View Full Version : Defending Islam against the constitution....
Steal
24th June 2010, 11:03 AM
Found this curious...... anyone's thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Smw9QuH1xkA&feature=player_embedded
LuckyStrike
24th June 2010, 11:31 AM
Gotta love multiculturalism. The good thing is churchgoers are waking up to the fact that we are not all equal. Only Whites can live in a free society envisioned by our Founders which is precisely why women and non White's weren't allowed to vote. These ideals of course have been turned into racist hate speech so that our alternative is this, a multi cultural hell hole that is on it's way to Rhodesia or South Africa status.
Spectrism
24th June 2010, 12:04 PM
And for such a nation, destruction is well deserved. People were blessed with bounty and peace. The people told the source of those blessing s to go away. He has pulled His protection and blessings from an ungrateful generation.
Ash_Williams
24th June 2010, 12:23 PM
Gotta love multiculturalism. The good thing is churchgoers are waking up to the fact that we are not all equal. Only Whites can live in a free society envisioned by our Founders which is precisely why women and non White's weren't allowed to vote. These ideals of course have been turned into racist hate speech so that our alternative is this, a multi cultural hell hole that is on it's way to Rhodesia or South Africa status.
That doesn't work because it was essentially white people that voted to allow all the others to vote.
Simple-minded white men are just as bad as women and other races. They have no long-term vision or understanding of strategy and will do whatever a charismatic leader convinces them to.
In the video, the cops making the arrest are white. Over half the people on the side of freedom of speech are non-white.
LuckyStrike
24th June 2010, 01:44 PM
Gotta love multiculturalism. The good thing is churchgoers are waking up to the fact that we are not all equal. Only Whites can live in a free society envisioned by our Founders which is precisely why women and non White's weren't allowed to vote. These ideals of course have been turned into racist hate speech so that our alternative is this, a multi cultural hell hole that is on it's way to Rhodesia or South Africa status.
That doesn't work because it was essentially white people that voted to allow all the others to vote.
Simple-minded white men are just as bad as women and other races. They have no long-term vision or understanding of strategy and will do whatever a charismatic leader convinces them to.
In the video, the cops making the arrest are white. Over half the people on the side of freedom of speech are non-white.
You claim that my views "don't work" then set up a strawman argument.
I never defended the brain dead yuppie male or the White population that is near brain dead. What I DID say was
"Only Whites can live in a free society envisioned by our Founders which is precisely why women and non White's weren't allowed to vote."
After womens suffrage the country has gone down the sh*tter. Before you go all post hoc ergo propter hoc on me, I'm not claiming this is the only reason why since 1913 preceded womens suffrage however a good deal of marxism could've been avoided if women wouldn't vote.
illumin19
24th June 2010, 03:00 PM
You don't want to bite the hand with the money......in this case it was those in charge of the festival or at least they were bringing money in.
That is the case here and most cases when "freedom of speech" is hampered in situations like these. I don't care what society you live in (on earth), control the money and you control everything else.
As far as Shariah law today as it's practiced seems to contradict the Qur'an.....not unlike how "Israel's" law might contradict the Torah.......or how those that claim to follow the Gospel love to go to war or at least invite it.
We're all messed up.
LuckyStrike
24th June 2010, 04:12 PM
As far as Shariah law today as it's practiced seems to contradict the Qur'an.....not unlike how "Israel's" law might contradict the Torah.......or how those that claim to follow the Gospel love to go to war or at least invite it.
The state of kikestan is governed under the talmud not the torah. They do not follow the Mosaic law.
Ash_Williams
24th June 2010, 04:25 PM
You claim that my views "don't work" then set up a strawman argument.
I never defended the brain dead yuppie male or the White population that is near brain dead. What I DID say was
"Only Whites can live in a free society envisioned by our Founders which is precisely why women and non White's weren't allowed to vote."
After womens suffrage the country has gone down the sh*tter. Before you go all post hoc ergo propter hoc on me, I'm not claiming this is the only reason why since 1913 preceded womens suffrage however a good deal of marxism could've been avoided if women wouldn't vote.
I think that white men have proven they can't live in a free society either. As a group, they/us are unfortunately too stupid to maintain it.
LuckyStrike
24th June 2010, 10:48 PM
I think that white men have proven they can't live in a free society either. As a group, they/us are unfortunately too stupid to maintain it.
I'm not arguing that, what I am saying is that Whites are the only ethnic group who can govern themselves as history proves.
People get the government they deserve as William Penn said "Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants."
