PDA

View Full Version : Growing ranks of long-term jobless face tough odds



Twisted Titan
6th June 2010, 06:47 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100605/ap_on_bi_ge/us_long_term_unemployed


Growing ranks of long-term jobless face tough odds


If you lose your job these days, it's worth scrambling to find a new one — fast. After six months of unemployment, your chances of landing work dwindle.

The proportion of people jobless for six months or more has accelerated in the past year and now makes up 46 percent of the unemployed. That's the highest percentage on records dating to 1948. By late summer or early fall, they are expected to make up half of all jobless Americans.

Economists say those out of work for six months or more risk becoming less and less employable. Their skills can erode, their confidence falter, their contacts dry up. Their growing ranks also will keep pressure on Congress to keep extending jobless benefits, which now run for up to 99 weeks.

Overall, the economy has created a net 982,000 jobs this year. But for Jeff Martinez and the record 6.76 million others who have struck out for six months or more, their struggles are getting worse, not better.

Martinez, 40, a salesman in Washington, D.C., says he's logged more than 200 interviews in the past three years. Decked out in a dark navy suit and Burberry tie, Martinez projects drive and a zest for deal-making. And yet the most urgent deal of his career — finding a job — eludes him.

"You have days where you feel motivated and hopeful and optimistic," he says. "Then there are other days, you really lose the faith and think, `I'm never going to get another job. Ever.'"

What's causing the rising ranks of the long-term jobless to exceed the pace of other recessions?

Mainly, it's the depth and duration of the job-slashing this time. Since the recession began in December 2007 through May this year, a net 7.4 million jobs have vanished. The unemployment rate has surged nearly 5 percentage points: From 5 percent in December 2007 to 9.7 percent in May.

By contrast, in the last severe recession, the rate rose less sharply over a shorter period: From 7.2 percent in July 1981 to 10.8 percent at the end of 1982.

Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, points to the "sheer scale of the falloff in demand for workers" this time. It's left more people out of work for longer stretches. And it's intensified competition for each opening.

"It's a cruel game of musical chairs," Mishel says.

To lower the unemployment rate from the current 9.7 percent to a more normal 6 percent would require roughly a net 15 million new jobs by the end of 2016, estimates Brian Bethune, chief U.S. financial economist at IHS Global Insight.

Few think that's likely.

One factor behind the growing proportion of the long-term unemployed is the erosion of their workplace skills — or employers' perception of it. It's hard to find work in a tight job market when your skills are seen as stale.

For some occupations in particular, such as computer technicians or accountants, people jobless for many months can lose pace with technological changes or federal rules.

Among those who fear losing their edge is Stephan Azor, 30. He's looking for information technology work, perhaps overseeing a company's computer system. He was laid off eight months ago as a system administrator for a defense contractor.

"Technology changes every six months, so there are things I have to look up and learn," says Azor, who lives in Washington.

Other reasons for the growing proportion of the long-term unemployed:

• Jobs wiped out by the Great Recession that aren't coming back. In industries like home construction, manufacturing and retail, fewer workers will be needed even after the economy has fully recovered. One reason is higher productivity: Companies have managed to produce the same level of goods or services with fewer workers. Economist Marisa DiNatale of Moody's Economy.com notes that people out of work in those industries may lack the skills for other jobs that are becoming available.

• The breadth of the recession, which struck every area of the country, makes it harder for job hunters to move to another region in expectation of finding a job. Complicating the matter, the housing bust made it difficult for people to sell their homes and move elsewhere to take a job, economists say.

A study by the National Employment Law Project found that older workers — those 45 and up — make up the largest slice of the long-term unemployed. African-Americans make up 20.8 percent. And men account for six out of 10.

Martinez was living in Los Angeles and pulling in $200,000 a year from a media sales job. Three years ago, he lost it.

Burning through cash, Martinez had to move back home with his parents in Sterling, Va., outside Washington. He landed another media sales job in the area in 2008, at the height of the financial crisis. But four weeks later, he was laid off.

By his count, Martinez has sent out 2,500 resumes in the past year. He's researched would-be employers and written personalized cover letters. He hit a dry spell at the start of this year. Since then, Martinez says the job climate seems to have improved. He's interviewing again. But it's emotionally draining.

"It's tough not to have an interview, and it's just as tough to go on five or six or seven interviews and not get hired," he says.

Dirty Harry
6th June 2010, 07:49 PM
I can relate.......

gunDriller
7th June 2010, 07:00 AM
now i'm hearing that some employers are stating in their job ads -
"Unemployed People Do Not Apply"
"Only Accepting Resume's from Currently Employed Applicants" ... seriously !

