Gulf on Tonkin Part II?

[Low Pan]

Wonder if this is just a way to enter into some wider conflict w/ N. Korea and Iran:

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/04/26/south.korea.ship/index.html?hpt=T2

Seoul, South Korea (CNN) -- A North Korean torpedo attack was the most likely cause for the sinking of a South Korean warship last month, according to a US military official.

The US believes the ship was sunk by the blast of an underwater explosion, but that the explosive device itself did not come in contact with the hull of the South Korean ship, the official said.

This is the same conclusion expressed by South Korean military officials.

[Neuro]

Of course I really don't know what went on in the border waters between NK and SK. but the way the US and SK reacted following the sinking of the ship doesn't suggest a false flag attack...My bet is that this was a North Korean attack.

[Spectrism]

Of course I really don't know what went on in the border waters between NK and SK. but the way the US and SK reacted following the sinking of the ship doesn't suggest a false flag attack...My bet is that this was a North Korean attack.


Not at all. If it was a false flag- the declaration of war would have already been broadcast. This was just a stupid move by the psychotic old stooge.

[Low Pan]

Of course I really don't know what went on in the border waters between NK and SK. but the way the US and SK reacted following the sinking of the ship doesn't suggest a false flag attack...My bet is that this was a North Korean attack.


Not at all. If it was a false flag- the declaration of war would have already been broadcast. This was just a stupid move by the psychotic old stooge.


...but aren't we still "technically" at war w/ the North? I could see this as a reason to ramp up our military personnel on the pennisula. But true, if it were a false flag movements would have already been made.