PDA

View Full Version : "Anonymous Sources"



Book
17th April 2010, 08:45 PM
"Anonymous Sources"

"Secret three-page Memorandum"

"Several officials said the highly classified analysis..."

"Officials familiar with the memo’s contents would describe only portions dealing with strategy and policy, and not sections that apparently dealt with secret operations..."

"One senior official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the memo, described the document as..."

"According to several officials, the memorandum also calls for..."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/world/middleeast/18iran.html?src=mv

New York Times ever print a real story calling for the real inspection of ISRAEL'S real nuke weapons factory?

hoarder
17th April 2010, 09:02 PM
Yet what the Njew York Times says is taken as fact, and anyone who suggests an alternate view of reality is ridiculed and expected to produce 10 times as much proof as the NYT.

Media is a position of AUTHORITY.

jedemdasseine
17th April 2010, 09:18 PM
If white men were not complaining, it would be an indication we weren't succeeding and making the inroads that we are.

-Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., owner, The New York Times

Ponce
17th April 2010, 09:35 PM
When you know who owns and runs the news then you will know what is really going on......

"They only tell us what they want us to know, or what they cannot longer control" ... Ponce

Book
17th April 2010, 09:45 PM
"Officials familiar with the memo's contents described only portions dealing with strategy and policy and not sections that apparently dealt with secret operations against Iran, or how to deal with Persian Gulf allies, The Times said".

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE63H01V20100418?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews


Now Reuters is printing their story using the Times as their source.

Americans will now think it is a real story with real sources...lol.

:oo-->

JDRock
18th April 2010, 06:55 AM
....bump. If you are tempted to believe that media ownership is not the single most important conspiracy subject, then tell me....what would happen if ALL the media told ALL the truth for just 24 hours??

mick silver
18th April 2010, 07:10 AM
if they told the truth just maybe we could fix what been done to our country

Hermie
18th April 2010, 08:50 AM
....bump. If you are tempted to believe that media ownership is not the single most important conspiracy subject, then tell me....what would happen if ALL the media told ALL the truth for just 24 hours??


Total control of the media most Americans get information from is the key element.
Your decisions are only as good as your information.

They broke up the Telephone company, why not Big Media?

And just imagine the reaction if say, Koreans owned 96% of all publishing and TV, radio and movies.

But somehow it is just perfectly normal for a small group with a radical theology/ideology, (compared to the USA's Christian-based culture) to be in control of what is seen and heard and NOT seen and heard.

I think the total control of the country's media should be the topic that is constantly talked about.
Everyday. Everywhere, to everyone.

Book
18th April 2010, 09:19 AM
...But somehow it is just perfectly normal for a small group with a radical theology/ideology, (compared to the USA's Christian-based culture) to be in control of what is seen and heard and NOT seen and heard.

I think the total control of the country's media should be the topic that is constantly talked about.
Everyday. Everywhere, to everyone.


Good idea to share this thread with all our ignorant family and neighbors and friends and co-workers who think we are nuts. They have no clue because they get all their information from our Jew-controlled mass media. This one single manufactured "news story" based upon New York Times anonymous sources then thereafter re-sold by other Jew-controlled mass media "quoting" only this New York Times manufactured story as their source is a glaring example of how this works.

The rest of the world outside America knows and sees reality:

Hatha Sunahara
18th April 2010, 10:09 AM
Isn't this how the media in the former Soviet Union worked?

I have heard stories about how, slowly, the Soviet citizens learned how to 'read between the lines', and to analyze the news by what's NOT there as much as by what's there. Or was that just the Intelligentsia that survived the various dictators?

Eventually people catch on to massive fraud--like the ones that are used to launch wars. Once a critical mass catch on, the fraud is over, and the fraudsters have to give up their power.

We'll know when that happens when the NYT or other big media folds.


Hatha

jedemdasseine
18th April 2010, 06:17 PM
http://radioislam.org/islam/roligt/ks04.jpg

Nordmann
18th April 2010, 06:24 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPpEQuatcTU