PDA

View Full Version : FL Foreclosure King - David J Stern, faces allegations of falsifying documents



ShortJohnSilver
3rd August 2010, 05:22 PM
Two links about this scumbag lawyer:

1. http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/state-foreclosure-mill-faces-allegations-of-falsifying-documents-839393.html


Florida's purported largest foreclosure law firm filed thousands of documents to take people's homes that contained deceptive and intentionally ambiguous information, according to a proposed class action lawsuit.

The suit, filed last month in U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, says David J. Stern and his Plantation-based legal team violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by generating fraudulent mortgage assignments when pursuing foreclosures.

An assignment is held by the entity that has the right to receive mortgage payments.

Stern's practice, which the lawsuit claims filed up to 7,000 new foreclosure cases in Florida every month last year, is also alleged to have pursued foreclosures for lenders that didn't own the debt on the homes.

"There really is no proper plaintiff to sue and foreclose and that's what this charade is designed to cover," said Fort Lauderdale Attorney Kenneth Eric Trent, who is seeking class action status and filed the suit on behalf of Oakland Park resident Ignacio Damian Figueroa. "There is no real holder of the note and the mortgage anymore because they broke it up and sold it to 10, 12, 20 people."

During the real estate boom, loans traded hands often, sometimes being bundled or split up and sold to investors.

Tracking the true owner of the debt sometimes can be a challenge. When pressed for proof of debt ownership, Trent said Stern's office would create an assignment signed by a Stern employee instead of a representative of the lender attempting to foreclose.

"The assignments were meaningless shells designed to pull the wool over the eyes of the judiciary and ease the burden upon the unknown real parties of interest," the lawsuit states.

Miami Attorney Jeffrey Tew, of Tew Cardenas law firm, is representing Stern. He said Stern and his company have done nothing wrong, and that it is accepted practice for a firm employee to be given power to approve assignments.

"This foreclosure crisis was not created by David Stern, but it is so huge and a lot of people are in very bad shape, so some of the finger pointing goes to him," Tew said.

Trent also named the Mortgage Electronic Registration Service Corp. as a defendant. The private entity, known as MERS, was created by banks in 1995 to track mortgage ownership electronically and reduce paper documents.

Trent says MERS helps hide the identity of loan ownership and that it conspired with Stern to "confuse everyone as to who owned what."

Tew called that claim "fantastical." He did acknowledge, however, that errors can happen.

West Palm Beach foreclosure defense Attorney Thomas Ice found 21 examples last year of assignments from Stern's office that had been executed with a date before the notary's commission was issued.

In a deposition, a Stern employee agreed with Ice that "sloppiness" was to blame for the irregularity.

Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Meenu Sasser, who handles the county's foreclosures, said she's dismissed cases when she found problems with assignments. She wasn't speaking directly about cases filed by Stern, and said it's only happened a few times.

"I haven't seen any widespread problem," Sasser said.

In combo with this nugget:

http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2010/07/22/florida-foreclosure-lawyer-david-j-stern-djsp-%E2%80%98su-casa-es-mi-casa%E2%80%99-your-house-is-my-house-exclusive-see-his-photos/

Stern was going to name his 130 foot yacht, "Su Casa es Mi Casa" (your house is my house)...



In South Florida, a foreclosure defense lawyer discovered more than 20 mortgage documents submitted by Stern’s firm that bore notary seals that did not exist at the time the documents supposedly were notarized. The Florida Bar reprimanded Stern in 2002 for overcharging and misleading clients, and is now considering a complaint questioning whether he should be allowed to farm out so much of his firm’s business to nonlawyers.

palani
3rd August 2010, 05:30 PM
Unless the one foreclosing can come up with the ORIGINAL note and the ORIGINAL mortgage then they have no standing. As a lot of banks sell these documents they can no longer PROVE they have any interest in the property.

One lady who was foreclosed on was done so by the State of Florida as her bank had gone out of business 2 years before. She was evicted by a team of (2) HOA guards, (2) sheriff deputies and (2) Homeland security goons.

Cebu_4_2
3rd August 2010, 08:51 PM
[quote=palani ]
Unless the one foreclosing can come up with the ORIGINAL note and the ORIGINAL mortgage then they have no standing. As a lot of banks sell these documents they can no longer PROVE they have any interest in the property.
Some judges do not care and won't listen to that excuse, there are many other angles to work to your benefit.


One lady who was foreclosed on was done so by the State of Florida as her bank had gone out of business 2 years before. She was evicted by a team of (2) HOA guards, (2) sheriff deputies and (2) Homeland security goons.

She was foreclosed by the State most likely due to non payment of Property taxes. Must have been a big deal with all them parties involved.

palani
4th August 2010, 04:31 AM
Some judges do not care and won't listen to that excuse, there are many other angles to work to your benefit.
It is not "an excuse". It is complete lack of evidence. A copy of a note or a mortgage requires the one signing it to attest to its authenticity. These are unilateral contracts. There is only one signature. That would be the signature of the one being foreclosed upon. What fool is going to attest to a copy of a document that is going to be used to throw him out of his property?

