No Protestants Allowed: Elena Kagan for Supreme Court

[BigShiny]

"The shallow talk about 'diversity' and 'racism' and 'inclusiveness' and 'multiculturalism' are mere words they use to morally disarm Whites and justify their seizure of power and confiscation of wealth."

BY Hunter Wallace


As everyone knows, Barack Obama has nominated Elena Kagan, a Jewish lesbian, to the Supreme Court.

1.) We are constantly told that we live in a nation that is dominated by “white privilege.” Yet we are fast approaching the historically unprecedented day when there won’t be a single WASP on the Supreme Court, but at least one negro, three Jews, one wise Latina, two Italians, and a lesbian.

2.) We are told that federal legislation is needed to protect homosexuals from hate crimes and the hideous discrimination they experience. Yet we are appointing a Jewish lesbian to the Supreme Court.

3.) We are told women can’t get ahead in America because of what is called the “glass ceiling.” Yet we are about to appoint two women in a row to the Supreme Court; if Harriet Miers had been confirmed, it would have been three.

4.) We are told the Jews are powerless and talk of Jewish Power by White Nationalists is nothing but a baseless anti-Semitic canard. Yet there will soon be three Jews on the Supreme Court. Jews are 2% of the population, but will compromise 33% of Supreme Court Justices. Jews will also comprise 75% of the liberal wing of the Supreme Court.

5.) When Harriet Miers was nominated by George W. Bush, the Left and Right erupted over her lack of judicial experience, but now Elena Kagan is being described by many of the same people as “brilliant” and “eminently qualified” to sit on the Supreme Court.

6.) We are told to idolize “diversity” and that the Supreme Court is not “diverse enough” for an America that has moved beyond race into the twentieth century. Last summer, the media told us that it was essential to have a Hispanic Justice on the Supreme Court because a “Latino perspective” on the bench was absolutely essential. The same people now say that it “doesn’t matter” that there won’t be a single WASP on the Supreme Court when Protestants are 51% of Americans. Has anyone else noticed that “diversity” and “inclusiveness” doesn’t seem to apply to one group in particular?


7.) President Obama and his supporters keep telling us that “race doesn’t matter.” We’ve moved beyond the days when individuals were judged on the basis of characteristics like race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and creed. Isn’t it ironic that his judicial appointments seem to be based exclusively on these factors?

8.) Losing your country? That’s a myth we call the White Anxiety Crisis. Surely, it has utterly no basis in fact: a black president, a Catholic vice president, a Catholic Speaker of the House, 6 Catholics and 3 Jews on the Supreme Court, Protestants declining from 74.1% of Congress in 1961 to 54.7% in 2008, Whites declining from over 85% of Americans to 67% and falling, Whites becoming an actual minority of new births, entrenched affirmative action and blatant discrimination in the name of promoting diversity, the demonization of our history and cultural symbols like the Confederate flag, and now the American flag itself.

Move along, folks. Nothing to see here.

The ugly truth: Whites are being wiped out as a people. A Jewish-led political coalition of racially conscious aliens rules in Washington. These people believe in promoting themselves at our expense and nothing else. The shallow talk about “diversity” and “racism” and “inclusiveness” and “multiculturalism” are mere words they use to morally disarm Whites and justify their seizure of power and confiscation of wealth.

Whites have been suckered into believing in this dream of a post-racial future. In reality, there is nothing “post-racial” about the Obama administration or its base in the black community. This has become increasingly clear to Whites who used to support him but are abandoning him in droves. It is time we started looking out for our interests and our future as a people and before it is too late.


http://wvwnews.net/story.php?id=8886

[Awoke]

* applaud *

[mamboni]

Speaking as a non-Anglo-Saxon white male citizen of European extraction, I am fond of telling people, tongue slightly in cheek (slightly), that the country started going down hill as soon as the Protestants started letting the "Cat-licks" and "Joos" into the country, infected as they were with socialistic and fascist ideologies. The laissez faire individual-freedom society is a distinctly Anglo-Saxon invention (Magna Carta et al).

