View Full Version : Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
PatColo
4th May 2010, 01:46 PM
Question and Answer Forum (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11686)
Updated May 4, 2010
Most Recent Question: We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library . You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why? You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11. Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents?
I have Piper's Final Judgment. I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.
Bollyn Responds: This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today.
The people you ask about: Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family. What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can" (http://www.bollyn.com/slam-bollyn-every-way-you-can-daryl-b-smith-2), which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?
http://www.bollyn.com/public/hufschmid.jpg
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?
No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?
I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. While I agreed to be interviewed by Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith, I have always worked as an independent journalist (for Spotlight and AFP from 2000 until October 2006) and was never affiliated with any of them in any way. I have been interviewed by many people. Being interviewed by a person or having my material posted on somebody's website does not indicate any deeper association than that. The attempts to link me with Hufschmid and Smith are part of an intel trap to discredit my work by connecting me with them. Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Bollyn_and_Smith_cropped.jpg
[i]Christopher Bollyn (left) and Darrel Setters (a.k.a. Darrel Bradford Smith)
at Smith's home in central France, the morning after Thanksgiving 2005
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn's book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Makufka_Scott.JPG
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn)
Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called "stealing the thunder." If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World? (http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book)
So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?
This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.
If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?
It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch's FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite
Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?
Eric Hufschmid's father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch's son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with "The French Connection" in early 2005.
Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like "The Committee to Expose Bunk", which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.
The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Lane_in_Jonestown_cropped.JPG
Mark Lane was present at Jonestown during the massacre. He is considered to
have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim
Jones. This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass
suicide/massacre. How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the
Liberty Lobby several years later.
Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.
Who does Lane work for?
Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane's role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.
But isn't the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?
Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?
What is the C.I.A.'s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that's where most of the world's opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel's Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.
This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.
One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.
Large Sarge
5th May 2010, 06:54 AM
thats interesting reading
I can only speak of what I remember, and DBS and Bollyn had there falling out after they finally met, Bollyn traveled to France.
DBS made the comment that Bollyn got "snookered" at their meeting
Bollyn made the comment that DBS's wife was Black and a "hip hop dancer" /instructor
Things went downhill from there, mud slinging, etc
Bollyn is not as innocent as he portrays himself IMO
they had personal issues between them
DBS has even posted some of Bollyns articles (only recently)
perhaps an olive branch?
anyway it all came apart after they met in France.
and then Bollyn posted that picture of DBS (which apparently DBS had said "please do not post it")
and then Bollyn started calling DBS a fake, because his dad was a marine fighter pilot, and died in service, and then his mom remarried.
Well DBS changed his name late in life, to keep his fathers sur name, Bollyn latched onto that, called DBS a phoney, etc
Bollyn is not lily white,
but the main point is that all of their issues are personal, has nothign to do with the quality of their research/ work
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Bollyn and Smith should just make a phone call, or do a visit sweden and france are not that far, thery could certainly develop a professional relationship (supporting each others works) if not a personal relationship
PatColo
5th May 2010, 10:55 AM
It's a tangled web they all weave that's for sure.
Mark Lane of AFPress is sure a curious operator. Bollyn says Lane was in Army Intelligence in Germany in the mid-40s after the war? I'm thinking how old is Lane? I look at Lane's wiki entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Lane_%28author%29), they say he's born 2/24/1927 making him 83 now, & meaning 2/24/45 he'd have just turned 18, which is around when Bollyn claims Lane served in Army intel... ?!? Of course wiki's "early career" info begins in 1959, when Lane would've been ~32, nothing about Lane before that. To read wiki's spin about Lane's "innocent" role in Jonestown is almost funny, when you assume that Lane was (is) indeed a CIA asset. Lane's central role in Liberty-Lobby/Spotlight/AFP lends credence to Bollyn's assertion that the enterprise is ultimately a sticky-flypaper op.
Book
5th May 2010, 11:25 AM
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Hufschmidt caused the whole thing. His tribe are pros at doing that kind of mindgame thing on goyim.
DBS and Bollyn should realize this and now reconcile.
:oo-->
PatColo
5th May 2010, 01:34 PM
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Hufschmidt caused the whole thing. His tribe are pros at doing that kind of mindgame thing on goyim.
DBS and Bollyn should realize this and now reconcile.
:oo-->
You may feel differently about Huffy instigating the DBS/Bollyn rift if you listen to the couple of recorded phone calls DBS made to Huffy, DBS drunk & cussing like a sailor about the need to destroy Bollyn.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html
(mp3s about 2/3 down that page)
Huffy's compromised himself though, I agree with Bollyn that Huffy's stubborn insistence that Bollyn/family are kidnapped by Mossad etc, providing no evidence, just repeating it over & over even in recent interviews-- very "strange".
Book
5th May 2010, 04:06 PM
You may feel differently about Huffy instigating the DBS/Bollyn rift if you listen to the couple of recorded phone calls DBS made to Huffy, DBS drunk & cussing like a sailor about the need to destroy Bollyn.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html
(mp3s about 2/3 down that page)
Huffy's compromised himself though, I agree with Bollyn that Huffy's stubborn insistence that Bollyn/family are kidnapped by Mossad etc, providing no evidence, just repeating it over & over even in recent interviews-- very "strange".
Gee...I dunno PatoColo: Huffy made those silent secret phone recordings of DBS being drunk bad-mouthing Bollyn then posted those embarrassing recordings on the internet. After Huffy did the usual jew divide-and-conquer-the-goyim headgame on drunkard DBS. Bollyn was Huffy's target all along and so he used the drunkard goyim DBS as his dupe character-assassin.
Didn't you just make my point for me buddy?
:D
PatColo
5th May 2010, 05:25 PM
Book, what specific content of the article(s) linked, or the DBS/Huffy phone call mp3s, leads you to believe Huffy was the central instigator?
As far as I can gather, DBS appeared to be the aggressor in seeking to discredit Bollyn by any (dishonest) means necessary-- for "reasons" I never saw evidenced (IE alleged Bollyn "lies" about DBS).
Book
5th May 2010, 05:36 PM
Book, what specific content of the article(s) linked, or the DBS/Huffy phone call mp3s, leads you to believe Huffy was the central instigator?
As far as I can gather, DBS appeared to be the aggressor in seeking to discredit Bollyn by any (dishonest) means necessary-- for "reasons" I never saw evidenced (IE alleged Bollyn "lies" about DBS).
I dunno anymore then you do PatColo. The fact that Huffy secretly recorded the phone calls then publicly posted those recordings on the internet is evidence to me. DBS was obviously drunk and he reasonably assumed that his "friend" Huffy was not recording their phone conversations.
I think Huffy head-played DBS like a goy violin. Since then Huffy shriveled up and his website died. DBS and Bollyn are still going strong and have many fans. OK with me if you still see it differently buddy.
:)
KumbayaMan
5th May 2010, 06:13 PM
Interesting.... Dont want to derail the conversation but how does Piper fit into all this? ???
What do you guy's think???
:dunno
Also, and why did DBS leave RBN....?
PatColo
5th May 2010, 06:46 PM
I dunno anymore then you do PatColo. The fact that Huffy secretly recorded the phone calls then publicly posted those recordings on the internet is evidence to me. DBS was obviously drunk and he reasonably assumed that his "friend" Huffy was not recording their phone conversations.
I think Huffy head-played DBS like a goy violin. Since then Huffy shriveled up and his website died. DBS and Bollyn are still going strong and have many fans. OK with me if you still see it differently buddy.
:)
Book: seems like you assume Huffy orchestrated the DBS/Bollyn rift mainly coz you assume Huffy to be a crypto-joo/zio-agent. I certainly allow for this possibility, as for one thing, Huffy's 'evil jooz' schtick is just over the top enough that it smells to me like chutzpah-maneuver-101 bunk. For that matter, ditto for DBS. And Huffy's long since needed to put out or shut up re Bollyn/family being kidnapped & held...
But in this instance, Huffy 'splains his decision to record the calls (first call's a partial recording coz Huffy didn't initiate it, but did grab the recording equipment during the call), and then his decision to post them on the internet, within the article:
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html
To me, the weightier evidence as to "who's guiltiest?" is the content of the calls, which definitely don't reflect well on the nature/agenda of DBS.
Judging by some of his "fruits", I know Huffy's compromised in some way so I'm not about defending him, but his site is still up, http://www.erichufschmid.net, and he does an article or audio monologue or radio interview (http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/TFC-interviews.html) now & then, but from what I've seen, he's the lowest profile/traffic/etc compared to DBS, Bollyn, or Piper.
PatColo
5th May 2010, 07:04 PM
Interesting.... Dont want to derail the conversation but how does Piper fit into all this? ???
What do you guy's think???
:dunno
Also, and why did DBS leave RBN....?
The Piper thing is addressed in the OP.
On DBS history with RBN, & GCN, I can't keep the details straight & it's been years that DBS has been "independent" anyways, but I know DBS has bad mouthed the owners of... at least GCN (T.Anderson?), of being a double crossing agent or some such. Seems like DBS doesn't like RBN's Stadtmiller either, can't remember why.. maybe search iamthewitness for something explaining. DBS is so full of piss & vinegar, it's easy to imagine he just doesn't play well with others, "not a joiner", yada yada. dyodd.
Book
5th May 2010, 07:16 PM
Why would I put personal phone calls on the Internet?
These are not personal phone calls. I only extracted the sections that did not have the personal information. I would not refer to these as "personal" phone calls. I would refer to them as evidence that an organized crime network is desperately trying to manipulate me.
Huffy rationalizing that their phone calls were not "personal" phone calls...lol.
:oo-->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsYHVHm3Y20
Huffy looks like Chertoff's cousin...lol.
:oo-->
KumbayaMan
5th May 2010, 07:17 PM
Thanks Pat...
guess I need to look into it...
Been listening to Piper on and off for a few years and just started listening to DBS's podcast a few months ago.
He does seem to not play well with others but I think his show is good and could never understand why these guy's werent more "together" on point... I only recently learned DBS started out on RBN so that's why I asked. Anyway, I have my thoughts about RBN... Stadtmiller seems to do some bone head things with the network sometimes...
The Piper thing is addressed in the OP.
I understand, what I meant was what did you think about the whole Mark Lang / AFP thing w/ Piper, is there another angle to this?
Book
5th May 2010, 07:18 PM
PatColo: Proof in the pudding is how DBS's website flourished since he canned Huffy.
:)
PatColo
5th May 2010, 08:57 PM
Why would I put personal phone calls on the Internet?
These are not personal phone calls. I only extracted the sections that did not have the personal information. I would not refer to these as "personal" phone calls. I would refer to them as evidence that an organized crime network is desperately trying to manipulate me.
Huffy rationalizing that their phone calls were not "personal" phone calls...lol.
:oo-->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsYHVHm3Y20
Huffy looks like Chertoff's cousin...lol.
:oo-->
PatColo: Proof in the pudding is how DBS's website flourished since he canned Huffy.
:)
Huffy edited out "personal" parts of the calls (as he stated in the article (http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html)); you're correct that Huffy's not pretty to look at; & Huffy's site is not intended as a "daily news pitstop" like DBS' site is. Book, if you're making the case that Huffy=BAD (crypto/agent/etc), & DBS=GOOD (honest/non-compromised/etc), you're not making a very convincing case so far, "lol". :oo-->
I listened to this Huffy interview a few weeks ago, interesting throughout:
Tuesday, 2 Feb 2010
I was interviewed by "Botrax" in Canada. He is familiar with the corruption, so this is not an introduction for beginners. We talk about Zionism, Bollyn, and how Zionism is failing. Click here MP3 (http://www.botcast.net/shows/TitesBots/2010/TiteBot-0030-Surround.mp3)
Huffy keeps sowing seeds of doubt about the true status of the Bollyns, providing no evidence to substantiate: How can so many people be certain that the Bollyns are free? (http://www.erichufschmid.net/learn-from-my-experiences.html#Bollyns)
Huffy was also interviewed last Nov by Mike Delaney/Prothink, which to me is an obvious FBI/ADL op,
Thursday, 12 Nov 2009
I am a guest on the show hosted by Mike of ProThink.org We talk about how I got involved with 9/11, and what I think is happening to the crime network today. A direct link to it is here (http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-16999/TS-292129.mp3).
