weapons systems have no place on the DC metro, or anywhere else for that matter!
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/04/10-1

iOWNme
10th April 2010, 04:56 PM
" This is a message from the Ministry of Propaganda: "

War is Peace

Freedom is Slavery

Ignorance is Strength

Use Doublethink

Listen to Newspeak

Bow to Thought Police

Heimdhal
10th April 2010, 06:09 PM
Fascism on its face, socialism at its core, and an international oligarchy at the helm.

Welcome to the American Faciligarchy.

jetgraphics
10th April 2010, 06:37 PM
Fascism on its face, socialism at its core, and an international oligarchy at the helm.

Welcome to the American Faciligarchy.

I see your point that you are trying to make, but you are greatly mistaken about Fascism.

What is FASCISM?

FASCISM - any political or social ideology of the extreme right which relies on a combination of pseudo-religious attitudes and the brutal use of force for getting and keeping power.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

The major characteristics of "Fascism" :

* EXTREME RIGHT
* PSEUDO-RELIGIOUS
* BRUTAL

Let's consider the wing with which people are associated with, when speaking of political partisanship.

LEFT WING - the section of a political party, government or group that holds the most left or radical views.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

RIGHT WING - the section of a political party, government or group that holding the views of the Right.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

THE RIGHT - that section of a political party ... which associates itself with traditional authority or opinion and which in legislative bodies is seated traditionally to the right of the presiding officer.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

THE LEFT - that section of a political party ... which differs most from traditional authority or opinion and which in legislative bodies is seated traditionally to the left of the presiding officer.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

Is that clear?
Left = opposition to traditional authority
Right = support of traditional authority

True "Fascism" would have to be in support of "traditional" authority, using brutality and pseudo-religious behavior.

So what clue leads us to know what "traditional authority or opinion" is?

Amendment V, US Constitution 1789
... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

What is AGAINST traditional authority or opinion?

From the Communist manifesto:

"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."

Most Americans would be surprised to learn that private property rights were abolished by voluntary enrollment into national socialism (aka Socialist InSecurity),starting in 1935.

PRIVATE PROPERTY - "As protected from being taken for public uses, is such property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive right of disposition. Property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of being in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and chattels."
- - - Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p.1217

If the government takes your property for public use - and does not pay just compensation - then you have absolute proof that you do not own private property anymore.

In case you were curious, there is NO LAW that requires all Americans to participate in Socialist InSecurity, nor is there any law that punishes an American who does not participate. It is 100% voluntary - voluntary servitude - legal slavery to the collective STATE.

(BTW - no communist nation achieved true communism. All admit that they have only reached SOCIALISM...)

COMMUNISM - the ownership of property, or means of production, distribution and supply, by the whole of a classless society, with wealth shared on the principle of 'to each according to his need', each yielding fully 'according to his ability'.
- - - Webster's Dictionary.

SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary

Socialism and its cousin, communism, are diametrically opposed to absolute ownership by individuals. They will only tolerate qualified ownership, shared with the State, and you know who has the superior claim... Just stop paying your socialist taxes and watch how fast your property (and your liberty) is taken from you.

Therefore, based on the evidence presented here, the military presence described as "Fascist" is actually part of the LEFT WING COLLECTIVIST POLICE STATE initiated in 1935, after the bankruptcy and capitulation of the U.S. Congress in 1933.

Socialism = slavery (compulsory labor for the benefit of another)
Socialism = thievery (taking your property for the benefit of another)

The usurer / socialist alliance has ruled us for three generations.
And the world's greatest propaganda ministry has insured that NO ONE HAS A CLUE TO THE TRUE NATURE OF IT.

Heimdhal
10th April 2010, 09:56 PM
Appreciate the posts, Jet.

Fascism is grossly misinterpreted as being on the far right. It is not. Broken down simply it combines rampant nationalism, massive corproate power portected by an even more massive arsenal controlled by the government (MIC). It is consolidated into a totalitarian, directive central government, generaly funded by a psuedo-private monetary system controlling the economy. This is based on historical observations, not only the classic "fascism" thought to have been begun by Mussolini.

All of these things combined place it right next to socialism on the FAR LEFT of the political spectrum. Anarchy is on the far right, as it is classicaly the absence of a state, or unified state.

I went a little more into detail about it the other day in another thread here: http://gold-silver.us/forum/index.php?topic=978.msg10765#msg10765

This sums it up:

Totalitarianism(left)<--------------*-----------------------Centrist------------------------------------------->Anarchy(right)

There is little reason intodays restructering of the political landscape that Fascism and Socialism cannot be, or have not been, modified into a singular entity consisting of key points from both. This of course is progressed and developed by a semi-esoteric group of international affiliations. Thus, the lose term of Fasciligarchy. A fascistic-socialist oligarchy. Do all of the terms fit perfect, nope, but there exists elements of everyone in our current system.

Political Science has been forever changed in this new millenium, history can show us where we are going, but what we name it is genearl irrelevent.

Horn
10th April 2010, 10:18 PM
Undoubtedly, the ads aim to influence key decision-makers, but they also serve the purpose of selling to the general public the concept that only our superior military prowess can protect us from a hostile world.

Or justifies our placement in the pecking order

jetgraphics
10th April 2010, 10:40 PM
Curious fact - both Hitler and Mussolini were SOCIALISTS, that clothed themselves with the FASCIST label. Because Fascism is actually the opposite of where they were going. And as good deceivers, they chose a name to befuddle their adversaries.

The original meaning of the fasces, the bundle of sticks with the axe attached, was to instruct Roman youth. A single stick was easily broken, but as more and more sticks were added, the bundle became strong. Thus Romans might be weak, individually, but united, they were awesome - and powerful - as the axe symbolized.

The point is - cooperation in defense of property rights is GOOD. But cooperation in the attack upon property rights is BAD.

In retrospect, Hitler and Mussolini united their respective peoples to attack other nations and take their property, thus were socialist pirates (left wing), and not Fascists (right wing).

jetgraphics
10th April 2010, 11:02 PM
Sidenote on the "left - right" spectrum chart.

In the Republican form of government, unique to America, the sovereign people ARE the law. Therefore, there is no ANARCHY unless there are no sovereign people.

"GOVERNMENT (Republican Government)- One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, P. 695


Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.
Yick Wo vs Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)

Sovereignty is exercised over one's private property, absolutely owned. That is why "voluntary" national socialism gutted all the protections from the American people. Without individual sovereignty, there is no natural and personal liberty. The government can restrict, regulate and punish behavior without an injured party, whose person or property was injured by the behavior.

The property right spectrum :
LEFT (pirates) ------------------------------ (private property owners) RIGHT
(Collectivists, usurers, parasites) versus (America)

Private property owners in America are sovereign, capable of using deadly force without benefit of trial, when defending their private property.

"Private property - NO TRESPASSING - Trespassers will be shot!"

(Now you know why socialist Americans can no longer arbitrarily use deadly force against trespass)

Gypsybiker45
11th April 2010, 04:27 AM
Sidenote on the "left - right" spectrum chart.

In the Republican form of government, unique to America, the sovereign people ARE the law. Therefore, there is no ANARCHY unless there are no sovereign people.

"GOVERNMENT (Republican Government)- One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, P. 695


Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.
Yick Wo vs Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)

Sovereignty is exercised over one's private property, absolutely owned. That is why "voluntary" national socialism gutted all the protections from the American people. Without individual sovereignty, there is no natural and personal liberty. The government can restrict, regulate and punish behavior without an injured party, whose person or property was injured by the behavior.

The property right spectrum :
LEFT (pirates) ------------------------------ (private property owners) RIGHT
(Collectivists, usurers, parasites) versus (America)

Private property owners in America are sovereign, capable of using deadly force without benefit of trial, when defending their private property.

"Private property - NO TRESPASSING - Trespassers will be shot!"

(Now you know why socialist Americans can no longer arbitrarily use deadly force against trespass)



Define trespass, I know of no specific case EVER where someone was LEGALLY killed for wandering onto someone elses property. Trespass can be intentional, accidental,or invasive. If i had a cow that wanderd onto your land, is it now your cow?or can i retrieve it? you may sue for damages, but i can still get my property back.

keehah
11th April 2010, 11:22 AM
I think we can all agree on authoritarian.
That said, as an example of the general trend, Obama's 'National Health Care' and structues like the Fed, are about private companies control (within a government structure), so I'd say both US political parties (and much of the west's parties) are fascist.
http://www.stageleft.info/blog-images/stageleft-political-compass.gif
One can easily see the big gap in political choice that politicians like Ron Paul fill.

