Will Jewish Zionism bring Armageddon?

[Libertarian_Guard]

The International Jew, by Henry Ford

Will Jewish Zionism bring Armageddon?

Volume 3 chapter 51



When the British Army passed into Jerusalem in the memorable capture of the city in 1917, the Protocols went in with it. A symbolic circle was thus closed, though not in the way the Protocolists had hoped. The man who carried the Protocols knew what they signified, and they were carried not in triumph, but as the plans of the enemies of world liberty.

Zionism is the best advertised of all present Jewish activities and has exerted a greater influence upon world events than the average man realizes. In its more romantic aspects it makes an appeal to Christian as well as to Jew, because there are certain prophecies which are held to concern the return of the Jews to Jerusalem. When this return takes place, certain great events are scheduled to ensue.

Because of this admixture of the religious sentiment, it will be rather difficult for a certain class of people to scrutinize modern Political Zionism; they have been too well propagandized into believing that political Zionism and the "return" promised by the prophets are the same thing. Having succumbed to the initial confusion of mistaking Judah for Israel they have entirely mistaken the ancient writings that relate to these two and have made the single tribe of Judah (whence comes the name Jew) the hub around which all history and humanity swing. Judah was the tribe with which Israel could not live in peace over two thousand years ago, and which has the fateful gift of stirring up the same kind of dissension today. And yet no one ever thought of charging the Ten Tribes of Israel with "anti-Semitism."

Zionism is challenging the attention of the world today because it is creating a situation out of which many believe the next war will come. To adopt a phraseology familiar to students of prophecy, it is believed by many students of world affairs that Armageddon will be the direct result of what is now beginning to be manifested in Palestine.

For these, if for no other reasons, the subject becomes important.

With Zionism as a dream of pious Jews this article has nothing to do. With Zionism as a political fact, every first class government is now compelled to have something to do. It is a bigger question than the German indemnities or American immigration, because it lies back of both, and is rapidly proceeding under cover of both.

It is worthy of note, if only in passing, that Zionism in the active modern political sense took its rise racially and geographically where Bolshevism arose, namely in Russia, and that its center, the seat of its Inner Actions Committee, was at Berlin. There was always a close relationship between the Zionists of Russia and the New York Kehillah, as is evidenced by public utterances made in Russia after the Revolution in which the Kehillah is extolled.

At the time the war was declared in 1914, the Inner Actions Committee was spread about in various countries. For example: Dr. Schmarya Levin, of Berlin, was in the United States and remained here. He was Russian rabbi, German scholar, and cosmopolitan. Although his headquarters were Berlin, he remained in the United States and became recognized as the leader of the leaders of Zionism, until the great Jewish shift to Versailles. Another member of the Inner Actions Committee was one Jacobson, who was in Constantinople. "When he saw that Constantinople could no longer be the center of Zionist politics, he left and went to Copenhagen, Denmark, where in a neutral country he could be of practical usefulness to the Zionists by transmitting information and funds." (Guide to Zionism, page 80.) In fact, the entire Inner Actions Committee, with headquarters at Berlin, moved freely through a war-locked world, the only exceptions being Warburg and Hantke � and there was no need for the Berlin Warburg to move about, for there were others who represented him.

Dr. Levin gave his sanction for the shifting of the center of Jewish gravity from Berlin to America, and "as early as August 30, 1914, a month after the outbreak of war, an extraordinary conference of American Zionists was called in New York."

What this change of seat meant, has formed the subject of much discussion. In 1914 the Jews apparently knew more about the probable duration of the war than did the principals. It was not to be a mere excursion through Belgium, as some fancied. There was time to dicker, to show the value of certain Jewish support to the governments. Germany gladly pledged the land of Palestine to the Jews, but the Jews had already seen what Wilhelm had done in that ancient state when he enthroned himself on the Mount of Olives. Evidently, the Allies won the contest of making promises, for on November 2, 1917, when General Allenby was pushing up through Palestine with his British Army, Arthur James Balfour, the British secretary of state for foreign affairs, issued the famous declaration approving Palestine as a national home for the Jewish people.