...so Huffy who ostensibly doesn't trust anyone, says everyone must be investigated; apparently thinks "prothink" is legit? LOL another arrow through Huffy's cred.
Huffy 5/3 on the gulf oil disaster & more,
How many accidents
are actually diabolical crimes? (http://www.erichufschmid.net/Suspicious-events-April2010.html)
again not vouching for Huffy, just look at his stuff with your brain kept in the "ON" position. :-*
Book
5th May 2010, 09:50 PM
...so Huffy who ostensibly doesn't trust anyone, says everyone must be investigated; apparently thinks "prothink" is legit? LOL another arrow through Huffy's cred.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/img/Eric-Hufschmid-small.jpg
PARANOIA GUY
I never went back to Huffy's website after reading his insane SHRILL accusations that everyone, and he means everyone, is a Crypto except him. It got old PatColo.
And yes...I still visit http://www.iamthewitness.com/ occasionally and think it is 100 times better without Huffy.
:-*
MAGNES
17th June 2011, 06:48 AM
Right out of the Protocols,
out of the whole thing Bollyn is the only one trustworthy.
DMac
17th June 2011, 07:42 AM
Hufschmid's sister is married to Rupert Murdoch's son.
iOWNme
17th June 2011, 06:41 PM
I just read this entire thread for the first time. There is a ton of good info here. I never got deep enough into any of these guys either way.
I cant believe Hufschmid's sister married Murdoch's son. Amazing. As if this was some type of 'coincidence'. Give me a break.
We must keep in mind that Zionist probably started the 9/11 truth movement.
MAGNES
5th July 2011, 11:13 PM
We must keep in mind that Zionist probably started the 9/11 truth movement.
This nut case never went away. Who remembers this guy, this is a job for PatColo.
Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11 | BobTuskin.com (http://www.bobtuskin.com/2011/07/05/inside-job-seven-questions-about-911/)
Is Jim Fetzer making a comeback ? LOL
This is how they operate, do some good and become leaders after building up
some credibility, then they do some sort of damage, even as subtle as making
sure the movement makes no progress, many examples of this, you may hear
the total truth from them but it will never go anywhere, then there's the blatant
outright damage. And remember, never ascribe malice where incompetence rules,
incompetence is their excuse, so say the head Masons. : boxing smiley :
PatColo
6th July 2011, 12:19 AM
This nut case never went away. Who remembers this guy, this is a job for PatColo.
Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11 | BobTuskin.com (http://www.bobtuskin.com/2011/07/05/inside-job-seven-questions-about-911/)
Is Jim Fetzer making a comeback ? LOL
I still don't trust Fetzer. It seems he went through a rehab/reinvention of his former discredited "truther" image, even pointing the finger at the perps of 911 - the zionists. He was for a time on the "development group" of this otherwise very credible ZIHOP 911 Truth site:
http://rediscover911.com/ (http://rediscover911.com/)
... but I notice Fetzer is no longer displayed in that list (top right). His article- Is 9/11 research ‘anti-Semitic’? (http://rediscover911.com/911-denialholocaust-denial/) - still appears at the site.
Fetzer is still peddling "no planes at WTC/ video fakery" which insults the intelligence of real truthers & noobs alike-- the exact point of such a ploy- sow division in the movement and turn away noobs before they get around to reviewing any of the real issues.
Fetzer was on Kevin Barrett's radio show recently, MP3 here: 06/27/2011 (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-062711.mp3) Monday - 1st Hour: With Jim Fetzer. 2nd Hour: With Stephen Lendman. (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-062711.mp3)
Barrett gives him general respect but also asks good questions about the problems with Fetzers "no planes @ WTC" noise.
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Jim Fetzer, Stephen Lendman on TJ Radio Monday (http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com/2011/06/jim-fetzer-stephen-lendman-on-tj-radio.html)
Truth Jihad Radio Mon. 6/27/11 (http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/11/19/american-social-credit-why-we-need-it-now-you-need-understand-stealth-economic-warf), 1-3 pm Central, American Fre (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/)edom R (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/)adio (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/)(archived here (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_11.html).) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1632985004).
First hour: Jim (http://www.d.umn.edu/%7Ejfetzer/)http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zrRCpJE8iP0/TgalRwfk3nI/AAAAAAAAAug/Odu4uMambC8/s320/Dr._James_Fetzer.jpg (http://www.d.umn.edu/%7Ejfetzer/) Fetzer (http://www.d.umn.edu/%7Ejfetzer/) explains his latest article "9/11: Seismic Proo (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/06/911-seismic-proof-video-fakery-inside.html)f + Video Fakery = An Inside Job (http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/06/911-seismic-proof-video-fakery-inside.html)." I don't understand the relationship between the seismic proof (Ross and Furlong's study (http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Article911SeismicProof.html) showing that the first explosion in the North Tower happened 14-17 seconds before the plane impacts) and the video fakery (http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Proof-of-Video-Fakery--by-Jim-Fetzer-080729-132.html) issue. But apparently Jim does...
Note: Dr. James Fetzer will be speaking on July 20 at the University of Minnesota-Duluth campus in Bohannon Hall Room 90 starting at 7 pm, with doors opening at 6 pm. That hall seats 350 people. Jim's talk is titled: "Were the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq justified by the events of 9/11/01?"
PatColo
7th August 2011, 07:50 AM
I still don't trust Fetzer. It seems he went through a rehab/reinvention of his former discredited "truther" image, even pointing the finger at the perps of 911 - the zionists. He was for a time on the "development group" of this otherwise very credible ZIHOP 911 Truth site:
http://rediscover911.com/ (http://rediscover911.com/)
... but I notice Fetzer is no longer displayed in that list (top right). His article- Is 9/11 research ‘anti-Semitic’? (http://rediscover911.com/911-denialholocaust-denial/) - still appears at the site.
Fetzer is still peddling "no planes at WTC/ video fakery" which insults the intelligence of real truthers & noobs alike-- the exact point of such a ploy- sow division in the movement and turn away noobs before they get around to reviewing any of the real issues.
Fetzer was on Kevin Barrett's radio show recently, MP3 here: 06/27/2011 (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-062711.mp3) Monday - 1st Hour: With Jim Fetzer. 2nd Hour: With Stephen Lendman. (http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-062711.mp3)
Barrett gives him general respect but also asks good questions about the problems with Fetzers "no planes @ WTC" noise.
Thread: Lawson Video on Absurdity of "No Planes Hit WTC" Theory (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?52743-Lawson-Video-on-Absurdity-of-quot-No-Planes-Hit-WTC-quot-Theory)
OP of that thread includes Bollyn's 8/5/11 post, Lawson Video on "No Planes" Theory (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13123)
PatColo
7th August 2011, 08:04 AM
also new from Bollyn:
Debunking the Lies of Michael Piper (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13096)
Updated August 4, 2011
Have patience awhile; slanders are not long-lived. Truth is the child of time; ere long she shall appear to vindicate thee.
- Immanuel Kant
The worthiest people are the most injured by slander, as is the best fruit which the birds have been pecking at.
- Jonathan Swift
For the past five years I have been subjected to an incredible amount of slander and defamation. Oddly, most of the defamation comes from two people with whom I was formerly associated, namely Eric Hufschmid and Michael Piper. Both of them lie about me with impunity with orders to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. They have both clearly been given orders to attack my credibility and kill me with ignominy.
In this respect Hufschmid and Piper act in the same way as Daryl Bradford Smith, who was recorded threatening Hufschmid and ordering him to "Slam Bollyn every way you can" (http://www.bollyn.com/slam-bollyn-every-way-you-can-daryl-b-smith-2) in 2007. The similarity of their efforts indicates they are working under the same orders and most likely for the same agency. A sure indication of an agent is his ability to lie with impunity. It seems logical that it is not because my 9/11 research is flawed or incorrect that these three disinformation agents have been ordered to attack me -- but because it is correct and true.
The following is from the beginning of the 2007 conversation (http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-1-8sep2007.mp3) in which the agent Daryl B. Smith (DBS) rudely threatens and orders Eric Hufschmid (EH) to attack me every way he could. To listen to Smith screaming and swearing (http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-1-8sep2007.mp3) like a complete madman gives the listener some idea of the intensity of the vile and malicious effort to defame me. Smith, who is supported by Michael Piper as "a genuine anti-Zionist", is obviously under the influence of a very evil power.
DBS: Well, here's a deal. And this is between you and me, because we've been doing this a long time together. You have to come out and, and slam Bollyn every way you can, in my, in support of me. Every way you can. No compromise. If you don't, I want parting from our, from our relationship.
EH: But what do you mean, slam him?
DBS: I, whatever the f--k you need to do to make this son-of-a--- be crippled by the s--t he's doing. I'm talking about a full court press on this guy. I'm talking about whatever it is you know about him, whatever it is you can say about him, whatever it is you can do about him, you need to do now. And if you can't do that, Eric, we gotta go. I gotta go.
Although they have also attacked each other, Hufschmid, Smith, and Piper work in harmony in their attacks against me. Hufschmid and Piper both claim, for example, that I am under the control of Zionists and that they are the only true anti-Zionists. Hufschmid, for example, has claimed since 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Israeli Mossad. Based on this ridiculous claim, Hufschmid has ignored my 9/11 research for the past five years, such as my book Solving 9/11 (http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book), saying that I am writing "Zionist bait" under the control of my kidnappers. I dealt with Hufschmid in an article entitled "Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception" (http://www.bollyn.com/eric-hufschmid-and-rupert-murdoch-agents-of-deception) written in October 2010.
Michael Piper, on the other hand, goes further and fabricates malicious lies about me and my wife in his relentless effort to defame me. As a veteran writer and senior officer at American Free Press, however, Piper's defamation is much more serious because he represents a newspaper and organization which many patriotic Americans believe in and support. It is for this reason that it is absolutely imperative for me to debunk and expose the falseness of the vicious lies of Michael Piper. By seeing how he is lying about an honest 9/11 researcher, one is able to understand Piper's role as an agent of the other side. A silver lining of the undercover police attack and malicious prosecution that I suffered in the corrupt courts of Cook County in 2007 is that through this ordeal Michael Piper and American Free Press were fully exposed as controlled opposition agents under the thumb of the Jewish lawyer, Mark Lane.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Piper.JPG
Michael Piper of American Free Press is paid to defame me with lies and disinformation. Exposing Piper's defamation is essential to understanding his role as a controlled disinformation agent.
As an independent journalist since June 2000, I have written about a number of significant and sensitive subjects. As a journalist with American Free Press, a weekly paper based in Washington, D.C., I wrote a great deal about the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 from the day of the attacks until October 2006. Then, suddenly, I was fired from AFP in early October 2006 after being attacked by three heavily-armed undercover police at my home in mid-August 2006.
Our police departments are being made adjuncts of the ADL's efforts to suppress dissent in America. Outspoken journalists such as Bollyn are the frontline targets. Don't let it happen in your town.
- Michael Piper, "ADL Link to Bollyn Case" (http://www.bollyn.com/adl-link-to-bollyn-case-by-mc-piper), American Free Press, 27 August 2006
After the assault by the three-man tactical squad, which left me TASERed with a broken elbow, the populist paper I wrote for suddenly turned against me. This change was most obvious in the behavior of Michael Piper, a corporate officer of American Free Press. Two weeks after the assault on their star journalist, Piper demanded that the publisher, Willis Carto, refuse to allow me to attend the paper's annual conference, held in Washington D.C. over the Labor Day weekend. During 2005 and 2006, however, Piper had always introduced me to his radio audience as "America's best investigative journalist, bar none." Now, days after being attacked by a tactical team of undercover cops, Piper was demanding that "America's best investigative journalist" be barred from attending AFP's annual conference. How much sense does that make?
