Log in

View Full Version : I Just Don't Buy It-Playing Favorites With the Ladies



philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 10:59 AM
zap



Re: Don't hold your breath expecting to see me again
« Reply #134 on: April 29, 2010, 07:56:57 PM »
Half of you guys are just hateful bastards , and the others are homiphobic...some of you are just good people, live and let live.

Scares me that you guys are the ones who will be around wtshtf, if you guys are this scared of gays, I can't imagine how scared you'll be in a real life shtf scenario.

Here is one of the first posts from zap (nub)
hateful bastards (personal attack), and homophobic (personal attack)

As it was obvious who the insults were directed towards, I responded in kind

"Shut up *ag"[/b


So here is Gaillos reply



Don't Smite Me, Bro!!



Re: Don't hold your breath expecting to see me again
« Reply #141 on: April 29, 2010, 08:02:40 PM »
Quote from: philo beddoe on April 29, 2010, 07:57:54 PM
Shut up *ag
[b]
Apparently madfrank's multiple bans for personal attacks (Rule #1) last night didn't sink in around here... let's see if increasing the ban length gets some attention. philo beddoe, see you in a week.

Of course, he completely ignores the insult from zap, who none of us had any idea who she was, until we were informed that she was formerly nub

of course greenbear comments and insults when I have no way of replying

greenbear

Gender: Female


Can a woman be a *ag? Your objectifying of women as sexual objects destroys any credibility you have anyway.

here's greenbear again doubling down with the insults

greenbear

Joined: Apr 2010

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Don't hold your breath expecting to see me again
« Reply #170 on: April 29, 2010, 08:56:33 PM »
Ever wondered why the ladies didn't flock to GIM or now the REAL GIM2? Hahaha. LOL. I'm described as cream cheese on a bagel according to the "nice guy" Joo hater on the board. I'm the "cupcake"who's invited to the Thunderdome in his sig by one of many resident morons who see nothing past their neo-nazi blinders. Book thinks it's hilarious to post pictures and articles of women fighting in the Mad Max TD, and in some cheesy woman's wrestling league, because I voiced my opinion about possible censorship concerns with the TD plan. These idiots aren't concerned with free speech for everybody, they are only interested in spewing their particular Nazi agenda, only they don't understand that's what they're doing. They disrupt just about every discussion with their simple-minded rhetoric, and they end up squelching free speech by more reasoned posters through intimidation. Just like at GIM, NOBODY STANDS UP TO THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID OF THE BULLYING TACTICS AND ABUSE THEY WILL RECEIVE AT THEIR HANDS. And these morons think they are the GOOD GUYS!!! I've never spoken privately to K-os, but I have noticed sexually offensive comments posted towards her on GIM and GS-us, as well. The morons on this site will turn this into Stormfront2 unless people stand up to them.

here's greenbear admitting she has no proof to justify her attacks

greenbear

Re: Don't hold your breath expecting to see me again
« Reply #176 on: April 29, 2010, 09:03:52 PM »
And of course, it is difficult to prove, it's always insinuated and sort of a private joke that you have to have "been there". Come on, you've been around the forums.

wow, here's slacker ken launching a personal attack on me personally, and gaillo ignores it

Gaillo

Re: Don't hold your breath expecting to see me again
« Reply #195 on: April 29, 2010, 10:59:59 PM »
Quote from: StackerKen on April 29, 2010, 09:44:17 PM
Is this site falling apart?......seeem it may be.

philo is a idiot for sayin that to Mrs Nub (zap)

This site isn't falling apart just because one or two threads are infested with trolls and troublemakers... the site is holding it's integrity because of it's commitment to the principles that will make it great - freedom, individuality, self-determination, and the use of heavy-handed moderation ONLY when it's absolutely required due to violation of the rules that protect EVERYONE's right to express themselves here freely. You'll notice philo got banned for a week for attacking Mrs. Nub? If he does something like that again his ban length will increase. Freedom of expression isn't always pretty, witness this thread. However, it's FAR prettier than heavy-handed censorship, thread locks and deletions, and round-the-clock banhammer. Think about that, then ask yourself if this site is "falling apart".

now here is
slacker ken moments later...feeling so refreshed he CAN make personal attacks while GAILLO silences others who have a different political view from his own
StackerKen

Re: Don't hold your breath expecting to see me again
« Reply #197 on: April 29, 2010, 11:12:47 PM »
thanks Gaillo

Yer doing a fine job

skidmark
7th May 2010, 11:01 AM
Aw, just think of it as affirmative action

General of Darkness
7th May 2010, 11:03 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?

