Ponce
1st May 2010, 07:55 AM
Teenage Mutant Ninja Birth Certificates
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
By Don Nicoloff
April 28, 2010
Naysayers must now regroup and reinvent their ad hominem attacks. After it was revealed that former U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower was not born in Denison, Texas in 1890, nor anywhere else in the United States, a flurry of 'Eisenhower' articles appeared on the Internet as an ineffectually feeble, psychological counterbalance to the revelation that Eisenhower (aka David Dwight Eisenhower) was not a natural-born U.S. citizen. It so happens that he real name was "Johann Adolf Eisenhauer," and his lineage was traced to Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary.
To the uninformed, the U.S. Constitution disqualifies anyone not born on American soil from becoming the president of the United States, though research proves that Johann Adolf Eisenhauer, George H. Scherff, Jr. (aka George Herbert Walker Bush), and Barry Rockefeller (aka Barack Hussein Obama, Jr./Barry Soetoro) accomplished the feat. The Constitution is quite definitive on the issue, yet three separate congressional conventions aided and abetted in the subterfuge of the American government.
In "Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed," (Nov. 30, 2009, Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions), I introduced a 1952 Denison, TX newspaper article which disclosed a birth-certificate scandal surrounding the presidential campaign of Dwight D. Eisenhower. Followup genealogical research revealed that Eisenhower was not and could not have been born in the U.S., primarily because of conflicting evidence provided to INS officials at Ellis Island on September 27, 1924 and the subsequent analysis of biographical accounts and fraudulent U.S. Centennial Census records. Eisenhower's 'American' relatives were determined to be fictional characters whose intransitive existence made his "American birth" a virtual impossibility.
Were it not for the late-Grayson County Judge J.N. Dickson's scrapbook, we may not have discovered the newspaper article's existenceâ€â€nor its significance. Judge Dickson's wife, Callie, in an act of self-absolution, archived the article as a testament to the unconstitutional act her husband was forced to commit, despite his judiciary oath to "uphold and protect the constitution." Great are the burdens placed upon the self-righteous by the military/industrial complex.
As ascertained within the conclusions of the author's aforementioned article, another document has been discovered which confirms the basic premise of the conspiracy to fabricate a fraudulent birth certificate for then-Republican presidential candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower. The document actually precedes the Denison, TX newspaper article, whose date and publisher were not known then, though surmised to be either The Sherman Democrat or The Denison Herald. As of September 1, 1996, both Grayson County newspapers merged into a singular entityâ€â€The Herald Democrat, in Denison, TX. Recent research reveals that it was The Sherman Democrat which had published three articles on the topic.
The conclusions drawn within the publication's first article could only have been derived upon the completion of the requests made within the application for the fictitious document. Using the document's dateâ€â€September 3, 1952â€â€we can determine that the newspaper article, "Ike Gets Birth Certificate; Filed In Courthouse Here," was published exclusively by a Grayson County, TX newspaper less than two months prior to the 1952 U.S. presidential election. The article referenced an inquiry by an undisclosed "New York law firm" into the issue of Eisenhower's claim to have been born in Denison, TX and whether there was a birth certificate on file in Grayson County. Upon the issuance of a court-ordered birth certificate, the newspaper ran a second article which credited "Lonnie F. Roberts" for spearheading the birth-certificate creation campaign. That a court order was required to validate the bogus document smacks of a conspiracy.
Though the newspaper article omitted many specific details about the birth certificate's creation, a recently-discovered letter allegedly sent to Mamie Eisenhower (aka "Ida Koch") from Roberts reveals an open-ended plot to fabricate a third-party birth certificate for her husband, then-candidate Eisenhower. The letter also reveals the role played by former "U.S. Army Pvt." Lonnie F. Roberts. Conveniently, the deed was performed by an underling, a virtual 'nobody' who posed as a patriotic Eisenhower devotee interested in assisting and promoting his favorite candidate. Examination of Roberts' letter provides clues that he was acting on behalf of U.S. Army brass who acknowledged and were subservient to Eisenhower's NATO mission in Europeâ€â€and his future mission in the United States.
The reader is reminded that an official "Certificate of Live Birth" is the appropriate document for proving one's vital statistics, the time and date, and place of birth. Even the court-ordered 'birth certificate' issued on behalf of "Dwight D. Eisenhower" fell short of the U.S. Constitution's citizenship requirements.
The revelations you are about to read will not only expose the fraud committed to further Dwight D. Eisenhower's own political ambitions, they will expose a massive, international plot to derail the U.S. Constitution, turning its principles over to a gang of organized Zionist, Fascist and Communist thugs intent on destroying America from within. What you are about to read will require us to rewrite history. Let that process begin here.
