PDA

View Full Version : Matt Simmons on BP: "about a month before they declare Chapter 11"



Quantum
9th June 2010, 09:44 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2010/06/09/news/companies/simmons_gulf_oil_spill.fortune/

The Gulf Coast oil spill's Dr. Doom

Interview by Nin-Hai Tseng, reporterJune 9, 2010: 1:31 PM ET

FORTUNE -- As an oil and gas industry insider, Matt Simmons speaks with a bold voice and makes even bolder predictions. His 2005 book, Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy, which argued that Saudi Arabia's oil supplies are way more limited than most people think, raised his profile as an authority on the industry.

For more than 35 years, Simmons has run a Texas-based boutique investment bank, Simmons & Co., which specializes in the energy industry. At times, with his somewhat doom-and -loom-like take on things, there's a hint of conspiracy theorist in his tone. But it's hard to ignore that Simmons is deeply connected and has been pretty much right on in the past: When oil was $58 a barrel the year Twilight was released, Simmons predicted prices would be at or above $100 within a few years. By 2008, when Fortune profiled Simmons, the price of crude had hit $147 a barrel.

As a big believer that wind power is the way of the future, Simmons says the era of easy oil is over and that world oil production will eventually fail to meet expected future demands.

These days, Simmons has been weighing in on BP (BP) and the worst oil spill in U.S. history, following the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico. As BP struggles to permanently stop the gush of oil, Simmons has been warning that the scale of the spill is much bigger and that there's a larger leak several miles away.

Simmons also thinks that perhaps the only way to seal the gush of oil is by doing what the Soviet Union did decades ago -- setting off a bomb deep underground so that the fiery blast will melt the surrounding rock and shut off the spill.

Fortune caught up with Simmons this week to hear his thoughts on the Gulf Coast oil spill, the future of BP and what's ahead for offshore drilling.

Experts forecast an active hurricane season this year. We know it could disrupt efforts to stop the spill, but how else do you think storms could impact the Gulf Coast?

We've got to stop the gusher first. Then we have to deal with the other issues. There's a lake at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico that's over 100 miles wide and at least 400 to 500 feet deep of black oil. It's just staying there. And only the lightest of that is what we're seeing hitting the shores so far. If a hurricane comes and blows this to shore, it could paint the Gulf Coast black. We should have been pumping this oil out onto other tankers weeks ago.

How do you think the U.S. government should handle this disaster?

I think the government should ask BP to leave the United States and turn its operation over to the military. Put the U.S. Navy in charge. Have all the contractors report to the Navy -- the cleanup efforts, the whole nine yards. Because as long as it's in BP's hands, they're going to spin the information as long as they can.

What do you think is in store for the future of BP?

They have about a month before they declare Chapter 11. They're going to run out of cash from lawsuits, cleanup and other expenses. One really smart thing that Obama did was about three weeks ago he forced BP CEO Tony Hayward to put in writing that BP would pay for every dollar of the cleanup. But there isn't enough money in the world to clean up the Gulf of Mexico. Once BP realizes the extent of this my guess is that they'll panic and go into Chapter 11.

There's currently a ban on new deepwater oil projects for six months to prevent other disasters. What lies ahead for offshore drilling?

First of all, to the industry's credit, we went 41 years in the United States without an oil spill. In a minor sense, this is what happened to the Challenger. We had so many successful shuttle takeoffs that the space station got kind of casual about this. But this is worse. BP was so certain that there wasn't any risk that three years ago they thought the insurance industry was ripping them off, so they're self-insured on this. How stupid! It was the best thing that ever happened to the insurance industry.

How do you think the Gulf Coast oil spill will change the energy business, if at all?

Profoundly. We're going to have to go back and re-examine all of our regulatory rules and realize the easy stuff is imminent and the rest of the stuff we do is really risky. We have to start questioning whether it's worth the risk, and do we need to get really serious about developing some alternative energy sources? Now I'm working on a big project in mid-coast Maine called the Ocean Energy Institute, and we're hoping that within the next year we can actually create 50 megawatt offshore wind turbines -- one every five miles a part -- and turn that offshore electricity into desalinated sea water and liquid ammonia. It could replace motor gasoline and diesel fuel.

What are the lessons learned from this environmental disaster?

That oil peaked. The easy stuff is over. We have to continue drilling in shallow water, but we probably need to take a deep breath and step back. Until we develop a new generation of equipment that can respond to these accidents, just don't go into the ultra-deep water and deep formations because it's just too risky.

Serpo
9th June 2010, 11:51 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2010/06/09/news/companies/simmons_gulf_oil_spill.fortune/

The Gulf Coast oil spill's Dr. Doom

Interview by Nin-Hai Tseng, reporterJune 9, 2010: 1:31 PM ET. BP was so certain that there wasn't any risk that three years ago they thought the insurance industry was ripping them off, so they're self-insured on this. How stupid! It was the best thing that ever happened to the insurance industry.

Spectrism
10th June 2010, 05:30 AM
That guy is full of Shhh@@@!!!

