who benefits from the oil rig explosion??? (cui bono)

[Large Sarge]

I am just going to cover the "who benefits" aspect & a timeline

Apr1 2010

Obama proposes opening up huge areas to off shore drilling (almost entire east coast of the U.S.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/science/earth/01energy.html


3 weeks later Gulf Rig "explodes"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100421/ap_on_bi_ge/us_louisiana_oil_rig_explosion


w/ the peoplenomics reports of strange crew members, etc (likely mossad) arriving just before the explosion


Apr 30 2010

"Obama pauses on all off shore drilling, new leases suspended"

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/obama-hits-pause-on-offshore-drilling/


now folks, if we will not drill off shore, and they will not open up alaska (and the oodles of oil there, see lindsey williams "energy non-crisis"), they will not allow SASOL technology to convert the mountains of coal we have to gasoline.

Well that means we have to keep shipping the oil from the middle east (importing it)

and we might see a shutdown of all rigs in the gulf for safety reasons.

So who benefits from this crime?

Middle Eastern Oil interests (zionism/Israel, as we continue to have our military in the region)

Green Technology (which has been a huge flop so far)

Any other shrimp or seafood producer outside the Gulf of Mexico

Tourism Spots/ Beach resorts outside the effected region

and a few others I have not thought of

There are ecologists fanatic enough to do terrorism, but the only group with a long history, and proven track record of using terrorism are the zionists.

We all need to watch how they spin this, we have already seen those new oil leases shut off.

meaning the flow of oil from the middle east will continue

[Ponce]

Take a look in a mirror.........and you will see the real terrorist.

[gunDriller]

the US military benefits in the sense that the 20 billion barrels of oil (discovered reserves) that is offshore the US - it stays in the ground.

because of this accident, it stays in the ground that much longer.

the US policy about banning offshore drilling - officially, it's for environmental reasons.

but if you look at the history of the US military - they have "first dibs" on all natural resources.

US civilians, to use the farming term, suck hind tit.

so the US military, various "Continuity of Government" functions, and those they serve (the Zionists) all benefit from the oil rig explosion. not now, but in the future.

[MAGNES]

JPMChase and EXXON are at the top of Forbes new list
of most valuable companies, just out, JPMChase comes
out on top, 12 Billion in profits 2009. Exxon right behind.
Exxon used to make 5 billion pre wars, now they make
20 Billion plus and who knows how much hidden offshore
through transfer costs and companies.

Both of those are Rockefeller companies.
Strong allies of the Rothchilds.

BP is/was a Rothchild company, how much of
it do they still own, Rocks are still huge stakeholders
in Exxon. They may even take it private some say.

Their goal is to take oil off line and they have.

That is what they did with and Iraq, and what
oil is coming out they are trying to send it to
Israel rebuilding the old pipeline, the bases
are right on that pipeline, we posted pics.

Rockefellers and Rothchilds created Israel.
Supplied oil to Hitler for the war.
They are the global oil masters, always were.

Intelligence agencies and oil companies,
revolving door of executives, who is who,
hard to tell. Same with some key banks.

ARAMCO is theirs too, war on Iran, keep it off line, etc.

Peak oil is a scam.

There is huge oil deposits in Gulf, China
and Russia are just starting to invest in Cuba.

Is this what Cuba is really about too ?

There is oil in the Aegean too,
they sick the Turks on the Greeks to
prevent them from drilling, and Turkey
threatens war if Greek assert sovereignty,
12 mile out international law of sea rights.
I was in Greece in 1988 and this happened.
I was a teenager.

[old steel]

Definitely not these guys.

[http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/photos/2010/05/02/w-gulf-spill-turtle-cp-8586420.jpg]







http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/photos/2010/05/02/w-gulf-spill-turtle-cp-8586420.jpg

[oldmansmith]

I'm not going to say it IS mossad, but I wouldn't be surprised. We have TONS of natural gas, yet nothing has been done to convert to natural gas based energy. All the north slope Alaska natural gas was pumped back into the ground to maintain oil presure. It is still there, and all we need is a pipeline to the US, yet nothing is being done. I see zero natural gas cars on the road. Cui bono?