Lonnie F. Roberts: Yet another genealogical myth?
Before considering the unlawfulness of 'Pvt.' Lonnie F. Robert's altruistic endeavors to create a piecemeal birth certificate on another's behalf, especially a U.S. presidential candidate, it would serve us well to examine who he was. Doing so will bring more clarity to the nature of the letter he 'sent' to Mamie Eisenhower.
The only vital statistics data that exist for Lonnie F. Roberts are found at three Internet 'genealogy' web sites, familysearch.org, rootsweb.com, and Ancestry.com; and in a clandestine document referencing tombstones at West Hill Cemetery, Grayson County, Texas. In each example, Lonnie F. Roberts (February 25, 1911â€â€January 11, 1989) did not have a birth place. His last residence, according to the U.S. Social Security Death Index, was Denison, TX. That declaration is doubtful, though.
Most significant is the issuance of Robert's Social Security number in Colorado, not in Texas. Was he born in Colorado? No. Was he born in Texas? Again, a definitive "no." There is no reliable way to substantiate that he was born in the United States at all, largely due to a total lack of any genuine genealogical information. The same anomalies appeared in the author's prior genealogical research of infamous politicians and their cohorts, so we can expect to see more of the same methodical obfuscation here.
If Lonnie F. Roberts was born in the U.S., he had no parents, no siblings, and no family of his own. His birth records in Denison, TX are nonexistent, though a few 'obituaries' and bogus government records provide information that only serve to further muddy the waters. The author has determined (and the reader will, too) that the original two Lonnie F. Roberts (discussed in his above-referenced article) are actually the same person, the name is an alias, and that there is sufficient evidence to support those conclusions. In fact, the two Lonnie F. Roberts alleged to have been born in Texas both received their Social Security numbers in Colorado.
For the sake of simplicity, I will identify each Lonnie F. Roberts as "LFR#1" and "LFR#2" within the text and document portions of this investigative analysis. I will begin with the standard genealogical information available from 'official' genealogy databases. We will then examine the accuracy of that information by comparing their obituaries (or lack thereof) and focusing on additional inconsistencies designed to further obfuscate the real identity of each character. The creators of this fictitious character discounted the fact that someone might actually discern that the information is not only inconsistent, it is fraudulent.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
By Don Nicoloff
April 28, 2010
Naysayers must now regroup and reinvent their ad hominem attacks. After it was revealed that former U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower was not born in Denison, Texas in 1890, nor anywhere else in the United States, a flurry of 'Eisenhower' articles appeared on the Internet as an ineffectually feeble, psychological counterbalance to the revelation that Eisenhower (aka David Dwight Eisenhower) was not a natural-born U.S. citizen. It so happens that he real name was "Johann Adolf Eisenhauer," and his lineage was traced to Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary.
To the uninformed, the U.S. Constitution disqualifies anyone not born on American soil from becoming the president of the United States, though research proves that Johann Adolf Eisenhauer, George H. Scherff, Jr. (aka George Herbert Walker Bush), and Barry Rockefeller (aka Barack Hussein Obama, Jr./Barry Soetoro) accomplished the feat. The Constitution is quite definitive on the issue, yet three separate congressional conventions aided and abetted in the subterfuge of the American government.
In "Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed," (Nov. 30, 2009, Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions), I introduced a 1952 Denison, TX newspaper article which disclosed a birth-certificate scandal surrounding the presidential campaign of Dwight D. Eisenhower. Followup genealogical research revealed that Eisenhower was not and could not have been born in the U.S., primarily because of conflicting evidence provided to INS officials at Ellis Island on September 27, 1924 and the subsequent analysis of biographical accounts and fraudulent U.S. Centennial Census records. Eisenhower's 'American' relatives were determined to be fictional characters whose intransitive existence made his "American birth" a virtual impossibility.
Were it not for the late-Grayson County Judge J.N. Dickson's scrapbook, we may not have discovered the newspaper article's existenceâ€â€nor its significance. Judge Dickson's wife, Callie, in an act of self-absolution, archived the article as a testament to the unconstitutional act her husband was forced to commit, despite his judiciary oath to "uphold and protect the constitution." Great are the burdens placed upon the self-righteous by the military/industrial complex.
As ascertained within the conclusions of the author's aforementioned article, another document has been discovered which confirms the basic premise of the conspiracy to fabricate a fraudulent birth certificate for then-Republican presidential candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower. The document actually precedes the Denison, TX newspaper article, whose date and publisher were not known then, though surmised to be either The Sherman Democrat or The Denison Herald. As of September 1, 1996, both Grayson County newspapers merged into a singular entityâ€â€The Herald Democrat, in Denison, TX. Recent research reveals that it was The Sherman Democrat which had published three articles on the topic.
