PDA

View Full Version : Depleted uranium is destroying life



Serpo
18th April 2010, 07:57 PM
If Obama was for real he would ban this cr@p........I know I would


Depleted uranium is destroying life

*http://www.infowars.com/depleted-uranium-is-destroying-life/


Jerry Mazza
Infowars.com
April 15, 2010

I have long heard sound-bites or seen passages about depleted uranium that sounded more than dire. But given my own cognitive dissonance, and the fact that I was writing about many other dire topics at the time, I filed depleted uranium in my cranium for future investigation, which, given the human aversion to bad news, could have been never.

But never was over in an exchange of emails about nuclear missiles in Israel’s arsenal. I received some startling nuclear information from San Francisco Bay View writer, Bob Nichols. It was an illumination long-time coming.

I started at the end of Bob’s article to find out who he was. His credits read “Bob Nichols is a Project Censored Award winning writer and a San Francisco Bay View correspondent. A former bomb maker in a U.S. government factory in rural Oklahoma, he reports on the two nuclear weapons labs in the Bay Area. He can be reached at duweapons@gmail.com.” His credentials were impressive and so was the article he sent, PTSD, infertility and other consequences of war.

In several, follow-up phone calls, Bob, in his gentle, mid-western drawl, filled me in on the picture of the imposing disasters caused by depleted uranium in Central Asia and in the Mid-East, in which hundreds of thousands of tons of depleted uranium had been dropped in the past 20 years.

Bob pointed out that San Francisco itself was receiving fallout from the Berkeley National [Nuclear Weapons] Lab, and from the Livermore Laboratory in the South Bay area, managed by San Francisco-based Bechtel, a nuclear-capable corporation, boosted by San Francisco’s “Nuclear Nancy’ Pelosi and her friends at Bechtel” as Bob commented. The University of California at Berkeley now earns more from weapons than from students.

The San Francisco facilities have been part of the Manhattan Project, operating from pre-1945, contributing a dangerous amount of radiation to the area with weapons testing and leakages of material into the Bay. It was for this reason, Nichols told me, that he still lives in Oklahoma, though he has a real love affair with San Francisco. Yet he fears for its human and natural safety due to poisoning by the nuclear projects.

In fact, he bemoaned the occasion of “Fleet Week,” “the happy boys sent off to war by Mayor Gavin Newsom’s Fleet Week – an event responsible for a big chunk of the enlistments in the US Navy and marines – who will probably come in deadly contact with another Bay Area product: depleted uranium, aka DU, and weaponized ceramic uranium oxide gas and aerosols, UO.”

As he wrote, “Iraq and virtually all the rest of the Middle East and Central Asia have been continually dosed for almost 20 years with thousands of tons of weaponized ceramic uranium oxide gas, also known as depleted uranium.

“When used as directed, the depleted uranium bullets, shells and bombs become a lethal uranium gas or aerosol. The poison uranium oxide gas aerosols last for billions of years and never stop indiscriminately maiming and killing, which is a war crime in itself.”

That was shocking to hear. So I did a bit of research to corroborate Bob’s claims and came upon a number of YouTube pieces, one particularly powerful ten-minute piece called Depleted Uranium – The Ultimate Dirty Bomb.

It features Dr. Doug Rokke, US Army Health Physicist and Nuclear Medicine Sciences Officer, as well as the internationally known Geological Scientist and International Radiation Expert Leuren Moret. Please take ten minutes to listen to it.

Dr. Rokke explains that as far back as 1973 [the Yom Kippur War], radioactive materials carpeted Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. He mentions too that DU radioactive contamination makes food and water unusable. He explains how the huge jolts of electrical energy in a small amount of depleted uranium can destroy human cells.


*

Most notably, Dr. Rooke estimates that from October/November 1991 in Gulf War 1, 160,000 US soldiers were permanently disabled by US use of some 340 tons of depleted uranium. Ten years later that number had climbed to 221,000 and left 10,000 dead. Dr. Rooke, a victim himself of the lack of proper post-battle examinations for DU poisoning, spoke with a tempered but deliberate anger and frustration at the damage done to all, including civilian populations, combatants, and himself.

