PDA

View Full Version : Obama to name Kagan for high court



goldmonkey
9th May 2010, 07:53 PM
President Barack Obama will nominate U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan to serve as an associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, NBC News’ Pete Williams reported late Sunday night.

Kagan, 50, served as the Dean of Harvard Law School from 2003 to 2009. Obama nominated her to serve in her current post as solicitor general early in 2009, and she won Senate confirmation by a vote of 61-31. She is the first woman to serve as solicitor general of the United States.

She was widely viewed as a front-runner when Obama was considering candidates for a Supreme Court opening last year, but the president ultimately chose Sonia Sotomayor for the job.

Some liberal critics have said that Kagan's views on executive power and the treatment of terrorist detainees are too conservative.

If confirmed, Kagan will fill the vacancy left by retiring Justice John Paul Stevens. Stevens, 90, announced his decision to retire on April 9 after nearly 35 years of service on the high court.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36967616/ns/politics-supreme_court/

Jews Back Kagan For Supreme Court - Interview With Kevin MacDonald PhD
http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=494

General of Darkness
9th May 2010, 08:10 PM
A jewish lesbian. Great, just great.

Shami-Amourae
9th May 2010, 08:14 PM
http://nimg.sulekha.com/others/original700/elena-kagan-2010-4-9-15-38-31.jpg

Why does he have a girl's name?

I am me, I am free
9th May 2010, 08:23 PM
As I posted earlier, this is the Kenyan monkeyboy's Mother's Day gift to us all.

Quantum
9th May 2010, 10:36 PM
A jewish lesbian. Great, just great.


It is great. It's high-time for the American imbeciles to realize that this country is not theirs, but Satan's.

AndreaGail
9th May 2010, 10:56 PM
1/3 of the supreme court is now jewish :o

FreeEnergy
9th May 2010, 11:17 PM
Supreme Court:
Chief Justice John G. Roberts - parents born in Chechoslovakia, mother very probably crypto-jew
Anthony M. Kennedy - Kennedy clan
John Paul Stevens - stevens clan, wifey is Maryan Mulholland Simon, likely jewess and a climate change propagandist
Antonin G. Scalia - seems to be italian
Clarence Thomas - black, graduated from jesuit school
Ruth Bader Ginsburg - jewish
Stephen G. Breyer - jewish
Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. - apparently is listed as italian, married to Martha-Ann Bomgardner (not very italian name)
Sonia Sotomayor - jewish
and now have via Obama
Elena Kagan - jewish


Samuel Alito - I'd say a complete crypto-jew. Here's his family photo, don't see much italian, but lots of khazar for sure:
http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/56725470.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF878921F7C3FC3F69D929FD2A6CAE07FE536E02 1C6D28AC02CB52AAD4A46436B1C43709F06BF04B24B4128C

I'd say Supreme Court is dominated by jew-khazars. I see at least 6 out of 10, which is a complete control.

optionT
9th May 2010, 11:29 PM
....rug muncher.

Gaillo
10th May 2010, 01:35 AM
http://nimg.sulekha.com/others/original700/elena-kagan-2010-4-9-15-38-31.jpg

It's PAT!!! ;D

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110169/

sunshine05
10th May 2010, 06:08 AM
Plus this:

Possible Supreme Court pick had ties with Goldman Sachs

By Matt Kelley, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — A top prospect for the Supreme Court was a paid member of an advisory panel for the embattled investment firm Goldman Sachs, federal financial disclosures show.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan was a member of the Research Advisory Council of the Goldman Sachs Global Markets Institute, according to the financial disclosures she filed when President Obama appointed her last year to her current post. Kagan served on the Goldman panel from 2005 through 2008, when she was dean of Harvard Law School, and received a $10,000 stipend for her service in 2008, her disclosure forms show.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2010-04-26-kagan_N.htm

Twisted Titan
10th May 2010, 06:11 AM
Just another nail in the coffin...........


T

cedarchopper
10th May 2010, 07:33 AM
This country is becoming unrecognizable. A New York City Jew Lesbian to replace the last Protestant on the court :o

Usury Inc has all the bases covered.

Book
10th May 2010, 08:26 AM
United States Congress

The Seven Laws of Noah were recognized by the United States Congress in the preamble to the bill that established Education Day in honor of the 90th birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement:

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded; Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws.[21]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah


About to change the title of Chief Justice to Chief Rabbi of Supreme Court.

:oo-->

Neuro
10th May 2010, 08:26 AM
Kurgan is that you?

http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Business/images-3/highlander-kurgan.jpg

oldmansmith
10th May 2010, 09:43 AM
NPR was saying today that it was the first time in history that there would be no Protesants on the Supreme Court. I'm not Protestant, but it seem like the Founding Fathers will be rolling over in their graves. I guess "diversity" means everyone except white Protestants.

goldmonkey
10th May 2010, 04:23 PM
(12/06/2002)
Jewish Law Comes to D.C.
http://bit.ly/ctQOYT
James D. Besser

What does the Talmud have to say about legal and moral controversies in modern America?

Plenty, according to the creators of the new Washington-based National Institute for Judaic Law (http://judaiclaw.org/news_articles.html), which opened with a lavish Supreme Court dinner last month. http://judaiclaw.org/lectures.html

Some Orthodox activists say they can’t figure out exactly the point of the whole thing. But Noson Gurary, a Lubavitch rabbi who came up with the idea and won backing from some top Jewish legal experts, harbors no doubts.

“It will be an eye opener for judges, scholars and law students,” he told The Jewish Week. “Before you know where you’re going, you have to know where you came from. And Jewish law is the basis of our legal system in America.”

