PDA

View Full Version : U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions.



Ponce
26th June 2010, 10:33 PM
They will have to kill me in order to save me.
=================================================


U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions.
…
Saturday, June 26, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer

An advisory panel to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that every person be vaccinated for the seasonal flu yearly, except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe.

"Now no one should say 'Should I or shouldn't I?'" said CDC flu specialist Anthony Fiore.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted 11-0 with one abstention to recommend yearly flu vaccination for everyone except for children under the age of six months, whose immune systems have not yet developed enough for vaccination to be safe, and people with egg allergies or other health conditions that are known to make flu vaccines hazardous. If accepted by the CDC, this recommendation will then be publicized to doctors and other health workers.

The CDC nearly always accepts the advisory committee's recommendations.

Current CDC recommendations call for the yearly vaccination of all children over the age of six months, all adults over the age of 49, health care workers, people with chronic health problems and anyone who cares for a person in one of these groups. These recommendations cover 85 percent of the US population.

Excluded are adults between the ages of 19 and 49 who do not come into close contact with people in high-risk groups. The new recommendation, if adopted, would close that gap, bringing an end to a 10-year campaign by supporters of universal vaccination. In the past, the advisory committee has been reluctant to recommend universal vaccination for fear that it might produce vaccine shortages that place members of higher risk groups in danger. Yet even with current recommendations, only 33 percent of the public gets vaccinated every year, leaving millions of doses to be disposed of.

The H1N1 swine flu scare of the past year played a major role in the committee's about face, both because the disease killed many people falling outside the current recommended vaccine demographic and because it raised public awareness of and demand for vaccines.

Sources for this story include: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy....

Serpo
26th June 2010, 10:53 PM
"Now no one should say 'Should I or shouldn't I?'" said CDC flu specialist Anthony Fiore.


Well I know myself that there is no should I or shouldnt I ,its basically NO THANKS.

Ponce
26th June 2010, 11:31 PM
Well Serpo, when they say "No Exceptions"......that can only mean that they will force you no matter what, and lke I said "They will have to kill me in order to save me".

Grand Master Melon
27th June 2010, 12:18 AM
I'm not of the anti vaccine crowd but I am of the anti flu vaccine crowd.

I like how my pediatrician put it:

"regular kids don't die from the flu, only really sick people die from the flu" or something like that. She's from the if it ain't broke don't fix school of medicine and doesn't constantly push crap on people which is pretty cool.

Serpo
27th June 2010, 12:34 AM
Well Serpo, when they say "No Exceptions"......that can only mean that they will force you no matter what, and lke I said "They will have to kill me in order to save me".


That should go down well in the media ,tying people up and forcibly injecting them with dubious substances

Ironfield
27th June 2010, 12:50 AM
Well Serpo, when they say "No Exceptions"......that can only mean that they will force you no matter what, and lke I said "They will have to kill me in order to save me".


That should go down well in the media ,tying people up and forcibly injecting them with dubious substances


Do you really think that if it came down to that, the MSN would willingly report about such going on? maybe those few and far between independent citizen reports might get it on tap but for the main it would be rather hush hush.

-Ironfield

Kali
27th June 2010, 01:05 AM
Link to story not working.

Ironfield
27th June 2010, 02:17 AM
Whilst Ponce's link was unintentionally shortened, the article was indeed posted in its entirety. Of interest though the article has disappeared from the Washington Post’s website and none of my searches on the website yielded any results.

Interpret this news as you may.

-Ironfield

Glass
27th June 2010, 02:22 AM
In Australia the swine flu vaccine was used as the seasonal flu jab this year. We are in winter. I caught it this year and I can tell you it is the worst flu I have had. I am pretty fit and can usually brush off the flu within about 2 days. I was wipedout for 2 weeks and it had the lot and then some. I think it will wipe out a lot of oldies.

A lot of people did not get their shot this year because there was a huge "unexplained" "non serious" outbreak of adverse reactions.