[JDRock]

Judicial experiance?? NONE not one single case,no, not even in traffic court. :soap

[BigShiny]

Speaking as a non-Anglo-Saxon white male citizen of European extraction, I am fond of telling people, tongue slightly in cheek (slightly), that the country started going down hill as soon as the Protestants started letting the "Cat-licks" and "Joos" into the country, infected as they were with socialistic and fascist ideologies. The laissez faire individual-freedom society is a distinctly Anglo-Saxon invention (Magna Carta et al).


That's an astute observation. The early 1900s is when most of the Catholics entered the country, and that's when socialism started to take hold. It could be said that socialism arose due to the urbanization of the country and the modernization of transport and media that allowed the gubbermint to have greater access to the people who could then demand more "services." Maybe the two are not causally linked, but either way, they coalesced at the same time to plunge America into an era of socialism.

In regards to your last sentence, I would extend that to Swedes, Norwegians, Dutch and most of the other Nordic peoples. I think that independent mindedness as a character trait was one of the drivers for the Protestant Reformation as a whole. The people who valued freedom and individual responsibility tended to chose Protestantism with its value on self interpretation of the bible and self education. The people who were more prone to be dictated to and welfare-minded tended to stay with the old Catholic tradition by which religion was "given" to the masses.

All of that aside, the Protestants were a relatively homogeneous group. Only when "diversity" arrived in the form of large numbers of Catholics, could subversives have free reign in a divided society.

[RJB]

In regards to your last sentence, I would extend that to Swedes, Norwegians, Dutch and most of the other Nordic peoples.
All of that aside, the Protestants were a relatively homogeneous group. Only when "diversity" arrived in the form of large numbers of Catholics, could subversives have free reign in a divided society.
To an extent, I agree and I'm a Catholic. But I think it's more of due to the Anglo-Saxon background, than religion.
Most of the Colonies were formed by people escaping the Church of England. Maryland was formed by Catholics escaping this. The Germans who settled the midwest (both Catholic and Lutheran-- this is my background) were probably more feircely independant than the Brits. This conservative block in the midwest is still strong.

At the turn of the century, The flood of Catholics who came in were mostly Irish (and Italians), who formed their own voting blocks and trusted blindly in the government it elected. The Hispanics are even more saturated in this.

BTW, I also agree there should be a bigger ruckus made over the last protestant leaving the supreme court. I'm amazed at the lack of response it's received on various selfreliance forums that I've brought it up.

[mamboni]

Mullins once said that the Constitutional Congress voted on and adopted English as the official language of the United States. The second choice lost by only one vote: German. At the time, the bulk of the population, excluding native Americans, was composed of whites of British Isles and German extraction, and some Dutch.

[Awoke]

OK people, I have to chime in on this. I am a Christian. A practicing Catholic.

Keeping short and to the point:

The Catholic/Protestant schizm was a product of crypto-jewish infiltration via the counsel of Martin Luther.
Luther was not aware that a large portion of his counsel was in fact jewish, carrying out the agenda of the 5th column.

This is Satans work. Protestants talk smack about Catholics, and Catholics talk smack about Protestants. For years, Christians have been murdering each other over this jewish-created schism. This is satans goal.

The "Den of Vipers", aka the "Synagog of Satan", as my Lord Jesus called them, are the root of the schism, and to this day the seek to strengthen that divide.

The Catholic molesters that are brought up on charges are often times jewish infiltrators. The Protestant churches are encouraging gay marriage and other nameless immoralities. Satan laughs. The jews carry out his work.

I personally am a Christian who attends a Catholic church, but the truth is, I don't pick sides. Jesus Christ is my Lord and saviour, and the God I pray to. If you can say the same thing, we should not be fighting over other mens words, other mens interpretations, or the jews corruption of the scriptures.

My personal goal is to get as close to the old Church that I can. The reason I attend a Catholic Mass is because in my area, that is the mass that dates back closest to the time of Christ.

Some Christian Historians would assert that the Church has been infiltrated since the Nicean Council. Some believe the jewish infiltration happened even before that. I don't know the start date, but I do know the end goal, and I do know for sure that the Catholic Church has been unquestionably compromised since the 2nd vatican council by the jew.