This was very odd to say the least and speaks volumes about the real nature of American Free Press. There I was, an American journalist who had done a great deal of original research on 9/11, beaten and TASERed at his home by a corrupt police force. There is a huge and very important story there. All of the things AFP warns its patriotic readers about had actually happened to their star reporter in the middle of the United States, but they did not want me talking about it at their annual conference. How very odd. Although I was not allowed to attend the conference this did not stop AFP from collecting thousands of dollars from their readership for my legal defense fund.
Michael Piper has continued to wage a relentless campaign of defamation against me ever since. Defamation is the act of damaging a person's reputation by saying or writing bad or false things about them. Today, nearly 5 years after I was fired from American Free Press, Piper continues to defame me. The first question is why? Why would an officer of a so-called patriotic newspaper go to such lengths to defame an independent 9/11 researcher? Piper is one of the controlling people at American Free Press. When I began working at the Liberty Lobby in the summer of 2000, Michael Piper would eat lunch at a local restaurant with Willis Carto, Mark Lane, and the accountant, Blayne Hutzel. As one of the corporate officers, Piper is allowed to sign checks from the various companies that control the funds for the organization.
Piper seeks to defame me by using lies to portray me as a Zionist agent who has sabotaged the 9/11 "movement". A Google search of my name, for example, brings up a webpage entitled "Christopher Bollyn - Agent Saboteur", just below the link to my own website Bollyn.com. The "Agent Saboteur" link brings the reader to a website called takeourworldback.com (http://www.takeourworldback.com/short/bollyn.htm), which has a very large section devoted to defaming me and my investigative research on 9/11.
The most recent defamation on this site is called The Bollyn - Hufschmid - Murdoch "Coincidence" (http://www.takeourworldback.com/bollynhufschmidmurdoch.htm), revised on July 17, 2011. This page begins by saying that I am a "suspected Zionist infiltrator" and a "proven liar" who uses a "a standard COINTELPRO tactic from the 1960s of smearing genuine activists as 'agents'."
The introduction, or Executive Summary, is very short but reveals a great deal about what is really going on at TakeOurWorldBack.com:
Two suspected Zionist infiltrators come on to the anti-Zionist 9/11 truth scene within a year of 9/11, both collaborate for years after 9/11 - from 2002 to 2007 at least, and both are using a standard COINTELPRO tactic from the 1960s of smearing genuine activists as "agents". Both of them are proven liars who promote disinformation and are a liability to the truth movement. And it turns out that both of these Judas Goats are connected to billionaire Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
According to attorney Brian Glick, the FBI used four basic methods for their COINTELPRO of the 1960s: Infiltration by agents and informers, psychological warfare from the outside, harassment through the legal system, and extralegal force and violence. His book, War At Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It, has the following description for infiltration (page 10):
1. Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
[The next 3 paragraphs describe what I also call the CHUTZPAH MANEUVER (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?48510-The-gullible-mind-explained-False-projection-of-honor-code&p=410540&viewfull=1#post410540)... -PC]
Glick points out how agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.
Covert Manipulation to Make A Legitimate Activist Appear to be an Agent: An actual agent will often point the finger at a genuine, non-collaborating and highly-valued group member, claiming that he or she is the infiltrator.
Although the author of takeourworldback.com is not known, Michael Piper is clearly the source and author of most of the material about me. He has crafted these lies about me, my wife, and others in an effort to discredit and defame me. Reading through the document, which I call "the Piper piece", it is clear that he is using projection, just as Brian Glick says agents will do. Agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.
GENUINE ACTIVIST vs AGENT
People who don't know me might be fooled into believing the lies of Michael Piper. This is, after all, what the people who control Piper want. He works very hard at spreading lies and disinformation about me because he is ordered to do so -- and is being paid for it. Using bald-faced lies mixed with facts, Piper spins a web of disinformation which he hopes the gullible reader will believe. Sowing suspicion about me and my work is the goal.
It needs to be said that this response is not a personal attack on Michael Piper. This is simply a much-needed response to his campaign of disinformation and defamation against me. There is nothing personal between me and Mike Piper. He is simply an agent of disinformation who poses as an American patriot. By attacking me Piper hopes to create suspicion and doubt in the reader's mind about me and my 9/11 research. The purpose is "to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters", as Glick says. This is what agents and informers do. I am the genuine activist and Piper is the agent seeking to smear me as an agent. There are so many lies in the Piper piece that I can't address each of them individually. I will try to expose the key lies in his tangled web of deception so that the reader can see who is telling the truth, and who is lying.
Piper claims that my wife and I were spying on him in Mexico in 1997. "In April of 1997, the Bollyn couple were tailing Mike Piper in Cancun, Mexico," the webpage says. Piper goes on to say that when he met us in May 2000 he realized that we were "the same couple" that had tailed him in Cancun in 1997. If Piper truly realized in 2000 that Helje and I had been trailing him in Mexico, why did he promote me to his listeners in 2006 as "America's best investigative journalist, bar none"? Piper was either deceiving his listeners in 2006, or he is lying about us having trailed him in Mexico. In either case, he is trapped in his own lies.
The idea that we were following Piper in Mexico is a complete fabrication. My wife Helje has never even been to Mexico, and I have not been there since the 1980s. My wife, who was pregnant for most of 1997, had her hands full raising our two-year old son. She certainly was not interested in following Michael Piper. After all, we did not even know who Michael Piper was in 1997. If he really believed that we had been tailing him in Mexico in 1997, why did he never mention this to me during the 6 years we worked together at AFP?
Piper also claims that my wife was a "nude model" and that we had shown him "her nude modelling photos". This is another lie. Helje worked as a professional model in Stockholm and Chicago, where we lived, but none of her work can be called nude modelling. The only photo that he could be referring to is one of Helje and our 10-month old son for a Stockholm traffic safety campaign billboard that encouraged drivers to use proper baby car seats for their children. This campaign was quite unusual because Sweden does not allow billboards along the highways. This photo was part of an official child safety campaign that used special billboards on 14 highway ramps around Stockholm in 1996 and 1997.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Anglavakt1.JPG
Guardian Angel or Child Car Seat?
The document claims that Helje has two Jewish names, Brand and Kaskel. Firstly, Brand is not Helje's name at all. Brand is the name of my mother's Swiss-born foster father. Kaskel may be a Jewish name but in the case of Helje's family they only took this name in 1938 during a campaign in the Republic of Estonia to encourage people with foreign-sounding names to take names that sounded more Estonian. Helje's father's family name was Klaassen, a name of Scandinavian origin. Her grandfather received 5 crowns for choosing the name Kaskel from a list of names.
Piper's disinformation piece also claims that my first wife was an "Israeli intelligence officer." This baseless claim is repeated throughout the piece as if it were a proven fact. The fact of the matter is that when she was drafted into the army, like all Israeli girls at age 18, Bosmat was assigned to work as a secretary, which was normal for a girl with her profile. She did not like working in the army and got married to get out. To call her an intelligence officer when there is absolutely no evidence to support this claim is dishonest.
The Piper piece also claims that I worked with Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. This is not true. I have always worked as an independent journalist. Hufschmid and Smith invited me to speak on their "French Connection" podcast as did many others. I was reluctant to speak with Smith because I had seen that he had already begun defaming me after I had visited him at his home in France.
Piper also takes rather normal things and spins them in a way to make me look suspicious. The fact that I travelled via Germany to go from Brussels to Smith's house in France leads Piper to all kinds of speculation. The simple fact of the matter is that there was a French rail strike (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/22/world/europe/22iht-strike.html) at the time. I decided to use the German trains, which give extremely good value for travelling families, and then rent a car from Geneva. I also travel to Switzerland when I can because I enjoy visiting the country where some of my ancestors came from.
The Piper piece also makes a big deal of the fact that I met Rupert Murdoch when I was a ski guide at the Pine Creek Cookhouse near Aspen, Colorado. What Michael Piper or his fellow agent don't seem to understand is that the Pine Creek Cookhouse is a place that is frequented by many people like Murdoch. It was not at all unusual to see Hollywood stars and politicians in the dining room. Once I saw a short fellow at the workbench in the ski shop and wondered what he was doing. It turned out to be Michael Douglas. One of our regular visitors was Robert McNamara, who enjoyed back country skiing in the peaks above Aspen.
[cont'd next post...]
PatColo
7th August 2011, 08:08 AM
[...cont'd from previous]
It is important to note that the Piper piece, which claims I am a "proven liar", promotes Piper and Smith as "genuine anti-Zionists". Smith revealed himself as an agent in 2007 when he was taped telling Hufschmid to "slam Bollyn every way you can." (http://www.bollyn.com/slam-bollyn-every-way-you-can-daryl-b-smith-2) It is obvious that Piper and Smith are controlled by the same people and have the same orders -- "Slam Bollyn."
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Smith.jpg
Daryl Bradford Smith, the anti-Bollyn agent, a.k.a. Daryl B. Setters
I only went ahead and spoke on the "French Connection" because I believed it was more important to get the information out about 9/11 than to refuse to participate. It is, however, utterly false to say that I was working with Hufschmid and Smith. It is more correct to say that they were using my research to bring attention to their show. Hufschmid did tell me about Sam Danner, who turned out to be a 9/11 hoaxer.
The Piper defamation piece says that I am responsible for the deception of Sam Danner, a person who apparently lied when he said that he had been at the Pentagon on 9/11. I had interviewed Sam Danner at length and found his testimony to be interesting and credible. I wrote two articles about Danner's testimony for American Free Press. Both articles included the necessary caveats, such as "if true" and "if accurate", etc. to warn the reader that the article was based on eyewitness testimony. "If his account is true" is how I introduced Danner's material. This lets the reader know that this is not factual, but a person's recollection. The reader is warned and can decide how credible he sounds.
Apart from outright lies, the Piper document claims that I am a "proven liar" because I have reported people saying things that were later challenged by another person or through another source. In these cases, however, Piper or his partner readily accept the veracity of the claim made by the other party and say this proves that I am lying. My report that Benjamin Chertoff, for example, who worked on Popular Mechanics "9/11 debunking" article, was related to Michael Chertoff, is said by Piper to be a lie because Benjamin has disputed what his mother told me on the phone. The Piper piece also misrepresents the Chertoff connection to 9/11 by completely ignoring the fact that Michael Chertoff, as Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division, played the key role in the 9/11 cover-up by supervising the federal non-investigation of 9/11 and the destruction of the crucial evidence. In this way the Piper piece seeks to protect Michael Chertoff. How odd.
When asked about the relationship with Michael Chertoff, Benjamin's mother told me "they are cousins", which is how I reported it. The Piper piece says that Benjamin said his mother had said "they might be distant cousins." This is certainly not what she told me, but the Piper piece takes the words of Benjamin Chertoff as true in order to present me as a liar. He does the same with the account of my arrest at the hand of the corrupt police of Hoffman Estates. By accepting the words of the police who attacked me as the complete truth, the Piper piece seeks to portray me as a liar, even when the dispatch timeline clearly supports my statements about the police conspiracy to injure me.
MOLTEN METAL
Another example is what I reported having been told by Mark Loizeaux about the discovery of molten metal (http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn2.htm) at the base of the three collapsed towers of the World Trade Center:
AFP [Bollyn] asked Loizeaux about the report of molten steel on the site. "Yes," he said, "hot spots of molten steel in the basements." These incredibly hot areas were found "at the bottoms of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels," Loizeaux said. The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon.