Ponce
27th June 2010, 02:42 AM
Try this link...........

http://www.naturalnews.com/029081_vaccinations_public_health.html

Neuro
27th June 2010, 02:45 AM
I'm not of the anti vaccine crowd but I am of the anti flu vaccine crowd.

I like how my pediatrician put it:

"regular kids don't die from the flu, only really sick people die from the flu" or something like that. She's from the if it ain't broke don't fix school of medicine and doesn't constantly push crap on people which is pretty cool.
Actually you can say what your pediatrician said about the flu about every other vaccinable disease. I'll try and find the charts of the decrease of the mortality of some childhood diseases which most of it occurred prior to the advent of mass vaccinations, due to improved living standard (plumbing, year round access to fruit and vegetables, central heating, refrigeration, baths etc.)...

Neuro
27th June 2010, 03:03 AM
Below is the chart...

Ask yourself why you haven't heard of anyone ever died of scarlet fever or typhoid? These are diseases that children frequently died from 100 years ago, but no one ever got vaccinated against them. Meanwhile you can see that measles and whooping cough vaccines got introduced after children tended to die from these diseases.
http://childhealthsafety.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/us-deaths-1900-1965.gif

Neuro
27th June 2010, 03:09 AM
Just another point Diphteria vaccine was introduced 1920, despite that Diphteria death doesn't decrease faster than any of the other diseases that there still is no vaccine for. If anything one could state that Diphteria got an initial boost with the introduction of the vaccine, when compared to Typhoid, which it appears to otherwise keep tracks with.

Looking at this chart should be enough for any thinking person to question the dogma of vaccination, that it saves life.

Steal
27th June 2010, 04:52 AM
only 33 percent of the public gets vaccinated every year, leaving millions of doses to be disposed of. Looks like someone is loosing alot of money.

woodman
27th June 2010, 05:20 AM
In Australia the swine flu vaccine was used as the seasonal flu jab this year. We are in winter. I caught it this year and I can tell you it is the worst flu I have had. I am pretty fit and can usually brush off the flu within about 2 days. I was wipedout for 2 weeks and it had the lot and then some. I think it will wipe out a lot of oldies.

A lot of people did not get their shot this year because there was a huge "unexplained" "non serious" outbreak of adverse reactions.


I believe the swine flu induces a feirce immune response. The young and healthy are at greater risk than the very young or very old due to the 'cytokine storm' and ensuing lung issues.

From Wikipedia:
pandemic deaths
It is believed that cytokine storms were responsible for many of the deaths during the 1918 influenza pandemic, which killed a disproportionate number of young adults.[1] In this case, a healthy immune system may have been a liability rather than an asset. Preliminary research results from Hong Kong also indicated this as the probable reason for many deaths during the SARS epidemic in 2003.[7] Human deaths from the bird flu H5N1 usually involve cytokine storms as well.[8] Recent reports of high mortality among healthy young adults in the 2009 swine flu outbreak has led to speculation that cytokine storms could be responsible for these deaths.[9] However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have indicated that symptoms reported from this strain so far are similar to those of normal seasonal flu,[10] with the CDC stating that there is "insufficient information to date about clinical complications of this variant of swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus infection."[10]

BabushkaLady
27th June 2010, 05:32 AM
U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions.
…
Saturday, June 26, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer

An advisory panel to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that every person be vaccinated for the seasonal flu yearly, except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe.


The title of the article is a copywriter's sensationalism. The key word from the article being "recommended".

Maybe that's why the story got pulled?

Of course we don't follow all of the CDC's recommendations . . . .never have, never will.

Neuro
27th June 2010, 05:35 AM
only 33 percent of the public gets vaccinated every year, leaving millions of doses to be disposed of. Looks like someone is loosing alot of money.

People have started calling their bluff, and start waking up to the facts re vaccination. I think many believers in vaccination got a wake up call with the swineflu hoax too. Just making the shots mandatory with the threat of children not being able to go to public schools any longer and fines etc. may not be enough any longer. Biological terrorism charges? With incarceration until the citizen agrees to roll up their sleave?

