PDA

View Full Version : State Farm: pay for broken bumper that killed your dog



Quantum
27th May 2010, 06:01 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d 9.531&show_article=1

Family asked to pay for car damage after dog run over

May 27 03:40 PM US/Eastern

A car insurer has asked a Canadian family to pay for repairing a broken bumper after their dog was struck by the vehicle and died, local media said Thursday.

The traffic accident occurred in March while Jake, a 12-year-old yellow Labrador, was out for his daily stroll around a quiet neighborhood in Aurora, Ontario, north of Toronto.

Kim Flemming had let the dog out when she arrived home from work. Moments later, a man knocked on the door to say a car had run over Jake.

"I got to the road and he was dying," Flemming told the Toronto Star. "He died in my arms."

Two months later, the family received a bill in the mail for 1,732.80 Canadian dollars (1,648.95 US) from State Farm Insurance.

The letter said Flemming had been found responsible for damage to the vehicle. "As such, we are looking to you for reimbursement," it reportedly stated.

State Farm spokesman John Bordignon told the Star: "They could have made sure their dog wasn't free on the roadway."

A local bylaw requires pets to be on a leash when off the owner's property, but the Flemmings said Jake had become accustomed to roaming outside the family's home.

State Farm was not immediately available for further comment.

"We've lost a member of our family but we're supposed to pay for the damage to her bumper? That's just wrong," daughter Katherine Flemming said.

ximmy
27th May 2010, 06:04 PM
That's why I carry uninsured doggie coverage.

Gangsta99
27th May 2010, 06:06 PM
Um. I actually agree that since it was their property which caused damage to the vehicle they should pay for the vehicle to be fixed.

General of Darkness
27th May 2010, 06:21 PM
Um. I actually agree that since it was their property which caused damage to the vehicle they should pay for the vehicle to be fixed.


+1, the owner was responsible.

willie pete
27th May 2010, 06:28 PM
Um. I actually agree that since it was their property which caused damage to the vehicle they should pay for the vehicle to be fixed.


+1, the owner was responsible.


Yea, I'd have to agree that the owners were at fault for not having the dog leashed off the property

Quantum
27th May 2010, 11:47 PM
An inanimate object is equated to a living, breathing...loving creature. A world gone mad. This is no different than sending a bill to someone whose dead child damaged the bumper.

I hope you enjoy your "property" when you end up in Hell.

Bullion_Bob
28th May 2010, 12:01 AM
Who let's their dog run around unattended near cars driving back and forth?

One well placed squirrel, some bad timing, and it's all over.

Stupid owners.

Gypsybiker45
28th May 2010, 03:31 AM
For one, dogs arent supposed to have "daily strolls around neighborhoods" unattended (loose). The dog's owner is responsible for its demise, no one else.

sirgonzo420
28th May 2010, 06:57 AM
An inanimate object is equated to a living, breathing...loving creature. A world gone mad. This is no different than sending a bill to someone whose dead child damaged the bumper.

I hope you enjoy your "property" when you end up in Hell.


Really? No different?

So dogs = children?

Come on...

Ash_Williams
28th May 2010, 09:03 AM
An inanimate object is equated to a living, breathing...loving creature. A world gone mad. This is no different than sending a bill to someone whose dead child damaged the bumper.

I hope you enjoy your "property" when you end up in Hell.

Who pays the bill then? What if someone tossed a lamb at your windshield as you drove past?

Quantum
28th May 2010, 01:19 PM
An inanimate object is equated to a living, breathing...loving creature. A world gone mad. This is no different than sending a bill to someone whose dead child damaged the bumper.

I hope you enjoy your "property" when you end up in Hell.


Really? No different?

So dogs = children?

Come on...


Yes, and yes.

Most dogs are more loyal...more valuable...than many so-called "humans."

kregener
28th May 2010, 03:36 PM
Yes, and yes.

Most dogs are more loyal...more valuable...than many so-called "humans."


Only they eat their own shit...

Quantum
28th May 2010, 04:01 PM
Yes, and yes.

Most dogs are more loyal...more valuable...than many so-called "humans."


Only they eat their own sh*t...


Really? At least dogs don't know any better...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia

keehah
16th July 2010, 12:43 AM
I thought this was fun...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL9duLVeFRM