PDA

View Full Version : Congress blocks indiscriminate IMF aid for Europe



Ares
18th May 2010, 04:42 AM
Europe may have to clean up its own mess after all. The US Senate has voted 94:0 to block use of taxpayers’ money for IMF rescues that make no economic sense or bail-outs for countries like Greece that far are beyond the point of no return.

“This amendment will help prevent American taxpayer dollars from underwriting dysfunctional governments abroad,” said Texas Senator John Cornyn, the chief sponsor. “American taxpayers have seen more bailouts than they can stomach, and the last thing they should have to worry about are their hard-earned tax dollars being used to rescue a foreign government. Greece is not by any stretch of the imagination too big to fail.”

Co-sponsor David Vitter from Louisiana said America had run out of money. “Our country already owes trillions of dollars in debt. We simply can’t afford to take on other countries’ debt in addition to our own.”

It is unclear where this leaves the EU’s $1 trillion “shock and uh” package. Urlich Leuchtmann from Commerzbank said the IMF share of $320bn was the only genuine money on the table, the rest being largely euro smoke and mirrors, or plain bluff.

The measure is an amendment to the US financial overhaul law. Backed by both parties, it can hardly be ignored by the Obama administration whatever Tim Geithner may or may not want to do. The bill has to go to Conference for reconciliation with the House, but the point is made.

It instructs the US representative at the IMF to determine whether a country with a public debt above 100 per cent of GDP can be expected to repay IMF loans. If this cannot be certified, the US must oppose the rescue package.

This is obviously aimed at Greece, which will have a debt of 130 per cent by the end of this year. The debt will rise to 150 per cent by the end of its the rescue/death package, leaving Greece in a worse position than before.

The IMF share of the Greek bail-out is 30 times quota, more than double any other rescue in the history of the Fund. There is a very strong suspicion in Washington that the IMF is being misused by French chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn – French presidential candidate in waiting – to support ideological purposes regardless of economic logic or sanity. This can (and in my view most likely will) destroy the credibility of the Fund itself unless the US and Asians can wrench the institution back from the Europeans.

The US is the IMF’s biggest shareholder and can veto aid packages, though it has never done so because the Fund has never been so stupid as to defy the world’s dominant financial and strategic power.

In this case it fair to assume that China shares many of the Senate’s concerns. The latest US Treasury Tics data shows that China is rotating is vast reserves back into dollars, and presumably away from euro bonds. If we treat this as Chimerica – the US/Chinese single currency or condominium – we have a force in the world that cannot be pushed around.

Personally, I have changed my mind on Greece. My initial reaction earlier this year was that it had to be saved to avoid a sovereign Lehman. Many posters on this blog cried “shame”, saying it was just another moral hazard rescue for bankers. They were right. I flagellate myself and wear a dunce’s hat.

The correct policy would have been – and still is – to help Greece out of its debt-deflation death spiral through an orderly “pre-emptive debt restructuring” along the lines of the IMF package for Uruguay. In Greece’s case it would require a haircut of 50 per cent or so for foolhardy creditors, ie your bank and mine, your pension fund and mine. This would not do much good unless Greece also devalued by 30 per cent to 40 per cent to retrieve competitiveness and put the whole fixed-exchange nightmare behind it.

This would be the normal IMF policy in these circumstances as countless ex-IMF officials have stated. I suspect that many in the Bundesbank and the Bundestag finance committee would have liked this policy too – making an example of a country that was so far gone, and had so flagrantly broken the rules.

The IMF-EU should instead have drawn up its defences in Iberia, along the Lines of Torres Vedras – to borrow from Wellington. Portugal and Spain are at least defensible – arguably – and more deserving.

The solution is being blocked because Brussels views any step back in the EMU Project as intolerable. So the IMF is squandering its scarce resources on an unworkable plan in Greece.

As we can now see, by misusing the IMF so cavalierly the euro-elites have provoked a reaction from Washington that will vastly complicate any future rescue for any eurozone state.

