PDA

View Full Version : THE HYPOCRISY OF THE OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE



Ares
20th April 2010, 05:10 AM
By Lynn Stuter
April 20, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

More than one mother has quipped to the effect that to enroll a child in school, one must produce the child's birth certificate.

More than one military person has lamented that they, too, must produce their birth certificate to enlist and on demand.

The latest being LTC Lakin who was ordered to report for a second tour of duty in the Middle East; ordered to show up for duty with his birth certificate in hand.

He refused to report, stating unequivocally that he has serious reservations that the individual, claiming to be his Commander-in-Chief, is legitimate to the office he holds.

That individual is Barack Hussein Obama or AKA (also known as) for what appears to be a myriad of aliases including the surnames of Dunham, Obama and Soetoro and the given names of Barry, Barack and Barack Hussein. As one can imagine, the combinations are many.

Interesting considering that when AKA applied for an Illinois law license, he claimed no aliases. Yet we know that AKA was adopted by his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, and registered as Barry Soetoro, Indonesian citizen of Muslim faith at the Fransiskus Assisi Primary School in Jakarta, Indonesia on January 1, 1967.

We also know that Barry Soetoro was listed as a dependent over the age of 18 "for the purposes of education" of Lolo Soetoro in the Soetoro divorce papers, raising the specter of his receiving financial aid as a foreign student to attend Occidental College.

As with everything else about AKA, there has been no proof presented that 1) he was ever an American citizen, 2) that he was ever eligible to reclaim American citizenship, and 3) that he ever did reclaim American citizenship.

Michelle Obama, in a speech given on August 26, 2008, during the Democratic National Convention in Denver, Colorado, stated his home country to be Kenya.

More recently, the transcript of the proceedings of the March 25, 2010 Kenyan parliamentary session alleges AKA was born in Kenya.

It seems the only people who refuse to look at facts are those "stupid Americans"; more specifically, however, a cabal of power elite (including lamestream media personalities) bent on keeping Americans in the dark about AKA's origins.

And, beyond all this, AKA has claimed he held dual citizenship at birth, making him ineligible to the office of president as dual citizenship does not equate to natural born, defined as having two American parents and born on American soil.

One of the ploys used by Marxists like AKA is to disparage equality of opportunity and offer up, instead, equality of outcome. People shouldn't be judged on their ability but on their need: from each according to his ability to each according to his need.

Under this mantra, no one should be allowed to make more, have more, do more than another; everyone should be equal in their passions, opinions and possessions under the mantra of the "common good" or community. Such also extends to their political rights under the Marxist ideal of "democracy."

So, with all that in mind, how is it exactly that any parent, enrolling their child in school, must produce the child's birth certificate but AKA does not have to produce his actual birth certificate, issued at the time of his birth, in order to sit in the Oval Office and live in the White House?

And how is it that LTC Lakin must arrive at his duty station, birth certificate in hand, but AKA does not have to produce his actual birth certificate, issued at the time of his birth, in order to sit in the Oval Office and live in the White House?

Oh, but you say, he has produced his birth certificate?

He has? You mean that computer generated, laser printed document with the "revised date" of 2001 in the lower right corner? That document that, if produced by the Department of Health, Hawaii, was printed after the 2001 revised date?

You mean that one?

That's not a birth certificate or a reasonable facsimile of one. That is a Certification of Live Birth (COLB) that Department of Health, Hawaii, has refused to authenticate as having been issued by them.

AKA's birth certificate, which he admits to having (so why the need for the COLB?), would have been issued at the time of his birth in 1961.

The COLB, pictures of which have appeared on the internet, is proof of nothing.

And those who have waved copies of it around, including Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly and Ron Paul have shown their ignorance in so doing.

The pictures of that document, including the one that showed up on the L.A. Times website (waved about by Bill O'Reilly and referenced by Ron Paul) have all been altered or forged. In the day and age of digital files, digital cameras, and photoshop programs, that is easy to accomplish. Just ask "Ducky," the author of at least one of the forgeries that has turned up on line that has been claimed by the Obamanoids as "authentic."

So, if we use AKA's standard of measure, that no one individual should be allowed to do what another is not, if LTC Lakin must show up at a new duty station, birth certificate in hand, then why is AKA being allowed to not show his?

And, if every other individual's education records are open to public scrutiny, then why should AKA be allowed to keep his secret?

And, if the government can authenticate that you really belong to your social security number, then why can't they authenticate that AKA's myriad of social security numbers (not a typo) are his?

Do you sense there is something wrong with this picture?

Join the millions of Americans, the numbers growing daily, who also see something wrong with this picture.