This is exactly what Mark Loizeaux told me during our telephone conversation in 2002. The Piper piece says that I have deliberately misquoted Loizeaux, which is a lie. I reported what Loizeaux told me in his own words. How would anyone know what Loizeaux said to me, other than myself and Mark Loizeaux? Furthermore, Loizeaux has never complained or claimed that what I reported about his comments was in any way incorrect. If I had misquoted Loizeaux I would expect to hear from him.
There are many lies about my arrest following the undercover police assault on me at my home in August 2006. The Piper piece, for example, claims that I lied when I said that I was thrown into a cell with no water and told to drink from the toilet. To prove that I am lying, the Piper piece shows a jail cell in Hoffman Estates with a toilet and sink. In my case, I asked for water because I was very thirsty and no water came from the tap when the button was pushed above the sink. The water flow had evidently been turned off. The Hoffman Estates police lied in court about everything that happened when they assaulted me at my home in August 2006.
One point that the Piper piece brings out is the fact that the ambulance and fire department were dispatched to my house about three minutes before the plain clothes tactical unit even arrived on the scene. This is supported by the official dispatch timeline and the fact that my wife saw the ambulance parked near our house when she stopped the undercover police coming up our driveway. The ambulance had been sent to my home to be prepared for an unknown medical emergency nearly three minutes before the undercover unit arrived.
My wife, who confronted the three plainclothes men wearing body armor coming up our driveway, saw the ambulance and fire truck in front of a neighbor's house, about 100 feet away. The fire department vehicles had been dispatched to our home at 20:01:06 while the undercover tactical unit only arrived on the scene at 20:03:56. The fire department vehicles were logged in as being on the scene at 20:03:57, only one second after the arrival of the undercover cops. This is due to the fact that the ambulance, which had been dispatched for an "unknown medical emergency", only had to travel two blocks from its station to my house.
The Piper piece also misrepresents the police response to my 911 call. I had called 911 because I had seen a suspicious vehicle with three heavily-armed men prowling around my house for two nights in a row. I pondered calling the police for a while after I had discussed the situation with my wife. What was so alarming to us was the fact that the three plainclothed men approached our house in a threatening manner. As we found out later, the tactical squad had hijacked the response to the 911 call and ordered the uniformed officer not to respond.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Hoffman_Estates_911_cropped_small.JPG
A 2006 brochure from the Village of Hoffman Estates encouraged residents to call 911 "when in doubt"...
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Hoffman_Estates_when_in_doubt_small.jpg
advising residents to call 911 "whenever you need police or fire service."
"Something is obviously wrong", the Piper piece says about the ambulance being dispatched before the arrival of the police:
Has there ever been a single example in human history where bent cops planned to attack someone, and helpfully called the paramedics to come to the aid of their victim in advance - thereby voluntarily providing evidence that would incriminate themselves and could be used to prove their victim's innocence in a court of law?
Yes indeed, there is something very, very wrong with the undercover police assault on Christopher Bollyn, an American journalist, at his home in August 2006.
What I discovered is evidence of a police conspiracy to injure or kill an American for exercising his Constitutional rights, which is a serious federal crime. This is why I realized that my chances of winning in the Zionist-controlled courts of Cook County were extremely slim. Had I won and been found not guilty, I would have been in an excellent position to sue the police and expose their crimes and the people who were behind their attack on me. With his lies, Piper is obviously protecting the corrupt police.
The police report claimed that they smelled alcohol on my breath -- from a distance of three meters. If there was any suspicion that I was intoxicated why did the police not do a simple breath analysis like they do for drivers? They were, after all, traffic police. The only reason I was not tested for alcohol is because there was no indication of intoxication. Rather than test me, the police used lies to try and defame me. They certainly had the means to test me, given the presence of 7 police cars, one ambulance, and a fire truck at my house that evening. Why didn't they?
The entire incident was recorded on police videotapes in the 7 police cars that came to my house. Like the crucial steel from the World Trade Center, the video evidence of the police action at my home was "recycled" by the police department in clear violation of their own regulations and my written request to preserve all the evidence. Why would the police destroy the evidence? Why was the steel from the World Trade Center destroyed?
Why has Michael Piper taken the side of the corrupt police and engaged in a defamation campaign against me for the past five years? It is certainly not because what I have written about 9/11 is wrong. If my analysis and reporting about 9/11 were inaccurate and flawed why would Piper spend so much time attacking me and my wife rather than arguing the facts about what really happened on 9/11?
I trust in the intelligence of my readers to be able to discern what is true and what is false. Michael Piper is clearly involved in spreading malicious lies and disinformation about me. More importantly, what does this say about the integrity of the outfit he is working for?
Sources:
Bollyn, Christopher, "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can - Understanding the Purpose and Methods of Defamation", 9 December 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/slam-bollyn-every-way-you-can-daryl-b-smith-2 (http://www.bollyn.com/slam-bollyn-every-way-you-can-daryl-b-smith-2)
Bollyn, "Bollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith", 7 September 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-responds-to-malicious-slander-of-daryl-b-smith (http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-responds-to-malicious-slander-of-daryl-b-smith)
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/109301 (http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/109301)
Hufschmid, Eric, "Smith's weird phone call on 8 September 2007" (with mp3 files of Smith's extremely rude and threatening phone calls to Hufschmid)
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html (http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html)
Hufschmid, Part I of D.B. Smith's threatening and obscene call
http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-1-8sep2007.mp3 (http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-1-8sep2007.mp3)
Hufschmid, Part II of DBS call
http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-2-8sep2007.mp3 (http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-2-8sep2007.mp3)
Hufschmid, Part III of DBS call
http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-3-8sep2007.mp3 (http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-3-8sep2007.mp3)
Piper, Michael, "ADL Link to Local Police Agencies Uncovered in Chris Bollyn Affair", American Free Press, 27 August 2006
http://www.bollyn.com/adl-link-to-bollyn-case-by-mc-piper (http://www.bollyn.com/adl-link-to-bollyn-case-by-mc-piper)
Large Sarge
8th August 2011, 02:50 AM
I am left wondering on this whole thing....
Hufschmidt I think is compromised in some way...,.
He just did a lot to sow discord
DBS has a whole library, for free,
Anyway the whole saga of "the mossad has kidnapped bollyn" when he disappeared for awhile, was strange...
then after that DBS and Huffy both were saying "bollyn is now an impostor", because he will not come out of hiding....
So some of what bollyn says corroberates that
Some of it might just be personality issues, general level of paranoia (dealing with conspiracies, etc)
to give Bollyn credit, he did pretty much solve 9/11, and he posted that book for free online.... that is the seminal work on 9/11.
I have sent DBS a number of notes urging him to "kiss and make up" with bollyn, he shows no interest in it....
PatColo
8th August 2011, 04:43 AM
It's a tangled web Sarge, no doubt. Past year or so I've been making Mark Glenn's The Ugly Truth blog (http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/) a regular news stop, and I enjoy his podcasts. Only problem I've found with MGlenn is, he's aligned with Piper in slandering & seeking to discredit Bollyn. Glenn is much less active in this endeavor than Piper though; first and last I heard Glenn badmouth Bollyn was perhaps a year or so ago, and I'd have to find it but I recall it amounted to Glenn's taking the Police's word re the Bollyn tazering incident as gospel, and Glenn was somehow using that as the core for his effort to discredit Bollyn.
Piper's a much more toxic character than his buddy Glenn, with Piper "slamming Bollyn" in virtually every one of his podcasts I've heard- even this most recent 8/5 one (http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/08/06/the-piper-report-aug-5-2011/), which Piper spends part of responding to this 8/4 Bollyn piece above. Piper's approach being mainly childish name calling (referring to Bollyn as "kinky balloon" ~10x per podcast) and repeating "proven liar!" over and over with only ambiguous and paper thin claims to back this up. When I'm really bored I'll listen to a Piper podcast, just to see what he's saying these days, but I can't say I enjoy or learn anything from his shtick- most of the time he's obviously full of scotch.
I do believe Bollyn about Piper being an agent, as Piper's attacks on Bollyn are just too thin yet too incessant and ongoing, esp in contrast to Bollyn's ignoring them (with Bollyn's 8/4 Piper-debunking piece above being a rare exception) and not picking fights generally, for Piper's tireless, endless Bollyn-slander-campaign to be anything but a spook disinfo op. And AFP's background with Mark Lane etc taint their trustworthiness indeed... they're surely compromised at best...
DBS' act has really cleaned up these past couple years, much less of his former piss & vinegar personality, seldom does he spend time on attacking other patriots like he used to spend way too much time doing several years ago, and lately he's just been pumping out good interviews & news links, besides his free audio/book libraries.
Hufschmid's been a joke and off the radar of real truth seekers for years already, his silly "Bollyn's been kidnapped!" campaign is only part of the reason why, next case.
I just now noticed this Mar '11 Piper podcast as I was searching his podcast page (http://www.michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com/) for "Bollyn"- I haven't listened, might later, anyways check it out if you're curious:
Special Broadcast (http://michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com/2011/03/17/special-broadcast/)
March 17th, 2011
PatColo
22nd February 2012, 06:00 AM
this post is just about huffy- didn't want to start a thread for it.
Don't know what reminded me of him, but it had been months since I'd visited http://erichufschmid.net - which in recent years hasn't been updated very often anyways. But I went by and, see he's as erratic and weird as ever, a mix if both interesting/insightful social commentary, and disturbing perspectives.
I'm not up for writing up a whole tome on his stuff now; I'll just say check it out.
On the "disturbing" side of things, look for where he suggests that cameras everywhere, including inside hotel rooms, with video saved somewhere centrally "for awhile", would really help us know how Whitney Houston really died, and what happened with D.S.Kahn & the maid, etc. In his otherwise interesting low-functioning thyroid discussion, he posts 3 pic of his bare backside, sack & all, just so we can see how his thyroid hormone therapy has helped turn around his morbid underweight-ness.
I'm still going through his other recently added stuff, above are just some teasers, if you're curious to check the latest on this character.
edit, here's a little ditty: from Nov '10, just 1.25 year ago, long after Huffy & DBS fell out, apparently DBS called Huffy drunk again, and...
http://erichufschmid.net/Desperate-Reptilians-Peggy-update.html#Smith
Daryl Smith called me on 2 November 2010 (http://erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html)http://erichufschmid.net/img/Daryl-Smith-tiny.JPG (http://erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html)
I didn't get the beginning of the conversation but here is most of it. His main topic was farts! He hung up the phone when I asked,
"What do you think is going to happen to your kids? Think about this, Daryl. Do you think anybody is going to want your kids around?"
http://erichufschmid.net/TFC/img/bull-horning.gifDaryl-Smith-2Nov2010.mp3 (http://erichufschmid.net/mp3/Daryl-Smith-2Nov2010.mp3) 1.6 mb, 14 minutes Perhaps he was going to hang up at that time, anyway, but it's possible that I made him realize that we are going to take a close look at his family members, including his two sons. Imagine having Daryl Smith as your father! If his kids aren't ashamed, something is seriously wrong with them.
More information about Smith is here (http://erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html), if you're not sure who he is.
PatColo
3rd March 2012, 11:17 PM
In his otherwise interesting low-functioning thyroid discussion, he posts 3 pic of his bare backside, sack & all, just so we can see how his thyroid hormone therapy has helped turn around his morbid underweight-ness.
I see Piper picked up on the above "nude huffy pics", and pokes fun at huffy near the top of the following podcast he just posted. His comments amount to, "I told you years ago what a nut this huffy is!",
The Piper Report March 3, 2012 (http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/the-piper-report-march-3-2012/)
Posted by crescentandcross (http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/author/crescentandcross/) in Uncategorized (http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/) on March 4, 2012 http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-ab3gTb8xb3dLg.gif
http://michaelcollinspiper.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/1-orthodox-jews-2.jpg?w=423&h=302&h=302
Tonight’s program–A respected Jewish academic demonstrates that the state of Israel is by medical standards clinically insane.