First, blowing any explosive device down there would likely rupture the reservoir containment entirely. Then we would see disaster by the bucket-load instead of the spoonful of daily death we currently see.

Next- Obama was smart to get in writing a BP promise? Where is that? I just watched a senate hearing wherein they said we have NOTHING from BP in writing and the courts advised him that there is NOTHING binding on BP. All the verbal promises by BP officers are worthless should they say they are finished with any payments or cleanups. BP could walk away and close their operations and we have nothing. This is why the Congress must enact a binding contract and law with teeth.

Sparky
10th June 2010, 12:40 PM
Doesn't Chapter 11 actually protect them? Why is that such a bad thing for them?

Son-of-Liberty
10th June 2010, 01:06 PM
They will file chapter 11 and the american taxpayer will foot the bill yet again.

Corporations suck.

I know most people think that limited liablity is a good thing and business couldn't operate without it, but that is bull. The Bible teaches full liability. Eye for an eye tooth for a tooth. It is the only way to keep people from taking advantage of the system. They have to be held personally responsible for all their actions.

osoab
10th June 2010, 03:18 PM
I think this guy is CFR.
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9484/global_oil_trends.html


Which nations produce the most oil?
Four of the five biggest oil-producing continues—Saudi Arabia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait—lie in the volatile Middle East (the other is Canada). Others, including Venezuela, Russia, Libya, and Nigeria, are either fraught with political uncertainty or run by strongmen hostile to U.S. interests. Here's an inside look at some of the most volatile energy havens, as well as their economic and political outlooks:
•Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, which holds 22 percent of the world's known reserves, produces roughly 10.5 million barrels per day (bpd); global daily consumption is 82 million bpd. The kingdom has said it hopes to increase daily production to 12.5 million bpd by 2009. However, some experts say Saudi Arabia’s oil fields, whose capacity and condition are kept secret, are not as bountiful as Saudi officials claim. “The Saudis don’t have that spigot any more,” said Paul Roberts, author of The End of Oil, in a June 2005 Council on Foreign Relations meeting. “They don’t have the capacity to just flip the switch any more. It's been used up.” Others, including Matthew Simmons, have called on the Saudi government to publish audited field-production reports. “‘It would then take anybody less than a week to say, ‘Gosh, Matt is totally wrong,’ or ‘Matt actually might be too optimistic,’” says Simmons, head of Simmons & Company, a company that advises energy investors. Saudis have dismissed demands by Simmons and others to open up their books. “Our record...is to understate rather than overstate our reserves,” said Prince Saud al-Faisal, foreign minister of Saudi Arabia, in a September 2005 Council on Foreign Relations meeting. “When you want to believe or disbelieve somebody, you look at his record. You don’t go and audit his books.” D. Barry McKennitt, executive director of the U.S. National Association of Petroleum Investment Analysts, also notes that much of the new supply is predicted to come from heavier-grade crude, which many refineries, especially in the United States, are unable to handle.


http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall4.htm


Robert B. Silvers CFR/TC/84
Umberto Silvestri CFR/88
Dimitri K. Simes CFR/92
Adele Smith Simmons CFR/85
Jamal N. Simmons CFR
Matthew R. Simmons CFR
P. J. Simmons CFR
Richard S. Simmons CFR/92
Ruth J. Simmons CFR
Wallace D. Simmons CFR/21
Francoise L. Simon CFR
Hugh V. Simon, Jr. CFR
Jennifer J. Simon

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/mike-ruppert-and-peak-oil/


Once in office, Dick Cheney commissioned a report on behalf of his oilfield buddies (Cheney was CEO of Halliburton from 1995 until being elected/appointed vice-President in 2000) titled, ‘Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century’. The report was supposedly produced by ‘An independent Task Force, sponsored by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University and The Council on Foreign Relations’. One of the participants in the discussions leading to the production of this report was ‘Kenny boy’ Lay; none other than the now disgraced (and supposedly deceased) ex-CEO of ENRON and major contributor to the Bush/Cheney 2000 campaign fund. Another of the signatories of this report was Thomas F. McLarty, Vice-Chairman of Kissinger McLarty Associates, listed as ‘an international strategic advisory firm’. An Independent Task Force? Need I say more?

However, one of the lesser known but most significant participants in the production of this document was one Matthew Simmons, President of Simmons & Company International, a specialised energy investment bank. Simmons is also a member of the National Petroleum Council and Bush/Cheney Energy Transition Advisory Committee and past Chairman of the National Ocean Industries Association. Whilst Colin Campbell takes the credit for re-awakening interest in the work of Dr. Marion King Hubbert (he didn’t like the name Marion, so he had everyone address him as ‘King’), Matthew Simmons, who admits to first reading Campbell’s hypothesis in 1996, was instrumental in translating the basic tenets of Hubbert’s depletion theory into an investment context. All that remained was to get the principles of the theory into the mass consciousness. A strategy that would be absolutely critical in softening the public reaction to the growing realisation that Weapon’s of Mass Destruction would never be found in Iraq; as admitted by Paul Wolfowitz in 2003 that the myth of WMD’s was created for political expediency (link: www.truthout.org/docs_03/053103A.shtml


The last article is pretty good. I picked this up reading tickerfourm. They all seem to think he is talking his book.

gunDriller
11th June 2010, 06:12 AM
I think this guy is CFR.

not surprising, given his age & business experience.

he's also one of the most knowledgeable guys in the oil industry, especially about the detailed history of the industry.

given that BP's liabilities were $100+ Billion with about $66 Billion current & liquid assets - before the spill - i think this might bring down BP.

it depends on who shoulders the true cost of the oil disaster.

it sounds like the financial press is waking up to the counterparty risk of a BP bankruptcy.