And what is wrong with this picture goes far beyond what is revealed here.

AKA calls those who would question his eligibility to the office of president "terrorists" and "racists", that they would dare question him; he having such a stellar record for truthfulness and all! Such a stellar record, in fact, that an accurate accounting of all the lies he's told is not to be had. Suffice it to say that if his lips are moving, he's lying.

And the lamestream media buffoons accommodate him, lick his boots, and put on display, for all to see, the hypocrisy of their now proud Marxist tradition in "journalistic" endeavor.

I mean really; how dare those people, those commoners, those "terrorists" think they have the right to know that the man sitting in the Oval Office, occupying the White House, is the legitimate president and commander-in-chief.

To boot, those who would dare question must be "racists"! Why? Because AKA erroneously claims to be "black". He's not, he's predominantly white with the other half predominantly Arabic of the slave trade variety. That is, if Barack Hussein Obama, the man listed on the COLB, is really his father. And we don't know that that's really the case either; we just haven't seen anything that points definitively to the other two suspects — Malcolm X and Frank Marshall Davis — being the more likely sperm donor.

The refusal of AKA to produce his birth certificate, the one he found amongst papers in his grandparents home in Hawaii while living with them, is not going to go away.

Nor is the fact that he is not the legitimate president of the United States.

And while the lamestream media may champion AKA's cause, the truth is going to come out. The American people are not going to be denied, nor should they be denied.

Every elected or appointed official, who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, to protect and defend it from all enemies, foreign and domestic, who has refused to address this matter, is complicit in the crimes committed by AKA against the American people.

Those who would scoff at, those who would make fun of, those who would denigrate people demanding to see AKA's actual birth certificate are their own worst enemy; for if the Constitution and Bill of Rights are irrelevant, then so is their freedom.

And, under AKA's own terms, if he should not have to show his birth certificate, then neither should anyone else. The next time some government official demands to see your birth certificate, tell them you want to see AKA's first. Try it and see what happens!

Oh, the hypocrisy of true democracy!

James Madison wasn't so stupid, after all:

"Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of Government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions."

Dear Barack, "Either produce your birth certificate or be known, forever, for the hypocrite you are!"

http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter188.htm

jedemdasseine
20th April 2010, 05:27 AM
The reaction people have to this issue is very revealing. It's as if there's massive cognitive dissonance in America. Ignore the facts, accept the dubious COLB, and rebury one's head in the sand. "No way we could have been duped by this guy!" It's a polarizing issue, one that people want to see go away, Obama above all others, I'm sure.

Kudos for being the annoying gadfly that brings it up again.

Also, I'm as interested in the Constitutionality of Obama's Presidency as I am in simply finding out what on earth he's been doing with his life outside his Public Life in Chicago. Seriously, what's this guy been up to all these years? What little information we have is most curious. What a murky past! He makes the previous few occupants of the White House seem downright transparent.

Neuro
20th April 2010, 06:15 AM
Some very good points raised, anyone who does question the official version of anything gets labeled with the derogative ''thruther" or "birther" and gets looked by the general public as a troublemaker with the attitude that the most important thing is that he/they are left alone so they can do their job to everyones benefit... The thing is they really don't have the publics benefit at heart, they are part of the elite club with the elite clubs benefit at heart...

I really don't know what the truth is of AKA is, but it is obvious that he has a lot to hide... We know incredibly little about the most officially powerful man on the planet...

Ares
20th April 2010, 06:17 AM
I find it hilarious that the lamestream media was crying bloody murder when Bush wouldn't release his military records.

Yet remain dead silent on Barrys school records, or any other records of his past.

Saul Mine
20th April 2010, 06:48 AM
It's religious. The country has been possessed by a spirit of stupid.

silver_surfer
20th April 2010, 07:05 AM
What surprises me is the reaction from the right.
When the Birth certificate is brought up on forumns they will say that this is somemaster plan by Obama
to make the right look crazy. We should just let it go because there is nothing you can do about it

I guess most people dont want the truth

sunshine05
20th April 2010, 07:26 AM
It really is amazing that so many people accept him without question when so many doubts have been raised of his eligibility. At this point, it would take a LOT to convince me he IS eligible to be president. Yet no one in congress or the supreme court would listen to this case and do something about it *before* he got in office. It just goes to show how easily people can be fooled, entire populations of people.

jaybone
20th April 2010, 08:08 AM
I'll repeat what I said over at GIM1.0 for posterity:

When an idea is almost universally dismissed out-of-hand, with incredulity and offense,
that indicates to me there is a hard kernel of truth at the center of it.

