Twisted Titan
24th May 2010, 08:27 AM
http://www.gata.org/node/8670
The only currency that can't be printed on a whim
You probably think gold is in a bubble. After all, it hit new highs in dollars, pounds, and euros this week -- and has pretty much quintupled since its lows of 2001.
What's more, everyone from Germany to China is still nuts for it. Earlier in the week, this newspaper reported that the Germans have been snapping up coins and gold bars faster than they did even in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers’ collapse. In the UAE you can buy bars direct from a vending machine. At Harrods you can pick up a variety of gold coins over the counter. And -- as the gold bears are keen to point out -- you can see ads for the purchase of gold all over TV.
But look at the actual price of gold and it is hard to see real evidence of a bubble. Gold may have hit new highs in nominal terms, but it hasn't come close to hitting its old highs in real terms. Adjust the 1980 high of $850 for US inflation and you get a price of around $2,400 -- a level only the most bullish are predicting even now.
hen look to the last few years. The bears would have you believe that the gold price has somehow gone "parabolic." But, in fact, the price in US dollars has risen only around 25 per cent in the last two years.
Compare that with, say, shares in Rockhopper Exploration, the lucky owner of the prospects where oil was struck off the Falklands the week before last. Its shares started the month at around 40p and have since more than quadrupled. But no one is shouting "bubble!" Far from it. Instead, they are all claiming the company has seen a transformational event, which makes its shares worth more than they are even now (which arguably they are).
But hasn't there been a transformational global event that has changed the case for gold too?
Back when gold's bull run kicked off, there were precious few gold bugs and we tended to make the case for the metal based on likely demand for "bling" from the new middle classes of emerging markets. We mentioned only in passing the fast rising US national debt and the nagging fear that fiat currencies might not be all they were cracked up to be.
Today, however, gold has reverted to its historical role as the global currency of the last resort. You no longer buy it because you think the Chinese and Russians are likely to up their consumption of gold-plated mobile phones. You buy it because you think there is a chance that governments, caught in a debt trap from which there is no honourable escape, will eventually think they have no choice but to print their way out of it. And the risk of hyperinflation is a transformational event for gold -- it being the only global currency that can't be printed on the whim of a central bank.
All that said, there is a strong chance that we might see a short-term falloff in the gold price.
Why? Partly because high prices are putting off India's jewellery buyers. Partly because there is likely to be a short hiatus in new investor buyers coming to the market -- if you haven't panicked yet, you will need a new crisis before you do so. But mostly because, after the mini-inflation scare following the ECB's bailout plans for Europe, we seem to be having a deflation scare. Prices may be stubbornly rising in the UK but Spain is now in outright deflation (exclude energy and food, and prices are falling) and core inflation across Europe and the US is very low.
The endless money-printing across the world has not yet brought us proper inflation simply because the mechanism for passing it on isn't working very well: The banks are too busy repairing their balance sheets to lend it out. But there is nothing like deflation to bring on hyperinflation: Governments desperate to prop up prices and economies, despite being broke, print reams of money -- money that eventually enters the market in a rush, flipping deflation to inflation.
If you can get a copy of Adam Ferguson's 1975 book "When Money Dies" (soon to be republished), you will find an excellent account of how this happened in the Weimar Republic. It might not happen again but, at this point, it would surely be foolhardy to discount it entirely.
Finally, a word on the ads for gold on TV. There is much muttering about them being a sign of the top. But that is to misunderstand the direction of the flow. The ads aren't selling gold to willing punters. They are persuading them to sell their gold at a discount to the spot rate. That's a very different thing -- more suggestive of awareness of gold beginning to enter the public mind than of a bubble. Either way I'd ignore the ads. If you have gold, you should hang on to it. If you haven't, you should use the pull-back in price to get some.
The only currency that can't be printed on a whim
You probably think gold is in a bubble. After all, it hit new highs in dollars, pounds, and euros this week -- and has pretty much quintupled since its lows of 2001.
What's more, everyone from Germany to China is still nuts for it. Earlier in the week, this newspaper reported that the Germans have been snapping up coins and gold bars faster than they did even in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers’ collapse. In the UAE you can buy bars direct from a vending machine. At Harrods you can pick up a variety of gold coins over the counter. And -- as the gold bears are keen to point out -- you can see ads for the purchase of gold all over TV.
But look at the actual price of gold and it is hard to see real evidence of a bubble. Gold may have hit new highs in nominal terms, but it hasn't come close to hitting its old highs in real terms. Adjust the 1980 high of $850 for US inflation and you get a price of around $2,400 -- a level only the most bullish are predicting even now.
hen look to the last few years. The bears would have you believe that the gold price has somehow gone "parabolic." But, in fact, the price in US dollars has risen only around 25 per cent in the last two years.
Compare that with, say, shares in Rockhopper Exploration, the lucky owner of the prospects where oil was struck off the Falklands the week before last. Its shares started the month at around 40p and have since more than quadrupled. But no one is shouting "bubble!" Far from it. Instead, they are all claiming the company has seen a transformational event, which makes its shares worth more than they are even now (which arguably they are).
But hasn't there been a transformational global event that has changed the case for gold too?
Back when gold's bull run kicked off, there were precious few gold bugs and we tended to make the case for the metal based on likely demand for "bling" from the new middle classes of emerging markets. We mentioned only in passing the fast rising US national debt and the nagging fear that fiat currencies might not be all they were cracked up to be.
Today, however, gold has reverted to its historical role as the global currency of the last resort. You no longer buy it because you think the Chinese and Russians are likely to up their consumption of gold-plated mobile phones. You buy it because you think there is a chance that governments, caught in a debt trap from which there is no honourable escape, will eventually think they have no choice but to print their way out of it. And the risk of hyperinflation is a transformational event for gold -- it being the only global currency that can't be printed on the whim of a central bank.
All that said, there is a strong chance that we might see a short-term falloff in the gold price.
Why? Partly because high prices are putting off India's jewellery buyers. Partly because there is likely to be a short hiatus in new investor buyers coming to the market -- if you haven't panicked yet, you will need a new crisis before you do so. But mostly because, after the mini-inflation scare following the ECB's bailout plans for Europe, we seem to be having a deflation scare. Prices may be stubbornly rising in the UK but Spain is now in outright deflation (exclude energy and food, and prices are falling) and core inflation across Europe and the US is very low.
The endless money-printing across the world has not yet brought us proper inflation simply because the mechanism for passing it on isn't working very well: The banks are too busy repairing their balance sheets to lend it out. But there is nothing like deflation to bring on hyperinflation: Governments desperate to prop up prices and economies, despite being broke, print reams of money -- money that eventually enters the market in a rush, flipping deflation to inflation.
If you can get a copy of Adam Ferguson's 1975 book "When Money Dies" (soon to be republished), you will find an excellent account of how this happened in the Weimar Republic. It might not happen again but, at this point, it would surely be foolhardy to discount it entirely.
Finally, a word on the ads for gold on TV. There is much muttering about them being a sign of the top. But that is to misunderstand the direction of the flow. The ads aren't selling gold to willing punters. They are persuading them to sell their gold at a discount to the spot rate. That's a very different thing -- more suggestive of awareness of gold beginning to enter the public mind than of a bubble. Either way I'd ignore the ads. If you have gold, you should hang on to it. If you haven't, you should use the pull-back in price to get some.