In fact, we are already living in a post-IMF world. There is no bailer-of-last-resort. Sobering, isn’t it?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100005734/congress-blocks-indiscriminate-imf-aid-for-europe/

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 05:00 AM
Nice parade, but meaningless. The US dollar supports Europe via Basel II reserve ratios. The real reserves of European banks are now negligible and miniscule. They've traded more liquid paper debt, such as actual euros and dollars, for less liquid and over-leveraged paper debt, such as AIG insurance swaps. Nearly all European banks are supported by dollars and dollar assets. It's the best kept secret in the currency markets: the dollar supports Europe. It has nothing to do with taxpayer money and everything to do with currencies. "Taxpayer money" is a joke. It's interest upon interest for debt upon debt. Sounds good to the masses, though.

Iceland had the luxury of devaluing its currency and thereby easing economic stress. Greece doesn't have that option. Similarly, the states of the US don't have the option of devaluing, either. Super-national currencies, such as the euro, foster dependency, because in tough times, there's no "pressure release valve" whereby a country can devalue.

Enter jewish bankers stage left.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 06:00 AM
Basically, it's Triffin's Paradox and Exter's Pyramid.

sirgonzo420
18th May 2010, 06:03 AM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_fcMlmE_zrhM/R9dMaxoiwXI/AAAAAAAAAJA/-awRQ42YN0I/s1600/exterspyramid.jpg

Ares
18th May 2010, 06:21 AM
Good description Jed, hope you don't mind. But I used your respond on another forum that I post at.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 10:48 AM
Good description Jed, hope you don't mind. But I used your respond on another forum that I post at.




No problem.

To expand upon this topic a bit, here's what I wrote in another thread a while back:









Directly or indirectly, the US is bailing out Greece and any other insolvent sovereigns.


AIG is now our national federal business model since we bought it. Might as well insure whole nations now.


AIG, indeed, for it concerns the transition of European Banks from Basel I to Basel II, and in particular, the consequences of this transition on the US dollar. It is my understanding that pursuant to Basel I, which presently is being phased out, European banks’ leverage may not exceed a 12:1 ratio or 8% capitalization, lest banks carry dangerous levels of “capital adequacy risk” (per SIGTARP) and are thereby deemed too risky to clear transactions under agreement. Predictably, under Basel II, capitalization restrictions and requirements have been eased, whereby a bank may now substitute capital against assets with insurance swaps against those respective assets. The primary issuer of these insurance swaps is AIG. I’m simplifying these matters a great deal, but the thrust of the matter is that European banks are now even more over-leveraged than ever, and if one follows the trail of counterparties, the trail ends at the balance sheet of the US Federal Reserve by way of AIG. If I understand the chain of counterparties correctly, and please correct me if I am wrong, then it appears that the US Federal Reserve is indirectly backstopping or underwriting European banks...another twist to Triffin’s Paradox.



Addendum: IMF = lots and lots of SDRs, and lots and lots of SDRs = lots and lots of FRNs. :)


And remember that China is also part of this "dollar demand swap equation."

World debt is greater by many magnitudes than world production of real goods and services. In other words, lots of promises will be broken. Who'll get stuck with the short end of the stick?

Ares
18th May 2010, 11:00 AM
Who'll get stuck with the short end of the stick?

The working people of the world. They always get stuck with the short end of the stick.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 11:22 AM
The US dollar will inevitably break, but only under the weight of other failed currencies.

sirgonzo420
18th May 2010, 11:28 AM
The US dollar will inevitably break, but only under the weight of other failed currencies.


No doubt.

But then what?



:-\

RJB
18th May 2010, 11:30 AM
Great thread.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 11:33 AM
The US dollar will inevitably break, but only under the weight of other failed currencies.


No doubt.

But then what?



:-\


I haven't a clue.

New SDR-like basket global currency? Ostensibly backed by gold but without physical convertibility?

A revalued two-tiered dollar, one for international trade and one for domestic use?