I figure that the "adverse" reactions will be easier for the immunized population to bear, if everyone is immunized. The pharma profit motive for vaccination I think is only a minor secondary objective. The main reason is to get a more easily handled population, where the majority has some low grade chronic disease, that requires medication for management, these managing medications will only be available to those who comply with Obama care, micro-chiping...

Neuro
27th June 2010, 05:41 AM
U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions.
…
Saturday, June 26, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer

An advisory panel to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that every person be vaccinated for the seasonal flu yearly, except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe.
The difference is that this was the panels recommendation to CDC, CDC's step is more likely to mandate this vaccine to the population...

The title of the article is a copywriter's sensationalism. The key word from the article being "recommended".

Maybe that's why the story got pulled?

Of course we don't follow all of the CDC's recommendations . . . .never have, never will.

BabushkaLady
27th June 2010, 05:45 AM
U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions.
…
Saturday, June 26, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer

An advisory panel to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that every person be vaccinated for the seasonal flu yearly, except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe.
The difference is that this was the panels recommendation to CDC, CDC's step is more likely to mandate this vaccine to the population...

The title of the article is a copywriter's sensationalism. The key word from the article being "recommended".

Maybe that's why the story got pulled?

Of course we don't follow all of the CDC's recommendations . . . .never have, never will.




and? a mandate is going to be implemented how? Yeah right!

Neuro
27th June 2010, 05:55 AM
As with other mandatory vaccines now, you will not be able to send your child to school without the jab. Public servant? Sorry you can't work if you are not willing to roll up your sleave? In need of treatment under Obama care? Well first you need to roll up your sleave, for your MANDATORY shots. Do you want a passport? Well you just need to wait until your vaccination schedule requirements is up to par. Food stamps? Sorry, your case is resting with CDC, go and speak to them first...

BabushkaLady
27th June 2010, 06:07 AM
As with other mandatory vaccines now, you will not be able to send your child to school without the jab. Public servant? Sorry you can't work if you are not willing to roll up your sleave? In need of treatment under Obama care? Well first you need to roll up your sleave, for your MANDATORY shots. Do you want a passport? Well you just need to wait until your vaccination schedule requirements is up to par. Food stamps? Sorry, your case is resting with CDC, go and speak to them first...


I'm shaking in my Babushka . . .

First off, why would you send your children to "schools"?

Second, who wants to be a "public" servant?

Work for Yourself.

Food Stamps---When Hell freezes over.

This is all speculation. I'm still planning on being free. That is my goal. Why would we even discuss all of this on the internet, if we are just going to roll over and submit??

sunshine05
27th June 2010, 06:17 AM
As with other mandatory vaccines now, you will not be able to send your child to school without the jab. Public servant? Sorry you can't work if you are not willing to roll up your sleave? In need of treatment under Obama care? Well first you need to roll up your sleave, for your MANDATORY shots. Do you want a passport? Well you just need to wait until your vaccination schedule requirements is up to par. Food stamps? Sorry, your case is resting with CDC, go and speak to them first...


So true. That's the first thing I thought about when I read the article - that with Obamacare they will require the vaccines to get any type of treatment.

JDRock
27th June 2010, 08:06 AM
great point sunshine.....as for me and MY house?

" vaccinate my COLD DEAD BODY " ...but be careful not to slip on the piles of spent brass

sunshine05
27th June 2010, 08:13 AM
What I don't really understand is - why do they push vaccines so strongly? I know the pharm companies profit, but why does the govt care? Is there a kickback somehow?

gunDriller
27th June 2010, 09:03 AM
in the New Jersey/ Maryland area, there was a case in 2008/2009 where about 150 families were threatened with jail if they did not allow their children to be vaccinated.

so although the title may have over-stated this particular news item about the CDC recommendation, what is being talked about - mandatory vaccination - has happened in the US in the last 2 years.

i sense that the government will have trouble pushing this mandate. although i expect they will use travel restrictions etc. to get people to go along.