"The wording of it came from the British foreign office, but the text had been revised in the Zionist offices in America as well as in England. The British declaration was made in the form in which the Zionists desired it, and the last clauses were added in order to appease a certain section of timid anti-Zionist opinion." (Guide to Zionism, pages 85-86.)

Now please read the declaration and note the italicized clauses just referred to:

"His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

Zionism is of particular interest, not merely because of the quarrels which have arisen among the leaders over money � it is the war of "interest" against "capital" � but also because of the light it throws on the two great armies of Jews in the world, the way in which they use their power where they can, and the trouble that always embroils the nations which become Jewish tools.

People sometimes ask why Jewry, which is capitalistic, should favor Bolshevism, which is the announced enemy of capital. It is an interesting question. Why should a New York Jewish financier, an officer of the government of the United States, help finance a "Red" publication which even our tolerant government cannot stomach? In addition to the fact that it is only "Gentile capital" that is attacked, the answer is that the Jew who has fallen for the worship of the Golden Calf is anxious to keep in the good graces of the Jew of the East � the Mongolian Jews � who are rampaging against orderly systems of society. It is quite useful when there is a revolution in Paris to have the 600 houses which you may own spared by the incendiary mobs � as were Rothschild's houses. Zionism has been one of the subjects upon which Western and Eastern Jew can unite. Indeed, it was the Eastern Jew that compelled the Western Jew to take a favorable stand on this matter. The Jewish gentlemen who are receiving the freedom of our cities today in their various aspects as "German" and "British" scientists are Eastern Jews. They have come to a contest with the Jews of America on the question of Money. The Jews of America have smothered some very ugly charges. The Jews of the East, more recently of Germany or England, are not likely to be browbeaten by the moneybags of Jewish New York, for the Eastern type of Jew knows of a situation in which money is the most useless thing in the world � and that is why he is feared and favored by Western Jewry of the Golden Calf.

The Jewish defenders are just now capitalizing the "split" in Jewry. The real split will come when Jews of wisdom begin to support the attempts which have been made to liberate the Jews from their leaders. This internal squabble means nothing but a squabble of leaders; but when the Jews themselves divide, one side for twentieth century light and the destruction of the class power of selfish leaders, then may we look up hopefully. When the Jew recognizes the honesty of his critics and the righteousness of what they charge, then will there be a "split," but not before. The division in Jewry as evidenced by the contempt of the revolutionary party for the financial party, and as even more strongly evidenced by the fear of the revolutionary party by the financial party, is being brought about by the insincerity of the Western Jew's Zionism. The Western Jew says that the United States is the Promised Land, profits and interest are the "milk and honey" and New York is Jerusalem; the Jew of Russia has another view.

[Libertarian_Guard]

A knowledge of Political Zionism is worth while also as an authoritative illustration of what the Jew does when he is in power. Heretofore there has been Russia to illustrate this, but now there is Palestine. With every fact against them, with every traveler and observer giving them the lie direct, there are still Jewish spokesmen and poor befuddled "Gentile fronts" who insist that Bolshevism is not Jewish and that Russia is not now governed by Jews. It is just this constant denial of facts, this failure to use their opportunity to be honest, that is going to be the judgement of Jewish leaders. Bolshevism all over the world, not in Russia only, but in New York, in Chicago, in New Orleans, in San Francisco, is Jewish.

However, there is no need further to insist upon that, except occasionally to add confirmatory illustrations of it. More to the present point is Palestine. It will be very difficult for the most irresponsible Jewish spokesman to deny that Palestine is Jewish. The government is Jewish, the plan of procedure is Jewish, the methods used are Jewish. Does anyone rise to deny that? Scarcely.