From the Plot against the Church, by Maurice Pinay:



The infiltration of Jewish mock-Christians into the French clergy of that time caused much harm, since it made possible the spreading out of the Huguenot movement in the 16th century. This sect was supported by Jews who pretended to be Christians, and clearly differed from the Lutheran churches which even seized upon anti-Jewish measures.

The purpose of this Jewish infiltration into the clergy is evident: the destruction of the Church from within. What was said in the aforesaid letter has been confirmed to sufficiency in countless trials by the Holy Inquisition against clergy who honoured Judaism. The treacherous activity of the clergy of the “Fifth Column” is indescribably many-sided, yet always directed at the same goal: to passionately defend the Jews or to favour heretical and today, revolutionary openly anti-Christian movements, to weaken the defence of the Church and to attack good Christians – especially the successful defenders of Christianity –, to denigrate and destroy them. Thus they prepare the victory of the Jewish heretical Freemasons and Communist organisations and hope in the future to be able to fully destroy the Church.


and


In order to combat not only the tentacles of the octopus, which the heretical revolutions in the Middle Ages represented, but the head itself, the Holy Catholic Church resorted to different methods, amongst which the Holy Office of the Inquisition, so slandered by Jewish propaganda, stands out on account of its importance,. This organisation was intended to eliminate the false doctrines and to give the death blow to the secret power of Jewry, which directed and stirred up the same. Thanks to the Inquisition, Holy Church was able to overthrow Jewry and for several centuries to hold up the catastrophe that now hovers threateningly over mankind; for several of the so-called false doctrines were already revolutionary movements of the same kind of scope and pretensions as those of recent times, and they not only fought to destroy the church of Rome, but also to destroy all princes and to destroy the existing social order in favour of Jewry, which was the concealed director of those earlier heretical movements and later of the Freemasonic-Jacobin and Jewish-Communist ones of the present time.

[madfranks]

I personally am a Christian who attends a Catholic church, but the truth is, I don't pick sides. Jesus Christ is my Lord and saviour, and the God I pray to. If you can say the same thing, we should not be fighting over other mens words, other mens interpretations, or the jews corruption of the scriptures.


Very well said! Sometimes people ask me what denomination I am and they get confused when I say I don't identify myself with any denomination.

[Awoke]

Thanks MadFranks.

I believe it is imperative to destroy the illusion of jewish infallibility in our philo-jewish churches. Christ was underattack from the day he was born, to the moment he was crucified. The attack has continued on unrelentingly on the church since it was founded. The people are betrayed and mislead to believe that the jew is our brother, through faith in the Father, when they reject, deny and despise the Son of the Father.

When people (Christians) find out the true history of the Church, I believe that they will identify themselves with Jesus Christ, instead of identifying themselves with a denomination.

Division is an aeons-old tactic employed by the great deciever.

[Twisted Titan]

You dont go to court to get "Justice"

You go to court to get 'BUSINESS'

Got that???


T

[BigShiny]

Some Christian Historians would assert that the Church has been infiltrated since the Nicean Council. Some believe the jewish infiltration happened even before that. I don't know the start date, but I do know the end goal, and I do know for sure that the Catholic Church has been unquestionably compromised since the 2nd vatican council by the jew.




I really mean no disrespect, but I do have to ask this: isn't Christianity at its CORE a Jewish invention? Christ was a Jew, Saul was a Jew, Yahweh (Jehova) is the Jewish tribal god. The whole religion revels in the pain and suffering of a man/God who bled on a cross and treats this suffering and opposition to this suffering as a virtue, something to be focused on. This adulation of pain, suffering, and torture reeks of the worst Hollywood (ie Jewish) films of today - Inglorious Basterds, Saw, Hostel and other "torture porn." This type of thing is not Aryan in nature, it's not in tune with our character or genetically-inherited values.

It's possible you could convince me that very early Christianity was not into this, but how could anyone argue that Christianity is not a Jewish invention when the crux of the religion (for most Christians anyway) is the worship of Jews as "God's Chosen People" who can't be criticized?

If you would rather discuss this over private message...

[Quantum]

how could anyone argue that Christianity is not a Jewish invention when the crux of the religion (for most Christians anyway) is the worship of Jews as "God's Chosen People" who can't be criticized?