The conclusions drawn within the publication's first article could only have been derived upon the completion of the requests made within the application for the fictitious document. Using the document's dateâ€â€September 3, 1952â€â€we can determine that the newspaper article, "Ike Gets Birth Certificate; Filed In Courthouse Here," was published exclusively by a Grayson County, TX newspaper less than two months prior to the 1952 U.S. presidential election. The article referenced an inquiry by an undisclosed "New York law firm" into the issue of Eisenhower's claim to have been born in Denison, TX and whether there was a birth certificate on file in Grayson County. Upon the issuance of a court-ordered birth certificate, the newspaper ran a second article which credited "Lonnie F. Roberts" for spearheading the birth-certificate creation campaign. That a court order was required to validate the bogus document smacks of a conspiracy.
Though the newspaper article omitted many specific details about the birth certificate's creation, a recently-discovered letter allegedly sent to Mamie Eisenhower (aka "Ida Koch") from Roberts reveals an open-ended plot to fabricate a third-party birth certificate for her husband, then-candidate Eisenhower. The letter also reveals the role played by former "U.S. Army Pvt." Lonnie F. Roberts. Conveniently, the deed was performed by an underling, a virtual 'nobody' who posed as a patriotic Eisenhower devotee interested in assisting and promoting his favorite candidate. Examination of Roberts' letter provides clues that he was acting on behalf of U.S. Army brass who acknowledged and were subservient to Eisenhower's NATO mission in Europeâ€â€and his future mission in the United States.
The reader is reminded that an official "Certificate of Live Birth" is the appropriate document for proving one's vital statistics, the time and date, and place of birth. Even the court-ordered 'birth certificate' issued on behalf of "Dwight D. Eisenhower" fell short of the U.S. Constitution's citizenship requirements.
The revelations you are about to read will not only expose the fraud committed to further Dwight D. Eisenhower's own political ambitions, they will expose a massive, international plot to derail the U.S. Constitution, turning its principles over to a gang of organized Zionist, Fascist and Communist thugs intent on destroying America from within. What you are about to read will require us to rewrite history. Let that process begin here.
Lonnie F. Roberts: Yet another genealogical myth?
Before considering the unlawfulness of 'Pvt.' Lonnie F. Robert's altruistic endeavors to create a piecemeal birth certificate on another's behalf, especially a U.S. presidential candidate, it would serve us well to examine who he was. Doing so will bring more clarity to the nature of the letter he 'sent' to Mamie Eisenhower.
The only vital statistics data that exist for Lonnie F. Roberts are found at three Internet 'genealogy' web sites, familysearch.org, rootsweb.com, and Ancestry.com; and in a clandestine document referencing tombstones at West Hill Cemetery, Grayson County, Texas. In each example, Lonnie F. Roberts (February 25, 1911â€â€January 11, 1989) did not have a birth place. His last residence, according to the U.S. Social Security Death Index, was Denison, TX. That declaration is doubtful, though.
Most significant is the issuance of Robert's Social Security number in Colorado, not in Texas. Was he born in Colorado? No. Was he born in Texas? Again, a definitive "no." There is no reliable way to substantiate that he was born in the United States at all, largely due to a total lack of any genuine genealogical information. The same anomalies appeared in the author's prior genealogical research of infamous politicians and their cohorts, so we can expect to see more of the same methodical obfuscation here.
If Lonnie F. Roberts was born in the U.S., he had no parents, no siblings, and no family of his own. His birth records in Denison, TX are nonexistent, though a few 'obituaries' and bogus government records provide information that only serve to further muddy the waters. The author has determined (and the reader will, too) that the original two Lonnie F. Roberts (discussed in his above-referenced article) are actually the same person, the name is an alias, and that there is sufficient evidence to support those conclusions. In fact, the two Lonnie F. Roberts alleged to have been born in Texas both received their Social Security numbers in Colorado.
For the sake of simplicity, I will identify each Lonnie F. Roberts as "LFR#1" and "LFR#2" within the text and document portions of this investigative analysis. I will begin with the standard genealogical information available from 'official' genealogy databases. We will then examine the accuracy of that information by comparing their obituaries (or lack thereof) and focusing on additional inconsistencies designed to further obfuscate the real identity of each character. The creators of this fictitious character discounted the fact that someone might actually discern that the information is not only inconsistent, it is fraudulent.