Bigjon
24th June 2010, 11:20 PM
Gotta love multiculturalism. The good thing is churchgoers are waking up to the fact that we are not all equal. Only Whites can live in a free society envisioned by our Founders which is precisely why women and non White's weren't allowed to vote. These ideals of course have been turned into racist hate speech so that our alternative is this, a multi cultural hell hole that is on it's way to Rhodesia or South Africa status.
That doesn't work because it was essentially white people that voted to allow all the others to vote.
Simple-minded white men are just as bad as women and other races. They have no long-term vision or understanding of strategy and will do whatever a charismatic leader convinces them to.
In the video, the cops making the arrest are white. Over half the people on the side of freedom of speech are non-white.
A honest look at the period called reconstruction and onward yields a picture of legislative corruption beyond belief. Many of the “Amendments†of those days were not properly ratified and just adopted as law. I’m not sure about the nineteenth amendment but there was a definite conspiracy to create change that took us away from our constitutional roots. The fifty two year period from 1868 to 1920 radically changed the way the USA elected representatives and ushered in fiat debt based money.
I rather doubt that men gave away their power to women, by granting them the right to vote.
Dave Thomas
24th June 2010, 11:28 PM
Actually White men can live in a society. They just need to enamor other cultures to their works.
Won't someone fire up Alte Kammeraden now?
This business of giving back is what everyone is pissed about.
Ash_Williams
25th June 2010, 12:18 PM
I'm not arguing that, what I am saying is that Whites are the only ethnic group who can govern themselves as history proves.
Not indians or persians or arabs or asians?
Dusty
25th June 2010, 12:41 PM
The constitution is perhaps next to the magna carta is one of the greatest human
works and words of men.
Now more to the point..
From the time these great works have been written , depending on the times and political atmosphere
at the times. Words are words and hold nothing to real life except to give guide lines to give equality of
men in a world of man. (sorry lady's it is the way things are written, you count also) These words have
been used as a loose guide for the governments in power at the time. over history.
Some governments have held close to these articles and others have not.
Sorry to say the racist and screwballs that want to wind back the clock hands 100-200 years are a small
minority and other than being vocal and sometimes sort of stinky.
There is nothing that can be done other than vote to try to get someone into the gov that may if enough are elected and have the same agenda . you are left of trying to piss up wind into a hurricain.
Unless or unill there is a total breakdown of gov and that sorry to say , I thinky wont happen..
Your vote counts..Use it wisely...
LuckyStrike
25th June 2010, 05:35 PM
I'm not arguing that, what I am saying is that Whites are the only ethnic group who can govern themselves as history proves.
Not indians or persians or arabs or asians?
Do you have examples of a civilization that is free run by any of the above groups?
Apparition
25th June 2010, 06:00 PM
Private-property owners have every right to use their private properties however they see fit & so long as they're not using the properties to commit, or intending to commit, criminal activities.
In this case, the individuals were standing outside the property so their actions should be considered completely legal.
How pathetic of the cops and those who reported them. >:(
Ash_Williams
25th June 2010, 07:36 PM
Do you have examples of a civilization that is free run by any of the above groups?
Well, about as free as we are now.
There may have been a brief shining point in their history, like ours, where they experimented with freedom. I honestly don't know.
I think you'll find a lot of Indians and Pakistanis would prefer us to have a freer society... they grew up with more freedom over there, although much of it was freedom through police laziness and corruption. Either way, they saw how things can work just fine without rules and cops everywhere so they don't fear freedom as people here do. However, they do draw the line at freedom when it conflicts with their religion, unfortunately.
One challenge we face here is the impression that we're more open and free than we used to be. People don't understand that once upon a time, you really could do just about anything you wanted as long as you didn't hurt anyone. Drugs were all legal, gun control was unheard of, prostitution was a just job, homosexuals were homosexual, and smut was smut (it was probably first created about 1 day after the invention of the camera). People tend to think of our history as some romantic time when everyone lived as fictional characters in an old romance novel, dressed perfectly and never cursing nor sinning and the kids didn't drink until 25 or have sex out of wedlock. They have it mixed up with stories they read about witch hunts, and what they've seen in old movies.
So, when people compare modern day america to what they think we were (super christian, drug free, wonderful polite people that lived under strict laws) they think we've progressed. They don't know that we're actually far less free than we once were.
And on the other side, the abortion guys get me the most, talking about how great it was before we had the procedure. I mean, get real, long before abortions they would just drown any kid that didn't look right before it was a day old, christian or not. There was no "right to life" back then, they knew they had to do it or the best the kid could hope for was being laughed at in a freak show.
There is simply so much BS out there in people's heads about how things used to be, that I'd say the brief period of time when America actually was free is basically forgotten. It was fair, but hard and occasionally brutal and people would rather pretend it didn't happen and instead believe the past was all Gone with the Wind.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.