There are two types of court hearings: argument and evidentiary. It is virtually impossible to get an evidentiary hearing these days. Attorneys love to argue and they do so with no facts. We started out in this country with common law pleading. There was a back and forth correspondence between parties until the issue was centered upon a single fact or two which then went in front of a judge. The pleadings changed to code pleading starting around 1850 until the 1930's. Now the pleadings are called "notice pleadings". In a notice pleading you can throw in any false statement you like and if the opponent remains silent then he is said to be in agreement. That is what goes on in these argument hearings. A lot of lies are spread out on the table, you might object to some of them and your opponent sorts through what is left and convicts you with your consent.



She was foreclosed by the State most likely due to non payment of Property taxes. Must have been a big deal with all them parties involved. It is a mortgage action she is fighting. I have no knowledge of her property tax status.

Phoenix
4th August 2010, 09:20 AM
Unless the one foreclosing can come up with the ORIGINAL note and the ORIGINAL mortgage then they have no standing. As a lot of banks sell these documents they can no longer PROVE they have any interest in the property.


That's the theory. In practice, however, some "judges" have simply ignored the statutes and justice and ruled in favor of the banksters anyways.




One lady who was foreclosed on was done so by the State of Florida as her bank had gone out of business 2 years before. She was evicted by a team of (2) HOA guards, (2) sheriff deputies and (2) Homeland security goons.


Do you have a cite for this? I'm not questioning you, but that is so profound it needs to be disseminated. DHS has no business being involved with a foreclosure...and shows how much of a police state we've got.

the riot act
4th August 2010, 10:30 AM
I heard yesterday that the Fl. Supreme Court has ruled that the foreclosing bank must now produce the note.

Let me see if I can find anything on this.

UPDATE: Quick search yielded nothing.. I'll keep on looking. So assume that the above is only rumor for now.

palani
4th August 2010, 03:32 PM
That's the theory. In practice, however, some "judges" have simply ignored the statutes and justice and ruled in favor of the banksters anyways.

Not theory. Law. To be entered into evidence someone has to testify to the authenticity of the evidence, then it is entered into evidence, then it can be discussed.

Very few evidentiary hearings these days. Lawyers like to argue and, being experts, they like to get the opposite party to argue. You can demand an evidentiary hearing and never receive one. The lady in question said the judge waved a COPY of the note or mortgage and asked if she had signed it. She told him she would be happy to comment on the document as soon as it was entered into evidence. Of course she being the only one to sign it could be the only one to authenticate it and who would authenticate a copy?



Do you have a cite for this? I'm not questioning you, but that is so profound it needs to be disseminated. DHS has no business being involved with a foreclosure...and shows how much of a police state we've got. The lady involved has been on Alfred Adasks shortwave broadcasts several times. I believe she stated the foreclosed home was in a gated community with an air strip where John Travolta lives. Otherwise no other info .. she has been fighting the foreclosure for 3 years or so.

Phoenix
4th August 2010, 08:51 PM
That's the theory. In practice, however, some "judges" have simply ignored the statutes and justice and ruled in favor of the banksters anyways.

Not theory. Law. To be entered into evidence someone has to testify to the authenticity of the evidence, then it is entered into evidence, then it can be discussed.


Yes, THEORY. You obviously don't deal much with the "courts" if you believe words on paper in a volume of statutes mean something just because you believe it.

"Law" is what the "judge" says it is.

palani
5th August 2010, 05:28 AM
Yes, THEORY. You obviously don't deal much with the "courts" if you believe words on paper in a volume of statutes mean something just because you believe it.

"Law" is what the "judge" says it is.

WHAT THE JUDGE SAYS IS A CONTRACT OFFER. YOUR AGREEMENT (SILENCE ... FAILURE TO RESPOND) MAKES IT LAW.


Every man is where he is by the law of his being; the thoughts which he has built into his character have brought him there, and in the arrangement of his life there is no element of chance, but all is the result of a law which cannot err.

Twisted Titan
5th August 2010, 09:42 AM
Yes, THEORY. You obviously don't deal much with the "courts" if you believe words on paper in a volume of statutes mean something just because you believe it.

"Law" is what the "judge" says it is.

WHAT THE JUDGE SAYS IS A CONTRACT OFFER. YOUR AGREEMENT (SILENCE ... FAILURE TO RESPOND) MAKES IT LAW.


Every man is where he is by the law of his being; the thoughts which he has built into his character have brought him there, and in the arrangement of his life there is no element of chance, but all is the result of a law which cannot err.




I would give up a third of Silver Stash To Raise James Allen from the Dead and have him spew his esostric wordsmithing in Front of Municiple Judge who only cares about his lifeteime Pension that based on how many people he shakes down keeping the States coffers nice and fat.

I would pay top dollar to see that one.

palani
5th August 2010, 10:16 AM
I would give up a third of Silver Stash To Raise James Allen from the Dead and have him spew his esostric wordsmithing in Front of Municiple Judge who only cares about his lifeteime Pension that based on how many people he shakes down keeping the States coffers nice and fat.

I would pay top dollar to see that one.[/b][/i]


When you come to the conclusion that you, the judge, the state all share the same attribute (bankruptcy .. no matter how large your silver stash) and all you have left are your own actions to survive or fail upon .... then you may get your desire.