PDA

View Full Version : BP chokes off the oil leak



JohnQPublic
15th July 2010, 04:14 PM
BP chokes off the oil leak; now begins the wait (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100715/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill)

By COLLEEN LONG and HARRY R. WEBER, Associated Press Writers Colleen Long And Harry R. Weber, Associated Press Writers – 29 mins ago
NEW ORLEANS – BP finally choked off the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday — 85 days and up to 184 million gallons after the crisis unfolded — then began a tense 48 hours of watching to see whether the capped-off well would hold or blow a new leak.

To the relief of millions of people along the Gulf Coast, the big, billowing brown cloud of crude at the bottom of the sea disappeared from the underwater video feed for the first time since the disaster began in April, as BP closed the last of three openings in the 75-ton cap lowered onto the well earlier this week.

But the company stopped far short of declaring victory over the biggest offshore oil spill in U.S. history and one of the nation's worst environmental disasters, a catastrophe that has killed wildlife and threatened the livelihoods of fishermen, restaurateurs, and oil industry workers from Texas to Florida.

Now begins a waiting period during which engineers will monitor pressure gauges and watch for signs of leaks elsewhere in the well. The biggest risk: Pressure from the oil gushing out of the ground could fracture the well and make the leak even worse.

"For the people living on the Gulf, I'm certainly not going to guess their emotions," BP vice president Kent Wells said. "I hope they're encouraged there's no oil going into the Gulf of Mexico. But we have to be careful. Depending on what the test shows us, we may need to open this well back up."

The news elicited joy mixed with skepticism from wary Gulf Coast residents following months of false starts, setbacks and failed attempts. Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's face lit up when he heard the oil flow had stopped.

"That's great. I think a lot of prayers were answered today," he said.

President Barack Obama called it a positive sign, but cautioned: "We're still in the testing phase."

The stoppage came 85 days, 16 hours and 25 minutes after the first report April 20 of an explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon oil rig that killed 11 workers. Somewhere between 94 million and 184 million gallons spilled into the Gulf, according to government estimates.

"Finally!" said Renee Brown, a school guidance counselor visiting Pensacola Beach, Fla., from London, Ky. "Honestly, I'm surprised that they haven't been able to do something sooner, though."

"I don't believe that. That's a lie. It's a (expletive) lie," said Stephon LaFrance, an oysterman in Louisiana's oil-stained Plaquemines Parish who has been out of work for weeks. "I don't believe they stopped that leak. BP's trying to make their self look good."

Wells said the oil stopped flowing into the water at 2:25 p.m. CDT after engineers gradually dialed down the amount of crude escaping through the last of three valves in the cap, an 18-foot-high metal stack of pipes and valves.

On the video feed, the violently churning cloud of oil and gas coming out of a narrow tube thinned, and tapered off. Suddenly, there were a few puffs of oil, surrounded by cloudy dispersant BP was pumping on top. Then, there was nothing.

"I am very pleased that there's no oil going into the Gulf of Mexico. In fact, I'm really excited there's no oil going into the Gulf of Mexico," Wells said.

The cap is designed to stop oil from flowing into the sea, either by bottling it up inside the well, or capturing it and piping it to ships on the surface. Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the Obama administration's point man on the disaster, said it is not yet clear which way the cap will be used. The answer could depend on the pressure readings over the next two days.

Even if it works, the cap is not a permanent fix, and not the end of the crisis by any means. BP is drilling two relief wells so it can pump mud and cement into the leaking well in hopes of plugging it permanently by mid-August. After that, the Gulf Coast faces a monumental cleanup and restoration that could take years.

BP stock, which has mainly tumbled since the spill began, closed nearly 8 percent higher on the New York Stock Exchange after the news.

Steve Shepard, Gulf Coast chairman of the Mississippi Chapter of the Sierra Club, said he was still skeptical about the news. "I think it's a little premature to say it's definitely over. They've gotten our hopes up so many times before that in my mind I don't think it's going to be over until Christmas."

Nine-year-old Lena Durden threw up her hands in jubilation when her mother told her the oil was stopped.

