Free Toilet Paper

[Phoenix]

http://www.freekoran.com/form.php

http://www.islamtomorrow.com/freequran.asp

http://www.freekoran.co.uk/2.html (for Britons)

http://www.sendaquran.com/index.php/english-translation-of-the-message-of-the-quran.html

http://www.freequran.ca/order/index.php?_m=tickets&_a=submit&step=1&departmentid=2 (for Canadians)

http://www.freequran.com/html/order.htm

http://www.explorethequran.com/request-a-quran/public-servants.html


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6jCh-5qXO6s/R065S_m8aYI/AAAAAAAAAd8/iG9LeSdSPiY/s320/2PlyKoran.gif

[PatColo]

good point, we should burn Korans coz how them scary moozlems done blowed up the WTC like what they done did!! :oo-->


Were America Attacked by Scary Moozlems on 9/11? (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10142)

by David Ray Griffin

Much of America's foreign policy since 9/11 has been based on the assumption that it was attacked by Scary Moozlems on that day. This assumption was used, most prominently, to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is now widely agreed that the use of 9/11 as a basis for attacking Iraq was illegitimate: none of the hijackers were Iraqis, there was no working relation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, and Iraq was not behind the anthrax attacks. But it is still widely believed that the US attack on Afghanistan was justified. For example, the New York Times, while referring to the US attack on Iraq as a "war of choice," calls the battle in Afghanistan a "war of necessity." Time magazine has dubbed it "the right war." And Barack Obama says that one reason to wind down our involvement in Iraq is to have the troops and resources to "go after the people in Afghanistan who actually attacked us on 9/11."

The assumption that America was attacked by Scary Moozlems on 9/11 also lies behind the widespread perception of Islam as an inherently violent religion and therefore of Scary Moozlems as guilty until proven innocent. This perception surely contributed to attempts to portray Obama as a Scary Moozlem, which was lampooned by a controversial cartoon on the July 21, 2008, cover of The New Yorker.

As could be illustrated by reference to many other post-9/11 developments, including as spying, torture, extraordinary rendition, military tribunals, America's new doctrine of preemptive war, and its enormous increase in military spending, the assumption that the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were attacked by Scary Moozlem hijackers has had enormous negative consequences for both international and domestic issues.1

Is it conceivable that this assumption might be false? Insofar as Americans and Canadians would say "No," they would express their belief that this assumption is not merely an "assumption" but is instead based on strong evidence. When actually examined, however, the proffered evidence turns out to be remarkably weak. I will illustrate this point by means of 16 questions.

1. Were Mohamed Atta and the Other Hijackers Devout Scary Moozlems?
more... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10142)



aww jeez looky there, every time I check that number gets bigger, 1,242 licensed architects & engineers (http://ae911truth.org) now calling the official 9/11 CT a fraud! ;D


http://www.ae911truth.net/flash/wtc7ani2.swf

http://www.ae911truth.org/images/explo2.jpg


Meanwhile, the REAL 911 PERPS' (http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/the-zionist-elephant-in-the-room/msg2940/#msg2940) banks & synagogues are peppered liberally around ground zero...

[Phoenix]

good point, we should burn Korans coz how them scary moozlems done blowed up the WTC like what they done did!! :oo-->


Have you touched the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Stone">"Sacred" Meteorite</a> during your Hajj?

Do you think your garbage posts about how Muslims did not perpetrate 9/11 excuse all their history of outrageous and uncivilized behavior?