Lauren Moret pointed out that as far back as 1943 depleted uranium usage, aka “poison gas warfare” was encouraged in a government memo shown on screen. She also tells us that the UN Human Rights Commission declared depleted uranium as illegal. The ultimate irony she points out is that in 2003 we attacked Iraq and Saddam Hussein for possessing Weapons of Mass Destruction, which turned out not to be true. Yet when we attacked Iraq in 2003, we dropped between 1000 to 2000 tons of depleted uranium, a known Weapon of Mass Nuclear Destruction in a three-week period. This is a war crime unto itself.

This all jibed with Bob Nichol’s writings, especially the fact that the damage of depleted uranium is forever, lasting billions of years in the atmosphere, the earth and water, as it lasts on clothing, the skin, the human body, destroying vital organs, causing birth defects of all kinds, cancers, infertility, damage to the bones, brains, testicles and ovaries, which applies to civilians and animals as well.

As Nichols writes, “Uranium munitions, containing weaponized uranium oxide gas and aerosols, are used by presidential order in US war zones. Privates and corporals do not decide to use these poisonous uranium gas weapons on their own. No, that order comes from the American president.”

“Uranium oxide gas weapons are called ‘genocidal weapons.’ They maim and kill millions of people, their animals and their land. The actual targets by the US Expeditionary Forces are the populations of Central Asia and the Middle East, about a billion people.” Remember that US forces themselves are the victims as well of these weapons, the worst imaginable blowback.

In fact, Nichols points us towards a “Middle Eastern country that requires all 18-year olds to join national service for several years. This country even has a roughly comparable health care system to America for a population of 7,233,701, according to the CIA World Factbook. This country is Israel.”

Bob sent along an article from the noted Israeli paper, Haaretz, dated 3/21/2010: Study: Quality of Israeli sperm down 40% in past decade. Bob claimed the number was fudged somewhat because from 2004-2008 there was a 10 million sperm a year drop-off. Taken to 2015, all of the nation would be infertile. The motility of the tested sperm also indicated a drop-off. These samples were taken from healthy young people who do not smoke.

“In Israel, too,” Haaretz writes, a study was published about a year ago, showing an increase of about 30 percent in defects in the male reproductive system. In addition, in the past decade, the number of cases of testicular cancer has doubled.”

Haaretz goes on to attribute the sperm drop to “chemicals in the ground and in drinking water…as impacting hormone levels and secondary sexual characteristics.” The paragraph concludes with “Studies published in Britain have highlighted a clear connection between continual decline in sperm counts and chemicals in the environment.”

In the next to last paragraph of Bob Nichols’ article, he writes of the Israeli situation, “Since 20 percent live sperm is considered to be the beginning of infertility, Israel will be sterile in less than 10 years at this rate of decline. The estimated 7 million Israeli Jews will have no more children after that. This catastrophic development has already occasioned legislative hearings in Israel’s Knesset… Israeli sperm concentration is just an example of what is happening to human sperm all over the Middle East and Central Asia, by the choice and force of will of successive US presidents.”

The 800-pound gorilla in the room here is that young people tested (both men and women) are performing in the Israeli Defense Forces, and face massive amounts of depleted uranium in the US manufactured weaponry being used in the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians. The land, animals, and those involved in the conflict on both sides must be, by definition, poisoned by these toxic weapons of nuclear destruction. That’s the real story. The Israelis have performed a service in a way just by conducting a bona fide scientific analysis of the situation.

In nearby Iraq, three-headed babies are turning up and a virtual Pandora’s Box of birth defects that you can see here. Caution: these are not pretty pictures, but they are true pictures of what the future could be as the present.

Again, please read the entire Haaretz article and view the YouTube piece. Or check the more conservative Wikipedia for the 38-page article (which includes 13 pages of footnotes) linked here on Depleted Uranium. You can verify the information presented above and find more information as well. In fact, the first DU, which uses radioactive isotope-238 was “manufactured in the 1940’s when the US and USSR began their nuclear weapons and nuclear power programs.” P.S. Depleted uranium bombs were also used on Serbia in the Bosnian War by President Clinton.

The total world inventory of depleted uranium stands at 1,188,273 tonnes as of 2002. That is enough to wipe out life on the planet for billions of years.

The United States leads the pack with 480,000 tonnes; Russia closely follow with 460,000 million tonnes; France, 190,000 tonnes; United Kingdom, 30,000 tonnes, etcetera.

mamboni
18th April 2010, 08:14 PM
It would be poetic justice of sorts for the Zionist occupiers to suffer poisoning from the use of DU because they brought it to the region via control of their puppet the United States. But, DU is poisoning the entire regions as the aerosol has a half life of thousands of years and the fine particles remain suspended in the atmosphere virtually forever. Ultimately DU will spread to the entire biosphere, including the United States and the remotist corners of the earth. The only protection from it I would imagine is to live in sealed environments wherein the air is electrostatically scrubbed.