If the impulse reaction is "no way, that's absurd, sooo absurd I'm not even going to think about it or look into it"
THAT is the hallmark of PROGRAMMING.

It is how I know in my guts that many of the 'whacko' theories that I hold as plausible, are likely true, at least to a point.

So when somebody labels you a nutty tinfoil hat wearing whacko, it is really their programming telling you that you are RIGHT.

iOWNme
20th April 2010, 08:18 AM
On January 21st, 2009, his very first day in office, Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489.

EO 13489 (http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13489) - Witholding Presidential Records


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

(a) "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.
(b) "NARA" refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.
(c) "Presidential Records Act" refers to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.
(d) "NARA regulations" refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.
(e) "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including Vice Presidential records.
(f) "Former President" refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.
(g) A "substantial question of executive privilege" exists if NARA's disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.
(h) A "final court order" is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.

Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records.

(a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege. However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.
(b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President.

(a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.
(b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of executive privilege is not justified. The Archivist shall be notified promptly of any such determination.
(c) If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.
(d) If the President decides to invoke executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates. After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.

Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.

(a) Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the former President's claim of privilege.
(b) In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

Sec. 5. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.


Barack Obama signature.svg
Barack Obama
The White House,
January 21, 2009.

FreeEnergy
13th May 2010, 11:54 AM
Below I posted a picture of what's being shown as Obama's Birth Certificate to everyone as "proof". This is nothing but A STOLEN BLANK FORM, with some text written on it. There's no names of any authorities, not a doctor, no signatures, no seal and not a single number on it. There's no Certificate number because he doesn't have one. If he had a real one, nothing would've stopped them from showing it. But writing a fake would be a bad idea, because it will either be someone else's number, or will be just like with SSN - out of sync, or you would be able to talk to a doctor or pull papers that way - which don't exist.

What is shown is a stolen blank with something typed on it, it is an obvious forgery. So they have to play all this sharade around it, "what's in it for you" (this is a dead giveaway of a pathological liar), "why do you want to see the number" etc. - it is all a way to avoid straight answer.

I am me, I am free
13th May 2010, 12:04 PM
Below I posted a picture of what's being shown as Obama's Birth Certificate to everyone as "proof". This is nothing but A STOLEN BLANK FORM, with some text written on it. There's no names of any authorities, not a doctor, no signatures, no seal and not a single number on it. There's no Certificate number because he doesn't have one. If he had a real one, nothing would've stopped them from showing it. But writing a fake would be a bad idea, because it will either be someone else's number, or will be just like with SSN - out of sync, or you would be able to talk to a doctor or pull papers that way - which don't exist.

What is shown is a stolen blank with something typed on it, it is an obvious forgery. So they have to play all this sharade around it, "what's in it for you" (this is a dead giveaway of a pathological liar), "why do you want to see the number" etc. - it is all a way to avoid straight answer.


Accepting counterfeit FRNs is such a big deal (they are ALL counterfeit lol), yet we are expected to accept a counterfeit form 'establishing' the birth of someone highly suspect as to his origins??? For all we know, that 17 y.o. slut who had him could have been impregnated by a Kenyan chimp, since we have no real documents (with a proper jurat) confirming parentage.

Quantum
13th May 2010, 03:40 PM
Demon Obama also uses a Connecticut-issued Social Security Number, issued years after he started working in Hawaii.

willie pete
13th May 2010, 03:58 PM
Quantum....you must believe and trust me my brethren ....

Cebu_4_2
13th May 2010, 07:29 PM
What is shown is a stolen blank with something typed on it, it is an obvious forgery.


Notice on that particular form there is no mention of a bank in small print on the bottom, as far as I have looked all BC's going back quite a while have some statement about a bank note on it and Barrys would also. Mattering how you interpret it can mean that you are owned by such bank. Sorry any BC are not available for me to quote exactly what is written on it but when I heard about it I said NO WAY... got the BC and low and behold, wasn't a conspiracy at all.

Quantum
13th May 2010, 07:39 PM
Quantum....you must believe and trust me my brethren ....


I "believe" alright...I believe Demon Obama should go back to Hell from where he came.

mick silver
13th May 2010, 07:41 PM
we all see the nwo at works here

cigarlover
16th May 2010, 07:23 AM
I havent seen it posted but Hawaii passed a law saying they can now ignore all requests for O's BC.

jedemdasseine
16th May 2010, 07:33 AM
http://www.islandoflogic.com/images/obama_birth_cert.jpg

jedemdasseine
16th May 2010, 07:39 AM
http://www.theodoresworld.net/pics/0409/takethemoneyImage3.jpg