Very well, Palestine will do to illustrate the genius of the Jew when he comes to power.

Professor Albert T. Clay, in the Atlantic Monthly (will anyone declare that this long-established and thoroughly respectable Boston publication is "anti-Semitic"?) warns us that the information about Palestine which we receive in America comes to us through the Jewish Telegraph Service (which is the Associated Press of world-wide Jewry) and the Zionist propaganda. "The latter," he says, "with its harrowing stories of pogroms in Europe, and its misrepresentations of the situation in the Near East, has been able to awaken not a little sympathy for the Zionist propaganda."

This propaganda of pogroms � "thousands upon thousands of Jews killed" � amounts to nothing except as it illustrates the gullibility of the press. No one believes this propaganda, and governments regularly disprove it. But the fact that it continues indicates that something besides facts is necessary to keep the scheme going.

In Jerusalem, as this is being written, martial law is proclaimed. There has been a struggle between the native inhabitants, whom the Balfour declaration sought to protect, and the new-come Jews. As in the famous Easter disorders of the last year, the wounded in the hospitals show that the Jews were armed and the natives fought with whatever weapons they could find on the spot; the conclusion of all impartial observers under the circumstances being that the Jews prepared for and sought the fight with unprepared natives.

The mark of disorder perpetrated by the Jews is all over the place, the "persecuted" turned persecutor, and lest this should be charged to the general wildness of the people in Palestine let it be said that the rioters were only expressing in deeds what cultivated American and English Jews have expressed in words � namely, that the lawful inhabitants of the land ought to be driven out, in spite of governmental promises to the contrary. One of the first Easter rioters, Jabotinsky, whom the British authorities sentenced to 15 years in prison, was released immediately upon the arrival of Sir Herbert Samuel and is now traveling in state and is talked of as a possible successor to Sir Herbert, although he is originally one of the Russian Bolsheviki come down to practice the gentle arts of that tribe in Palestine.

The government is Jewish. Sir Herbert Samuel is High Commissioner, representing the power of the British Government, which holds the mandate over Palestine. The head of the judicial department, who appoints the judges of Palestine, is a Jew. Christian or Moslem judges who do not give the Jews a shade the better of the proceedings are ousted � a condition not unknown in New York. Chaim Weizman is head of the department of works � he is a Jew, now traveling in this country and having the polite lie passed to him occasionally by Judge Julian W. Mack. In fact, at the heads of all departments are Jews, a former New York Jew being head of the department of immigration, who has made splendid rules for the protection of Palestine from an undesirable class of Jews, rules so well adapted for the purpose that if the Congress of the United States should adopt them the cry of "persecution" would girdle the world.

It is to be noted that the Jewish government of Palestine is very much like that of Russia � mostly foreign. Trotsky came from the East Side of New York. A gentleman recently released from Bolshevik custody told the writer that the governor of his prison was an ordinary Jew who formerly lived on Fourteenth street, Detroit. Practically every big American city is represented in the Bolshevik government of Russia. There is another full-fledged government waiting in this country for service wherever necessary.

The methods being adopted to get the land are such as will fill the world with indignation once the world fully understands what is being done. And that it is done with the knowledge and approval of the Zionist Commissioner is indicated by the fact that he suspended the activities of the British officer who endeavored to stop the abuse. It was the old game of lending money at an exorbitant rate of interest to people hard pressed by war and crop failure, and then seizing their land when they could not pay. The bank that did this was the Anglo-Palestine Bank, a Zionist concern. This British officer, to save the people and the land, made arrangements with a British bank to lend them money at 6 1/2 per cent, with five years to pay. If payment failed, the land was to go to the government for redistribution, not to the Zionist bank. This was the humane plan which the Zionist Commissioner forbade, whereupon the British officer resigned. Some effort was afterward made to redress the terrible act, but there it stands as the well-considered action of Jewry in power.