JDRock
27th June 2010, 01:42 PM
What I don't really understand is - why do they push vaccines so strongly? I know the pharm companies profit, but why does the govt care? Is there a kickback somehow?


micro chips and other things can be inserted via vacc....brainnumbing crap..ANYTHING can be put into those.

Neuro
27th June 2010, 02:46 PM
What I don't really understand is - why do they push vaccines so strongly? I know the pharm companies profit, but why does the govt care? Is there a kickback somehow?
The government as such doesn't really care, what matters is the financiers of the politicians. They want a population of brainless nonthinking drones, thus they want to inject the subjects with neuro-toxins on a regular basis. Vaccines contain apart from the immune altering substances, the well known neurotoxins of mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde. The "flu"-shots major benefit is that it "needs" to be done every year, because every year a new flu comes. They say that every year about 30.000 people die from flu. This is a blatant lie. It includes people with chronic heart disease and respiratory problem, and they are not in most cases even confirmed flu cases. Some are just pushed over the edge by a common cold, some happen to die during the flu season, and are classified as a flu case, due to their respiratory problems, some may have the flu, but the reason they died was because they were having a terrible heart function. So far there is no convincing research showing that flu-shots have any positive impact on mortality in ANY of the risk groups. So now everyone should get the shot.

I agree with Babushka that everyone that are concerned about there health should get out of government healthcare, schooling, and work ASAP. And find real alternatives to the 'benefits' government is offering. It is going to get worse, first for those on government teet and those are many. Then they will rip up a frenzy against the "biological terrorists", that managed to stay away from it all, for destroying herd immunity... Because those who got the shot will get ill, and the fault will be those who didn't get the shot.

Serpo
27th June 2010, 04:19 PM
U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions.
…
Saturday, June 26, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer

An advisory panel to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that every person be vaccinated for the seasonal flu yearly, except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe.


The title of the article is a copywriter's sensationalism. The key word from the article being "recommended".

Maybe that's why the story got pulled?

Of course we don't follow all of the CDC's recommendations . . . .never have, never will.




Its just a bunch of words people throw out to justify their own ideas.
They do this all the time,it gives this group of idiots justification of their own work group ,in this case the CDC.
We just had the swine flu(pigs can fly flu) which was so over blown but turned out to be a complete fizza.
A few sneaky words will not change much but it does mean these people are trying to justify their exsistance in face of strong headwinds.

Serpo
27th June 2010, 04:23 PM
What I don't really understand is - why do they push vaccines so strongly? I know the pharm companies profit, but why does the govt care? Is there a kickback somehow?


You have probably hit the nail on the head or they are just plain STUPID

oldmansmith
27th June 2010, 05:37 PM
What I don't really understand is - why do they push vaccines so strongly? I know the pharm companies profit, but why does the govt care? Is there a kickback somehow?


micro chips and other things can be inserted via vacc....brainnumbing crap..ANYTHING can be put into those.


I agree. When they intoduce the microchip, this is how they will do it.

johnlvs2run
27th June 2010, 07:20 PM
micro chips and other things can be inserted via vacc....brainnumbing crap..ANYTHING can be put into those.


And into food, and the air, and the water, which is what they are already doing.

They are totally insane.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
27th June 2010, 07:55 PM
Assault with a deadly weapon, will defend myself under the common law if necessary.

Twisted Titan
28th June 2010, 07:02 AM
There will always ALWAYS, ALWAYS be a exemption

How so?

I have never in all my years seen vaccinations dispensed at the Jewish Schools (Chabbad Centers (sp))

So whatever policies they fall under I will be making that exemption as well.

T

Awoke
28th June 2010, 08:01 AM
The H1N1 swine flu scare of the past year played a major role in the committee's about face, both because the disease killed many people falling outside the current recommended vaccine demographic and because it raised public awareness of and demand for vaccines.


This statement is laughable. They still have not proven that a single person has died exclusively from the swine flu alone. Every single fatality had "underlying medical conditions".

