German legislator: Stop 'thriving Holocaust industry.

[Ponce]

German legislator: Stop 'thriving Holocaust industry.

Extreme right leader carries hate speech against Israel; calls to cut ties, issue economic sanctions

Dor Glick Published: 06.18.10, 08:41 / Israel News

BERLIN – "Stop cooperation with the state of Jewish scoundrels", "Don't give in to the thriving Holocaust industry." These statements were not said in the Tehran parliament, but in the German city of Dresden, during a parliament meeting in the state of Saxony.


Leader of the extreme right National Democratic Party (NPD) Holger Apfel stirred up a storm in the parliament on Thursday when he carried a speech titled "no to cooperation with scoundrel countries – and end cooperation between Saxony and Israel."

Castro: Swastika has become Israel's banner / AFP

Most parliament members urged Apfel to change the title, fearing it would damage Saxony's image – but to no avail. Apfel, a former neo-Nazi, stepped up to the podium and carried out his hate speech, while being booed by other parliament members.

Even after his time was up, Apfel refused to step down from the stage and continued to denounce the "Jewish terror state." His speech was finally stopped after the chairman turned off his microphone and instructed ushers to escort Apfel out of the hall.

President of the Saxony Parliament Matthias Roessler instructed to keep Apfel out of parliament hearings until December.

This is not the first time Apfel has expressed his harsh feeling toward Israel, and the need to cut ties with it. On NPS' official website, the former neo-Nazi published his reaction to the recent flotilla incident, saying: "Today's attack, with at least 10 fatalities, demonstrates a new 'characteristic' of 'state terror' employed by Israel.

"Since the establishment of the state in 1948 and the expulsion of millions of Palestinians – the history of Israel has been accompanied by bloodshed."

Apfel called to "cut off Germany's political ties with Israel and issue economic sanctions against it."

[Quantum]

Apfel is usually a Jewish name. Not saying that Holger IS a Jew, but it's interesting...almost a liability...but not as much as Alfred Rosenberg.

[keehah]

Only one of these two quotes is real.

Reuters , Wednesday 23 Mar 2011 (http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/2/8/8412/World/Region/Israel-passes-new-Nakba-Law.aspx)


Germany's parliament passed a measure on Tuesday enabling the denial of state funding to institutions that question the country's existence as a GemanCatholic state, in a move criticised as targetting a Jewish minority.

The so-called Holocaust Law, using the Judaic word for "catastrophe" which is how many Jews regard the event passed by a vote of 37 to 25 after an angry debate among right and left-wing lawmakers.

Civil rights groups have denounced the measure as an effort to restrict freedom of expression to Jews.


Israel's parliament passed a measure on Tuesday enabling the denial of state funding to institutions that question the country's existence as a Jewish state, in a move criticised as targetting an Arab minority.

The so-called Nakba Law, using the Arabic word for "catastrophe" which is how many Palestinians regard the founding of Israel, passed by a vote of 37 to 25 after an angry debate among right and left-wing lawmakers.

Civil rights groups have denounced the measure as an effort to restrict freedom of expression to Arabs

[General of Darkness]

I'm guessing the Israeli law. ;)

[Ponce]

THE LAW is only a law only for as long as you choose to followed, or obey, it.....otherwise they are just words in a piece of paper.

[keehah]

Of course the 1% and those Christian minds they control directly (http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/03/10/canada-%E2%80%98will-always-stand-by%E2%80%99-israel-harper-says/), over rule the 99%.

Globe and Mail: Poll rejects museum’s plan to set Holocaust apart from other genocides (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/poll-adds-to-controversy-over-rights-museums-holocaust-program/article1952131/)

The telephone poll of 1,216 adults, conducted earlier this month by Nanos Research, is the latest instalment in an ongoing feud between various communities and the CMHR over the Winnipeg-based museum’s plans to establish a large, permanent space highlighting the Holocaust and a separate one for other atrocities, such as 3.3 million Ukrainians starved to death under Stalin in 1932-33 and the 1915 Armenian genocide.

