Log in

View Full Version : Warren Pollock Warns Of Emergency Drug Shortage As EMTs Told To Go To "Alternate



MNeagle
26th July 2010, 11:48 AM
Warren Pollock Warns Of Emergency Drug Shortage As EMTs Told To Go To "Alternate Protocols"


Warren Pollock reports on a rather troubling development which we can only attribute to various cost cutting measures by near-bankrupt states, as anything beyond that would be far too macabre even for us. It appears that "several drugs are in severe shortfall, drugs used to treat emergency patients that might be transported by ambulance to emergency rooms, the drugs include heart attack drugs, epinephrine, lidocain, as well as drugs used to treat shock and other conditions. These emergency care drugs are now in shortfall with alternate protocols going out to emergency services in various parts of the nation. This means that if you need emergency services, the drugs you rely upon to save your life may not be there." As WEP asks, "where have these drugs gone? It is unrealistic to suggest that a whole variety of emergency treatment drugs would go missing from the inventory all at the same time, and areas around the country all at the same time." Pollock highlights the states of TN, PA and CA may have already seen the incorporation of the "alternate protocol." Once again, we hope this is merely an interim shortage and not a widespread effort to impair the traditional operation of emergency technicians across the country.

vid at link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/warren-pollock-warns-emergency-drug-shortage-emts-told-go-alternate-protocols

Awoke
26th July 2010, 12:10 PM
Just in case anyone here doesn't already know, they want us dead.

Phoenix
26th July 2010, 02:59 PM
Just in case anyone here doesn't already know, they want us dead.


America's forests, land, waterways, metals, coal, oil, four-footed livestock = assets

America's people (two-footed livestock) = liabilities

Twisted Titan
26th July 2010, 03:27 PM
The shortfall is because states are doing everything in their power NOT to re-emburse the ambulance carriers.

The loss of revenue is making the carriers scale back on everything to still keep the ship running

The next time you call a ambulance what may show up instead is a taxi

And the car wont move until you up up front.

Strange times ahead


T

I am me, I am free
26th July 2010, 03:30 PM
The shortfall is because states are doing everything in their power NOT to re-emburse the ambulance carriers.

The loss of revenue is making the carriers scale back on everything to still keep the ship running

The next time you call a ambulance what may show up instead is a taxi

And the car wont move until you up up front.

Strange times ahead


T


I've actually called a taxi instead of an ambulance to go to the ER before.

Phoenix
26th July 2010, 03:55 PM
The shortfall is because states are doing everything in their power NOT to re-emburse the ambulance carriers.

The loss of revenue is making the carriers scale back on everything to still keep the ship running

The next time you call a ambulance what may show up instead is a taxi

And the car wont move until you up up front.

Strange times ahead


T


I've actually called a taxi instead of an ambulance to go to the ER before.


$50 v. $1000 - and quicker, too!