DU is not the only problem. The burning of coal has introduced millions of tons of radioisotopes, mainly thorium and uranium present as contaminants in coal if memory serves, into the atmsophere as permanent aerosols. It is ironic to note that coal burning introduced orders of magnitude more radioactivity into the environment than does nuclear power.

Outstanding article - thanks for posting.

johnlvs2run
18th April 2010, 09:50 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg2NHfoC2pc

Libertarian_Guard
18th April 2010, 10:08 PM
Sadly the aftermath of today’s warfare will leave a much bigger wake of death than battlefield, civilian and military casualties.

War Pigs

Generals gathered in their masses
Just like witches at black masses
Evil minds that plot destruction
Sorcerers of death's construction
In the fields the bodies burning
As the war machine keeps turning
Death and hatred to mankind
poisoning their brainwashed minds
Oh Lord yeah

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight
They leave that all to the poor

Time will tell on their power minds
Making war just for fun
Treating people just like pawns in chess
Wait 'till their judgment day comes

Now in darkness world stops turning
As the war machine keeps burning
No more war pigs have the power
Hand of God has struck the hour
Day of judgment God is calling
On their knees, the war pigs crawling
Begging mercy for their sins
Satan laughing spreads his wings
Oh Lord yeah

iOWNme
19th April 2010, 06:04 AM
I just had this talk with a friend in the Military...

I told him that the Military is using DU munitions in many weapons now. I explained to him that they use these to blow up buildings and other areas and then they send HIM in to secure the area. He didnt like that very much.

Depleted Uranium (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium)


The use of DU in munitions is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects. Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive, uranium is a toxic metal. It is weakly radioactive and remains so because of its long half-life (4.468 billion years for uranium-238). The aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites or can be inhaled by civilians and military personnel. During a three week period of conflict in 2003 in Iraq, 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes of DU munitions were used, mostly in cities.

The actual acute and chronic toxicity of DU is also a point of medical controversy. Multiple studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents suggest the possibility of leukemogenic, genetic, reproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure. A 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU." The World Health Organization states that no consistent risk of reproductive, developmental, or carcinogenic effects have been reported in humans. However, the objectivity of this report has been called into question (The WHO even says it tastes like chicken)


The US and NATO military used DU penetrator rounds in the 1991 Gulf War, the Bosnia war,[13] bombing of Serbia, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.


Graph showing the rate per 1,000 births of congenital malformations observed at Basra University Hospital, Iraq:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/Basrah_birth_defects.svg/250px-Basrah_birth_defects.svg.png


But dont worry, the Pentagon, UN, and NATO are still deciding if it is bad to use for our soldiers. f*ck the Iraqi's!

Now go search Iraqi birth defects up (http://us2.startpage.com/do/metasearch.pl?) - up to 15x


YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL KILL YOU.

Nomen luni
21st April 2010, 04:47 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyX4307WgBc&feature=related

keehah
15th January 2022, 11:35 AM
NATO War Crimes don't just stop when the western countries being open border invaded and native genocided stop diverting their military and security to war-crime for NATO and anti-Nationalists.

sputniknews.com: Serbia to File 2 More Lawsuits Against NATO Over Uranium Bombing (https://sputniknews.com/20220113/serbia-to-file-2-more-lawsuits-against-nato-over-uranium-bombing-1092236013.html)

13.01.2022
BELGRADE (Sputnik) - Two new lawsuits against NATO will be brought to the Higher Court in Belgrade on behalf of Serbian victims of the 1999 depleted uranium bombing in Yugoslavia, a year after the first claim over the issue was filed, lawyer Srdjan Aleksic told Sputnik.

The first lawsuit, over 20 years after the bombing, was filed in January 2021.

"On January 20, we are filing two new lawsuits in Belgrade from two victims and we hope that then every month, we will file two or three more [lawsuits]. It takes time and money for the work of an expert in explosives and weapons and a medical examiner's conclusion. It must be clearly proved that NATO carried out depleted uranium bombings where the plaintiffs were located. It also has to be proved that the plaintiffs' cancer has been caused by radiation from NATO uranium," Aleksic said.

