Inhabitants of the Earth... Get Out Now!

[ximmy]

It was bound to happen...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHtZ6Ixeqvs

[StackerKen]

LOL....love it Ximmy!

I workin on a "way" out.

[JohnQPublic]

Wow Great find. You'll thank God the Gulf oil spill is only a, umm.., oh forget that.

[k-os]

Nice find, ximmy!

[willie pete]

Thanks for that Imma, gonna watch it, never saw it, Dana Andrews was one of my favorite Film Noir actors.... ;D

[k-os]

Thanks, ImaCannin. Scary read, sure to bring about the nightmares. ;D

[k-os]

Does it make you think twice about going ahead and getting in your Old RV and hitting the road?


I still want to do it, but sometimes the more I read, the more I think we are ALL screwed.

[StackerKen]

Maybe the Mayans were right?

[keehah]

Everybody dies regardless. ^-^

Hey Ximmy at first I thought this might be yours work again.

The scientist is the clip got one thing wrong, if the earth is expanding as it cracks we don't have to worry about water running into it. ;D

Iconic crack colours in the movie poster. Real life is like living a slow, so very slow, slow motion effect.

http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/thumb/7/72/Seacrust_age.gif/400px-Seacrust_age.gif
[Edit for link (http://creationwiki.org/Expanding_earth_theory) ]

[crazychicken]

The OP certainly was comforting.

Sure glad I am near Ponce in the NW. In case I need some canned Tuna or TP.

:D ;D :D ;D :D ;D

CC

[ximmy]

Everybody dies regardless. ^-^

Hey Ximmy at first I thought this might be yours work again.

The scientist is the clip got one thing wrong, if the earth is expanding as it cracks we don't have to worry about water running into it. ;D

Iconic crack colours in the movie poster. Real life is like living a slow, so very slow, slow motion effect.

http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/thumb/7/72/Seacrust_age.gif/400px-Seacrust_age.gif





Gotta watch that movie.. Thanks Ima... Keehah... where did you find that pic... :)

[keehah]

Lets pray that crack off Fukishima sucked in the radioactive water eh?

Sea Level Plummeting : Lowest Level Since At Least 2004 (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/05/27/sea-level-plummeting-lowest-level-since-at-least-2004/)
Posted on May 27, 2011 by stevengoddard

The latest data has been added to the Aviso site, and sea level is dropping through the floor. Europe’s Envisat satellite has been collecting data since 2004, and now shows that sea level is the lowest it has been since they started collecting data.

Since the start of the year, sea level has dropped almost 10 mm.

http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/msl_serie_en_global_ib_rwt_nogia_adjust-1.gif?w=500&h=323

This data would be expected with a recent expanding earth or global cooling overriding any melting ice trend.

Regarding my earlier post above about expanding earth evidence, an image I posted a few weeks ago (http://gold-silver.us/forum/science-technology-and-medicine/goce-reveals-earth's-gravity-in-unprecedented-detail/msg224935/#msg224935) also shows the expansion with areas differentiated by earth's magnetic field at the time(s).

[JJ.G0ldD0t]

The earth is changing.

I think I'll be dead before it's unrecognizable. Change is the new normal.

[keehah]

This may not be the ideal thread, but I have some more science global warming crimes on faking sea level rise fear. Basically if something is causing sea level to fall, these 'scientists' will remove observation of it from the sea level measurement.

Fox News, June 17, 2011: Changing Tides: Research Center Under Fire for 'Adjusted' Sea-Level Data (http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/17/research-center-under-fire-for-adjusted-sea-level-data/#ixzz1Pe4lAn9A)

The University of Colorado’s Sea Level Research Group decided in May to add 0.3 millimeters -- or about the thickness of a fingernail -- every year to its actual measurements of sea levels, sparking criticism from experts who called it an attempt to exaggerate the effects of global warming.

"Gatekeepers of our sea level data are manufacturing a fictitious sea level rise that is not occurring," said James M. Taylor, a lawyer who focuses on environmental issues for the Heartland Institute.

Steve Nerem, the director of the widely relied-upon research center, told FoxNews.com that his group added the 0.3 millimeters per year to the actual sea level measurements because land masses, still rebounding from the ice age, are rising and increasing the amount of water that oceans can hold.

"We have to account for the fact that the ocean basins are actually getting slightly bigger... water volume is expanding," he said, a phenomenon they call glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA).

Taylor calls it tomfoolery.

"There really is no reason to do this other than to advance a political agenda," he said.

Climate scientist John Christy, a professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, said that the amount of water in the ocean and sea level were two different things.

"To me… sea level rise is what's measured against the actual coast," he told FoxNews.com. "That's what tells us the impact of rising oceans."

Taylor agreed.

"Many global warming alarmists say that vast stretches of coastline are going to be swallowed up by the sea. Well, that means we should be talking about sea level, not about global water volume."

In e-mails with FoxNews.com, Nerem indicated that he considered "sea level rise" to be the same thing as the amount of water in the ocean.
"If we correct our data to remove [the effect of rising land], it actually does cause the rate of sea level (a.k.a. ocean water volume change) rise to be bigger," Nerem wrote. The adjustment is trivial, and not worth public attention, he added.

"For the layperson, this correction is a non-issue and certainly not newsworthy… [The] effect is tiny -- only 1 inch over 100 years, whereas we expect sea level to rise 2-4 feet."

But Taylor said that the correction seemed bigger when compared with actual sea level increases.

"We’ve seen only 7 inches of sea level rise in the past century and it hasn’t sped up this century. Compared to that, this would add nearly 20 percent to the sea level rise. That's not insignificant," he told FoxNews.com.

Nerem said that the research center is considering compromising on the adjustment.

"We are considering putting both data sets on our website -- a GIA-corrected dataset, as well as one without the GIA correction," he said.
Christy said that would be a welcome change.

"I would encourage CU to put the sea level rate [with] no adjustment at the top of the website," he said.

Taylor’s takeaway: Be wary of sea level rise estimates.

[letter_factory]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bhoWfC1L9k

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e322/patisblog/scaredsmiley.gif?t=1241978021