Spectrism
11th June 2010, 07:48 AM
I think this guy is CFR.

not surprising, given his age & business experience.

he's also one of the most knowledgeable guys in the oil industry, especially about the detailed history of the industry.

given that BP's liabilities were $100+ Billion with about $66 Billion current & liquid assets - before the spill - i think this might bring down BP.

it depends on who shoulders the true cost of the oil disaster.

it sounds like the financial press is waking up to the counterparty risk of a BP bankruptcy.


Where did you find the info on liabilities? I heard on the news last night that they have cash warchest of $8 or 10 billion, and something like 100million barrels of oil in reserve.

I have a good contact who via a BP accountant got a negative report some time ago. The need to borrow for operating expenses made the cash fund sound like a tall story.

Ponce
11th June 2010, 09:51 AM
I posted about this the other day........if each well is its own company then their chapter 9 would be only on this one well so that the other wells would be safe and producing more money for them........I can only wonder if that is what they are working on now.

First post of the day........ good morning to one and all.

gunDriller
11th June 2010, 10:02 AM
Where did you find the info on liabilities?


their balance sheet -
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=BP+Balance+Sheet&annual

osoab
13th June 2010, 05:51 AM
So Simmons has now changed his tune and is calling BP a buy with target of 52.

BP As Schrodinger's Cat: Simmons Upgrades Firm To Buy, Seeing It As Both Bankrupt And With $52 Stock Price At Same Time (http://www.zerohedge.com/article/bp-schrodingers-cat-simmons-upgrades-firm-buy-seeing-it-both-bankrupt-and-52-stock-price-sam)


Ever wonder who may have been buying up every share of BP stock earlier this week, especially when it plunged to 14 year lows on June 9 amid media frenzy based on a Fortune story in which Simmons & Co.'s CEO Matt Simmons was quoted as saying that BP "has about a month before they declare Chapter 11." Why, Simmons & Co. itself, of course. In a note released to clients on Friday, Simmons & Co, upgraded BP from Neutral to Overweight, in which Mr. Simmons amusingly notes, "the kitchen sink of headlines have been thrown at BP shares over the past 2 weeks, thereby partially desensitizing the shares to the news." With his dire warnings of an imminent bankruptcy just two days prior to the upgrade, Mr. Simmons surely did his fair share to contribute to kitchen sink. It is only fair that after creating a near-panic in the name, that the firm would now suddenly be stuck in a Schrodinger's Cat world, in which BP is seen as both bankrupt, and having a $52 price target at the same time.

I had never heard of this guy before of all this. I think the guys @ Tickerforum put it best. He has been talking his book the whole time. Kind of like Rothschild and the London Stock Exchange.

So, does this put his numbers of 9000 days of unabated flow completely out of the realm of possibiliety?

Spectrism
13th June 2010, 07:54 AM
So Simmons has now changed his tune and is calling BP a buy with target of 52.

BP As Schrodinger's Cat: Simmons Upgrades Firm To Buy, Seeing It As Both Bankrupt And With $52 Stock Price At Same Time (http://www.zerohedge.com/article/bp-schrodingers-cat-simmons-upgrades-firm-buy-seeing-it-both-bankrupt-and-52-stock-price-sam)


Ever wonder who may have been buying up every share of BP stock earlier this week, especially when it plunged to 14 year lows on June 9 amid media frenzy based on a Fortune story in which Simmons & Co.'s CEO Matt Simmons was quoted as saying that BP "has about a month before they declare Chapter 11." Why, Simmons & Co. itself, of course. In a note released to clients on Friday, Simmons & Co, upgraded BP from Neutral to Overweight, in which Mr. Simmons amusingly notes, "the kitchen sink of headlines have been thrown at BP shares over the past 2 weeks, thereby partially desensitizing the shares to the news." With his dire warnings of an imminent bankruptcy just two days prior to the upgrade, Mr. Simmons surely did his fair share to contribute to kitchen sink. It is only fair that after creating a near-panic in the name, that the firm would now suddenly be stuck in a Schrodinger's Cat world, in which BP is seen as both bankrupt, and having a $52 price target at the same time.

I had never heard of this guy before of all this. I think the guys @ Tickerforum put it best. He has been talking his book the whole time. Kind of like Rothschild and the London Stock Exchange.

So, does this put his numbers of 9000 days of unabated flow completely out of the realm of possibiliety?




This is just another warning that all we can count on is an endless stream of lies and deception.