Most people (Blue Pills) that I know are leary of the vaccinations now, because there was such a forceful attempt and fear-campaign to drive everyone into getting vaccinated.

That made regular people step back and say "Woah, what's going on here?"

keehah
11th October 2021, 01:41 PM
thefederalist.com: Joe Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Doesn’t Exist. It’s Just A Press Release (https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/07/joe-bidens-vaccine-mandate-doesnt-exist-its-just-a-press-release/)

OCTOBER 7, 2021
Yes, we’ve heard all about Joe Biden’s alleged vaccine mandate for private companies employing 100 or more people. It was all over the news even before he announced it on September 9. His announcement has jeopardized the employment of millions of Americans and increased worker shortages in critical domains such as health care.

There’s only one problem. It’s all a mirage. Biden’s so-called vaccine mandate doesn’t exist — at least, not yet. So far, all we have is his press conference and other such made-for-media huff-puffing. No such rule even claiming to be legally binding has been issued yet.

That’s why nearly two dozen Republican attorneys general who have publicly voiced their opposition to the clearly unconstitutional and illegal mandate haven’t yet filed suit against it, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General confirmed for me. There is no mandate to haul into court. And that may be part of the plan.

According to several sources, so far it appears no such mandate has been sent to the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs yet for approval. The White House, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Department of Labor haven’t released any official guidance for the alleged mandate. There is no executive order. There’s nothing but press statements.

Despite what you may have been falsely led to believe by the media fantasy projection machine, press statements have exactly zero legal authority.

“There is nothing there yet that gives employers any mandate,” Stephanie McFarland, spokeswoman for the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration, told me Oct. 6. “The president made an announcement on this asking OSHA to do it, but we’ve not yet seen anything come from it yet,” she also said. When the state agency gets any further information, she said, they’ll review it.

To impose the public perception of a mandate, the Biden administration is following an unusual rule-making process it also employed earlier this year, called an emergency temporary standard (ETS). The spring ETS rule took nearly six months to issue. Meanwhile, companies are telling reporters their vaccine mandates will have at the latest December deadlines. (For those who can’t calendar, that’s four months after Biden’s non-existent mandate was proclaimed. According to OSHA, an ETS takes up to six months to go into effect after the initial mandate is issued in the Federal Register — which, again, for the proclaimed 100-employee mandate hasn’t happened yet.)

Lawyers for big business were blunt about their love for this mandate mirage: “Everybody loves this cover,” Minneapolis employment lawyer Kate Bischoff told Bloomberg Law in September. “Many were already looking down the road at doing this, but the fact that they get to blame Biden is like manna from heaven.”

Using the ETS procedure instead of normal federal rule-making processes both allows the Biden administration to push its demands faster and without any public input or requirement of responding to public input, which is normally required of even legally laughable federal rule-making like this one would be. That is part of why ETS rules have been overwhelmingly overturned in courts.

“OSHA has used that legal authority only 10 times in 50 years,” David Rivkin Jr. and Robert Alt wrote in the Wall Street Journal in September. “Courts have decided challenges to six of those standards, nixing five and upholding only one.”


The mandate’s nonexistence shields the Biden administration from legal challenges that may ultimately restrict the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s authority. Yet the mandate is still effective at compelling industries and companies into compliance, as it leaves room for any eventual issuance to target noncompliant entities. This implied cudgel is particularly effective on industries and companies that are dependent on federal spending or the goodwill of federal regulators. The nonexistent mandate also allows so-inclined state and local governments and companies to issue their own mandates, seemingly in lockstep with Washington.
The Biden White House has been well-served by presenting a nonexistent mandate as a done deal.

All this allows weak Republicans and evil Democrats to shadowbox each other for the cameras while ordinary Americans suffer under their abdicated leadership. By the time Republican attorneys general get around to filing lawsuits over any eventually issued legal documents that fulfill Biden’s promises, the vast majority of people not wanting government to force them into medical procedures will likely be unemployed, forcibly injected with treatments that have almost no track record, forced from their education paths, provided with fake documents like these citizens are beneath COVID-rule-exempt illegal aliens, and all the rest.