NATO could have used conventional weapons; however, it chose to use depleted uranium on the territory of Serbia, the lawyer went on, which will have a detrimental effect on people for many years to come.

"This is a war crime and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization must compensate for damage to the Serbian citizens," Aleksic said.

Aleksic is seeking compensation of at least 300,000 euros ($344,000) for each Serbian victim, as it was for the western European military who were exposed to a dangerous amount of radiation during their service at NATO.

NATO airstrikes continued from March 24 to June 10, 1999, claiming an unknown number of lives. The Serbian authorities say that about 2,500 people, including 89 children, were killed and about 12,500 people were injured in the bombings. Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said that the use of depleted uranium weapons caused an increase in the number of cancer patients in the country.

keehah
21st March 2023, 01:25 PM
Big Israel (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/5/zelenskyy-says-wants-ukraine-to-become-a-big-israel) plans got scrapped? Scorched earth acceptance that Ukraine conflict areas will remain under Russian control?
Or just the usual crap from current years democidal western polios and civil servants?

questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-03-06/hl6144 (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-03-06/hl6144)

AnswerBaroness Goldie
Conservative
Life peer Lords
Answered on
20 March 2023

Alongside our granting of a squadron of Challenger 2 main battle tanks to Ukraine, we will be providing ammunition including armour piercing rounds which contain depleted uranium. Such rounds are highly effective in defeating modern tanks and armoured vehicles.

mil.in.ua: Ukraine will receive depleted uranium ammunition (https://mil.in.ua/en/news/ukraine-will-receive-depleted-uranium-ammunition/)

2 hrs ago
Along with Challenger 2 tanks, the UK will transfer to Ukraine ammunition that includes armor piercing rounds containing depleted uranium.

This was announced by Annabel Goldie, the British Deputy Minister of Defense...

The main military application of depleted uranium is armor-piercing ammunition. The use of this metal in ammunition is associated with its properties – high weight, density and pyrophoricity. Thanks to these characteristics, the shells have a high armor-piercing effect and cause significant armor destruction.

In countries with advanced nuclear industries and large accumulations of depleted uranium, such as the United Kingdom, the United States and France, its use in the defense industry is much cheaper than the use of alternative materials, such as tungsten.

rt.com: Putin warns UK against plan to supply depleted uranium to Ukraine (https://www.rt.com/russia/573385-putin-uk-depleted-uranium/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS)

21 Mar, 2023
Putin commented on British plans to include DU munitions in a forthcoming delivery of Challenger 2 main battle tanks as he spoke alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping following talks in Moscow on Tuesday.

“I would like to note that if this happens, then Russia will be forced to react accordingly, bearing in mind that the collective West has already started to use weapons with a nuclear component,” he stated.

A similar warning was issued by Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu on the sidelines of the Russia-China talks, who said the move would bring the world yet another step closer to a nuclear disaster.

“Another step has been taken, and there are fewer and fewer left,” Shoigu told reporters...

The DU munitions have long been the subject of international controversy, with critics of their use highlighting the toxicity and radioactivity of the material. Depleted uranium is used to make the hardened cores of armor-piercing rounds, excelling in this role due its high density. The round’s core evaporates on impact, turning into aerosol and contaminating the environment with uranium.

The UN has already expressed alarm over the UK plans. Farhan Haq, a spokesman for Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, told a media briefing that the international body had long voiced concerns about the consequences of DU use, as well as about those who supply such weaponry.

These munitions were actively used by NATO during the First Gulf War, as well as during the bloc’s aggression against former Yugoslavia, both in the form of tank and aircraft artillery shells. The use of the munitions was acknowledged by NATO in a 2000 report, with the US-led bloc revealing that it had used some 10 metric tons of the material in Yugoslavia – and 300 metric tons in Iraq.

midnight rambler
21st March 2023, 05:32 PM
In his latest interview with Judge Nap Col. Macgregor (who shot a whole bunch of DU rounds himself in GW1) downplays any lasting effect from DU.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GfuxfM8IL26m/

osoab
21st March 2023, 05:46 PM
The Brits are send D.U. to Ukraine. That will teach them! :rolleyes:

Russia's Putin blasts UK move to send ammo with depleted uranium to Ukraine (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-blasts-uk-move-send-ammo-with-depleted-uranium-ukraine-2023-03-21/)

keehah
22nd March 2023, 08:22 AM
rt.com: Putin warns UK against plan to supply depleted uranium to Ukraine (https://www.rt.com/russia/573385-putin-uk-depleted-uranium/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS)

The use of the munitions was acknowledged by NATO in a 2000 report, with the US-led bloc revealing that it had used some 10 metric tons of the material in Yugoslavia – and 300 metric tons in Iraq.