BrewTech
7th June 2010, 08:03 AM
now i'm hearing that some employers are stating in their job ads -
"Unemployed People Do Not Apply"
"Only Accepting Resume's from Currently Employed Applicants" ... seriously !


I haven't seen that yet, but I won't be at all surprised when I do. That's harsh.

Quantum
7th June 2010, 08:55 AM
now i'm hearing that some employers are stating in their job ads -
"Unemployed People Do Not Apply"
"Only Accepting Resume's from Currently Employed Applicants" ... seriously !


Always remember: corporations have no concern about you as a human being. Always return the favor.

I would suggest any unemployed, ready-to-work man or woman, desperate for work, simply embellish their resume with verifiable, credible data. Everyone can have a small business. Get a PO Box. Get a MagicJack "office phone" w/ voicemail. You have nothing to lose with attitudes like this among the "human resources" department scum.

Ash_Williams
7th June 2010, 11:48 AM
I would suggest any unemployed, ready-to-work man or woman, desperate for work, simply embellish their resume with verifiable, credible data. Everyone can have a small business. Get a PO Box. Get a MagicJack "office phone" w/ voicemail. You have nothing to lose with attitudes like this among the "human resources" department scum.

I understand why they do it. You put an ad up now and you get a flood of resumes. Maybe 20% are from people that actually read the ad and have some of the qualifications. Most are just "spam" (applicants send a resume to everyone who is hiring for anything... email is free...) Then of those 20% you're getting mostly applicants that got laid off from another place (unless you have an entry level position where students apply) and in the interview you discover it was for good reason.

We tried hiring at work for a non entry-level position and it was a total failure despite hundreds of resumes and dozens of interviews over two months. There's a massive sea of candidates out there and frankly they are all useless to us. There's only so much effort you can put into finding an employee - we actually gave up. We'll know the economy is in real trouble when someone we can actually use has been laid off from somewhere!

madfranks
7th June 2010, 12:15 PM
Plus, in order to receive unemployment monies, you have to send in a certain number of resumes/applications each week and prove you sent them if asked. When I got laid off in Colorado the requirement was 5 applications per week. After a while you run out of places to send the resumes and just send them randomly to whoever. This makes it even harder for places looking to hire someone actually find a qualified candidate.

goldleaf
7th June 2010, 12:43 PM
It makes sense to me. In this depressed economy we now have more workers
than we do jobs. the companies that are laying some people off aren't going to
lay off their better employees, they're going to be culling. There is an awful lot
of worthless people out there looking for work. Hell!, even when things were
booming the last few years look at the hiring practices of some of the companies,
probationary periods, or temporary jobs with the possibility of fulltime. They all
would rather just try you out first to see if you're going to work out. There is alot
of B.S. to go through to hire somebody anymore.

PatColo
7th June 2010, 01:52 PM
now i'm hearing that some employers are stating in their job ads -
"Unemployed People Do Not Apply"
"Only Accepting Resume's from Currently Employed Applicants" ... seriously !


Disturbing Job Ads: 'The Unemployed Will Not Be Considered' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/04/disturbing-job-ads-the-un_n_600665.html)

BrewTech
7th June 2010, 04:29 PM
now i'm hearing that some employers are stating in their job ads -
"Unemployed People Do Not Apply"
"Only Accepting Resume's from Currently Employed Applicants" ... seriously !


Disturbing Job Ads: 'The Unemployed Will Not Be Considered' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/04/disturbing-job-ads-the-un_n_600665.html)


Absolute undeniable proof of a DEE-PRESSION. I don't want to hear the stupid term "Great Recession" anymore. It's BS!

SLV^GLD
7th June 2010, 04:42 PM
I'm going on blind faith here that all our audience was easily amused by the large swaths of that article written specifically to engender an "it will be ok" mentality... don't let me down.

ratholer, as someone who is employed in a very tightly constricting industry I can tell you that you hit the nail on the head about the remaining workforce working harder but sticking it out just to keep a paycheck.

Ash_Williams
7th June 2010, 06:38 PM
There is alot
of B.S. to go through to hire somebody anymore.

A lot of B.S. to go through to fire people as well.
I'm sure some companies took full advantage of the downturn to get rid of those they couldn't fire without a lawsuit.

Twisted Titan
8th June 2010, 08:17 AM
now i'm hearing that some employers are stating in their job ads -
"Unemployed People Do Not Apply"
"Only Accepting Resume's from Currently Employed Applicants" ... seriously !


Disturbing Job Ads: 'The Unemployed Will Not Be Considered' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/04/disturbing-job-ads-the-un_n_600665.html)


Absolute undeniable proof of a DEE-PRESSION. I don't want to hear the stupid term "Great Recession" anymore. It's BS!


Rock bottom is coming..........


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdXdsF08SWQ