"God, that's wonderful," said Yvonne Durden, a Mobile-area native who now lives in Seattle and brought her daughter to the coast for a visit. "When came here so she could swim in the water and see it in case it's not here next time."

Randall Luthi, president of the Washington-based National Ocean Industries Association, a national trade group representing the offshore oil industry, said: "This is by far the best news we've heard in 86 days. You can bet that industry officials and their families are taking a big sigh here."

___

Weber reported from Houston. Associated Press Writers Shelia Byrd in Jackson, Miss., Jay Reeves in Dauphin Island, Ala., Mary Foster, Alan Sayre, Kevin McGill and Vicki Smith in New Orleans, and Matt Sedensky in Pensacola Beach, Fla., contributed to this report.

beefsteak
15th July 2010, 04:29 PM
Color me skeptical.

There's that pesky oil plume leak from a fracture according to Simmons about 10 miles away, and a third smaller but still significant leak besides the "capped one."

Underwater camera work is just more digital legerdemain is what I'm thinking.

Watch the birdie, foolish people, watch the birdie, NOT the photographer under the black cloth behind the box camera.

Bullfrog
16th July 2010, 10:58 AM
Yep, but watch what happens. BP is only gonna pay fines on the oil that gushed out of 'their' well, which is now capped. They are gonna try and avoid all responsibility for those other leaks. 'Well golly... Don't know nothing about them, they must be natural occurrences that nobody noticed before'.

SLV^GLD
16th July 2010, 11:00 AM
Has anyone provided any actual evidence of these additional leaks?

Bullfrog
16th July 2010, 11:29 AM
NPR had a short report about a scientific vessel verifying the undersea oil plumes. I will see if I can find it.

Bullfrog
16th July 2010, 11:38 AM
This (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127560134&ft=1&f=1003) is what started the ruptured floor theory I think. These plumes were spotted very early and a long ways away. The timing and distance make it look like these are a unique event separate from BP's well.



At a briefing in Washington, the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Jane Lubchenko, said tests confirmed the existence of underwater oil plumes drifting in the Gulf. Scientists from the University of South Florida found oil 40 miles northeast of the well and as deep as 3,300 feet below the ocean's surface.

"We remain concerned about the location of oil on the surface and under the sea," she said. "We are attacking it aggressively to mitigate the harm and to understand the impact."

Lubchenko said the oil's chemical fingerprint proved it was coming from BP's ruptured well. The samples show that concentrations are very low — around half a part per million. BP had raised doubts about whether the subsurface plumes existed.

SLV^GLD
16th July 2010, 12:32 PM
First, they say it was found 40 miles NE of the Macondo well. Macondo is only 41 miles South of the LA shoreline. Now, how much East is in the NE is not indicated. Nest they state the depth to have been 3,300 feet. Macondo well is right at 5,000 feet under the surface. That's all fine and good because Macondo is 41 miles off the coast of LA putting it well within the Mississippi Canyon (block 252), and is pretty much the deepest part of the Canyon.. Considering the Canyon's width of only 5 miles and length of about 75 miles, one would be fairly hard pressed to travel 40 miles from Macondo and stay within the deepest parts of that Canyon (although NE would be the appropriate direction).

The blurb in the NPR article is ambiguous due to the grammatical use of "and" does not preclude the possibility that oil was not found in 2 distinct locations instead of a single location that comprises the directional distance and the depth (how about some GPS coordinates, folks?). Finally, they use the word "drifting", not seeping or leaking or pluming. We have a known leak billowing millions of gallons a day at a greater depth and the presence of oil at a shallower depth a bit further up the Canyon is supposed to indicate additional leaks? How about it indicates that millions of gallons from the known leak have drifted up the Canyon?

I mean to say, thanks for the linkage and I will admit this does constitute some circumstantial evidence but the cries of mass ruptures in the seafloor are unsubstantiated. Simmons' own words on the topic indicate nothing substantiated past leaked oil from the Macondo well drifting up the Mississippi Canyon. He speaks of a fissure a few miles wide and 100 miles long. Guess what that is... the effing Canyon that has been there for Millennia, people.

http://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/2c5e25009d.jpg

http://content.edgar-online.com/edgar_conv_img/2008/03/28/0001157523-08-002540_SLIDE63.JPG