PDA

View Full Version : Judge tells defense: Prove militia isn't dangerous



sunshine05
28th April 2010, 07:17 AM
Judge tells defense: Prove militia isn’t dangerous
By ED WHITE | Published: 04/27/10 at 7:57 AM | Updated: 04/27/10 at 7:43 PM




DETROIT (AP) — An FBI agent who led the investigation of nine Michigan militia members charged with trying to launch war against the U.S. couldn’t recall many details of the two-year probe Tuesday during a grilling by defense lawyers.

Even the judge who must decide whether to release the nine until trial was puzzled.

“I share the frustrations of the defense team … that she doesn’t know anything,” U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts said after agent Leslie Larsen confessed she hadn’t reviewed her notes recently and couldn’t remember specific details of the case.

Roberts is hearing an appeal of another judge’s order that has kept members of Hutaree in jail since their arrest in late March.

The indictment says the nine planned to kill police officers as a steppingstone to a widespread uprising against the government. Defense lawyers, however, say their clients are being punished for being outspoken.

Prosecutors fought to keep Larsen off the witness stand, saying the defendants had no legal right to question her. But the judge said the agent’s appearance was appropriate because the burden is on defense lawyers to show their clients won’t be a threat to the public if released.

The nine lawyers asked specific questions about each defendant. Larsen said she had not listened entirely to certain recordings made by an undercover agent who infiltrated the group.

She said she didn’t know if weapons seized by investigators last month were illegal because they were still being examined. At other times, Larsen couldn’t answer questions because she said she hadn’t reviewed investigative reports.

Defense lawyer William Swor asked if the No. 1 defendant, Hutaree leader David Stone, had ever instructed anyone to make a bomb. The agent replied: “I can’t fully answer that question.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Tukel defended Larsen, telling the judge it wasn’t clear until Monday that she would testify. Roberts, however, said she told the government to be prepared last week.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ronald Waterstreet played an audiotape of what he said were several militia members talking freely about killing police. The participants talked over each other, often laughed and made goofy noises and disparaging remarks about law enforcement.

Defense lawyer James Thomas said some exchanges sounded “like a 6-year-old watching a cartoon.” Larsen disagreed.

“They’re talking about killing police officers. I don’t think you can joke about that,” the agent replied.

Prosecutors objected to questions about interpreting the secretly recorded conversations, but the judge said they were fair game.

“A lot of this case is going to be about the spoken word,” Roberts said.

The judge will resume the court hearing Wednesday. Prosecutors will have a chance to question people who are willing to be responsible for some of the nine if they are released from jail.


http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/27/9-charged-with-plotting-against-us-seek-release/

sirgonzo420
28th April 2010, 07:23 AM
If a militia isn't dangerous, then what's the point?

iOWNme
28th April 2010, 07:24 AM
The only group of men and women to EVER set man free = The Militia of the several Colonies



The group of men and women who enslave other men = US Military

Ponce
28th April 2010, 07:28 AM
M-i-c-k-e-y.......M-o-u-s-e...........Micky Mouse, Micky Mouse.

Perception is how you interpret what you see or hear.......nothing that you see or hear is real till you know the facts........and then yara yara yara.

Libertytree
28th April 2010, 07:36 AM
Is it not the burden of the prosecution to prove that they are dangerous?

sunshine05
28th April 2010, 07:38 AM
Is it not the burden of the prosecution to prove that they are dangerous?


Exactly!

Awoke
28th April 2010, 07:42 AM
Prove the Militia is not Dangerous = Prove the moon will never explode

Celtic Rogue
28th April 2010, 07:52 AM
Is it not the burden of the prosecution to prove that they are dangerous?


Exactly!


Uh I believe that the burdon of proof is always the prosecutions job... hence the presumption of innocents until PROVEN guilty. Proven by the prosecution... not the defence.

silver_surfer
28th April 2010, 08:32 AM
This whole case was just political theater

Blink
28th April 2010, 09:14 AM
Is it not the burden of the prosecution to prove that they are dangerous?


Exactly!


Uh I believe that the burdon of proof is always the prosecutions job... hence the presumption of innocents until PROVEN guilty. Proven by the prosecution... not the defence.


For now. It seems to be sliding a bit to the "shoot first" and then make up some BS lie later with false "legitimate" cover stories later....... average joe don't have a chance.......

cigarlover
28th April 2010, 10:17 AM
The only group of men and women to EVER set man free = The Militia of the several Colonies



The group of men and women who enslave other men = US Military





You do realize the President is the commander in chief of the militias right? One of the reasons I would never join one.




The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States

Hellsbane
28th April 2010, 10:30 AM
I hope the defence lawyers remembered to close the screen door on their submarine because their case has " sunk " written all over it! They can't win a case that has an already predertermined conclusion, that conclusion being their clients found guilty.

jbeck57143
28th April 2010, 11:30 AM
The only group of men and women to EVER set man free = The Militia of the several Colonies



The group of men and women who enslave other men = US Military





You do realize the President is the commander in chief of the militias right? One of the reasons I would never join one.




The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States


Here is a series of articles about the militia, writtten by Edwin Vieira:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin16.htm

(in part 4 he writes about the President being commander in chief of the militia)

Here's another article:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin61.htm

Edwin also talked about the militia on April 21, with the Committees of Safety

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=35794&cmd=tchttp://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=35794&cmd=tc

Awoke
28th April 2010, 12:16 PM
Hmm, I always thought the Militia was a sovereign group that did not answer to anyone, except the constitution. I didn't realize the POTUS is their "Commander" or whatever.

I thought they were just a group of gun-owning citizens exercising their 2nd-A rights together, and prepping to defend the Republic from tyranical government.

cigarlover
28th April 2010, 01:59 PM
Thats what I thought as well Awoke. I just stumbled across that when I was reading the constitution the other day looking for where it authorizes the president to pass all these laws with a presidential order.

Thanks for the links jbeck.. Havent checked them out yet but should be good info..