Also–the nude antics of a famed internet commentator.
MCP WILL BE BEGIN HIS NEW PROGRAM AT WWW.REPUBLICBROADCASTING.ORG (http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/) SUNDAY MARCH 4 FROM 7-9 CENTRAL TIME.
Download Here (http://michaelcollinspiper.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/mcp3mar2012fin.mp3)
DMac
16th August 2012, 10:14 AM
Bump, I need to re-read this thread.
Related:
Fake Patriots thread (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?62999-Fake-Patriots-thread)
PatColo
24th August 2012, 05:26 PM
Bollyn has this article up, scorning American Free Press for publishing 2 articles endorsing both leading zio-puppet prez candidates. Then he rehashes his thoughts on why AFP is controlled opposition.
AFP and Disinformation: How it works (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13658)
PatColo
10th September 2012, 03:16 AM
The above Bollyn article sparked a couple MCP podcasts flaming Bollyn. MCP's flame efforts are quite void of substance- really boiling down to calling Bollyn silly names like "kinky balloon", and saying he's a big dummy head.
Mami's shit blog (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/) has been posting all (?) of MCP's podcasts, recently with this graphic,
The Piper Report 2012.09.09 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-piper-report-20120909.html)
http://i49.tinypic.com/35m432a.jpg
LOL ;D
PatColo
16th September 2012, 09:35 PM
latest in Piper's ongoing pedantic smear campaign against bollyn (& other topics too), haven't listened... off hand I say shame on any "patriot" who props up the cruel hoax that our vote counts whatsoever... FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win" (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?53978-FAKE-quot-ELECTIONS-quot-Why-Ron-Paul-Can-t-quot-Win-quot&highlight=fake+paul+can%27t[/url)
The Piper Report 2012.09.16 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-piper-report-20120916.html)
http://i48.tinypic.com/2lwsn5f.jpg (http://i48.tinypic.com/2lwsn5f.jpg)
Piper's official endorsement of Obama for the next presidency of the USA, some stuff about kinky balloon again. Mark Glenn shows up and much much more!. LMAO
Mike Piper Report.com (http://mikepiperreport.com/)
AFP (http://americanfreepress.net/)
RBN (http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/)
Download MP3 (http://kiwi6.com/file/0vm535aqpx) (at link)
PatColo
22nd October 2012, 08:59 AM
This discussion MP3, a recorded phone conversation between Eric Hufschmid and some Israeli operative supposedly named "Hogarl", took place in Aug '09 but I just stumbled upon it. Eric describes it this way (http://www.erichufschmid.net/fatal-flaws-of-Zionism.html):
In this conversation, Hogarl tries to convince me over and over that the Jews are beating us. I responded with some issues that I think are very important for you to understand, and I suppose the criminal Jews don't want to hear this. Namely, that I think the Jewish crime network is losing, and that they suffer from two fatal flaws that will cause them to lose time after time. Here is that phone conversation, missing the first minute or so. He hangs up on me at the end, or his phone disconnected by accident.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/img/audio_icon.gif Hufschmid-Hogar-2Aug2009.mp3 (http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/Hufschmid-Hogar-2Aug2009.mp3) 7.1 mb, 60 mins
To download, click your right mouse button and select Save Target As
So it's an hour long, where the two are arguing round and round about whether the zionist crime network is "winning" or not in their goal of taking over the world.
Early in, "Hogarl" is asked what country he's from, and he vaguely identifies himself as "European", declining to be more specific. His Israeli accent is conspicuous. While Hogarl's Israeli-Jewishness is obvious, it's never said openly. Within just a few minutes though, Hogarl stops referring to Jewry as "they/them/their", and openly refers to them as "we/us/our".
The rest of the hour is all Hogarl trying to convince Eric that djooz are winning in their joo world order (http://zioncrimefactory.com/jew-world-order/) agenda, and Eric pointing out all their failures and how quickly people are waking up to djooz' big lies and to the JWO conspiracy, and insisting that djooz' trans-generational organized crime network's centuries long demonstrated talent in swindling money is different from "taking over the world". Hogart counters that with all their swindled money, they can (and obviously DO) buy politicians, armies etc. They talk openly about the holohoax (http://vho.org/Intro/GB/Brochure.pdf) (@ 23:00) and 9/11 being zio-crime network scams.
The fact that this conversation is from 3 years ago makes it at least as interesting, because we have the past 3 years history to review now, and see how some of each of their points have played out. Consider that the zio crime network has still not been successful in their ordering USA to holocaust Iran.
PatColo
11th March 2013, 05:51 AM
I was just poking around Bollyn's site. It's been a gripe about his site that the most recent articles posted on the main page, eventually drop off that page some months later, and have a permalink which is different from the "anchor link" which they originally had while they were main-paged. But he does have them organized by subject; here's one:
Articles by Subject (http://www.bollyn.com/articles-by-subject/)http://www.bollyn.com/next.gif The Cure for Disinfo (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/)http://www.bollyn.com/next.gif http://www.bollyn.com/grey.gif
Ahmadinejad Makes Sense (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13861)
AFP and Disinformation: How it works (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13723)
Why the Assange Case is Important (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13707)
James Murdoch and Hufschmid's Stalking of Bollyn (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13592)
How U.S. Military Intelligence Got Bollyn Banned from RMN (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13540)
The Real (Kosher) News Network and the 9/11 Cover Up (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13380)
Who Fosters Fear of Muslims in America? (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13370)
Debunking the Lies of Michael Piper (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13188)
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Refute Judy Wood's Theory (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13169)
MSNBC Pulls Libelous Article (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_13026)
"Hollywood Basterds" by David Duke (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12930)
The Self-Sacrifice of Real Truthseekers and Whistleblowers (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12925)
Who Owns Your Mind? Mind Control and the Media (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12924)
Helen Thomas on the Zionist-Controlled Media & Israel (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12922)
The Swedish Plot to Criminalize Julian Assange and WikiLeaks (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12918)
A Brave Aussie Stands Up for 9/11 Truth Against Zionist Media (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12899)
The BBC's Bias and Israeli Crimes on the High Seas (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12545)
Hijacking 9-11 to Wage War on Islam (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12549)
On the Cusp of the Next Ice Age (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12464)
The Western Sky by Julian Lee (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12449)
Solving 9-11 Most Popular Online Book in Norway (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12436)
"We Would Publish Whole Stories That Were Lies" - Newsweek Editor (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12269)
The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12152)
Bollyn Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12119)
Bollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12118)
James B. Phillips Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid & Daryl B. Smith (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12121)
"Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can" - Daryl B. Smith (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_12116)
Portraits of the Fallen Note (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_11766)
Webster Tarpley's Disinfo (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_11756)
The Big Lie and Paradigms of Deceit (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_11769)
The Global Warming Fraud and Ben Bernanke (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_11761)
The Liberty Lobby's Mark Lane and the Jonestown Massacre (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_11755)
Responses to Criticism from Eric Hufschmid (http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_11750)
PatColo
2nd June 2013, 10:34 AM
from a less appropriate thread:
I'm sure most people here have heard of "Christopher Bollyn", and his exposure of Zionism and 9-11.http://www.bollyn.com/about-christopher-bollyn/ I was researching the "Rockefellers" came across this: He's related ,Royal bloodline, to "Anne Boleyn" the Queen of England http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Boleyn The Rockefellers are also related to her:
William Avery "Bill" Rockefeller, Sr. (November 13, 1810 – May 11, 1906) was the father of American oil tycoon and billionaire, John Davison Rockefeller (July 8, 1839 – May 23, 1937) and William Avery Rockefeller, Jr. (1841–1922), who both founded the Standard Oil company.
The Rockefellers trace their patrilineal line to Goddard (Gotthard) Rockenfeller (1590) of Fahr, today part of Neuwied, Germany. The first Rockefeller to settle in America (1723) was Johann Peter Rockenfeller (1710, Segendorf, Neuwied; 1787, Amwell Township, New Jersey), who changed his name to Rockefeller. Godfrey Lewis Rockefeller was a son of William and Christina Rockefeller.
Lucy Avery was born to Miles Avery and Malinda Pixley, New England Yankees of mostly English descent. She was descended by her father from Edmund of Langley's first marriage (through 5th Baron Audley's second marriage)[1] and from Mary Boleyn's first marriage (through the 2nd Barons de la Warr).[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rockefeller,_Sr.
Mary Boleyn: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Boleyn
I'm not sure if he ever mentioned his connections to the Rockefellers....
MCPiper was trying to make hay of the above allegations a couple years ago when they started feuding. With those 4 links you provided, you oddly didn't cite above WHERE you came across all that-- wasn't something with an MCPiper byline was it?
I see now what you're likely referring to in the bollyn.com link-:
The Boleyns and the English Bible (http://www.bollyn.com/about-christopher-bollyn/#article_13183)
February 3, 2011
I'd say Bollyn prolly posted that in response to Piper's trying to make hay of the ancestry as being somehow discrediting of Bollyn. I dismiss it personally, Bollyn's "fruits" (http://www.bollyn.com/index.php) speak for themselves.
PatColo
27th August 2013, 09:05 PM
I still listen to Piper podcasts when Mami's Shit (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/) posts them, and I've run out of more interesting podcasts. It's worth linking into this thread, how MCP was part of the MGlenn/HTillawi/MCP team which launched an offensive campaign (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?65846-new-shooting-Newtown-Conn-details-breaking&p=603757&viewfull=1#post603757) against Sandy Hook skepticism, then later against Boston skepticism. This untenable campaign which MCP and GlennCo @ TUT launched & persisted with ultimately caused me to publicly abandon support of them all (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?57478-The-Ugly-Truth-podcasts&p=614081&viewfull=1#post614081).
So Piper's still at it in this latest podcast... posturing himself as the big 'anti-shill', whilst shilling away through the show about a variety of people & topics:
The Piper Report 2013.08.26 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-piper-report-20130826.html)
http://iamthewitness.com/audio/Michael.Collins.Piper/Michael.Collins.Piper.jpg (http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1110/evwf2.jpg)
The sloppy ‘research’ done by so many in the ‘truth movement’ and how it is utilized by our enemies against us.
AFP (http://americanfreepress.net/)
Mike' PodBean (http://michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com/)
Download (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/tutradionetwork/2013/08/26/tpr-aug-26-2013.mp3)
Posted by zapoper (http://www.blogger.com/profile/15726967138606494466) at 7:23 PM 3 comments: (http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440450620561193447&postID=380901098073197044)
this 3rd commenter @ Mami's got it about right:
Christopher Marlowe (http://www.blogger.com/profile/09777051923990043562) said...Piper keeps making this same stupid argument:
1. People who are lazy conspiracy theorists believe in stupid theories without checking them.
2. Critics make fun of these couch potatoes, and they make all conspiracy theorists look bad.
3. Some people believed crazy ideas about crisis actors.
4. Therefore the Sandy Hook and Boston bombing conspiracy theorists are wrong.
But there are people on Sept Clues who think that the JFK conspiracy was a hoax, and that no one was killed. People can come up with foolish theories about anything.
Piper knows that kids were killed at Sandy Hook because he has some "well-known names" that saw them. He doesn't have any death certificates.
It's sad that Piper and Mark Glenn have lost any sense of reason when it comes to Sandy Hook and Boston. They made their minds up long ago, and have stopped thinking about the matter.
August 27, 2013 at 5:55 PM
PatColo
13th October 2013, 10:29 PM
Bollyn in response to a reader comment, http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11686 :
Question: Do you receive the American Free Press (AFP) newspaper? There are two copies in September 2010 that try to convey that they are right on top of the 9/11 issue, which makes me annoyed, as you are the one who has done all the serious research.
