PDA

View Full Version : 1964 Gulf of Tonkin = False Flag; Attack never happened!!!!



beefsteak
16th July 2010, 07:00 PM
Declassified and from an alt media site:

Am I the last one of the 60's American to learn this? ? ?



[size=9pt]De-classified Vietnam-era Transcripts Show Senators Knew Gulf Of Tonkin Was A Staged False Flag Event

by Steve Watson

Elected Reps. chose to hide details from American public for fear of reprisals from “the big forces” that run the media and the presidency

Over 1,100 pages of previously classified Vietnam-era transcripts released this week by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee highlight the fact that several Senators knew that the White House and the Pentagon had deceived the American people over the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.

The latest releases, which document skepticism over the pretext for entry into the Vietnam war, date from 1968.

Four years into the war, senators were at loggerheads with Lyndon B. Johnson. At the time Foreign Relations Committee meetings were held behind closed doors.

It would take over thirty years for the truth to emerge that the Aug. 4, 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, where US warships were apparently attacked by North Vietnamese PT Boats – an incident that kicked off US involvement in the Vietnam war – was a staged event that never actually took place.

However, the records now show that at the time senators knew this was the case.

In a March 1968 closed session of the Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Albert Gore Sr. of Tennessee, the father of former vice president Al Gore, noted:

“If this country has been misled, if this committee, this Congress, has been misled by pretext into a war in which thousands of young men have died, and many more thousands have been crippled for life, and out of which their country has lost prestige, moral position in the world, the consequences are very great,”

Senator Frank Church, Democrat of Idaho, said in an executive session in February 1968:

“In a democracy you cannot expect the people, whose sons are being killed and who will be killed, to exercise their judgment if the truth is concealed from them,”

Other senators were keen to withhold the truth about Tonkin in order not to inflame public opinion on the war:

Senator Mike Mansfield, Democrat of Montana, stated, “You will give people who are not interested in facts a chance to exploit them and to magnify them out of all proportion.”

Mansfield was referring to the proposed release of a committee staff investigation that raised doubts over whether the Tonkin incident ever took place.

The committee decided in the end to effectively conceal the truth, with Senator Church noting that if the committee came up with proof that an attack never occurred, “we have a case that will discredit the military in the United States, and discredit and quite possibly destroy the president.”

He also noted that if the senators were to follow up on their skepticism over Tonkin, “The big forces in this country that have most of the influence and run most of the newspapers and are oriented toward the presidency will lose no opportunity to thoroughly discredit this committee.”

The LBJ Presidential tapes, declassified and released in 2001, prove that LBJ knew the Tonkin incident never happened. After dressing down his Defence Secretary Robert McNamara for misleading him, Johnson then discussed how to politically spin the non-event and escalate it as justification for air strikes.

“You just came in a few weeks ago and said they’re launching an attack on us – they’re firing at us,” Johnson tells McNamara in one conversation, “and we got through with the firing and concluded maybe they hadn’t fired at all.”

The NSA also deliberately faked intelligence data to make it appear as if two US ships had been lost in the “attack”.

Johnson used the 1964 false flag event to expand dramatically the scale of the Vietnam War by ushering in the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, as well as to rope in much needed domestic support with the Congress and public.

Perhaps if the Foreign Relations Committee hadn’t been so afraid of “the big forces” controlling America, a large percentage of the almost 60,000 American soldiers and 2 million Vietnamese people wouldn’t have lost their lives.

Sadly, modern day elected representatives have failed the American people in exactly the same way over the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

gunDriller
17th July 2010, 06:11 AM
Admiral James Stockdale talks about this in his autobiography.

http://www.amazon.com/Love-War-Familys-Sacrifice-Vietnam/dp/0060153180

He was the lead flyer at the time of Gulf of Tonkin.

In his autobiog. he says -
* they were ordered to fire on open water. TAKE THAT, YOU NORTH VIETNAMESE WATER MOLECULES !!!
* there was not a North Vietnamese craft in sight.

I would love to get the names of the NSA top managers at the time.

Ironfield
17th July 2010, 09:17 PM
The LBJ Presidential tapes, declassified and released in 2001, prove that LBJ knew the Tonkin incident never happened.


The information has been out there since 2001 and yet the American public still takes the word of those that are meant to represent them at face value. They question noting and worry only about the next episode of their favorite series, the issues of celebrities, moaning about their job and living beyond their means.

-Ironfield

Bluegill
18th July 2010, 09:02 AM
I dunno, I knew the Tonkin incident was total BS for decades... I thought it was common knowledge for anybody who was paying attention. The info has been out there the whole time...http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l37/boris505/shrug.gif

Buddha
18th July 2010, 08:40 PM
The LBJ Presidential tapes, declassified and released in 2001, prove that LBJ knew the Tonkin incident never happened.


The information has been out there since 2001 and yet the American public still takes the word of those that are meant to represent them at face value. They question noting and worry only about the next episode of their favorite series, the issues of celebrities, moaning about their job and living beyond their means.