Then follows what is described by every impartial observer as an "arrogant" attempt to expropriate everything in sight. In Russia it could have been done very easily under the plea of "nationalization," but there was Great Britain whose laws do not condone theft. The only schools that have been established in Jerusalem have been built and manned by the so-called "Gentiles," although the Jews of Jerusalem have been the pensioners of world-wide Jewry for centuries. As long ago as 1842 Dr. Murray M'Cheyne noted that the Jerusalem Jews cared nothing for schools because their children were only growing up into pensioners too. But Christians, with a warm regard for the Holy City, set about to improve the miserable condition of the Jewish inhabitants, and thus it came that at the time of the Zionist invasion a considerable number of Jewish children were in attendance at the schools. The new-come Zionist leaders demanded that the best of the schools be given up to them. Of course, this was refused.

"The Council of Jerusalem Jews" then caused it to be published in the Hebrew daily that parents who did not withdraw their children from the schools would be punished. And now look at the typical punishments threatened:

If any parent refused whose name was on the list of the American Relief Fund, the relief would be withdrawn. An interesting bit of news to subscribers to that fund.

Doctors would be forbidden to visit the families that had children attending the enlightened schools.

Their names would be sent to the blacklist at the places where circumcision was performed, so that new-born descendants of the recalcitrants might be refused the rite of Moses.

They would be denied all share in Zionist benefits or funds.

If they were in business, they would be boycotted.

If they were workmen, they could get no work.

"Anyone who refused, let him know that it was forbidden for him to be called by the name of Jew. They will be fought by all lawful means. Their names will be put upon a monument of shame and their deeds made to reproach them to the last generation. If they are supported, their support will cease. If they are rabbis, they will be moved far from their office. They shall be put under the ban and persecuted, and all the world will know that in this justice there has been no mercy."

It is the Jewish Bolshevist spirit all over again, that spirit which so many people have been vainly endeavoring to reconcile with the Russian temperament � because it is so un-Russian.

It is tyranny, and not the tyranny of strength, but of meanness and darkness. It is now perfectly clear what was meant by Dr. McInnis, who is Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem, when he said: "The emigrants so far brought in (to Palestine, under the Commission) did not include many respectable English Jews; but they did include a great number of Russians, Poles and Rumanians, many of them thoroughly Bolshevik in their attitude to the government."

If this spirit obtains at the beginning of a movement which the Christian world has been taught by propaganda to regard as a profoundly religious and respectable exodus, it burdens the imagination to forecast what will be done in a period of full and unquestioned rule.

Observing and weighing the events and tendencies of Jewish rule thus far in Palestine, it is not difficult to see the purpose in it all. The Jews still distrust their ability to make a State. They do not distrust the world's willingness to let them have a State; indeed, it is amazing how naturally the Jews place confidence in that portion of the world they have always affected to despise. But deep-seated in the Jew is a distrust of himself. He doesn't know how his people will contrive to live together. He doesn't know how they will contrive to drop the principles and practices which are so destructive of social comity elsewhere. And he feels that, patient as the mandatory power may be now, it is doubtful how long that patience will hold out under the blunders and brutalities that will be inseparable from Zionist rule, if any deductions can be drawn from the facts at hand. Therefore, feeling that the time may be short, he is endeavoring by such actions as interference with the cultural question, with the racial rights if the natives, and by such schemes as the land-grabbing device described above, to get so strong a hold on the situation as will seriously complicate it whenever Great Britain shall feel it to be her duty to the world to step in and attempt to bring some kind of order out of the chaos.

It begins to be very clear that Jewish nationalism will develop along the line of enmity to the rest of the world. Already the dangerous proposal has been made to organize a Jewish army for the protection of the Suez Canal. Instead of thinking of roads and farmsteads, of vineyards and oil presses, of schools and sanitary villages, the Jews are thinking of elevating themselves into the military power that shall stand between East and West on that most strategic strip of ground in the world. The whole situation is fraught with danger, and men who wish well to the Jews are alarmed and saddened by the prospect.