Bollyn Responds: This question came from a person who has been reading my work for a long time. No, I don’t read AFP, which is a newspaper I wrote for from 2000 until October 2006. The newspaper is run by Willis Carto and his lawyer friend Mark Lane. According to information gleaned during a lawsuit in which Lane was suing L.T. Patterson of Criminal Politics, Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994. This indicates that AFP is nothing but an asset of the C.I.A., which runs it as a controlled opposition mouthpiece.
Mark Lane is an old Army intelligence agent from WWII in Germany. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre, which he witnessed and is said to have instigated by using fear tactics on the paranoid Rev. Jim Jones. This is similar to what AFP does to its readers.
Lane’s relationship with AFP explains the paper’s bizarre actions I observed as I got closer to the truth about 9/11.
AFP is now publishing articles about 9/11 that suggest that there were no planes on 9/11 (see “Absence of Real Photo Evidence Leads to Video Fakery Speculation”, October 11, 2010). In an article from September 20, 2010, Makufka asks whether “mini-nukes” were used to bring down the WTC. These “disinfo” articles are written by Scott R. Makufka who writes under the name “Victor Thorn”.
Makufka and his girlfriend Lisa Giuliani teamed up with Michael Piper after I was attacked by undercover police. They sought to impugn my credibility and claim my research as their own in a concerted Zionist effort to marginalize my work, and have me prosecuted and thrown in jail.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Scott-Makufka-and-Lisa.jpg
Scott Makufka and Lisa Giuliani were part of the anti-Bollyn disinfo hit squad, along with Michael Piper. Why would AFP turn on its own reporter after 6 years of good reporting?
It is very clear from the evidence that Boeing airplanes hit the Twin Towers, the only question is exactly which planes they were. Photographs reveal that more durable parts, such as landing gear and engines from the aircraft, landed on the streets of Manhattan.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Aircraft_engine_Murray_st.jpg
This engine from the aircraft that struck the South Tower landed on Murray Street. The parts of this engine are all marked with specific numbers that would identify precisely which aircraft they belonged to. Why haven’t they been shown to the public? Why the secrecy about exactly which jet engine this is?
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Aircraft_debris_tag.jpg
Every time-tracked part of the aircraft is numbered, such as this piece.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Aircraft_landing_gear.jpg
This landing gear would also contain time-tracked parts with specific serial numbers which would precisely identify the aircraft that struck the tower.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Aircraft_collection_FBI_box.jpg
All of these aircraft parts were collected by the F.B.I., which was under the command of Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General…
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Aircraft_part_truck.jpg
...who authorized for the aircraft evidence to be taken to the dump at Fresh Kills…
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Aircraft_engine_at_Fresh_Kills.jpg
...where they were treated like garbage – not as crucial primary evidence from the scene of a mass murder.
Why would Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, allow such critical criminal evidence to be treated like garbage? Why wasn’t this engine taken to a high-tech FBI crime scene lab (like we see on television) and its time-tracked parts compared with the maintenance records for the planes said to have been involved? There is only one logical answer to these questions: the aircraft parts were not examined and shown to the public because they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the Twin Towers. The FBI and U.S. military only solve such crimes on TV shows, not in real life. That’s part of the deception.
PatColo
28th October 2013, 11:19 PM
I'm only a few minutes into this podcast (far enough for MCP to have already worked in his requisite, vacuous "kinky balloon" dig), but description suggests Piper's going to school us about the shills & frauds we need to be leery of.... :D
My skepticism of MCP has only grown this year since he's been the most persistent barker of the Tillawi/Glenn/Piper trio who absurdly maintain that Lanza really did Sandy Hoax as .gov tells us, and also that the Boston charade is as zio.media.gov have presented... and that suspecting/investigating/discussing otherwise is harmful to "our movement" (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?57478-The-Ugly-Truth-podcasts&p=643745&viewfull=1#post643745)... :o
1h 20m:
The Piper Report Oct 28, 2013 (http://grizzom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-piper-report-oct-28-2013.html)
http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MCP-The-New-Babylon.jpg (http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MCP-The-New-Babylon.jpg)
Michael Collins Piper discusses: Agents within the movement, literally under every bed, some of them knowing who they are and what they are doing, others who simply do the enemy’s dirty work while believeing they are doing something good.
Show-page (http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2013/10/28/the-piper-report-oct-28-2013/) FINAL JUDGEMENT lecture [Mossad connection to JFK] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2utTWSdq8YY)
The Barnes Review (http://www.barnesreview.org/)
32k CF Download (http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/5/618/show_5618525.mp3)
PatColo
29th October 2013, 09:50 AM
I'm only a few minutes into this podcast (far enough for MCP to have already worked in his requisite, vacuous "kinky balloon" dig), but description suggests Piper's going to school us about the shills & frauds we need to be leery of.... :D
I've since heard this whole thing ^. At 1:09:00, Pied Piper (< like "kinky balloon", only funnier) says:
"[...] You know, someone can be an AGENT, working for somebody or some intelligence agency, or some force, and genuinely be anti-zionist, or genuinely be a critic of Israel. But they may still have another AGENDA. Because even some of these intelligence agencies have, how can I put this; you know, the left hand doesn't always know what the right hand is doing. [...]"
Heh, surely a coincidence that MCP seems to be describing MCP there ^... :D
I mean, a shill or a con artist would NEVER have the AUDACITY to aggressively posture themselves as "#1 shill/con watchdog", would they?!? ???
Which brings us to:
My skepticism of MCP has only grown this year since he's been the most persistent barker of the Tillawi/Glenn/Piper trio who absurdly maintain that Lanza really did Sandy Hoax as .gov tells us, and also that the Boston charade is as zio.media.gov have presented... and that suspecting/investigating/discussing otherwise is harmful to "our movement" (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?57478-The-Ugly-Truth-podcasts&p=643745&viewfull=1#post643745)... :o
Pied Piper & John Friend have been at odds over Sandy Hoax. On Wednesday Sept 26, JF had MCP scheduled to come on JF's show to discuss their diverging opinions on the subject [ref: last paragraph here (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/09/a-few-quick-notes.html)]. That MCP/JF discussion didn't take place as scheduled, and I asked JF in the comments in his next blog, for some clue as to why? Click on the date links below for originals:
PatColo (http://tinyurl.com/afh5gl7) September 27, 2013 at 10:24 PM (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/09/news-from-jews_27.html?showComment=1380345888309#c2616973694 319563868)
John, anything juicy you feel at liberty to share with us as to why the formerly planned podcast with M.C.Piper to discuss Sandy Hoax (ref: end of you 9/21 "A few quick notes" entry), didn't take place? It was apparently up in the air at the end of your recent DeNugent podcast, when you mentioned that you weren't sure whether or not the Piper discussion would happen the following day as planned.
I realize you need to walk on egg shells a bit given that you & Piper are currently AFP colleagues. But I was really pining to hear that Sandy Hoax discussion, given how completely alienated I was by Piper/Glenn/Tillawi's anti-S.Hook-skepticism campaign introduced last January. Again, see my essay: "Abandoning support for The Ugly Truth podcasts":
http://tinyurl.com/afh5gl7
And of that TUT-trio, Piper was disappointingly the most virulent in his subsequent months' podcasts in employing the joowey "ridicule" disinfo gambit in seeking to discourage/mock S.Hook skepticism; which he then carried forward in also seeking to discourage Boston skepticism.
Also see: "Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA":
http://tinyurl.com/mtgphxb
Reply
Replies
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hRs0x_a8JlE/UjoSv6wjiuI/AAAAAAAACHw/VPnO9QMCrYQ/s45/IMG_1701.JPG
John Friend (http://www.blogger.com/profile/17331636747072636125) September 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/09/news-from-jews_27.html?showComment=1380351874000#c3872565571 279301731)
Well, there's not much I can share. It was scheduled to take place this past Wednesday at 10am PST, then it was cancelled pretty much last minute. I don't know what's up. I hope it will take place, but something tells me it won't... Piper's position is simply untenable, and I think that's why! LOL, Mike Piper is easily one of the best journalists and writers in the independent media, but he is just wrong on this, in my view. We'll see what happens, but I doubt the discussion will take place.
So Pied Piper apparently penned another hit piece, published in AFP, condemning skepticism of only certain "events", presumably including Sandy Hoax and Boston-- but only AFP subscribers can read it presently, so I'm speculating.
John Friend, who's also an AFP staff writer, wrote a rebuttal piece which he submitted to AFP for publication, but they declined to publish it in their print or online editions. Yesterday JF published it instead at his own blog:
Monday, October 28, 2013
Sandy Hook shooting: Where's the proof? (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/10/sandy-hook-shooting-wheres-proof.html)
Note: this article was written and submitted to American Free Press (http://www.americanfreepress.net/) for review, however, it appears it will not be published in the newspaper or on the website. Therefore, I have decided to publish it here. I ask readers to provide feedback in the comments section. -JRF
The alleged shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut in December of last year has caused quite a bit of friction and disagreement amongst the staff at American Free Press (http://americanfreepress.net/). Here I will attempt to explain my views on this controversial subject, which stand in stark contrast to the position taken by Michael Collins Piper in his recent article entitled, "Internet Rife with Disinformation: "Cyber Shills" working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers," published on page 18 in issue number 43 of AFP’s print edition.
I took a keen interest in the alleged Sandy Hook shooting from the very beginning. The Connecticut State Police and news media reported that on December 14, 2012, a 20-year-old young man named Adam Lanza first shot and killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, in their Newtown, Connecticut home before driving to the Sandy Hook Elementary School and going on a shooting rampage, murdering 20 children and 6 adults at the school – truly an amazing, and highly implausible, feat allegedly accomplished by a young man with no known military training. According to the official narrative (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/sandy-hook-elementary-school-massacre-death-certificates-released-article-1.1376084) of the alleged shooting, Adam Lanza – the “lone gunman” – shot all but two of his victims multiple times, firing 154 total rounds in a matter of minutes. Many have questioned the plausibility of such a scenario.
The alleged Sandy Hook shooting scenario conveniently aligns with the hysterical anti-gun agenda and planned destruction of the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution long promoted by certain organized political factions (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/01/jews-and-jewish-organizations-lead-the-gun-control-campaign/).
more: http://www.john-friend.net/2013/10/sandy-hook-shooting-wheres-proof.html
PatColo
7th November 2013, 10:43 AM
Monday, October 28, 2013
Sandy Hook shooting: Where's the proof? (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/10/sandy-hook-shooting-wheres-proof.html)
Update Wednesday, October 30th: I'm happy to announce American Free Press (http://www.americanfreepress.net/) has published this article along with Michael Collins Piper's article on their website. The full title is COMPETING VIEWS: INTERNET RIFE WITH DISINFORMATION; SANDY HOOK SHOOTING: WHERE'S THE PROOF? (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=13571) Be sure to visit American Free Press and check out Michael Collins Piper's article, along with mine. Also, if you are not already subscribing to AFP, you should be!
Note: this article was written and submitted to American Free Press (http://www.americanfreepress.net/) for review, however, it appears it will not be published in the newspaper or on the website. Therefore, I have decided to publish it here. I ask readers to provide feedback in the comments section. -JRF
Note above ^ that AFP reconsidered, and did post JFriend's article above. :)
So MCPiper's latest podcast is one of his most nauseating yet in his beating the "agents everywhere!" drum (projection? it's my guess!), and denigrating SH, Boston & now LAX skeptics.
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-piper-report-nov-4-2013.html
It goes roughly like this,
"[inane strawman] fake HUH-HUH-HUH, [inane strawman] fake HUH-HUH-HUH, [< repeat ad nauseum]"
His bombast reminds me of AJ! Were JFriend to challenge him to actually address, point by point, his excellent SH-Proof? essay above, I guarantee MCP will run not walk, same as he did with John's formerly scheduled podcast with him to discuss SH (http://www.john-friend.net/2013/09/news-from-jews_27.html?showComment=1380345888309#c2616973694 319563868).
