PDA

View Full Version : New Tribe Rising?



wildcard
20th April 2010, 08:07 PM
New Tribe Rising? By Patrick J. Buchanan

http://buchanan.org/blog/new-tribe-rising-3930


“Is white the new black?”

So asks Kelefa Sanneh in the subtitle of “Beyond the Pale,” his New Yorker review of several books on white America, wherein he concludes we may be witnessing “the slow birth of a people.”

Sanneh is onto something. For after a year of battering as “un-American,” “evil-doers” and racists, and praise from talk-show hosts and Sarah Palin as “the real Americans,” Tea Party America seems to be taking on a new and separate identity.

Ethnonationalism — the recognition of an embryonic people that they are different from their neighbors, and the concomitant drive to live apart — is, as Arthur Schlesinger Jr. wrote 20 years ago, a more powerful force than any ideology, be it communism, fascism or democracy.

Ethnonationalism is the pre-eminent force of the age we have entered, the creator and destroyer of empires and nations. Even as Schlesinger was writing his “Disuniting of America,” Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union were disintegrating into 22 new nations, along the lines of ethnicity. In Dagestan, Ingushetia, Chechnya, Ossetia and Abkhazia, the process proceeds apace.

It has happened before — and here.

In the American colonies, the evil institution of slavery, followed by a century of segregation, created out of the children of captured Africans who had little in common other than color a new people, the African-Americans, who went out and voted 24-to-one for Barack Obama.

In 1754, the 13 colonies consisted of South Carolinians, New Yorkers, Pennsylvanians and Virginians, all loyal subjects of the king.

But after the contemptuous treatment of colonial soldiers in the French and Indian War, the Stamp Act, the Townshend duties, the Boston Massacre, the Tea Party, the Quartering Act and the Quebec Act, by 1775 a new people had been born: the Americans.

In 1770, New York colonists had erected a statue of George III in Bowling Green in grateful tribute for his repeal of the Townshend taxes. In July 1776, they pulled it down and melted it for lead bullets after Washington read his soldiers the Declaration of Independence portraying George III as another Ivan the Terrible.

“There is no such thing as a Palestinian people,” said Golda Meir. When she said it, she may have been right. But as generations have grown up under the occupation and two intifadas and a Gaza War, the Palestinians are a people today.

Adversity and abuse increase the awareness of separate identity and accelerate the secession of peoples from each other.

Obama in the campaign of 2008 recognized that “out there” in Middle America existed another country, far from the one he grew up in, far from the privileged Ivy League community to which he belonged.

“You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and … the jobs have been gone now for 25 years. … So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Palin and Tea Partiers now repeat Obama’s disparaging line about their clinging to Bibles and guns — with defiant pride.

As others have done in our multicultural and multiethnic nation, this people is beginning to assert its identity, unapologetically.

Sioux gather at Little Bighorn to celebrate the massacre of Custer’s command. Hawaiian natives demand a new ethnically based government — and receive Obama’s blessing. Hispanics march under Mexican flags in Los Angeles to demand citizenship for illegal aliens.

Now Southerners are proudly commemorating ancestors who fought and fell in the Lost Cause and demanding recognition of Confederate History Month. And state governors are acceding.

In 2004, when Howard Dean reached out to “guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks,” Shelby Steele wrote that this was “absolutely verboten. Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America” because of their history and white guilt.

This, Sanneh suggests, is changing. The imputation of racism to Tea Partiers has not intimidated or cowed them.

When Obama named Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, there was no hesitation in blistering her for showing contempt for the rights of Frank Ricci and the white firefighters of New Haven, cheated of the promotions they had won in competitive exams.

When black Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates was arrested by Cambridge cop James Crowley, most Americans, despite Obama and media suggestions of racial profiling, sided with Crowley.

Why are the Tea Partiers not intimidated the way Republicans often are? Why is the charge of racism not working?

First, they do not feel the guilt of country-club Republicans.

Second, they know it to be untrue. While Tea Partiers are anti-Obama, they are also anti-Pelosi, anti-Martha Coakley and anti-Charlie Christ. The coming conflict is not so much racial as it is cultural, political and tribal.