The poll was paid for by Canadians for Genocide Education and the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the last being one of the most vociferous opponents of the CMHR’s current plans. Of the 1,216 respondents, just over 60 per cent said they want the CMHR to adopt a “one exhibit/all genocides” approach, whereas close to 25 per cent prefer “one gallery [highlighting] a particular genocide permanently, while [grouping] the others ... together in a separate exhibit.” Just over 15 per cent of respondents said they were “unsure.”...

It was the Harper Conservatives who, in 2007, announced that the CMHR would become Canada’s first self-administered national museum outside the capital region, earmarking $100-million for its $310-million construction and $22-million a year to its operating budget.

For Lubomyr Luciuk, UCCLA research director, the results “underscore what we’ve said from the start, that most Canadians ... believe that a national museum of this sort should be thematic, comparative and inclusive and it should not elevate the suffering of one community over another. However horrible those experiences were, they’re part and parcel of a continuum that needs to be addressed fairly and equitably.”

Angela Cassie, CMHR communications director, declined to comment on the poll’s specifics, but said she takes it “as an opportunity to do a better job to show Canadians what an ‘ideas’ museum is about.”

While the CMHR would be “inclusive,” she stressed it was never conceived as a venue to “cover all genocides” and “memorialize those kinds of events.” It’s about “drawing lessons.”

Globe's Online poll:

Should the Canadian Museum for Human Rights devote a section to the Holocaust?
Yes 17% 170 votes The Holocaust's historical significance merits this specific treatment.

No 83% 829 votes Singling out the Holocaust this way is inequitable.
___________

http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/03/10/canada-%E2%80%98will-always-stand-by%E2%80%99-israel-harper-says/

Canada is “morally obliged” to stand up to threats against Israel, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told a Jewish audience in downtown Toronto Thursday night as both he and Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff sparred over which party is the stronger supporter of democracy in the Middle East.

Opponents who say that Canada has “lost its way” when it comes to its foreign policy are using “code for the view that Canada should go back to being ambivalent about our relationship with Israel and its fundamental right to defend itself,” Mr. Harper said. “Our party will never do that. We will always stand by [Israel].”

Both he and the Liberal leader addressed a sold-out crowd of 1,000 at the event hosted by the Canadian Jewish Political Affairs Committee. It was held at the Royal Conservatory of Music.

The Liberals have a long association with the Canadian Jewish community and, as a defender of Israel, “does not do code,” said Mr. Ignatieff.

“I disagree with Mr. Harper about just about everything,” he said. “We have plenty to disagree upon. We have plenty we can use to run an election campaign on. Let us not run an election campaign on who’s the better support of the state of Israel,” he said.

Both Mr. Harper and Mr. Ignatieff decried anti-Semitism on Canadian campuses, which the Prime Minister said has gained a disturbing foothold in the country’s universities in the form of Israeli Apartheid Week and had become increasingly sophisticated and “intellectually acceptable.”

“This is the time to reaffirm that it is permissible to criticize the state of Israel, but it is impermissible to compare it to South Africa,” Mr. Ignatieff said.

[Hatha Sunahara]

THE LAW is only a law only for as long as you choose to followed, or obey, it.....otherwise they are just words in a piece of paper.


George Bush said the Constitution was "just a ******* piece of paper'. But the words on the Patriot Act have armed thugs shoving them down your throat.

You might want to read Gene Sharp's book Dictatorship to Democracy to get the idea of political defiance. Daring TPTB to do something that makes them look like the thugs they are. Support vanishes like a fart in the wind.


Hatha

[Antonio]

Keehah, have you noticed that at the forefront of the Ukrohoax lie aka Ukrainian genocide there are hook-nosed kikes promoting it like Eric Margolis etc? Do you ever wonder why? Because nothing is better than have goym fighting the Holyhoax lie with another lie. That way they are completely drowining in lies with no chance of a single breath of oxygen reaching their lungs.