Your guess is as good as mine.

RJB
18th May 2010, 11:37 AM
I've learned that any time 94 or so senators are in agreement it is either a meaningless bill or a very bad bad bill.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 11:45 AM
One thing is obvious: a lower standard of living.

Deflation or inflation?

You're asking the wrong question.

Essentials up in price, non-essentials down.

Why? The Great Revaluation of Everything.

Monetary aggregates only have meaning insofar as they have velocity in the real economy of real stuff.

It's ponzi mathematics.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 11:46 AM
I've learned that any time 94 or so senators are in agreement it is either a meaningless bill or a very bad bad bill.

lol.

True!

I wonder what Germany and Greece think of this bill? :D :D :D

sirgonzo420
18th May 2010, 11:56 AM
I haven't a clue.

New SDR-like basket global currency? Ostensibly backed by gold but without physical convertibility?

A revalued two-tiered dollar, one for international trade and one for domestic use?

Your guess is as good as mine.

I don't have a clue either... which is a tad disconcerting to me. I've never lived through a global economic/monetary collapse of this magnitude before.... things could get pretty damn nasty, in my estimation.



One thing is obvious: a lower standard of living.

Deflation or inflation?

You're asking the wrong question.

Essentials up in price, non-essentials down.

Why? The Great Revaluation of Everything.

Monetary aggregates only have meaning insofar as they have velocity in the real economy of real stuff.

It's ponzi mathematics.





Yep.


"may you live in interesting times" <-- a curse, indeed

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 12:03 PM
Nice parade, but meaningless. The US dollar supports Europe via Basel II reserve ratios. The real reserves of European banks are now negligible and miniscule. They've traded more liquid paper debt, such as actual euros and dollars, for less liquid and over-leveraged paper debt, such as AIG insurance swaps. Nearly all European banks are supported by dollars and dollar assets. It's the best kept secret in the currency markets: the dollar supports Europe. It has nothing to do with taxpayer money and everything to do with currencies. "Taxpayer money" is a joke. It's interest upon interest for debt upon debt. Sounds good to the masses, though.

Iceland had the luxury of devaluing its currency and thereby easing economic stress. Greece doesn't have that option. Similarly, the states of the US don't have the option of devaluing, either. Super-national currencies, such as the euro, foster dependency, because in tough times, there's no "pressure release valve" whereby a country can devalue.

Enter jewish bankers stage left.


Here's another way of thinking about this, in terms of currencies.

Greece's economy is, depending on whom one asks, about 15 to 20 times the size of Iceland's. Both countries reached the brink and then got a loan. The severity of their problems are similar enough to compare. (You only ask for and receive a loan if you reach a certain point of no return.) Yet the size of Greece's loan is measured in billions, whereas Iceland's is measured in mere millions. I know of no micro or macro factors other than the purchasing power of their respective currencies that could possibly account for such a vast difference in the size of their loans.

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 12:52 PM
Nixon Shock will look silly compared to Merkel Shock and Obama Shock. :o

The bankers know the majority of US chattel only think of finance in terms of house prices and taxes.



"I don't want my tax dollars going to pay for some Greece bailout!"
Don't worry buddy, your wealth is being confiscated in ways you'd never dream. :)

jedemdasseine
18th May 2010, 08:45 PM
U.S. Senate bid to curb IMF bailouts may not survive
http://in.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-48601920100518

singular_me
18th May 2010, 08:59 PM
ROFLOL... this is exactly playing out as they want... the blame game will take the world economy, confusing the sheeple even more

MAGNES
18th May 2010, 09:22 PM
The FED Chief already went to Congress and said
he doesn't know which European banks got what
parts of the $500 Billion sent over to Europe.

Did they find out yet ?
That was late 2008.

:ROFL:

Everything is happening for a reason.

Notice they don't give a shit about Ron Paul Audit the FED.

Neuro
18th May 2010, 11:34 PM
I think they may be after Greece's gold... The US senators were just a handy tool to that end...