-Ironfield


99% of governments throughout history have been compulsive lairs. According to the average joe 99% of the current governments of the world are compulsive lairs, besides ours.

jetgraphics
18th July 2010, 09:07 PM
If you want to have more "fun" - check back into 1914 and see the tangled web that Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt wove, before either got into power.

Did they really collude to get the USA into WW1?
Did they benefit from the mess?
Did they rise to power because of their conspiracy?
Did we suffer national socialism because of it?

Bluegill
18th July 2010, 10:06 PM
If you want to have more "fun" - check back into 1914 and see the tangled web that Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt wove, before either got into power.

Did they really collude to get the USA into WW1?
Did they benefit from the mess?
Did they rise to power because of their conspiracy?
Did we suffer national socialism because of it?


Yes, yes, yes and yes.

The accusation by the Germans that the Lusitania was carrying war material, therefore making it a fair target of war was proven correct a couple of years ago. A diving team recovered cases upon cases of rifle ammunition from the wreck...

The Germans were not the bad guys in that war... Only the losers.

Bluegill
18th July 2010, 10:09 PM
And those two bastards got away with it again in 1941. And both are national heroes. :redfc

Book
18th July 2010, 10:42 PM
The Germans were not the bad guys in that war... Only the losers.



Agreed. Winners get to write the History books....lol.

:)

jetgraphics
19th July 2010, 04:18 AM
The true nature of international collectivism is thus exposed - deception, lies, treachery and murder...
The "kinder, gentler" tyranny.

Libertarian_Guard
19th July 2010, 06:54 AM
I would love to get the names of the NSA top managers at the time.


Other than LBJ & McNamara, I don't think you could find out any sources further up the food chain than Daniel Ellsberg, only because of where he was located through the 1960's and his release of The Pentagon Papers.

The papers showed that President Lyndon Johnson had planned to bomb North Vietnam well before the 1964 Election. Johnson had been outspoken against doing so during the election and claimed that his opponent Barry Goldwater was the one that wanted to bomb North Vietnam.

After the release of the Pentagon Papers, Goldwater said:

"During the campaign, President Johnson kept reiterating that he would never send American boys to fight in Vietnam. As I say, he knew at the time that American boys were going to be sent. In fact, I knew about ten days before the Republican Convention. You see I was being called trigger-happy, warmonger, bomb happy, and all the time Johnson was saying, he would never send American boys, I knew damn well he would.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers

Buddha
22nd July 2010, 12:42 AM
Victors write history...

That's it...

Argentium
22nd July 2010, 05:57 AM
I can't think of a US war, since the Mexican War, that could be justified. The most glaring examples were the Spanish-American War, Vietnam and our current wars. WW1 and WW2 are less obvious examples, but both were fabricated reasons for war.

beefsteak
22nd July 2010, 09:30 AM
Very well put, Arg. I'm inclined to agree.

Libertarian_Guard
22nd July 2010, 03:51 PM
The Pentagon Papers

Page 9

On May 8 1950 Washington announced that it would provide economic and military aid to the French in Indochina, beginning with a grant of $10-million.

The first step had been taken. “The U.S. thereafter was directly involved in the developing tragedy in Vietnam,” the account says. Ultimately, the American military aid program reached $1.1-billion in 1954, paying for 78 per cent of the French war burden.

10 years later …..

In August 1964 the Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred, or at least, so the American public was told. “While on routine patrol in international waters,” it was announced from Washington, “the U.S. destroyer Maddox underwent an unprovoked attack.” An invisible enemy vessel, it seemed, had fired an invisible torpedo, which obviously missed the Maddox. Shortly afterwards a similar incident took place involving another U.S. naval vessel.

Johnson soundly denounced this “open aggression.” He appeared in national television to inform the American citizenry that “renewed hostile actions against United States ships on the high seas in the Gulf of Tonkin have today required me to order the military forces of the United States to take action in reply.” Congressional leaders of both parties, he said, had assured him of passage of a resolution making it clear “that our government is united in its determination to take all necessary measures in support of freedom and in defense of peace in Southeast Asia.”

The Gulf of Tonkin resolution passed on August 7 1964. Promptly following the congressional resolution, American planes began their first bombardment of North Vietnam. In 1965 more than 200,000 American troops poured into South Vietnam.

Libertarian_Guard
22nd July 2010, 04:02 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/31/politics/31war.html?_r=2

Matthew M. Aid, an independent historian who has discussed Mr. Hanyok's Tonkin Gulf research with current and former N.S.A. and C.I.A. officials who have read it, said he had decided to speak publicly about the findings because he believed they should have been released long ago.

"This material is relevant to debates we as Americans are having about the war in Iraq and intelligence reform," said Mr. Aid, who is writing a history of the N.S.A. "To keep it classified simply because it might embarrass the agency is wrong."

beefsteak
22nd July 2010, 07:43 PM
Thanks, L-G.
I find it bracing and refreshing to read historical references in regard to this False Flag event which totally missed my radar screen.

I'm still pretty angry right now thinking about all the Viet Nam war soldiers' funerals I've attended since the 60s. Unspeakably angry.

DAMN!!!!

beef