Heimdhal
7th May 2010, 11:03 AM
http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m179/TeamPointBlank/smallestviolin.jpg

TPTB
7th May 2010, 11:07 AM
Have those boobies on your avatar grown bigger? :)

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 11:12 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 11:14 AM
Have those boobies on your avatar grown bigger? :)
yes, they fluctuate with the atmosphere

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 11:18 AM
http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m179/TeamPointBlank/smallestviolin.jpg
That was witty......anything else?

wildcard
7th May 2010, 11:20 AM
Let it go man. If you have to flame out do it in another battle.

Nomen luni
7th May 2010, 11:22 AM
Gotta say, Zap's post was definitely ban worthy and I'm not just saying that because I got sent to sit on the naughty step for a couple of days. < :'(> I just want to know which half I fall into, hateful bastard or homophobe?

wildcard
7th May 2010, 11:24 AM
I'm 100% hateful bastard. I ain't scared of no fairy boys. ;D

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 11:24 AM
Let it go man. If you have to flame out do it in another battle.
I believe you are right
but let's be honest..GAILLO did not let it go, and he kept chattering about it knowing that I could not reply...He should of shut the thread down immediately...... I am simply making my response........

wildcard
7th May 2010, 11:28 AM
Duly noted, now can we let it go? No need to dare the mods to ban you. This site is running 99% wide open. I think all the mods and owner are good guys. Ban grenade was thrown and you got hit, after a little time on the sideline you're back in action. Next time take it to the thunderdome. I have fully test driven it. ;D

StackerKen
7th May 2010, 11:31 AM
Im sitting here wondering if it is considered a "personal attack" to tell someone that their avatar is Dumb...... ???

Grand Master Melon
7th May 2010, 11:32 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.


What's the "white" perspective?

General of Darkness
7th May 2010, 11:34 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.


Ben, I'm not questioning you, I'm just confused.

sirgonzo420
7th May 2010, 11:35 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.


What's the "white" perspective?


The opposite of the "wong" perspective? ;D

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 11:36 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.


What's the "white" perspective?
Why don't you tell me what you think it is?

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 11:38 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.


What's the "white" perspective?


The opposite of the "wong" perspective? ;D
seriously, that was funny.........lol

Grand Master Melon
7th May 2010, 11:38 AM
So Ben what's the deal here?
Mark if you ever want to meet me I live a stones throw from Los Angeles. If you have any doubts about who I am.That thread went on long enough to get some bans, then it was closed conveniently. With insults flying around from all sides, I want to know if the 'WHITE' perspective is a target.




What's the "white" perspective?
Why don't you tell me what you think it is?


I don't know what it is, that's why I asked.

You made the statement, obviously you must know what this "white" perspective is. Come out with it already.

madfranks
7th May 2010, 11:48 AM
I don't have the desire or time to study and review every detail over every aggressive post on this forum, so I leave you with this:

ximmy
7th May 2010, 12:00 PM
Dear Magic Ximball...

What is the white perspective?

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s222/chrisneros/ximball-1.gif

Ponce
7th May 2010, 12:09 PM
For a change I have nothing to say.............I don't know what the heck is going on.

Grand Master Melon
7th May 2010, 12:14 PM
For a change I have nothing to say.............I don't know what the heck is going on.


I don't think you're missing much.

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 12:34 PM
For a change I have nothing to say.............I don't know what the heck is going on.


I don't think you're missing much.
Yet strangely, you keep posting like a moth to an open flame.....................

k-os
7th May 2010, 01:03 PM
Two wongs do not make a white.

sirgonzo420
7th May 2010, 01:05 PM
Two wongs do not make a white.


Nope...


But three rights make a left.

ximmy
7th May 2010, 01:24 PM
Two wongs do not make a white.


Nope...


But three rights make a left.


and a double dong is just wrong

aybesee123
7th May 2010, 01:44 PM
:boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo :boohoo

http://sunnyskeptic.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/crying-baby-party-56800676.jpg

Horn
7th May 2010, 02:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkWSCM78VSs

Gaillo
7th May 2010, 02:42 PM
philo,

I'll reply to this, as I think you deserve a response after the effort you put in to your post.

You claim zap made some kind of personal attack with this post:


Half of you guys are just hateful bastards , and the others are homiphobic...some of you are just good people, live and let live.

Scares me that you guys are the ones who will be around wtshtf, if you guys are this scared of gays, I can't imagine how scared you'll be in a real life shtf scenario.

Here is one of the first posts from zap (nub)
hateful bastards (personal attack), and homophobic (personal attack)

Nobody was singled out, nobody was directly replied to, it was a broad-sweeping statement directed at a group of posters... so there was no "personal attack" in her post. You, on the otherhand, replied directly to her with:


shut up, fag

About as personal and as attacking as it gets.