Cebu_4_2
11th October 2021, 02:13 PM
thefederalist.com: Joe Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Doesn’t Exist. It’s Just A Press Release (https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/07/joe-bidens-vaccine-mandate-doesnt-exist-its-just-a-press-release/)

"That’s why nearly two dozen Republican attorneys general who have publicly voiced their opposition to the clearly unconstitutional and illegal mandate haven’t yet filed suit against it, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General confirmed for me. There is no mandate to haul into court. And that may be part of the plan."

midnight rambler
11th October 2021, 02:23 PM
"That’s why nearly two dozen Republican attorneys general who have publicly voiced their opposition to the clearly unconstitutional and illegal mandate haven’t yet filed suit against it, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General confirmed for me. There is no mandate to haul into court. And that may be part of the plan."

"Flood the zone."

keehah
18th November 2021, 09:02 AM
granitegrok.com: Twenty Five States Officially File Suit Against ‘Biden’ OSHA Vax Mandate (https://granitegrok.com/blog/2021/11/twenty-five-states-officially-file-suit-against-biden-osha-vax-mandate)

6 November 2021
OSHA has “officially filed its vaccine mandate rules for the COVID19 Jab. Affected employers have until Jan 4, 2022, to comply. In response, twenty-five states have filed or joined lawsuits in four different circuit courts to stop the mandate.

The states are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Several groups have also joined with the states in each respective filing in the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts.


A pause from the worst of the insanity and democide.

nypost.com: OSHA suspends Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate after court challenge (https://nypost.com/2021/11/18/osha-suspends-bidens-covid-19-vaccine-mandate/)

November 18, 2021
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has suspended enforcement of the Biden administration’s sweeping COVID-19 vaccine mandate (https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/bidens-private-business-vaccine-mandate-begins-jan-4/) for large companies after a federal appeals court upheld a decision to pause it last week (https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/court-affirms-pause-on-biden-vaccine-mandate-for-private-companies/).

“While OSHA remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies, OSHA has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the ETS [Emergency Temporary Standard] pending future developments in the litigation,” OSHA said in a statement (https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/ets2) on its website.

“While OSHA remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies, OSHA has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the ETS [Emergency Temporary Standard] pending future developments in the litigation,” OSHA said in a statement on its website.

Biden announced the mandate in September (https://nypost.com/2021/09/09/biden-to-require-all-federal-workers-be-vaccinated-for-covid-19/) and asked OSHA to draft up workplace rules that implement the order, which would mandate that every company with 100 or more employees either require they get the COVID-19 vaccine or get tested weekly and wear face masks.

Companies that failed to comply would face a $14,000 fine for every infraction, according to the OSHA rules, which were set to take effect on Jan. 4 before the courts got involved.

Last week, a three-member panel of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans cited “grave statutory and constitutional” concerns (https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/court-affirms-pause-on-biden-vaccine-mandate-for-private-companies/) in upholding the stay on implementation of the mandate.

The appeals court initially issued an emergency stay on enforcement of the rules on Nov. 6 (https://nypost.com/2021/11/06/us-appeals-court-blocks-federal-covid-19-vaccine-mandate/) before affirming that decision last week.

The requirement, which would affect over 84 million workers, prompted legal challenges from over two dozen state attorneys general, as well as from religious and business groups, who argue it is unconstitutional (https://nypost.com/2021/11/15/the-ruling-against-bidens-private-sector-vax-mandate-shows-its-indefensible/).