You need to stop confusing Judeo-"Christianity" and Jesus Christ's Christianity.

Jesus said the Talmud Jews are Satan's children, not God's chosen people: John 8:44.

Turn off John Hagee, and pick up the New Testament.

[Book]

I really mean no disrespect, but I do have to ask this: isn't Christianity at its CORE a Jewish invention? Christ was a Jew, Saul was a Jew, Yahweh (Jehova) is the Jewish tribal god. The whole religion revels in the pain and suffering of a man/God who bled on a cross and treats this suffering and opposition to this suffering as a virtue, something to be focused on. This adulation of pain, suffering, and torture reeks of the worst Hollywood (ie Jewish) films of today - Inglorious Basterds, Saw, Hostel and other "torture porn." This type of thing is not Aryan in nature, it's not in tune with our character or genetically-inherited values.

It's possible you could convince me that very early Christianity was not into this, but how could anyone argue that Christianity is not a Jewish invention when the crux of the religion (for most Christians anyway) is the worship of Jews as "God's Chosen People" who can't be criticized?



Fair and logical argument. "Turn the other cheek" and "Love thy enemy" in the face of Talmudic predators is suicide. Literally.

:)

[Quantum]

Fair and logical argument. "Turn the other cheek" and "Love thy enemy" in the face of Talmudic predators is suicide. Literally.

:)


Both of those commandments of Jesus Christ refer to one's personal enemies, not the enemies of God and goodness. If you have a beef with a brother or neighbor, yes, you must apply those maxims. However...

Christ did not "turn the other cheek" or "love thy enemy" when He went into the temple and whipped the shit out of the moneychangers.

[BigShiny]

how could anyone argue that Christianity is not a Jewish invention when the crux of the religion (for most Christians anyway) is the worship of Jews as "God's Chosen People" who can't be criticized?


You need to stop confusing Judeo-"Christianity" and Jesus Christ's Christianity.

Jesus said the Talmud Jews are Satan's children, not God's chosen people: John 8:44.

Turn off John Hagee, and pick up the New Testament.


I won't pretend to know enough about the Old/New Testament to give a solid rebuttal.

My big question is: then why do so many New Testament Christians think Jews are God's Chosen People? I thought the whole point of Protestantism was to interpret the bible on your own, without the help or influence of others.

So Jesus was an anti Jewish Jew?

[Awoke]

JESUS WAS NOT A Jew

Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian - Researcher - Scholar.
From "Common Sense", p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59

"Christians have been duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."

"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th century A.D. to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable."

"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed twenty-four hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and magazines, by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office and seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside their churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside their curricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians are subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to suspect. Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the Khazars, a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia, according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the 1st century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar kingdom. For some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is conspicuous by its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.

"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews", their rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a nation from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in about 740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from American Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic Khazar ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by them. Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this author since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a vicious smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these facts, for obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?

"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's Public Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5 inclusive, appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New York Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and other sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing with Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that subject."

Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.

During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves "Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies a person living in Texas.

In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as "Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees". "Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.

Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".




JESUS WAS NOT A Jew

by Jason Collett

Many denominational Christians and even church leaders are under the mistaken belief that Jesus was a Jew. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Judea and Galilee were two separate states and political entities, as illustrated on the map of Palestine in the time of our Saviour in your Bible. Jesus Himself was not a Jew (Judean) or resident of Judea, He was a Galilean or resident of Galilee (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah. The Judeans of prominence were not of the Tribe of Judah, but of Edomites. Pilate was being ironic when he wrote the sign "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Judeans" for the Cross (John 19:19). That is, "the Galilean who was King of the Judeans," as in "Queen Victoria of England, Empress of India." Jesus grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. His disciples were fishermen from the Sea of Galilee. And although He visited Jerusalem, he spent most of His life in his home country of Galilee. John 7:1, "After this Jesus stayed in Galilee; for He could not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him." His followers were constrained "for fear of the Jews" (John 7:13, 19:38, 20:19).

Why was this?