In his latest interview with Judge Nap Col. Macgregor (who shot a whole bunch of DU rounds himself in GW1) downplays any lasting effect from DU.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GfuxfM8IL26m/
Was he DC's DU 'civil' servant?

wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Macgregor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Macgregor)

Douglas Abbott Macgregor (born January 4, 1947) is a retired U.S. Army colonel and government official, and an author, consultant, and television commentator. He played a significant role on the battlefield in the Gulf War and the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia.
hir.harvard.edu: Depleted Uranium, Devastated Health: Military Operations and Environmental Injustice in the Middle East (https://hir.harvard.edu/depleted-uranium-devastated-health-military-operations-and-environmental-injustice-in-the-middle-east/)

22.SEP.2021
Depleted uranium was use (https://thebulletin.org/2020/07/war-and-the-environment/)d during major conflicts in the past decades, including in the Balkans and during the First and Second Gulf Wars. The United States and United Kingdom both used (https://thebulletin.org/2020/07/war-and-the-environment/) depleted uranium during the First Gulf War, but the United States used relatively more (https://thebulletin.org/2020/07/war-and-the-environment/). Estimates vary, with some sources saying that around 300 tons (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362480607085793) of depleted uranium were used during the conflict. Shockingly, around (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362480607085793) 1,000 to 2,000 tons were used in the Second Gulf War in 2003, a conflict which only lasted around three weeks.

Depleted uranium may pose a risk to both soldiers and local civilian populations. When ammunition made from depleted uranium strikes a target, the uranium turns into dust that is inhaled by soldiers near the explosion site. The wind then carries dust to surrounding areas, polluting local water and agriculture.

Pieces of old armor and ammunition also pose a threat, particularly to local children playing on tanks and other military hardware made from depleted uranium. “The kids were playing on the tanks… and they were collecting the bullets,” explained Souad Al-Azzawi, an associate professor of environmental engineering at the Canadian University Dubai and former director of the doctoral program in environmental engineering at the University of Baghdad. “For some of the people, those bullets stayed in their houses for years. It was a disaster.”

This should not come as a surprise. Students rarely–if ever–receive education about the harms of depleted uranium. Children aren’t warned against playing on toxic structures, reflecting a general lack of public awareness on the issue. Moreover, some young children may be exposed to depleted uranium through contaminated soil in former conflict zones.

The depleted uranium left over from the Gulf Wars should be a cause for concern. Although it is only 60 percent as radioactive as natural uranium, depleted uranium is still chemically and radiologically toxic...

In the past, leaders did not pay the necessary amount of attention to the risks of depleted uranium. Documents suggest that the United States may have known about the potential consequences of depleted uranium during conflicts in which it was used. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published a 1991 report indicating that deploying depleted uranium in the Gulf War could have caused 500,000 cancer deaths.

However, the United States still used depleted uranium in the Middle East despite the risks, deeming that its military benefits outweighed (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362480607085793) the potential civilian impact...

What Now? A Possible Response to Depleted Uranium

Scientists should conduct research on the effects of depleted uranium on populations living in or near conflict zones. To avoid bias, this research should not be funded by governments or groups that want to use depleted uranium. There is a chance (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13623699.2010.535277) that future research will show that depleted uranium is not harmful, but states would be wise to err on the side of caution and refrain from use until the material is proven safe.

Hypothetically, military leaders could rely on the Geneva Convention to prove that depleted uranium is illegal. For instance, they might look to the Principles of Distinction or Proportionality. However, this might not be the most effective course of action. States that use depleted uranium could respond by arguing that the military advantages of depleted uranium are enough to outweigh the negative effects, even if science shows that depleted uranium is extremely harmful. Powerful countries like the United States will likely win a lengthy debate over whether depleted uranium violates the Geneva Convention or other international law.

Instead, nations should adopt an explicit ban on depleted uranium. They might consider the ban written (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13623699.2010.535277) by the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons. Such a convention sidesteps highly politicized debates about whether depleted uranium violates the Geneva Convention.