PDA

View Full Version : Adrian Salbuchi's call for a new Republic



Bigjon
12th April 2010, 09:34 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu1fNYt5cno&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NXJeGM1kLM&feature=related

jetgraphics
13th April 2010, 12:16 AM
It starts out well.

Bigosh... He's got it, methinks!

"Power elite" = predators = collectivists / usurers / parasites

Socialist pirates = slavers and thieves

Money (madness) insures compliance

Fight back?
Personal sovereignty... he says.
Okay, go on.

But "they" only have power because we consented to it... didn't we sign up for all those goodies?
We surrendered to the bankers and their allies, the socialist pirates, and their parasitic supporters, who benefit from government sponsored thievery.

He suggests:
1) Open your eyes and ears...
2) Stay Alert...!
3) See the world around you as it really is..
4) Use your common sense ... think with your own mind.
5) Stay calm...
6) Act diligently
7) Be optimistic
8) Alert family, friends, colleagues,
9) Defend your values
10) Defend your property

The Powers that Be:
[] collaborate or
[] resist

How the system works?
[your consent]

How to resist?
[withdraw your consent]

His remedy:
A new republic!

His call to Second Republic won't go over well with the British Commonwealth, under Queen Elizabeth II. Or any other monarch, for that matter.
Ditto for any democracy, where the people are subject citizens of the sovereign government; or the republican form of government in the United States of America.

He suggests:
Public control over money (okay - who "creates" money?)

End Fractional Reserve banking and usury
- - - GOOD!

Abolish the public debt - good.

He's off point with respect to American law, but he sounds sincere.

Democracy? We don't want no stinkin' democracy. We want the REPUBLICAN FORM, where the people are the sovereigns, and the government people are the servants - below the people.

OH OH - - - he advocates political "leadership", top down direction - by HIS rules.
Now, he's going off the reservation.

You can't be "in" the ship of state, and be "out" of the ship of state.
Entering into democracy, submerges the sovereignty of the individual, into submission to the majority will.

Sigh... Just when I thought he was going to hit all the right points.

You can't "fight the power" by climbing into the Ship of State. If you oppose it, you're a mutineer. You have to leave the sinking ship of state.
In America, that's not easy - but at least the law supports it.
In the rest of the world?
No expletive deleted way - except revolution - a nasty recipe.

The bottom line: don't go in the direction where he points.