Black America seems united. White America is the house divided, for it is in the womb of white America that this new people is gestating and fighting to be born.

wildcard
20th April 2010, 08:12 PM
I said this on GIM just a day or so before it was deleted, whitey is suffering from "racist" fatigue and starting to get past white guilt.

Book
20th April 2010, 08:47 PM
I said this on GIM just a day or so before it was deleted, whitey is suffering from "racist" fatigue and starting to get past white guilt.


Teevee commercials constantly depict Whitey as a buffoon to his own wife and kids. It works:


Welcome to the new comic image of men on tv: incompetence at its worst. Where television used to feature wise and wonderful fathers and husbands, today's comedies and ads often feature bumbling husbands and inept, uninvolved fathers. On Still Standing, Bill (Mark Addy) embarrasses his wife Judy (Jamie Gertz) so badly in front of her reading group, that she is dropped from the group. On Everybody Loves Raymond, Raymond (Ray Romano) must choose between bathing the twin boys or helping his daughter with her homework. He begrudgingly agrees to assist his daughter, for whom he is no help whatsoever.

CBS is not the only guilty party. ABC's My Wife and Kids and According to Jim, Fox's The Bernie Mac Show, The Simpsons, Malcolm in the Middle, and (the recently cancelled) Titus, and the WB's Reba also feature women who are better organized and possess better relational skills than their male counterparts. While most television dramas tend to avoid gender stereotypes, as these undermine "realism," comic portrayals of men have become increasingly negative. The trend is so noticeable that it has been criticized by men's rights groups and some television critics.

It has also been studied by academicians Dr. Katherine Young and Paul Nathanson in their book, Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture. Young and Nathanson argue that in addition to being portrayed as generally unintelligent, men are ridiculed, rejected, and physically abused in the media. Such behavior, they suggest, "would never be acceptable if directed at women." Evidence of this pattern is found in a 2001 survey of 1,000 adults conducted by the Advertising Standards Association in Great Britain, which found that 2/3 of respondents thought that women featured in advertisements were "intelligent, assertive, and caring," while the men were "pathetic and silly." The number of respondents who thought men were depicted as "intelligent" was a paltry 14%. (While these figures apply to the United Kingdom, comparable advertisements air in the U.S.)

The TRIBE that owns and controls all goyim teevee will prevent any possible improvement in the lives of Whitey. They have been reducing Whitey since the 1960s...when we still had White People in the White House

iOWNme
21st April 2010, 07:10 AM
This coming from the Knights of Malta Buchanan?


The enemy, like a chameleon, can change into whatever suits its environment.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csq9g5sX8v0

Ash_Williams
21st April 2010, 07:36 AM
The trend is so noticeable that it has been criticized by men's rights groups and some television critics.

Men's rights groups?
Oh great now we can join the women and gays and blacks and have a bunch of crying bitches claim to speak for all of us too.
How long until the claim that James Bond is portrayed as too cold and violent and really he should be breastfeeding a baby?

Ponce
21st April 2010, 09:01 AM
I can finally say that I am a member of a loss tribe.......the white tribe.

Book
21st April 2010, 10:24 AM
I can finally say that I am a member of a loss tribe.......the white tribe.


http://www.misterbryans.com/.a/6a00d83451d1ae69e2011168f7edf7970c-400wi

:oo-->

mamboni
21st April 2010, 11:03 AM
I can finally say that I am a member of a loss tribe.......the white tribe.


http://www.misterbryans.com/.a/6a00d83451d1ae69e2011168f7edf7970c-400wi

:oo-->


That's the Lost White Tribe? Wow, they do tan good in Cuba! :oo-->

Ponce
21st April 2010, 11:21 AM
Hahahahahahah, for you information Bamboni, the same as in the US we have blacks and whites in Cuba......my grandad is Castillian Spanish and blond with blue eyes and so was my sister and I am white with green eyes and like I said before my mom was Irish-Amaerican.

By the way Bamboni, I have noticed that you waste no time in trying to put me down by saying something about me, while I find it anyoing others may see it as insulting or, worse yet, as a personal attack.......knock it off.

Hey Book? love that picture, thanks.

mamboni
21st April 2010, 11:34 AM
Hahahahahahah, for you information Bamboni, the same as in the US we have blacks and whites in Cuba......my grandad is Castillian Spanish and blond with blue eyes and so was my sister and I am white with green eyes and like I said before my mom was Irish-Amaerican.