[gunDriller]

I'm not going to say it IS mossad, but I wouldn't be surprised. We have TONS of natural gas, yet nothing has been done to convert to natural gas based energy. All the north slope Alaska natural gas was pumped back into the ground to maintain oil presure. It is still there, and all we need is a pipeline to the US, yet nothing is being done. I see zero natural gas cars on the road. Cui bono?


Israel has tons of scams going on. Why add another ?

Also, this will not be good for Jewish owned businesses - e.g. beach hotels in the Southern states and the Gulf side of Mexico.

I don't see the tactical or strategic advantage to Israel to have an oil spill that makes the Valdez incident look like a mini-spill.

[MAGNES]

I don't see the tactical or strategic advantage to Israel to have an oil spill that makes the Valdez incident look like a mini-spill.


They work for Rockefeller and Rothchild.
They created Israel. They are also working
on rebuilding the old pipeline that was closed,
going to Isreal. US bases are on this route.
After destroying Iraq output and driving prices
through the roof, Iraq was a swing producer.

They start wars for this and you think that
it is not to their benefit, it is to their benefit,
what happened, question is are they responsible.

Would not surprise me not one bit.

They own the oil companies and they are behind everything
trick imaginable taking oil off line , they are even behind the
evironmental movement in the US preventing drilling.

[Large Sarge]

I'm not going to say it IS mossad, but I wouldn't be surprised. We have TONS of natural gas, yet nothing has been done to convert to natural gas based energy. All the north slope Alaska natural gas was pumped back into the ground to maintain oil presure. It is still there, and all we need is a pipeline to the US, yet nothing is being done. I see zero natural gas cars on the road. Cui bono?


Israel has tons of scams going on. Why add another ?

Also, this will not be good for Jewish owned businesses - e.g. beach hotels in the Southern states and the Gulf side of Mexico.

I don't see the tactical or strategic advantage to Israel to have an oil spill that makes the Valdez incident look like a mini-spill.


they were going to open up all the offshore drilling, entire east coast of the U.S.

thats a LOT of oil

no need to have our kids dying in the middle east, if we have lots of oil right offshore.

[MAGNES]

Sarge, care to voice your opinion ?

Large Sarge is very knowledgeable in this area.
Old school GIM.

In 2008 we predicted a surge in oil prices and they came.
very fast with as spike 2 months later.

LOL

Some actually make money on these analysis. LOL

[Percival]

Why do some of you think that someone always has to benefit from something. I am sure those who win all the lawsuits against those involved will benefit somehow so maybe the fisherman and others whose lives are being destroyed because of it and are suing to get their voices heard are responsble for it.

The national fishermans union was involved in an inside job to blow up an oil ig so they could benefit from the legal windfall that would follow. Thats it. ::)


I dare say most of the time plain old incompetence is enough to cause these sorts of catastrophes, there doesnt have to be some evil villian hiding in a dark smokey back room somewhere planning and plotting disaster.

[Percival]

I'm not going to say it IS mossad, but I wouldn't be surprised. We have TONS of natural gas, yet nothing has been done to convert to natural gas based energy. All the north slope Alaska natural gas was pumped back into the ground to maintain oil presure. It is still there, and all we need is a pipeline to the US, yet nothing is being done. I see zero natural gas cars on the road. Cui bono?


Israel has tons of scams going on. Why add another ?

Also, this will not be good for Jewish owned businesses - e.g. beach hotels in the Southern states and the Gulf side of Mexico.

I don't see the tactical or strategic advantage to Israel to have an oil spill that makes the Valdez incident look like a mini-spill.


You along with the rest of the world doesnt see it but some of these folks have secret rings that allow them to see all and know all and what it allows them to see and know is that there is a Jew behind all of the world's problems.