There are three elements of danger in the situation as it exists today: the overwhelmingly predominant Bolshevik element that is being poured into Palestine; the intense, egotistic and challenging nationalism that Zionists exhibit even before they get a potato patch � the taste for world politics and world power; and the racial confusion which now exists in Palestine.

These combined are dynamite. The first is more vital than many realize. Already the Jews who have gone to Palestine at great sacrifice and for pious reasons are complaining that instead of the Psalms of David the people are singing songs of the Red Revolution, and instead of meeting for instruction and prayer there are riotous gatherings extolling Trotsky as Messiah and the Soviet as the kingdom of heaven. On the third anniversary of the Jewish Revolution in Russia, the streets of Jerusalem were placarded with sentiments of blasphemy and treason, and May Day this year was devoted to the exaltation of anarchy.

This fact will be of interest to students of prophecy. It is as certain as any human forecast can be that this sort of thing will not be permitted to go forward in the face of the world. It is unimaginable that the nations responsible to humanity for the conduct of that important strip of territory will remain supine while Bolshevism spreads under the false pretense of a religious movement favored by Christendom. An attempt will be made to stop it. The Jews of Palestine will turn on their sponsor nation. The Jews of Russia will come down to help. Great Britain and perhaps the United States will defend the old pure vision of a Jerusalem redeemed. Then will come to pass the prophecy of Zachariah:

"And Judah also shall fight against Jerusalem."

Judah also! It is a thought to make a Jew bethink himself where the lawlessness of the East and the materialism of the West will lead him. Against Jerusalem! What a terrible ending of Judah's present mad delusion.

Palestine has been called the center of the earth. It is. The power that controls Palestine controls the world. Although exercising no sovereignty over the land itself, Great Britain's control of adjacent waters and of Egypt and Persia and India forms the key of her power. The white race has thus far been the Chosen People to whom the dominion of the earth has been given. Palestine is the key to world military strategy and trade. In question 12 of the Questions and Answers published by the department of education, Zionist Organization of America, this occurs:

12. What are the commercial possibilities of Palestine?

The location of Palestine between the three continents favors foreign trade.

All this lends itself to dreams of future glory, and many Christian friends of the Jew have pleased themselves by conceiving an universal Hague at Jerusalem and a new social order going out to bless the nations from Zion. It is the idea conveyed by men like A. A. Berle in books like "The World Significance of a Jewish State." All this might be expected if the Jews of today were Old Testament people, anxious to re-establish the social laws of Moses, which are conceded to be the best safeguards ever devised against pauperism on the one hand and plutocracy on the other. But Palestine has not fallen into the hands of that sort of Jews. Before the dream can be fulfilled Judah must come to himself, as he has not yet, for from of old the Word is �

"And Judah also shall fight against Jerusalem."

The racial situation in Palestine just now is very delicate. Americans do not understand it. The Zionist propaganda has always been accepted on the assumption that Palestine is the Jews' land and that they only need help to go back. It is an historical and political fact that Palestine has not been the Jews' land for more than 2,000 years. There are in Palestine 500,000 Moslems, 105,000 Christians and 65,000 Jews. The industry of the land is agriculture. Engaged in this are 69 per cent of the Moslems, 46 per cent of the Christians and 19 per cent of the Jews. Neither numerically nor industrially have they held the land. Yet, as the result of a war bargain, it is handed over to them as regardless of the native inhabitants as if Belgium had been handed over to Mexico. Many of the natives are Semites, like the Jews, but they do not want the Jews among them.

That is a strange fact for those who use the term "anti-Semitism"; why do real Semites also dislike the Jews? Surely Semites are not victims of "anti-Semitism."