Gurary said that the idea for the institute came in an exchange of letters in which Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the most conservative Justices, expressed his “fascination with Jewish law.”

“And as a teacher of Judaic studies, I began to see the excitement of students who were being exposed to Jewish law for the first time, who now had a better understanding of where Western law come from,” Gurary said.

Gurary, who teaches at the University of Buffalo law school, said his target audience includes judges around the country and law students, not politicians and lawmakers.

According to Gurary, the group, which has hired two researchers to compile reports, will focus initially on the issue of business ethics. Eventually, the goal is to compile a library and database in Washington that will offer Jewish law insights into a host of contemporary issues and to help create courses on the subject at law schools nationwide. The institute will also inaugurate a monthly lunch series for legal machers in Washington.

The Buffalo rabbi is a relative unknown in the Jewish world. Not so some of the participants in the new project, including Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. Solicitor General Seth Waxman and top constitutional lawyer Nathan Lewin and his law-partner/daughter, Alyza.

Alyza Lewin noted that “the idea is to make Jewish law accessible to the public — to jurists, legal scholars, the press, anybody.”

http://i39.tinypic.com/161nfc0.jpg

mick silver
10th May 2010, 04:43 PM
i hate to see the news anymore ... the show that just keeps shitting on everyone

StackerKen
10th May 2010, 05:17 PM
http://www.theamericanview.com/dictator/images/1668/s-elena-kagan-large1t.jpg

Kagan Invokes Myth-Of-Neutrality, My-Views-Don’t-Effect-My-Viewing View To Avoid Revealing Her View Of Constitution


By John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, at the time Solicitor General of the United States, said, in a Public Radio interview (12/22/09), when asked about her views re: the U.S. Constitution: “What my constitutional values are are wholly irrelevant to the job, and so neither you nor anyone else will know what they are…What my political views are, what my constitutional views are just doesn’t matter.”

Well, now. The next thing I always want to hear said to a person who says this kind of thing is something like this (with a big smile): “Fine. Wonderful. Congratulations on your ability to compartmentalize! — to be objective!, to approach matters in a totally unbiased manner! I wish I had that talent.

“So, since what you believe is wholly irrelevant to your job you can now tell me what you believe! — no problem! No problem because your beliefs have nothing to do with your job!”

But, of course, Kagan’s views re: the Constitution matter. She knows this. She knows that others know that her views matter. And this is why she has refused to say what her views are.

Kagan’s views on the Constitution mattered when she was Solicitor General representing the U.S. before the Supreme Court. They matter now that she has been nominated to sit on the Supreme Court.

The absurd my-views-don’t-effect-how-I-view—things-view is designed to perpetuate The Myth Of Neutrality. But, no one views anything “neutrally.” There is no view from nowhere. All people view everything from some perspective, according to some presupposition, according to some frame of reference into which they integrate all facts, all that they see and hear.

And it is precisely because presuppositions — “personal views” — determine interpretations that the most important questions Kagan could (but, alas, will not be) asked in her confirmation hearing would be questions about her “personal views,” her presuppositions, her assumptions, her standards, according to which — for good or evil — she judges all things.

Such questions would include such questions about such basics as: Where do you think law originates?; is there an ultimate law-maker?; Does law change?; if so, how can there be a fixed standard of justice?; by what standard would you judge a law to be just or unjust?; in what way, if any, would God’s Law effect your judging?; what is your definition of justice? What is the role of a judge?

I would add that my personal experience has been that when folks like Kagan say what Kagan said in her Public Radio interview it is to cover up views, usually views that are very Liberal, way over on the Left.

— A “Christian” web site has noted, critically, that Kagan once wrote a memo while clerking for the late Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall saying religious organizations that provide care for teen pregnancies shouldn’t get Federal funds because of a strict line separating church and state. True! They should not be Federally funded because such funding is outside God’s limits on civil government; such funding is unConstitutional.

— The conservative Susan B. Anthony List has complained: “Elena Kagan has no judicial record from which to determine her position on Roe v. Wade.” So what? We must ignore Roe. Stop making it the centerpiece of our pro-life concerns. Roe is nothing!

It is just an “opinion;” not law. As pro-lifers, we must concentrate on trying to get abortion prosecuted for what it is — murder.

And what modern Presidential introduction of a Supreme Court nomineee would be complete without the nominator and nominee both demonstrating they are clueless re: the form of government our Founders left us? Once in his introduction of Kagan, President Obama referred to our country as a “democracy.” Kagan referred twice to our country as a “democracy.” Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!



http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1668

LuckyStrike
10th May 2010, 05:27 PM
I recognized her immediately from her cameo in The Princess Bride

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/156181/thumbs/s-ELENA-KAGAN-large.jpg

http://www.filmdope.com/Gallery/ActorsS/16151-15223.gif

http://www.jimmyakin.org/images/the_albino.jpg

Horn
10th May 2010, 06:05 PM
Hermaphrodite for sure.

goldmonkey
10th May 2010, 08:16 PM
The Kagan appointment means that we have entered a period in which Jews are equal members, if not actually predominant members, of the American Establishment. Obama's two closest political advisers are Jewish, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, and are said to be his foreign-policy braintrust. The economy is supervised to a large degree by Jewish appointees, Larry Summers and Fed Reserve Board chair Paul Bernanke (Time's man of the year last year, a selection overseen by Rick Stengel, the Time magazine editor, who is also Jewish).

Recently a Jewish friend in the media said, "We're the new WASPs," referring to the patrician class that used to represent the elite in American society.

Jews are fully empowered in the most powerful country in the world.

Kagan appointment shows, Jews are the new WASPs
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/05/kagan-appointment-shows-jews-are-the-new-wasps.html

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=1779