This is the reason you were banned, no other - no agenda, no anti-white stance, no "politically correct" BS, and no political agenda of my own. Your attack came right on the heels of 3 others in a different thread the night before that caused madfranks to do multiple bans, and people didn't seem to notice.

TO EVERYONE: Rule #1 WILL be enforced here, as will the others... we don't want to crack down and do bans, and will typically warn people when they step over the line, but after repeated warnings and an evening of attacks like madfranks had to deal with, it's just going to happen sometimes.

Hope this clears up any confusion.

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 02:49 PM
philo,

I'll reply to this, as I think you deserve a response after the effort you put in to your post.

You claim zap made some kind of personal attack with this post:


Half of you guys are just hateful bastards , and the others are homiphobic...some of you are just good people, live and let live.

Scares me that you guys are the ones who will be around wtshtf, if you guys are this scared of gays, I can't imagine how scared you'll be in a real life shtf scenario.

Here is one of the first posts from zap (nub)
hateful bastards (personal attack), and homophobic (personal attack)

Nobody was singled out, nobody was directly replied to, it was a broad-sweeping statement directed at a group of posters... so there was no "personal attack" in her post. You, on the otherhand, replied directly to her with:


shut up, *ag

About as personal and as attacking as it gets.

This is the reason you were banned, no other - no agenda, no anti-white stance, no "politically correct" BS, and no political agenda of my own. Your attack came right on the heels of 3 others in a different thread the night before that caused madfranks to do multiple bans, and people didn't seem to notice.

TO EVERYONE: Rule #1 WILL be enforced here, as will the others... we don't want to crack down and do bans, and will typically warn people when they step over the line, but after repeated warnings and an evening of attacks like madfranks had to deal with, it's just going to happen sometimes.

Hope this clears up any confusion.
not true stacker ken clearly called me an idiot......

« Reply #195 on: April 29, 2010, 10:59:59 PM »
Quote from: StackerKen on April 29, 2010, 09:44:17 PM
Is this site falling apart?......seeem it may be.

philo is a idiot for sayin that to Mrs Nub (zap)

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 03:07 PM
I didn't stir it, you did....you clearly were talking about it two days after the fact.......not me
my PM box works
you can lock the thread if you like I had my say
basically you are admitting that you interpret insults as you like, NOT on face value as you say
(idiot, fag )both insults

Libertarian_Guard
7th May 2010, 03:36 PM
Back in the days of vaudeville, someone would get the hook out and put an end to an act that has gone this badly. Here one can continue to flop along without the aide of a closing rescue.

The curtain will be of no help either.

Flop along, perhaps you'll finally get 'it' out of your system.

And I have no idea what 'it' may be, so don't ask.

MNeagle
7th May 2010, 03:36 PM
you can lock the thread if you like I had my say


OPs can lock their own threads too, FYI.

philo beddoe
7th May 2010, 03:43 PM
philo beddoe

Here is your personal public apology, I am sorry.

I didn't mean anything by it just calling a spade a spade , you hateful bastards and homiphobes and just good people here.

JUST KIDDING !!!! :sun:

HOPE WE CAN ALL JUST GET ALONG........................ Oh and I also put in a plea for your return if you'd have read the posts.

Remember broad and sweeping statements ! :dunno

Hope I don't get banned for this. :CS
I don't have a problem with you have fun here

Gaillo
7th May 2010, 04:14 PM
basically you are admitting that you interpret insults as you like, NOT on face value as you say
(idiot, *ag )both insults


No need to "admit" anything... it's clearly stated.

Rule #5 - Moderators will interpret these rules. Moderators will try to be fair.

Cebu_4_2
7th May 2010, 04:53 PM
I vote Gaillo to determine. he as far as I have read does not have an agenda but was somewhat cascaded into moderator position. This I feel is the best as it could be regarding free speech. I will side with him as I have not seen any distortion of the first, sometimes crazys have to be put out of their own misery.




basically you are admitting that you interpret insults as you like, NOT on face value as you say
(idiot, *ag )both insults


No need to "admit" anything... it's clearly stated.

Rule #5 - Moderators will interpret these rules. Moderators will try to be fair.

StackerKen
7th May 2010, 07:16 PM
I'm sorry too philo.

I should not have called you an idiot....


But I still think your avatar is dumb....lol :P

hoarder
7th May 2010, 08:03 PM
Ad hominem in place of reason is intellectually dishonest and has no place on a forum. It should not be tolerated.
Personal attacks OTOH, just insulting for the hell of it is not intellectually dishonest, just a little childish.
Whenever someone does the latter just ignore it. If you can't, then you need to learn how to let antagonism roll down your back.
Can we stop all the antagonistic emotional sillyness and have ourselves a good forum?

vacuum
7th May 2010, 09:20 PM
Don't take it personally, it happens to everyone. Just post better next time.

And always.....fear the ban hammer