By the way Bamboni, I have noticed that you waste no time in trying to put me down by saying something about me, while I find it anyoing others may see it as insulting or, worse yet, as a personal attack.......knock it off.

Hey Book? love that picture, thanks.


Ponce,

I think you are confusing me with someone else. If you search this forum, you will be hard pressed to find examples of me "putting you down." It is not my way.

wildcard
21st April 2010, 11:40 AM
Another Ponce-y scheme. 8)

Book
21st April 2010, 11:54 AM
Another Ponce-y scheme. 8)

Ponce
21st April 2010, 12:32 PM
Hahahahahha Wildcard........kudos to you.

wildcard
21st April 2010, 12:35 PM
http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/resources/2006/11/scarface_million.jpg

cojelo con take it easy mang

Book
21st April 2010, 12:36 PM
I can finally say that I am a member of a loss tribe.......the white tribe.


:oo-->

wildcard
21st April 2010, 12:37 PM
Haha, book. :P

nunaem
21st April 2010, 12:43 PM
Great, more tribalism, just what we need. Stone age, here we come! :oo-->

Brent
21st April 2010, 12:52 PM
Great, more tribalism, just what we need. Stone age, here we come! :oo-->


Tribalism and the competition from it is what brought us out of the Stone age.

This isn't some fantasy world where we are all "one" and can stand around the fire singing kumbaya in perfect peace.

goldmonkey
21st April 2010, 12:57 PM
New Tribe Rising? By Patrick J. Buchanan
The coming conflict is not so much racial as it is cultural, political and tribal.


Yes, it is racial.

Book
21st April 2010, 01:02 PM
Great, more tribalism, just what we need. Stone age, here we come! :oo-->


Thank God our Cuban brothers are on our side...lol.

nunaem
21st April 2010, 01:05 PM
Great, more tribalism, just what we need. Stone age, here we come! :oo-->


Tribalism and the competition from it is what brought us out of the Stone age.

It's odd then that the most tribalistic cultures, in Africa and the Middle East are the most primitive. And that increasing civilization always coincides with increasing legal equality.

Even apes and dogs and a myriad of other animals form tribe, I don't notice any increasing sophistication in them.

nunaem
21st April 2010, 01:08 PM
Great, more tribalism, just what we need. Stone age, here we come! :oo-->


Thank God our Cuban brothers are on our side...lol.

The magnificence of tribalism:

Book
21st April 2010, 01:16 PM
The magnificence of tribalism:


http://lindyborer.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/hitler_youth.jpg

Magnificent isn't it.

:)

nunaem
21st April 2010, 01:25 PM
The magnificence of tribalism:


http://lindyborer.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/hitler_youth.jpg

Magnificent isn't it.


Yup, pretty impressive how fast tribalism can turn a constitutional republic into a brutal, despotic basket case. Animal instincts are harsh.

Book
21st April 2010, 01:41 PM
Even apes and dogs and a myriad of other animals form tribe, I don't notice any increasing sophistication in them.


http://files.puritanhead.com/uploaded_images/zeppelin-field-797028.jpg

Sure you do. Nice try posting the mud hutters image to make your illogical point...lol.

:oo-->

nunaem
21st April 2010, 01:47 PM
This is your civilization:
http://www.1st-art-gallery.com/thumbnail/87188/1/View-Of-The-Pantheon-Rome.jpg

This is your civilization on tribalism:
http://keep2.sjfc.edu/class/bnapoli/msti431/jpk7984/msti431/fallofrome.jpg

Any questions?

Book
21st April 2010, 01:58 PM
This is your civilization:


http://talkfeeleez.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/alone_with_the_alone_by_pakpao.jpg

This is Nunaem without his tribe.

Any questions?

:oo-->

Ponce
21st April 2010, 02:03 PM
Hahahahahahhaah Book, stop it.........you are killing me hahahaahaahahah, love it.

And where is my "NO USRael" sign?

nunaem
21st April 2010, 02:04 PM
Okay this is going nowhere fast.

Anyways, my last post, the good german with his tribe:

Book
21st April 2010, 02:43 PM
Okay this is going nowhere fast.


http://sabbah.biz/mt/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/3174092813_2096f20c71.jpg

:oo-->