To read an alt perspective on AFP, Piper, Carto, Lane & others, from former AFP reporter Chris Bollyn-- go to his homepage,
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php
and use your browser's CTRL-F word search function for any of those names above, to jump to his fairly recently posted recollections of his experience there. His homepage is a mile long and takes a couple mins to load even with a broadband connection.
PatColo
8th November 2013, 05:23 AM
AFP PODCAST: Has AFP ‘Dropped the Ball’ on Sandy Hook? (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/11/afp-podcast-has-afp-dropped-ball-on.html)
http://americanfreepress.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/40_Sandy_Hook_Bart-300x231.jpg (http://americanfreepress.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/40_Sandy_Hook_Bart-300x231.jpg)
American patriot Bart Van Ness, longtime supporter of AMERICAN FREE PRESS and it’s precursor, Spotlight, discusses Operation Open Eyes, and how it relates to recent United States mass shootings and the subsequent attempts at gun control which have followed each incident, which clearly, to him, represent a conspiracy by the nation’s elite to confiscate this country’s weapons.
Bart feels AFP has not properly covered these shootings in relation to this conspiracy, and has, he believes, forbidden its reporters from even traveling to Sandy Hook to investigate, where he discusses this and more in this informative interview.
Show-page (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=13168)
Download (27 mins) (http://americanfreepress.net/podcast/BartVanNessOperationOpenEyes128.mp3)
PatColo
20th March 2014, 09:19 PM
Pretty good one here; never heard of this blogger before, mostly indicts MCP, Glenn, & AFP; though he tries to assert that Boston was NOT a hoax, sooooo... many good links inside, incl free PDF copy of MCP/CIA's "False Flags" book:
Sandy Hook: Hoax or Truth? Tracy, Smallstorm, & Fetzer vs. Michael Collins Piper (http://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/2013/12/29/sandy-hook-hoax-or-truth-tracy-smallstorm-fetzer-vs-michael-collins-piper/)
Posted on December 29, 2013 (http://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/2013/12/29/sandy-hook-hoax-or-truth-tracy-smallstorm-fetzer-vs-michael-collins-piper/)
PatColo
4th June 2014, 05:01 AM
This from Bollyn's Q & A posting, currently on his homepage but not sure if it'll get a permalink. Funny the commenter makes the same observation about MCP which I've speculated; namely that "his books" are ghost written by spooks. :rolleyes:
Comment:
Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11.
All human-factor, personal dispositions aside, I submit the following:
In the oceans of extra-curricular text that I have devoured during college and since graduation, I am well equipped to discern what I read.
Based on my experiences with publishers both on and off campus during my college days and with those after graduation in the alternative media, I have a feel for who works for whom.
Sadly, but not surprisingly, many of the "big names" in so-called alternative media have been co-opted by Jewish money (call them the Meyer Lansky Gang if you want). Predictably and right on time.
All you gotta do is crack, if you can weather the slog, any of Mike Piper's books to see what's happening at the American Free Press (AFP) and Barnes Review. Piper plugs their Jewish lawyer-owner, Mark Lane, throughout his texts, singing his praises. I question whether a man named Michael Collins Piper [real name Michael Bernard Piper] actually wrote "books" per se. He claims to be a journalist, but nothing attributed to his by-lines reads like one. His books appear to me like a patch-work of assorted ghost-writers. There is no definitive thread of writer's voice that runs through them and ties them together. His books lack a signature. They lack a feel that attributes text to its author.
In my dealings with Piper, he took care to not write more than a line or two in my direction. He slipped into a phone call between Mark Glenn and me once. I got this "drum roll" introduction from Mark Glenn as though Piper was somebody's Kahuna. Piper was feeling me out for girl'ity and fan'dom I suppose. He got neither. Mark Glenn is one of Piper's close friends according to both Glenn and Piper.
For example Piper's much-trumpeted Final Judgment is a quilt of other men's text sewn together loosely by annoying, superfluous words. Bad writing, pure and simple. Crappy writing to be frank in some spots. Puerile in style. Like a newbie who graduated last week whose daddy owns the big city paper and wants to call Jr. a journalist -- to his cocktail party and golf club. The lines that smote me as brilliant were enclosed in quotation marks. Other men wrote them. Final Judgment reads like a research paper from a high school kid.
No wonder Piper seeks to discredit and smear a journalist like Christopher Bollyn. What Piper is good at is not writing, but defamation. How Jewish is that? What Piper's paymasters fail to cover, envy shall. Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11. Since Mark Lane (formerly Levin) owns the American Free Press, it would be Lane (Levin) who pulls the strings at AFP. Hence their feeble attempt to sabotage my work there. Petherick, fake-named Victor Thorn [real name Scott Makufka], and Mike Piper are puppets and profiteers in my opinion. They capitalize on the fears and concerns of aging conservatives who read AFP on their porch rockers. People who don't know how to type and don't own a computer. Willis Carto is 86 years of age, a WWII veteran. They are using his good name as a rubber stamp to push the Barnes Review and AFP pabulum rag to old people.
Bollyn Responds: You are quite right about the deception that is going on at American Free Press and the Liberty Lobby. It is absolutely evil to deceive and fleece patriotic Americans with their fake Liberty Lobby and its newspaper. (I know how fraudulent it is having worked there for 6 years.) Mike Piper even brags about his Jewish relatives and carries a portfolio from AIPAC. Ask yourself, why would a patriotic American do that?
The owner of AFP is Mark Lane, whose original family name was Levin. His father was a Jewish accountant named Harry Arnold Levin. Mark Lane is former U.S. Army Intelligence from post-war Germany, where there is a similar controlled opposition newspaper called National Zeitung. It should be noted that Mark Lane was the primary psy-ops agent/handler who instigated the horrific massacre at Jonestown in Guyana.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Lane_in_Jonestown_cropped.jpg
Mark Lane (center), the lawyer who reportedly owns the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press, was the lawyer for the Rev. Jim Jones. Lane was present during the massacre/suicide and is considered to have been the person who instigated it by scaring Jim Jones to the point of desperation.
Now, why would a high-level psy-ops agent like Mark Lane be interested in running American Free Press, which uses the exact same scare tactics? What's the real connection between Jonestown and AFP? What's going on?
http://www.bollyn.com/public/jonestown.jpg
Jonestown, November 1978
Beware of the tainted Kool-Aid: read all the sordid details about Mike Piper and Mark Lane in my article:
http://www.bollyn.com/the-liberty-lobbys-mark-lane-and-the-jonestown-massacre/ (http://www.bollyn.com/the-liberty-lobbys-mark-lane-and-the-jonestown-massacre/)
* * * * *
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Russian_dolls.jpg
It is essential for the survival of the American republic that the high crimes and treason committed by our highest officials be investigated and prosecuted.
If violence is the salvation of the brutes,
the salvation of Man is Justice.
- Rev. Charles Wagner, Justice (1905)
PatColo
12th October 2014, 05:31 AM
about 65:00 here, Ognir (once one of the iamthewitness DBS-Huffy-Bollyn-Ognir band of the mid '00s) is asked about what happened with their group when they all sort of drifted apart. He's not too specific, just mentions there was a joo in the ointment... off hand I'd guess Huffy, but DBS has his skeletons too.
CIRCUS MAXIMUS EP. XXXII OCTOBER 09 2014 (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/10/circus-maximus-ep-xxxii-october-09-2014_11.html)
http://oi60.tinypic.com/29e3z82.jpg (http://oi60.tinypic.com/29e3z82.jpg)
Guest: Ognir (http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php)
Ognir joins Nick to discuss various topics
Del, Brizer and Zap call in towards the end of the show to form a roundtable.
Outside Radio (Circus Maximus) Archive (http://circusmaximusachives.blogspot.ie/)
Circus Maximus Archive (http://www.circusmaximusshow.com/shows/)
Download (http://k007.kiwi6.com/hotlink/qj3ida5of8/CIRCUS_MAXIMUS_XXXII_OCT_09_2014OGNIR.mp3)
A View from the Bog (http://outsideradio.blogspot.ie/)
Posted by delcroix (http://www.blogger.com/profile/04838891459471113991) at 10:18 PM 3 comments: (http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440450620561193447&postID=6804378874444648333)
PatColo
5th November 2014, 08:05 PM
Bollyn did a 3-stop 911 tour in CA last month, here's the San Diego spiel:
Christopher Bollyn at SD911Truth (1of3) (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?23130-The-quot-Israel-did-9-11-quot-Thread&p=736390&viewfull=1#post736390)
So I rolled by Huffy's just to see what's new. Apparently, Bollyn still needs to PROVE he's not kidnapped by tricky jooz!! :D But Huffy doesn't need to give any such "proof" of his vacuous assertions that Bollyn/family are "kidnapped"; he only needs to continue matter-of-factly repeating (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/FromOthers/somebodyMetBollyn-Oct2011.html) them... oh yeah, and meanwhile warning us (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/what-is-libel.html#phone) about the joowey rhetorical tricks we need to be vigilant against! :rolleyes:
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/events-Sep-2014.html
Christopher Bollyn is touring America
(http://hugequestions.com/Eric/events-Sep-2014.html)
On 7 September 2014, Bollyn announced (http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-truth-events-with-bollyn-in-california/) on his website that he would be visiting three cities in California to speak about 9/11. He would first speak in Oakland on 11 September, then near Los Angeles on 13 September, and then San Diego on 14 September.
On 10 September, Bollyn announced (http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-joins-face-of-truth-campaign/) that he had joined the "Face of Truth" campaign. That organization not only promotes Bollyn, but it also promotes some of the websites that I have criticized as Jewish propaganda.
On 11 September 2014, Bollyn's trip to America was given publicity (http://blog.adl.org/anti-semitism/christopher-bollyn-september-11-anti-semitism-2?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=christopher-bollyn-september-11-anti-semitism-2) on the official blog of the ADL. As with David Duke and David Irving, Bollyn was criticized for being an anti-Semite.
Also on 11 September, Bollyn posted another document to announce (http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-to-speak-at-davis-for-9-11-truth/) that he will also speak at Davis on 17 September.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/img/Bollyns-in-gulag.jpg
I suppose that the Jews are so desperate to counteract my accusation (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Bollyn-kidnapping-info.html) that they have kidnapped the Bollyn family that they believe that dragging him around California for a while will convince people that he is free to travel and talk to people.
Sure, he is free to spend thousands of dollars on a tour of America, but he is not free to get a job, so we must continue donating money to him!
Have you noticed that most of the 9/11 truth seekers and websites are constantly begging for donations? Rather than accept this as sensible, you should consider it as a sign that there is something seriously wrong with this group of people.
I suppose the Jews gave only four days notice of the trip because they are not trying to attract an audience. They merely want to be able to claim that Bollyn went on a speaking tour of America.
Some Jews give Bollyn publicity as a 9/11 truth seeker, and others give him publicity as an anti-Semite, but he's not getting much publicity. The trip appears to be just a propaganda stunt.
The sheeple would certainly be fooled into believing that he is not a kidnap victim, but the sheeple do not know who he is, and they don't want to know. They don't care about world affairs.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/img/Bollyn-is-free.jpg
Will the Jews fool anybody of importance with this trick?
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/img/Bollyn-beggar.jpg
Huffy also noted
14 Aug 2014
Fixed dozens of links to my older audio files here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/TFC-interviews.html).
I've been listening, or re-listening in most cases, to the middle-column audios (Some interviews I did with other people), from circa '06-'10; and they're interesting in giving a time-capsule view of those years where 911T was gradually breaking out of their "can't speak ill of dajooz" Qabalistic spell, and increasingly naming dajoo. Huffy, with all his faults and irrelevance today, was among those at the front line of that change in the later half of the '00s.