The Balfour Declaration, as well as the terms of the Mandate adopted at San Remo, recognized the rights of the native races. Indeed, everyone who knows about the people who have been native to Palestine for 2,000 years recognizes their rights, everybody except the Jews. Bethlehem was a Christian town, as befits the birthplace of Christ. Yet the Jews have contrived that 2,000 Bethlehemites leave Palestine rather than submit to what they see coming. The other races are not so placid about it, hence the trouble. It is now that the last clauses, added as the Zionist historian declares, "in order to appease a certain section of anti-Zionist opinion," begin to get a meaning for the reader. Was the purpose only to quiet disturbing questions until all the arrangements were made? Evidently. It was then a dishonest appeasement! Such may have been the Zionists' intention, but no one need expect perjury on the part of the responsible nations. The end of the matter will see those last clauses redeemed by honest application of their terms to the people involved.

General Allenby promised those native races of Palestine that their rights would be respected. So did the Balfour Declaration. So did the San Remo Conference. So also did President Wilson in the twelfth of his Fourteen Points.

But Judah says, "Let them get out!" "The last clauses were added in order to appease a certain section of timid anti-Zionist opinion."

"Let them get out!" says Israel Zangwill. "We must gently persuade them to 'trek.' After all, they have all Arabia with its million square miles, and Israel has not a square inch. There is no particular reason for the Arabs to cling to those few kilometers. To fold their tents and silently to steal away is their proverbial habit; let them exemplify it now." Aside from the falsity of using the term "Arab," there is the delightful Jewishness of it � let them give it up to us, we want it! Americans have been in their land less than 150 years as a nation and there is China and Arabia or Siberia for us to go to if we should want to, but we prefer our own country, and so do the native races of Palestine, who have dwelt there for 2,000 years.

The watchmen on the towers of the world are alarmed at what seems brewing in Judah's geographical caldron.

THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 28 May 1921

[Ponce]

From the article = Zionism is the best advertised of all present Jewish activities

As long as the world keeps thinking this way the Zionist will be in power, only when pull the curtains that says "JEWS" back will you see the Zionists and not the Semites hiding back there.

[MNeagle]

THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 28 May 1921


And 90 years later...?

[Hatha Sunahara]

Wasn't it Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild who said Let me issue money and control its value, and I care not who makes the laws.?

If you have unlimited money, you can take advantage of human nature. Everybody has his price. If you can't buy them outright, you can lend them money, and they are your slaves. And you can control their behavior if you can get them fired from their jobs. Or ruin their businesses. But none of that should be necessary if you can make them believe they are free and living in an honest, civilized world. So you control the agendas in the schools, and you decide what people are told or not told in the media. And you can even control the 'clandestine services' to do black ops to keep people afraid at all times of terrorists.

You can do all these things if you issue and control the value of money. The people who control everything are the elite Jews. They use the Zionists, and every other group to press their agenda. If you think that today, any of the world's leaders are autonomous--able to do what the want, you are mistaken. They have to please that unseen, but ubiquitous power that can cause them to be ousted, and replaced by someone more compliant to the agenda. Ford describes it on a smaller scale with New York judges. It was Jews who figured it all out. What you can do with money.

As long as people will do whatever they do for money (I'm just doing my job.) and as long as people with an agenda control the supply and distribution of money, they will keep following that agenda. They will not easily give up what power they have from money, and what is commonly referred to as armageddon will be that struggle to make them give up that power. It just means they will make us all fight to the death until we destroy ourselves.

The root of the problem is the money system. We need something radically different--something that doesn't allow all the wealth to accumulate into such few hands. What we have now is what happens when we refuse to address this fault in our money system.

Hatha

[FreeEnergy]

Here, fixed it for you:


The people who control everything are the elite Zionist Khazars. They use the real Jews, and every other group to press their agenda.

Zionists are not jews, yet they use "antisemitism" to prevent everyone from investigating the garbage, atrocities, killing - including killing of jews - and outright genocide Zionists love to do.