[mick silver]

http://thedailybell.com/1016/Real-Story-of-Offshore-Drilling.html ... Real Story of Offshore Drilling
Saturday, May 01, 2010 – by Staff Report


Barack Obama U.S. President Barack Obama (left) has approved a move to ban any new offshore oil drilling until an investigation into what caused the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that threatens to destroy U.S. coastal areas and wildlife. Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Texas are all facing potentially devastating effects from last week's explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig. That explosion eventually sank the rig and has led to as many as 5,000 barrels of oil a day spilling into the Gulf waters and heading to the shores. Environmental experts have already said the oil spill will eclipse the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster off the Alaska coast. That spilt 11 million gallons into the water and destroyed a large portion of the wildlife in the area. At its current pace the Deepwater Horizon oil spill will eclipse the damage of the Exxon Valdez in 50 days. There has been no official word on what caused the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon and White House officials have demanded that answer be provided. Until a full report on the cause is known the White House will back a drill ban in any new areas offshore. – WooEB

Dominant Social Theme: Oil is a dirty business.

Free-Market Analysis: We blame American oil companies for this most recent oil spill, but not for the predictable reasons. American oil companies, in our opinion, have helped set up a situation where there is a substantial amount of oil production offshore, even though there doesn't need to be. It's been our opinion all along that US oil companies especially, have been funding Green movements in the US and abroad to help ensure that regulatory issues prevent drilling in the lower 48. This forces drilling offshore and inevitably there will be oil spills – maybe massive ones that are hard to clean up.

How convenient! This in turn, creates more legislative activity to further regulate drilling. And the largest oil companies are not averse to increased regulation that helps drive out smaller players. The largest companies in any industry will always welcome increased regulation because they tend to control the tempo and kinds of regulations being inflicted on a given industry, and therefore on their rivals.

Of course we're aware that American president Barack Obama is sending SWAT teams to the Gulf to inspect oil rigs. This has been seen – by elements of the anti-Obama, conservative press – as precursor to some sort of nationalization. But we would be surprised if the Obama administration messed with Big Oil in a serious way. Big Oil's allies and owners are an elite bunch and tend to be in our estimation the same people that supported Obama's bid for power. Currents and countercurrents swirl deeply around all these issues, to be sure.

In this article, we shall restrict ourselves to an analysis of how Big Oil has used environmental regulation to generate a competitive advantage – and no doubt will try to take advantage of British Petroleum's Deepwater spill in much the same fashion. This sort of mercantilism is endemic to the industry, in fact, and we're not the only ones to have noticed it. Here's an excerpt we found on the Internet – adapted from Chapter 10 of the Holes in the Ozone Scare: The Scientific Evidence That the Sky Isn't Falling, published in June 1992 by 21st Century by Rogelio A. Maduro and Ralf Schauerhammer:

Who Owns the Environmentalist Movement? ... Far from a grass roots movement, environmentalism is a big business, funded and directed by the leading families of the U.S. and European establishments ... Twenty-five years ago, those who believed that Mother Nature comes first and humankind second were part of an insignificant fringe, considered radical by most Americans. ... Official lore from the environmental movement's publications asserts that the movement emerged from the grass roots. The truth, however, is that funding and policy lines comes from the most prestigious institutions of the Eastern Liberal Establishment, centered around the New York Council on Foreign Relations, and including the Trilateral commission, the Aspen Institute, and a host of private family foundations. ...

The vast wealth of the environmentalist groups may come as a shock to most readers who believe that these groups are made up of "public interest", "nonprofit" organizations that are making great sacrifices to save the Earth from a looming doomsday caused by man's activities. In fact, the environmental movement is one of the most powerful and lucrative businesses in the world today. ...

Where do the environmental groups get their money? Dues from members represent an average of 50 percent of the income of most groups; most of the rest of the income comes from foundation grants, corporate contributions, and U.S. government funds. Almost every one of today's land-trust, environmental, animal-rights, and population-control groups was created with grants from one of the elite foundations, like the Ford foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. These "seed grants" enable the radical groups to become established and start their own fundraising operations. These grants are also a seal-of-approval for the other foundations. ...