While Republican politicians have vocally opposed the mandate, even some Democrats, such as Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, have objected to Biden’s directive.
...

midnight rambler
18th November 2021, 09:53 AM
A friend pointed out to me that Fox News reported that OSHA backed off because RR workers and truckers were going to quit en mass over the death jab. Reportedly 40% of TSA are unvaxxxed. Shit will be coming to a head soon.

keehah
15th January 2022, 11:50 AM
A couple of recent news items support the idea its not about cold and flu safety but about satanic western politicians and public servants forcing western citizens to submit to not properly tested toxic injections.

thelocal.ch: Intentionally contracting Covid in Switzerland carries five-year jail term (https://www.thelocal.ch/20211223/intentionally-contracting-covid-in-switzerland-carries-five-year-jail-term/)

23 December 2021
Switzerland’s Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) confirmed this week that intentionally contracting Covid-19 is illegal and leaves you liable to a prison sentence of up to five years.

Some vaccine-skeptic people in Switzerland go to great lengths to catch coronavirus so they can receive a Covid certificate after recovery...

While advocates of contracting the virus rather than being vaccinated argue that the immunity is stronger, doctors say this is not always the case due to the unpredictable nature of the virus...

Claude-François Robert, a cantonal doctor in Neuchâtel, told Switzerland’s RTS he “strongly advised against self-infection. Nothing can be controlled with natural infection, we have a ten times higher risk of myocarditis by natural infection than by the vaccine. [Lie.]

“The vaccine is a safe product.”

thegatewaypundit.com: After Firing Unvaxxed Healthcare Workers, California Tells Covid-Positive Medical Workers to Stay on the Job (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/firing-unvaxxed-healthcare-workers-california-tells-covid-positive-medical-workers-stay-job/)

January 13, 2022
Governor Gavin Newsom required all healthcare workers to be fully vaccinated by September 30.

Thousands of healthcare workers who worked during the height of the pandemic in 2020 and most of 2021 were fired or suspended for refusing to get jabbed...

Several hospitals in California are now overwhelmed due to staffing shortages so the “experts” are now saying Covid-positive medical workers should stay on the job if they are asymptomatic.

To be clear, unvaxxed medical workers with natural immunity cannot work, but vaxxed, Covid-positive healthcare employees can show up to work.
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHCQ/LCP/Pages/AFL-21-08.aspx

From January 8, 2022 until February 1, 2022, HCP who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 and are asymptomatic, may return to work immediately without isolation and without testing, and HCPs who have been exposed and are asymptomatic may return to work immediately without quarantine and without testing. These HCPs must wear an N95 respirator for source control.

keehah
22nd January 2022, 09:55 AM
breitbart.com: 27 State Attorneys General Ask OSHA to Withdraw Coronavirus Vaccine Mandate (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/20/27-state-attorneys-general-ask-osha-to-withdraw-coronavirus-vaccine-mandate/)

Attorneys general in 27 states sent a letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on Wednesday, asking the agency to withdraw its coronavirus vaccine mandate for large employers...

The letter followed a 6-3 decision by the Supreme Court last week, which halted President Joe Biden’s OSHA vaccine mandate for businesses with 100-plus employees while the mandate is being challenged in the Sixth Circuit.

OSHA has not withdrawn its emergency temporary standard (ETS) following the Supreme Court’s ruling. In the letter, the attorneys general “described the detrimental effect that the OSHA mandate will have on employers and businesses if it goes into effect.”
ag.ky.gov/Press%20Release%20Attachment (https://ag.ky.gov/Press%20Release%20Attachments/OSHA%20Proposed%20Rule%20Public%20comments%20%20Fi nal%202022.01.19.pdf)

January 19, 2022
Re: Comments by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming, on the request for comment on COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard, and whether it should be adopted as a final standard (Docket No. OSHA-2021-0007)

Dear Assistant Secretary Parker: 27 State Attorneys General Ask OSHA to Withdraw Coronavirus Vaccine Mandate

The undersigned States submit the following comments on the COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard issued in 86 Fed. Reg. 61402 (Nov. 5, 2021) (“ETS”). The States have already filed a Petition to Review the ETS, which is pending at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (In re MCP No. 165), and the United States Supreme Court granted an emergency application for stay of the ETS on January 14, 2022 (Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. OSHA, 595 U.S. ___ (2022)).