[gunDriller]

i would say Jewish Zionism has already brought Armageddon.

just ask the Palestinians. their life has been a lot like Armageddon the last 63 years. before that their life was a lot more simple, mainly growing olives and raising sheep.


also, Jewish Zionism is inter-twined with the Military and Nuclear industries. the nuclear industry pushed for uranium-based nuclear, one of the results being Fukushima - and that's looking a lot like Armageddon.


considering another large disaster - BP's destruction of the Gulf ... well, they are the Anglo-Persian Oil Company,which is synonymous with Mossad, MI6, CIA - all Jewish Zionist organizations.


unfortunately, their are many more examples of the Fvckedness of Jewish Zionism.

like 9-11.

[7th trump]

Arnageddon is a war that takes place between God and satan (who stands in Jerusalem claiming to be Christ) and his fallen angels smack dab in Jerusalem. Its a magnificant battle thats measured in a matter of seconds.
We, the flesh bodied, will not be in that battle. Its fought between God and satan.
Soon after satan loses this battle the last trumpet (the 7th trump) is sounded (the return of the authentic Christ on earth).

[Horn]

What happened to "On Earth, as it is in Heaven"?

[Libertarian_Guard]

Just 4 you Salty.

[General of Darkness]

LG, the answer is yes.

[Ponce]

Here, fixed it for you:



Zionists are not jews, yet they use "antisemitism" to prevent everyone from investigating the garbage, atrocities, killing - including killing of jews - and outright genocide Zionists love to do.

"antisemitism" dosen't have a danm thing to do with religion or even in particular with the jews sinse there are seven clasification of Semites which includes 30% of all Arabs and of course the Jews of the Bible.

To be anti Semite is like saying that you are against those living in the state of Oregon......so, if you are anti Oregonian you are then a anti OregonianSemite.

V

[Horn]

What about Zionism for Judea supported by U.S./Roman Utilitarianism.

[messianicdruid]

Because of this admixture of the religious sentiment, it will be rather difficult for a certain class of people { the blind and their teachers } to scrutinize modern Political Zionism; they have been too well propagandized into believing that political Zionism and the "return" promised by the prophets are the same thing. Having succumbed to the initial confusion of >>>>> mistaking Judah for Israel <<<<< they have entirely mistaken the ancient writings that relate to these two and have made the single tribe of Judah (whence comes the name Jew) the hub around which all history and humanity swing.

Key #1: Israel and Judah

"The united kingdom of Israel under David and Solomon became a divided kingdom after Solomon died. Thereafter, the kingdom itself was called Israel, or the house of Israel, but it consisted only of the ten northern tribes. The southern house of Judah consisted of Judah, Benjamin, and most of the Levites.

The full story is found in 1 Kings 11, where the prophet Abijah told Solomon that because he had departed from God, the kingdom would be taken from him and given to another. Solomon's son would be given the tribe of Benjamin (along with Judah, of course), but the kingdom itself would be stripped from him. When Solomon died, the kingdom was given to an Ephraimite named Jeroboam, but Solomon's son, Rehoboam, reigned over the southern House of Judah.

From this point on, the Bible speaks of Israel and Judah as two distinct nations. The definition of “Israel” changes. Up to Solomon's day “Israel” meant the entire nation of all twelve tribes, but after the split in the kingdom, “Israel” usually referred to the northern House of Israel, as distinct from the House of Judah to the south. Furthermore, the prophecies to Israel and to Judah are quite different, for each nation had a destiny to fulfill.

Key #2: The Sceptre and the Birthright

When Jacob blessed his twelve sons, he gave the birthright to Joseph (or actually, Joseph's sons when he adopted them in Genesis 48:13-16). With that birthright came the right to be called by the name which the angel gave him, the name of Israel (Genesis 48:16). Judah, on the other hand, received the Sceptre. That is, the messiah, the king of Israel, would come through his family. These things are verified by 1 Chronicles 5:1 and 2,

"Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel; and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright. For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler; but the birthright was Joseph's."