Horn
11th April 2010, 12:10 PM
I think we can all agree on authoritarian.


Now we have to associate the political poles with Earth's own magnetic, and apply hypothesis for reversal.

Hellooooo Houston......... ;D

jetgraphics
11th April 2010, 03:57 PM
Private property owners in America are sovereign, capable of using deadly force without benefit of trial, when defending their private property.

"Private property - NO TRESPASSING - Trespassers will be shot!"

(Now you know why socialist Americans can no longer arbitrarily use deadly force against trespass)



Define trespass, I know of no specific case EVER where someone was LEGALLY killed for wandering onto someone elses property. Trespass can be intentional, accidental,or invasive. If i had a cow that wanderd onto your land, is it now your cow?or can i retrieve it? you may sue for damages, but i can still get my property back.

Retrieving livestock that has trespassed, without permission, is not an excuse for trespass. Two wrongs do not make a right. The livestock owner would need the land owner's permission to retrieve the errant livestock.

"Good fences make good neighbors."

TRESPASS - An unlawful interference with one's person, property, or rights.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.1502

TRESPASSER - One who has committed trespass. One who intentionally and without consent or privilege enters another's property.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.1504

BREACH OF CLOSE - The unlawful or unwarrantable entry on another person's soil, land or close.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p. 188

CLOSE - A portion of land, as a field, inclosed as by a hedge, fence, or other visible inclosure, or by an invisible ideal boundary founded on limit of title.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.254

SELF DEFENSE - The protection of one's person or property against some injury attempted by another. The right of such protection. An excuse for the use of force in resisting an attack on the person.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p. 1359

Defending one's person, property, or rights from trespass (and breach of the close) has been part of the law (common and statutory). However, those who have surrendered absolute ownership may lack the legal standing to use deadly force in the defense of estate.

Massuh doesn't like slaves killing slaves. A dead slave is worthless.

I am me, I am free
11th April 2010, 04:11 PM
Defending one's person, property, or rights from trespass (and breach of the close) has been part of the law (common and statutory). However, those who have surrendered absolute ownership may lack the legal standing to use deadly force in the defense of estate.


Also embodied in Hague V:

CONVENTION RESPECTING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS AND PERSONS IN CASE OF WAR ON LAND

...

CHAPTER I The Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers
Article 1.

The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable.

...

Art. 10.

The fact of a neutral Power resisting, even by force, attempts to violate its neutrality cannot be regarded as a hostile act.

dysgenic
11th April 2010, 04:20 PM
You can call it whatever you want, it's oppression.

jetgraphics
11th April 2010, 04:25 PM
I think we can all agree on authoritarian.

One can easily see the big gap in political choice that politicians like Ron Paul fill.


The problem with such simplifications, is that they actually support the propaganda ministry's confusion about the American form of government.

1. To the best of my knowledge, no other nation on this planet has a republican form, where the people are sovereign until they surrender that endowment.
2. The left / right paradigm only applies to the democracy, not the republican form.
3. Even the Libertarian Party Platform http://www.lp.org/platform is not cognizant of the republican form.

No political action, legislation or reform is needed to enjoy the blessings of liberty under the republican form of government.
I have yet to find one law that trespasses upon the natural and personal liberties of the free inhabitant, American national, domiciled upon his private property within the boundaries of the USA.

HOWEVER, there are reams and reams of laws, rules, regulations, punishments for those "persons" who have surrendered their birthright of sovereignty, freedom and independence.

It is futile to compare socialist America with socialist Europe or with the goals of the Libertarian party - a partisan political organization.

The most effective solution only requires the majority of Americans to stop volunteering. And that choice is missing from the "spectrum" charts of the pundits.


both US political parties (and much of the west's parties) are fascist
NO. They are left wing socialists.
see: http://gold-silver.us/forum/index.php?topic=1611.msg14705#msg14705