PDA

View Full Version : Federal law may limit BP liability in oil spill



MNeagle
3rd May 2010, 05:53 PM
By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer Erica Werner, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 2 mins ago
WASHINGTON – A federal law may limit how much BP has to pay for damages such as lost wages and economic suffering in the Gulf Coast oil spill, despite President Barack Obama's assurances that taxpayers will not be on the hook.

A law passed in response to the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska makes BP responsible for cleanup costs. But the law sets a $75 million limit on other kinds of damages.

Economic losses to the Gulf Coast are likely to exceed that. In response, several Democratic senators introduced legislation Monday to raise the liability limit to $10 billion, though it was not clear that it could be made to apply retroactively.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Monday the administration's commitment was for BP to pay for all costs associated with the spill.

Obama said the same thing during a tour of the area Sunday. "Let me be clear: BP is responsible for this leak; BP will be paying the bill," the president said.

Kenneth Baer, spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget, also noted that if BP were found to have acted negligently in the spill or to have violated federal laws, the damages cap under the Oil Pollution Act would be lifted.

Baer said BP could also be held liable under additional federal or state laws.

"You can be sure that BP will be held accountable to the full extent of the law," he said.

Nevertheless, the existence of the liability cap might complicate Obama's commitments to make BP pay for numerous costs anticipated in the Gulf such as shortened fishing seasons and lost tourism. It is not clear how high those costs could rise.

"We're glad that the costs for the oil clean up will be covered, but that's little consolation to the small businesses, fisheries and local governments that will be left to clean up the economic mess that somebody else caused," said Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., a sponsor of the legislation raising the cap, which the administration said it supported.

BP issued a fact sheet Monday committing to pay "all necessary and appropriate cleanup costs" as well as "legitimate and objectively verifiable claims for other loss and damage caused by the spill." A company representative did not immediately return a phone message seeking comment on whether claims would be paid out over $75 million.

Beyond the $75 million in law, the federal government also maintains an Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund supported by industry fees. It can make a total of $1 billion in payouts per incident to individuals, businesses and governments.

Roughly 2.6 million or more gallons has spilled into the Gulf since the April 20 blast that sunk an oil rig and killed 11 workers.

On Monday afternoon top administration officials, including Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, economic adviser Lawrence Summers and energy adviser Carol Browner, met with BP CEO Tony Hayward and BP America Chairman and President Lamar McKay at the Interior Department.

The 90-minute meeting was closed to reporters, but officials said discussion centered ongoing response efforts, as well as an update on BP's mitigation plans for potentially affected Gulf Coast states. It was the latest in a series of meetings between administration officials and BP.

BP officials said little as they left the session.

"Very constructive dialogue," Hayward told reporters as he and other BP officials got into a car.

Summers and Browner declined to comment.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100503/ap_on_bi_ge/us_oil_spill_liability

Ponce
3rd May 2010, 06:11 PM
That money wont cover even 1/100 of what is going to happen.

Grand Master Melon
3rd May 2010, 06:18 PM
75 million is a fucking joke. These stupid ass oil companies rake in all sorts of money and to think that they'd be limited to only that is ridiculous.

Buddha
3rd May 2010, 06:49 PM
Should we really be surprised?

mick silver
3rd May 2010, 07:00 PM
we all will pay at the pump

I am me, I am free
3rd May 2010, 07:43 PM
75 million is a f*cking joke. These stupid ass oil companies rake in all sorts of money and to think that they'd be limited to only that is ridiculous.


Someone posted earlier they hoped BP would be put out of business. I laughed. The corporate state takes care of its own. Does this $75M limit really surprise anyone? $75M is merely the crumbs which fall off the table.

Gaillo
3rd May 2010, 07:58 PM
we all will pay at the pump


Ain't that the truth, Mick! :P

1970 Silver Art
4th May 2010, 03:47 AM
75 million is a f*cking joke. These stupid ass oil companies rake in all sorts of money and to think that they'd be limited to only that is ridiculous.


I could be very wrong here but $75 million is probably a small fraction of what BP makes in profits in a year.

undgrd
4th May 2010, 04:51 AM
I could be very wrong here but $75 million is probably a small fraction of what BP makes in profits in a year.



in a year!?!?!

ghost
4th May 2010, 12:11 PM
The best congress money can buy.
Those statements leave off zeros. Your looking at 25 billion dollar profit not million.
General Electric, Goldman Sachs, and Exxon paid no U.S. income tax this past year, just how much U.S income tax you think British Petroleum paid?


ghost

MNeagle
4th May 2010, 12:15 PM
2nd line: "All numbers are in thousands"

Ponce
4th May 2010, 12:48 PM
Went to the store to get some milk and I happened to glance at the heading of one of the newspapers........."BP will pay any ...legitimate..."

But what is legitimate to millions will not be legitimate to one.

MAGNES
4th May 2010, 04:21 PM
Surprise !

Not !

The Oil Barons are probably happy to
poison the oceans too.

ghost
4th May 2010, 07:47 PM
When the statement says in thousands you multiply by 1000, that eliminates a lot of zeros.
BP's net operating income for 2009 was 26.43 billion dollars, their net profit was 16.58 billion dollars. Wikipedia
The statement showed they paid income tax but is does not show how much U.S. tax they paid

1970 Silver Art
4th May 2010, 07:50 PM
When the statement says in thousands you multiply by 1000, that eliminates a lot of zeros.
BP's net operating income for 2009 was 26.43 billion dollars, their net profit was 16.58 billion dollars. Wikipedia
The statement showed they paid income tax but is does not show how much U.S. tax they paid


They probably did not pay any U.S. tax. It would not surprise me if that was true.

keehah
10th May 2010, 02:01 AM
http://oilprice.com/Environment/Oil-Spills/The-Cover-up-BP-s-Crude-Politics-and-the-Looming-Environmental-Mega-Disaster.html

Obama and his senior White House staff, as well as Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, are working with BP's chief executive officer Tony Hayward on legislation that would raise the cap on liability for damage claims from those affected by the oil disaster from $75 million to $10 billion. However, WMR's federal and Gulf state sources are reporting the disaster has the real potential cost of at least $1 trillion. Critics of the deal being worked out between Obama and Hayward point out that $10 billion is a mere drop in the bucket for a trillion dollar disaster but also note that BP, if its assets were nationalized, could fetch almost a trillion dollars for compensation purposes. There is talk in some government circles, including FEMA, of the need to nationalize BP in order to compensate those who will ultimately be affected by the worst oil disaster in the history of the world.

Ponce
10th May 2010, 06:55 AM
Like the US economy........it will never really be known.

"They only tell us what they want us to know, OR WHAT THEY CANNOT LONGER HIDE"... Ponce

FreeEnergy
10th May 2010, 09:51 AM
I modified it and posted it into a separate topic. Castro says global financial elite, and not the government, runs the world (http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/castro-says-global-financial-elite-runs-the-world/).