This is why the northern ten tribes retained the name of Israel after the split in the kingdom. It was because the northern tribes included the tribes of Joseph, whose right it was to the name of Israel. Judah never had that political right, although in the genealogical sense, they were Israelites, because they were descendants of Jacob-Israel.

This key is very important, in view of Isaiah's word that “another shall . . . surname himself by the name of Israel” (Isaiah 44:5). The obvious implication is that a people other than the descendants of Joseph would take the name Israel for themselves and thereby lay claim to the birthright and the birthright name, Israel. Judah was not the birthright holder, nor ever could they be, for it was given to Joseph, not to Judah. This is an important and useful key of truth.

Key #3: The Two Works of Christ

The divine law tells us in Leviticus 14:1-7 that it takes two doves to cleanse a leper. Leprosy is the biblical type of our incurable death-ridden nature. The first dove was killed in an earthen vessel over running water (14:5). The second was dipped in the blood of the first and let loose into an open field (14:7).

Jesus came and was killed in an earthen vessel (this mortal, earthen body). In the second appearance, we read in Rev. 19:13, “And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood.” This identifies Him as the second living Dove being loosed in the open field. The field is the world (Matthew 13:38).

The same pattern is found in Leviticus 16 in the things done on the Day of Atonement. The priest killed the first goat and sent the second alive into the wilderness.

This key is directly related to our second key. The second appearance of Christ, with his vesture dipped in blood, not only acts out the part of the second dove, but also identifies him as “Joseph.” Genesis 37:31 says,

"And they took Joseph's coat, and killed a kid of the goats, and dipped the coat in the blood."

In other words, Jesus' first appearance was as the first dove, and He came through the line of Judah. His second appearance is as the second dove, and this time He comes with a Joseph ministry. The first time He came of Judah to lay claim to the Sceptre that Jacob had given to Judah. The second time he comes of Joseph in order to lay claim to the birthright given to Joseph.

The prophetic promise to Judah was fulfilled in Jesus' first appearance. He was born in Bethlehem of Judea (Matthew 2:1). That work was finished when He said on the Cross, “It is finished” (John 19:30). But there was still another work to be done needed to fulfill the prophetic promise to Joseph. That promise was to be “a fruitful bough (son).” The Hebrew word for “bough” is ben. It means a son.

The tree was planted with Jesus' death and burial. It sprouted in His resurrection. Now we have come to the time where the tree must bear fruit.

Key #4: The Cursed Fig Tree

The remnant of Judah in Jesus' day did not accept Him as the messiah, their king. There were, of course, many individuals who did accept Him, but as a nation, they clearly rejected Him (John 11:11). As a consequence, at the end of His ministry, Jesus laid a curse upon the fig tree that represented the nation. Matthew 21:19 says,

"And when He saw a fig tree in the way, He came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away."

Jesus prophesied that it would not bear fruit when it came time for the fruit to be eaten. This fig tree, then, is the one Jesus mentioned later in Matthew 24:32-34, saying,

"Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh. So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled."

Many today understand that Jesus was here referring to the cursed fig tree. It is widely accepted that the cursed fig tree that had withered from the roots up in Jesus' day suddenly began to put forth leaves in 1947-48 when the Israeli state was created. We agree with this. Strangely enough, however, many also believe that the Jewish fig tree nation founded in 1948 is going to bear fruit, though Jesus specifically said in Matthew 21:19 that it would not. Consequently, this is an area that deserves further investigation, so that we might understand the mind of God and know what He is doing in the world today."

If not already, you now the means to overcome the influences of "the blind leading the blind".

http://www.gods-kingdom-ministries.net/teachings/books/blindness-in-part/chapter-1/

[messianicdruid]

The root of the problem is the money system.
Hatha

We must stop using their chits.

[Libertarian_Guard]

We must stop using their chits.

"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America (think world) arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of coin, credit and circulation."

John Adams