However, despite that the United States Supreme Court─in a 6─3 decision─has held that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) lacks the statutory authority to issue the type of rule reflected by the ETS, OSHA has yet to withdraw the ETS. We therefore submit these comments to reiterate that OSHA lacks authority to require that tens of millions of employees vaccinate against an endemic virus that presents a generic risk, not a workplace risk. OSHA should, therefore, immediately withdraw the ETS and suspend its efforts to promulgate a similar permanent standard.

keehah
27th January 2022, 08:44 AM
Good news! Sort of.
Although no longer an enforceable act, the legislation still exists in attenuated form to persuade companies to clot-shot their employees.


federalregister.gov: COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/01/26/2022-01532/covid-19-vaccination-and-testing-emergency-temporary-standard)
A Rule by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration on 01/26/2022 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/01/26/2022-01532/covid-19-vaccination-and-testing-emergency-temporary-standard)

SUMMARY:
OSHA is withdrawing the November 5, 2021, emergency temporary standard (ETS) which was issued to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers (100 or more employees) from the risk of contracting COVID-19 by strongly encouraging vaccination.

DATES:
The withdrawal is effective January 26, 2022...

Although OSHA is withdrawing the Vaccination and Testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard, OSHA is not withdrawing the ETS to the extent that it serves as a proposed rule under section 6(c)(3) of the Act, and this action does not affect the ETS's status as a proposal under section 6(b) of the Act or otherwise affect the status of the notice-and-comment rulemaking commenced by the Vaccination and Testing ETS. See 29 U.S.C. 655(c)(3).

Notwithstanding the withdrawal of the Vaccination and Testing ETS, OSHA continues to strongly encourage the vaccination of workers against the continuing dangers posed by COVID-19 in the workplace.

keehah
23rd February 2022, 11:27 AM
breitbart.com: Four Senate Republicans Fail to Show Up for Vote on Amendment Defunding Vaccine Mandates, Ensuring Failure (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/17/four-senate-republicans-fail-to-show-up-for-vote-on-amendment-defunding-vaccine-mandates-ensuring-failure/)

17 Feb 2022
The Senate voted on Sen. Mike Lee’s (R-UT) amendment to the continuing resolution (CR), which would defund Biden’s remaining vaccine mandates. The measure failed 46-47, with Sens. Mitt Romney (R-UT), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Richard Burr (R-NC) failing to show up, depriving Senate Republicans a potential majority to pass the amendment to the CR...

Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Jon Tester (D-MT) voted in December for a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to defund the private employer vaccine mandate.

Manchin and Tester voted no on Lee’s amendment.

The Supreme Court has blocked the Occupational Safety and Health Administration vaccine mandate for large employers; however, the federal government can still enforce the other four mandates, which include the mandates on medical workers, military personnel, federal employees, and federal contractors.

Lee and Sens. Roger Marshall (R-KS), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Mike Braun (R-IN), Rand Paul (R-KY), and Ted Cruz (R-TX) have led the fight to defund Biden’s vaccine mandates.

keehah
8th April 2022, 10:16 AM
Huh?

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21580732-fifth-circuit-ruling
"For the following reasons we VACATE the district court's preliminary injunction and REMAND to the district court with instructions to DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction."

nbcnews.com (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/appeals-court-oks-biden-federal-employee-vaccine-mandate-rcna23541): (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-covid-19-vaccine-rule-federal-employees-upheld-by-appeals-court/)Appeals court OKs Biden federal employee vaccine mandate (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/appeals-court-oks-biden-federal-employee-vaccine-mandate-rcna23541)

APRIL 7, 2022
The administration argued that the Constitution gives the president, as the head of the federal workforce, the same authority as the CEO of a private corporation to require that employees be vaccinated.

Lawyers for those challenging the mandate had pointed to a recent Supreme Court opinion that the government cannot force private employers to require employee vaccinations.

What's next, orchidectomies required for all public servants?

After all there is precedence of such treatment for servants. Would improve workplace safety for women, reduce male privilege, reduce medical costs associated with prostrate problems.