I myself evolved through this time frame. Huffy's beef with the Loose Change crew was that they were getting promoted by controlled alt-media outlets like KPFK radio and others; meanwhile Huffy's 2002 "Painful Deceptions" book & video were shut out-- he was blacklisted from radio interviews, and infowars which once upon a time promoted his 911T work, removed it all from their site. Huffy was complaining that, while neither his 911T items or Loose Change touched anything "Izzy", that Huffy was sidelined coz of his views made public elsewhere about the holohoax and zionism and apollo.
So during these years Huffy was "marginalized", in the good "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth" way; and here I am today agreeing with his once-toxic zion/jooz/holohoax/apollo views. Would that be the case without peeps like him?
Of "flashback" relevance to this thread, here's audios of Huffy/DBS/Bollyn, from the '06-'07 years where their trio fell apart. I haven't re/listened to any.
Bollyn
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
Bollyn, on his arrest, and why the "truth seekers" are ignoring this. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-29May2007.html)
Thursday, 17 May 2007
Bollyn, and Hufschmid on Bollyn's trial, Professor Jones, and growing a backbone. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-Hufschmid-17May2007.html)
Thursday, 3 May 2007
Bollyn, and Hufschmid on how to help Bollyn and stop allowing the Zionists to silence their critics. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-Hufschmid-3May2007.html)
Sunday, 15 Apr 2007
Bollyn, and Hufschmid on the desperate attempt by Zionists to put Bollyn in jail. Will the citizens have to deal with these criminals? Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-Hufschmid-15Apr2007.html)
Wednesday, 28 Feb 2007
Bollyn, on his arrest, and the infiltration by Zionists. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-28Feb2007.html)
Sunday, 28 Jan 2007
Bollyn interviews Stanley Praimnath, a survivor of the 9/11 attack on the 81st floor of the South Tower. Clickhere (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Bollyn-Stanley-Praimnath.html)
Friday, 12 Jan 2007
Bollyn and Hufschmid on Iraq, thermite, the liberals, and the deception. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-Hufschmid-12Jan2007.html)
Thursday, 28 December 2006
Bollyn, on the Israeli involvement with 9/11 and the Cleveland connection. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn28Dec2006.html)
Sunday, 3 December 2006
Bollyn, exposes Jeffrey Feltman and the Zionist plans for "Balkanization". Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn3Dec2006.html)
Thursday, 16 November 2006
Bollyn, exposes Rahm Emanuel's family as hard-core Zionists. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsBollyn16Nov2006.html)
Saturday, 4 November 2006
Bollyn, exposes the Chertoff family as hard-core Zionists. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-4Nov2006.html)
Wednesday, 11 October 2006
Hufschmid and Bollyn, on the suspicious reasons Bollyn was fired. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Hufschmid_Bollyn_AFP_11Oct2006.html)
Monday, 11 Sep 2006
September 11th 5-year Anniversary Special, Smith, Bollyn, and Hufschmid
Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-Hufschmid-11Sep2006.html)
Wednesday, 30 Aug 2006
Bollyn, on the Israelis involved in 9/11. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn_30Aug2006.html)
Thursday, 18 May 2006
Bollyn, on how the Zionists are controlling the 9/11 message. Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsBollyn-Simon.html)
Thursday, 11 May 2006
Bollyn, on the news reports of Flight 93 landing in Cleveland, and how Zionists are masterminds of 9/11
Click here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsBollyn.html)
Jewboo
9th June 2015, 11:45 PM
Of "flashback" relevance to this thread...
In Memoriam: Michael Collins Piper 1960 – 2015 (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=24918)
Shami-Amourae
10th June 2015, 12:25 AM
Not that I trust this source but...
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/06/03/did-israel-assassinate-michael-collins-piper/
He dies coincidently in a hotel from a heart attack at that young of an age? I'm sure there's energy weapons that can help trigger a heart attack remotely. Just saying.
PatColo
10th June 2015, 02:16 AM
In Memoriam: Michael Collins Piper 1960 – 2015 (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=24918)
yeah, I've been unable to get excited about the "seemingly unanimous" chorus of articles & podcasts eulogizing MCP. I migrated from somewhere between positive to neutral to negative on him for most of the decade or so that he's been on my radar. MCP's vacuous war against Bollyn, the latter who's never given me any reason to doubt his integrity, was when MCP's number started falling in my view. Then in the recent 2.5 years when MCP became a full card carrying member of the official sandy hoax story shill-a-thon (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?75243-Spingola-Jumps-Shark-Supports-Zion-gov-s-Official-Sandy-Hook-Story); I had to dismiss him altogether... "don't speak ill of the dead" slogans be damned.
I noted above in this thread, and/or in one of the sandy hoax threads, that MCP was an alkee and that this was at the root of his "health problems." In the wake of his early 2014 (Jan?) hospitalization, which shortly followed his "firing from AFP," I predicted that he was probably in the final months or perhaps couple years of his life. In the several "MCP eulogy" podcasts I've listened to in the past couple days, the only one which made even passing mention of MCP's alkee-ism, was this DDuke show (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/06/david-duke-show-20150608.html) where a little past half way through, guest Mark Dankof mentioned it; and DD & MD then both noted how "highly productive" MCP had remained in spite of his struggle with the alc beast.
The only thing I currently see at http://bollyn.com re MCP, is a May 18 (pre-MCP-death) reprint of an even older reader comment & Bollyn response;
Q&A and Comment Forum (http://bollyn.com/#article_11686)
go to the homepage and CTRL-F "Piper" to read. I see nothing new re MCP since his May 30 death.
PatColo
10th June 2015, 02:26 AM
Not that I trust this source but...
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/06/03/did-israel-assassinate-michael-collins-piper/
He dies coincidently in a hotel from a heart attack at that young of an age? I'm sure there's energy weapons that can help trigger a heart attack remotely. Just saying.
heh, Bollyn doesn't like 40%-Disinfo-Duff much either; though their dispute mostly surrounds the existence/usage of nano-thermite at the WTC. At bollyn.com, CTRL-F "Duff" too. FWIW I'd guess there were multiple, redundant means employed in the WTC's CD, and that any "warring" between 911T "factions" is completely contrived & unnecessary.
PatColo
7th August 2015, 12:06 AM
From a mostly unrelated thread, moving this otherwise derailing topic here.
6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
Enter it into Google Maps and we get a Street View of his apartment building. That's his real-world home.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/smilies/300%20%2824%29.gif he ain't hiding from the ADL...lol...has nothing left to lose.
^ Eustace Mullins said in a interview with DBS in 2006 that JK (and MCPiper, Stadtmiller, DDuke & couple others I forgot) is ziowned, disinfo, gatekeepers etc. It's funny coz I've long wondered about DBS himself, and used to be more sure he's compromised... In mid '00s DBS seemed to be lashing out at anyone & everyone as being 'disinfo', which always causes me to wonder if the speaker themself is disinfo & sowing distrust & division (Flipping the Script & Projecting).
Jump to 14:30,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTIkE_5LfRc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTIkE_5LfRc
JK could be deep cover disinfo/agitprop, sticky flypaper etc... I believe so with MCP & Duke & Stadt. In one of JK's more recent interviews but I forgot which, he said how he took some flack in the mid '00s for being too... now I forgot! But it wasn't for being too hard on djooz, and JK represented the time frame as when he was more benignly ignorant than he is now.
The one thing I could fault JK for today is for being "too pessimistic" about the present & future. It can leave listeners depressed & inactive, a desirable disinfo op goal. But in the next breath JK is praising the upcoming talent, 20-30-something bloggers like JFriend & others... like JK does harbor some hope?
I've also heard him get very esoteric a couple times about the electric nature of the universe or some shit like that; can't prove or disprove stuff... I just hold my breath and wait for the topic to return to more interesting contemporary topics.
I plead guilty to being as pessimistic as Kaminski. Probably because we are both geezer goyim. Shami recently called me out on it...lol.
http://forums.pcpitstop.com/public/style_emoticons/default/old7rz.gif we live in a jew ant farm and they control EVERYTHING.
So Book, you have on opinion on JK as authentic or compromised? U said,
http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/smilies/300%20%2824%29.gif he ain't hiding from the ADL...lol...has nothing left to lose.
So is that stemming from "nothing left to lose", or from JK's being ziowned & 'protected', similar to that waycist shock jock guy (name?) a few years ago who ended up in court for some reason, where he disclosed being an FBI informant?
I'm pretty sure the radio interview I ref'ed above where JK briefly goes into the early (mid-00's) criticisms he received, was June 20 with host Dennis Fetcho. IIRC, JK comes on at top of hour 2, through end of hour 3. So jump to about 50 min mark in the MP3 for top of JK interview,
June 20 – John Kaminski, Internet Essayist, The Rebel.is (http://therebel.is/kaminski), 2 hour special
Metapedia seems quite positive on him,
John Kaminski (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/John_Kaminski)
http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/3/3f/John_Kaminski.png (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:John_Kaminski.png)
http://en.metapedia.org/m/skins/common/images/magnify-clip.png (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:John_Kaminski.png)
John Kaminski.
John Kaminski (born 1959) is an American (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/American) writer and journalist, originally from Florida (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Florida), who is best known for his works exposing Jewish supremacism (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Jewish_supremacism) in the world and as a critic of Talmudism (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Talmudism). Kaminski previously edited several different newspapers as part of his journalist career, but became part of the Truth movement (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Truth_movement) after looking into the events of 9/11 (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/9/11) and coming to the conclusion that the government wasn't telling the truth about it. In his youth Kaminski was a hippie (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Hippie) and an opponent of the Vietnam War (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War). He coined the phrase destabilisation template (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Destabilisation_template). Thanks to the groundbreaking efforts of Kaminski, Fetcho (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Fetcho), Giuliani (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Giuliani) and a few others from around 2008 onwards when many were still in the Alex Jones (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones) camp, the word "Jew" can now be used instead of "Zionist" in the alternative media.
Contents
[hide]
[LIST]
1 Works (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/John_Kaminski#Works)
2 Quotes (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/John_Kaminski#Quotes)
3 See also (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/John_Kaminski#See_also)
4 External links (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/John_Kaminski#External_links)
Jewboo
7th August 2015, 04:19 AM
So Book, you have on opinion on JK as authentic or compromised?
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d0mkVU5tG7w/hqdefault.jpg
I like Kaminski ONLY because he openly calls them jews. All his factual articles are profoundly depressing and hopeless. Fatalistic geezer (like me...lol).
I don't like Kaminski because he is obviously a loser in real life. No money and was always whining about living in a trailer in Florida. Please send donations so I can buy a can of Alpo whining. Had a jew girlfriend who stole his reader mailing list. Attempted to rip off ailing Eustace Mullins. Currently lives in what appears to be an apartment building hunched over his laptop. Waste of time for the ADL.
Serpo
12th August 2015, 05:22 PM
Fatalistic geezer (like me...lol).
I don't like Kaminski because he is obviously a loser in real life...................;D
PatColo
16th August 2015, 07:38 AM
JFriend published this ~2.5 months ago. I saw it at the time, but didn't think to post it here (cross-posting this to 3 relevant threads). But I just returned to it in my searching for something else. It's odd coz JFriend was fired by Carto last year. And then, "at some point" (??), was re-hired... JF never posted a similar blog entry announcing his return to AFP, the way he did when he was fired last year (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?78597-John-Friend-fired-from-American-Free-Press).
Thursday, May 28, 2015
Willis Carto: Champion of the American Right (http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/willis-carto-champion-of-american-right.html)
Esp notice the 30 comments, many good ones. One posts audio of a 2006 MCP/Carto radio show interview.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=04399652743137342838
Another comment points to this disgusting Keith Johnstein Sandy Hoax researcher hit piece, "Sandy Hook Parents Could Be In Danger (http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17698)"
...more about KJohnstein in the Spingola/Shark thread (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?75243-Spingola-Jumps-Shark-Supports-Zion-gov-s-Official-Sandy-Hook-Story).
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.