PDA

View Full Version : Urban hydroponic window gardens



Ironfield
13th April 2010, 11:46 PM
An interesting concept I stumbled across from another poster on one of the forums I frequent daily. It introduced me to the concept of urban hydroponic gardens, setup next to windows within their apartments. I thought I’d share the link with everyone here and see what your opinion was on the concept.

About the organization:
The Windowfarms project broaches both immediate urban agriculture goals as well as a far-sighted shift in attitudes toward the green revolution. We are both starting a windowfarming craze in cities worldwide and hoping to accelerate the pace of sustainable design by having ordinary citizens think of themselves as innovators.

The Project was started by artists Britta Riley and Rebecca Bray in February, 2009 through an artist's residency at Eyebeam Art and Technology Center in New York and sponsorship by Submersible Design, Riley and Bray's interactive design firm. Riley continues to drive the project at Eyebeam with a team of volunteers and the participation of hundreds of windowfarmers worldwide.
Windowfarms: Growing Food Year-Round in Inner City Buildings

Researchers have argued that to grow some of his own food is the most effective action an individual can take for environment, not only because of the food industry’s heavy carbon footprint but also because participating in agricultural production cultivates a valuable skill set around sustainability issues.

Many neighborhoods (particularly low income ones) in cities aroun the world are considered food deserts, meaning little fresh food is easily accessible. Residents tend to consume processed, packaged, and canned food having depleated nutrients.
Few other projects provide opportunities for such direct personal involvement, make this productive use of existing construction, or so directly target urban dwellers estranged from agricultural issues.

Inner city dwellers can grow their own food in their apartment or office windows throughout the year by means of these elegant, inexpensive, vertical, hydroponic vegetable gardens made from recycled materials or items available at the local hardware store. The first system produced 25 plants and a salad a week in mid winter in a dimly lit 4’ x 6’ NYC window.
R&D-I-Y: Mass Collaboration to Solve Environmental Problems

The ultimate aim of the Windowfarms project, however, is not to create a perfected physical object or product. Rather, the most highly valued result is a rewarding experience with crowsdsourced innovation. We are interested in the participants’ experience as they design for their own microenvironments, share ideas, rediscover the power of their own capacity to innovate, and witness themselves playing an active role in the green revolution.

The windowfarms project approaches environmental innovation through web 2.0 crowdsourcing and a method called R&D-I-Y (research and develop it yourself). Big Science’s R&D industry is not always free to take the most expedient environmental approach. It must assume that consumers will not make big changes. Its organizational structure tends toward infrastructure-heavy mass solutions. A distributed network of individuals sharing information can implement a wide variety of designs that accommodate specific local needs and implement them locally. Ordinary people can bring about innovative green ideas and popularize them quickly. Web theorists claim that this capacity to “organize without hierarchical organization” will be a fundamental shift in our society brought about by the web over the coming decades.
After only 7 months and only $5000 in funding the project has already been widely acclaimed and supported with features in Grist, Art in America, Wired Blog, Ready Made magazine, prominent food blogs, and upcoming documentary films. Hundreds of thousands of hits have come in to the site from IP addresses workdwide. The participating public has submitted 29 unique viable design improvements.

Further reading (http://www.windowfarms.org/)

-Ironfield

Saul Mine
14th April 2010, 12:35 AM
It must assume that consumers will not make big changes. Its organizational structure tends toward infrastructure-heavy mass solutions.

That is because it takes a flood of money to develop something not already on the market. For example, a small hydroponic unit likely needs a low volume pump with a lift of a few feet. Try and find one. It's easy to find small ($20 - $50) fountain pumps with a lift of a few inches, not adequate for the job, and the only other models in the same price range are general purpose models for emptying ponds and watering lawns. I tried something like that idea a few years ago. A local hydroponic store offered a window sized unit for $800. I spent about $200 trying to do it myself and then dropped the project.

Any manufacturer faces the same problems of supply, selection, and price/volume.