Another huge source of contributions to the environmental movement is private corporations. Unlike tax-exempt foundations, however, corporations are not required by law to report what they do with their money, so it is difficult for an independent researcher to estimate the level of funding for the environmentalist movement from business and industry. There are watchdog groups, however, that have investigated these money flows and come up with startlingly large figures.

For example, the April 1991 newsletter of the Capital Research Center in Washington, D.C., which monitors trends in corporate giving, scathingly denounces those corporations it has discovered financing the environmentalists. The newsletter states that oil companies "are heavy financial supporters of the very advocacy groups which oppose activities essential to their ability to meet consumer needs". Further, it reports, "The Nature Conservancy's 1990 report reflects contributions of over $1,000,000 from Amoco, over $135,000 from Arco, over 4100,000 from BP Exploration and BP Oil, more than $3,200,000 (in real estate) from Chevron, over $10,000 from Conoco and Phillips Petroleum and over $260,000 from Exxon".

From the scant information publicly available (largely annual reports from the major environmental groups), one can conservatively estimate that corporations contribute more than $200 million a year to the environmentalist movement. This should come as no surprise. Over the past 20 years, giant corporations have discovered that by using environmental regulations they can bankrupt their competition, the small- and medium-sized firms that are the most active and technologically innovative part of the U.S. economy.

Yes, indeed ... America's largest oil companies and those who own them have been busy pushing discoveries out into the sea or overseas for decades, and the environmental movement has provided a lever. It certainly makes sense. In the case of deep-sea drilling, the effort tends to be prohibitive unless you are the size of Exxon – and thus the barriers to entry are tremendous. In the case of Middle Eastern and other foreign drilling, the supply chain is long enough to tolerate considerable pricing shenanigans that oil companies could never get away with were they drilling at home.

The Deepwater spill is sure to put pressure on deep-water drilling, which in turn will make the price of oil even more expensive. US oil companies are, at the least, facing the prospect of more regulation as regards deep-drilling, off-shore efforts. Is this something US big oil conglomerates fear? Hardly. More regulation merely raises the barriers to entry once again. Worst case, exploration moves to Africa and central Europe and prices rise once more for American consumers.

There are so many large discoveries of oil in the Americas that we have all-but-lost track. There have been huge discoveries of oil in the Gulf of Mexico and the Bakken Formation in the Dakotas promises additional billions, if not hundreds of billions of barrels. There are the oil-rich tar sands in Canada and of course manifold discoveries in Alaska, some of which are being exploited, others not. The Sahara is rich with oil, much of which has not yet even been drilled, and one assumes that there are other as yet undiscovered deposits throughout Africa.

Then there is the idea that oil is abiotic, or caused by naturally occurring geological processes deep in the earth – which would explain why some wells seem to refill, at least partially. This theory is not opposed to the idea that oil is also composed of dead plants and animals, but one can certainly speculate that there is more to the creation of oil than has thus far been explained. The nomenclature "fossil fuels" makes us suspicious to begin with. When the elite labels something so forthrightly, it's usually for a reason. In this case, the name defines the process, something which is either extraordinarily convenient or in a sense propagandistic.

Oil companies generally hope to keep the price of oil aloft by preventing supply from coming online. Domestic production in North America has definitely been slowed by the environmental movement, even though as we just pointed out, above, there is likely plenty of oil were it to be actually tapped. We won't go so far as to say that there is rejoicing in the corporate boardrooms of the American oil giants tonight as they face the prospect of a widely publicized Deepwater spill. But in fact additional regulations put in place as a result of Deepwater will actually only further cement the competitive advantages that American oil giants already enjoy. The barriers to entry are vast. The amounts of money necessary to compete these days, given the regulatory blockages, continue to rise.

Conclusion: To visualize the oil industry as fighting like mad to stave off environmental attacks is to utilize a paradigm that is from our point of view a bit naïve. Environmentalism, to date, has been one of the power elite's most successful promotions, a dominant social theme worthy of an Oscar nomination. But in the 21st century, we shall see if the elite is able to maintain the momentum. That's not just a sociopolitical question, but an important issue from an investment standpoint as well.