Psalm 83:3 says God's elect are "hidden" or protected ones, and that they are under attack from a coalition of evil groups led by Edom. Who was Edom?

Esau, the brother of the patriarch Jacob, became the ancestor of the people called Edom, or Idumea. The Antiquities of the Jews by Flavius Josephus, XIII ix 1; XV vii 9 instructs us: John Hyrcanus forcibly assimilated the Edomites as a national group and they became "Jews" in about 120BC. The Jewish historian Josephus, who lived just after the time of Christ, wrote, "They [Edom] were hereafter no other than Jews'. The Jewish scholar Cecil Roth in his Concise Jewish Encyclopedia (1980) says on page 154, "John Hyrcanus forcibly converted [Edom] to Judaism. From then on they were part of the Jewish people. In the Talmud the name of Edom was applied to Christian Rome, and was then used for Christianity in general".

Terrible judgements against Edom are made in most of the prophecies of the Old Testament. For instance, Isaiah 34, 63, Jeremiah 49, and the entire book of Obadiah.

Isaiah 63:1-6, "Who is this coming from Edom . . . in garments stained with crimson? It is I [the Lord] who speak in righteousness and am mighty to save."

"Why are your garments red, as if you had trodden the winepress?"

"I have trodden the winepress alone: and of the people there was none to help Me. In My anger I trod them down, trampled them in My wrath. Their blood splattered My garments, and all My clothes are stained. For the day of vengeance is in My heart, and the year of My redeemed has come. . . I will tread down the people in My anger, and bring their blood upon the ground".

These verses refer to Revelations chapter 19:11-21, when the Word of God destroys His enemies: "And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse: and He that sat upon him was called Faithful and True. . . His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns, and He had a Name written that no man knew but Himself. And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood, and His Name is called The Word of God. . . and He trod the winepress of God’s fierce anger".

Jehovah of the Old Testament "hated Esau (Edom), against whom He has indignation forever" (Malachi 1:2-4). If Jesus will destroy Edom when He returns, then Edom is present today, and obviously evil, anti-Christian, and anti-Semitic.

The Edomite, Antipater, became the Procurator of Judea in 47BC. Ten years later his son Herod actually became "king of the Jews," initiating the Edomite dynasty which ruled Palestine under Roman authority for over a hundred years. The Edomite assimilation opened the way for the virtual takeover along the lines predicted by Ezekiel and stimulus for an influx of population from the arid country of Edom into the more hospitable environment of Judea, an influx obviously encouraged for political reasons by the ruling Herodian dynasty. Edomites would have been appointed to the most influential positions, in order to extend and consolidate Edomite authority over the land and its people. Herod became notorious for his massacre of infant boys two years old and undger," a supernaturally inspired attempt on the life of Christ (Matthew 2:16). Herod's son Herod Antipas, continuing the work, and was responsible for the gruesome murder of John the Baptist (Matthew 14:6-12).

Christ demonstrated a very real antipathy towards the people called Jews, in Bibles published after about 1776, but who would be more accurately described as Judeans, or residents of the


More articles at link:

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm

[Awoke]

I won't pretend to know enough about the Old/New Testament to give a solid rebuttal.

My big question is: then why do so many New Testament Christians think Jews are God's Chosen People? I thought the whole point of Protestantism was to interpret the bible on your own, without the help or influence of others.

So Jesus was an anti Jewish Jew?


See my post above. I will paste it here. It is a bolded section from a quote from TPATC



The treacherous activity of the clergy of the “Fifth Column” is indescribably many-sided, yet always directed at the same goal: to passionately defend the Jews or to favour heretical and today,

You must not have seen my post in which I flatly state that the Christians of today are being decieved and brainwashed into thinking the jew is our brother, because we believe in the same Father. The jews harbour hatred and resentment to Christ, and serve ba'al via the tulmud and cabbalistic rites, which are both an abominated re-writing of the Holy Word of God.

But, enough. I'm not a bible thumper that is on a mission to convert people, etc. If anyone wants to talk about this more, someone can start a different thread and PM me an invitation, and we can discuss the ongoing jewish plot to destroy the Church and rule humankind under the watchful eye of lucifer.

Pretty heavy shit.