PDA

View Full Version : "Are You Ready for the Next Crisis?"



mamboni
11th August 2010, 06:53 PM
"Are You Ready for the Next Crisis?"


By Paul Craig Roberts



Evidence that the US is a failed state is piling up faster than I can record it.



One conclusive hallmark of a failed state is that the crooks are inside the government, using government to protect and to advance their private interests.



Another conclusive hallmark is rising income inequality as the insiders manipulate economic policy for their enrichment at the expense of everyone else.



Income inequality in the US is now the most extreme of all countries. The 2008 OECD report, “Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries,” concludes that the US is the country with the highest inequality and poverty rate across the OECD and that since 2000 nowhere has there been such a stark rise in income inequality as in the US. The OECD finds that in the US the distribution of wealth is even more unequal than the distribution of income.



On October 21, 2009, Business Week highlighted a new report from the United Nations Development Program concluded that the US ranked third among states with the worst income inequality. As number one and number two, Hong Kong and Singapore, are both essentially city states, not countries, the US actually has the shame of being the country with the most inequality in the distribution of income.



The stark increase in US income inequality in the 21st century coincides with the offshoring of US jobs, which enriched executives with “performance bonuses” while impoverishing the middle class, and with the rapid rise of unregulated OTC derivatives, which enriched Wall Street and the financial sector at the expense of everyone else.



Millions of Americans have lost their homes and half of their retirement savings while being loaded up with government debt to bail out the banksters who created the derivative crisis.



Frontline’s October 21 broadcast, “The Warning,” documents how Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt blocked Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, from performing her statutory duties and regulating OTC derivatives.



After the worst crisis in US financial history struck, just as Brooksley Born said it would, a disgraced Alan Greenspan was summoned out of retirement to explain to Congress his unequivocal assurances that no regulation of derivatives was necessary. Greenspan had even told Congress that regulation of derivatives would be harmful. A pathetic Greenspan had to admit that the free market ideology on which he had relied turned out to have a flaw.



Greenspan may have bet our country on his free market ideology, but does anyone believe that Rubin and Summers were doing anything other than protecting the enormous fraud-based profits that derivatives were bringing Wall Street? As Brooksley Born stressed, OTC derivatives are a “dark market.” There is no transparency. Regulators have no information on them and neither do purchasers.



Even after Long Term Capital Management blew up in 1998 and had to be bailed out, Greenspan, Rubin, and Summers stuck to their guns. Greenspan, Rubin and Summers, and a roped-in gullible Arthur Levitt who now regrets that he was the banksters’ dupe, succeeded in manipulating a totally ignorant Congress into blocking the CFTC from doing its mandated job. Brooksley Born, prevented by the public’s elected representatives from protecting the public, resigned. Wall Street money simply shoved facts and honest regulators aside, guaranteeing government inaction and the financial crisis that hit in 2008 and continues to plague our economy today.



The financial insiders running the Treasury, White House, and Federal Reserve shifted to taxpayers the cost of the catastrophe that they had created. When the crisis hit, Henry Paulson, appointed by President Bush as Rubin’s replacement as the Goldman Sachs representative running the US Treasury, hyped fear to obtain from “our” representatives in Congress with no questions asked hundreds of billions of taxpayers’ dollars (TARP money) to bail out Goldman Sachs and the other malefactors of unregulated derivatives.



When Goldman Sachs recently announced that it was paying massive six and seven figure bonuses to every employee, public outrage erupted. In defense of banksters, saved with the public’s money, paying themselves bonuses in excess of most people’s life-time earnings, Lord Griffiths, Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs International, said that the public must learn to “tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity for all.”



In other words, “Let them eat cake.”



According to the UN report cited above, Great Britain has the 7th most unequal income distribution in the world. After the Goldman Sachs bonuses, the British will move up in distinction, perhaps rivaling Israel for the fourth spot in the hierarchy.



Despite the total insanity of unregulated derivatives, the high level of public anger, and Greenspan’s confession to Congress, still nothing has been done to regulate derivatives. One of Rubin’s Assistant Treasury Secretaries, Gary Gensler, has replaced Brooksley Born as head of the CFTC. Larry Summers is the head of President Obama’s National Economic Council. Former Federal Reserve official Timothy Geithner, a Paulson protege, runs the Obama Treasury. A Goldman Sachs vice president, Adam Storch, has been appointed the chief operating officer of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Banksters are still in charge.



Is there another country in which in full public view so few so blatantly use government for the enrichment of private interests, with a coterie of “free market” economists available to justify plunder on the grounds that “the market knows best”? A narco-state is bad enough. The US surpasses this horror with its financo-state.



As Brooksley Born says, if nothing is done “it’ll happen again.”



But nothing can be done. The crooks have the government.



Note: The OECD report shows that despite the Reagan tax rate reduction, the rate of increase in US income inequality declined during the Reagan years. During the mid-1990s the Gini coefficient (the measure of income inequality) actually fell. Beginning in 2000 with the New Economy (essentially financial fraud and offshoring of US jobs), the Gini coefficient shot up sharply.



Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com



"Do you have enough food and supplies on hand?"


http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/Archives2009/RobertsUSFailedState.html

Ponce
11th August 2010, 06:56 PM
Export to Import down another 18.5%.................


"No Export = No Recovery"... Ponce

General of Darkness
11th August 2010, 07:06 PM
I'm kinda ready, but I live in Pasadena California, and if the "next crisis" creates a SHTF scenario I'm not in bad shape, my concern are the zombies. ;)

Ponce
11th August 2010, 07:08 PM
Hey gringo, u beter speki epanish u live en California.

gunDriller
11th August 2010, 07:14 PM
this is why i have trained myself to eat earthworms.

so far my technique has been to eat them alive. however, i hear they can have tapeworm eggs, so basically they need to be cooked.

that part i have not yet mastered.

good thing i have some rice. 8)

maybe i should get a solar oven, too.

General of Darkness
11th August 2010, 07:19 PM
Hey gringo, u beter speki epanish u live en California.


Yeah right.

http://i34.tinypic.com/25sbcdc.jpg

gunDriller
11th August 2010, 07:29 PM
I'm kinda ready, but I live in Pasadena California, and if the "next crisis" creates a SHTF scenario I'm not in bad shape, my concern are the zombies. ;)


this may be terribly naive, but my gut feeling is that Pasadena will do allright. i've only been there once. something about it being up on a hill, sort of elevated, a medium sized city.

my concern in Pasadena would be water supply.

( also the fact that, in a TSHTF situation, it would be very difficult to get from Pasadena to the ocean. )

what kind of 10 ounce bar is in the upper right near the gun and the one Amark bar and the First Majestic bar ?

General of Darkness
11th August 2010, 07:32 PM
I'm kinda ready, but I live in Pasadena California, and if the "next crisis" creates a SHTF scenario I'm not in bad shape, my concern are the zombies. ;)


this may be terribly naive, but my gut feeling is that Pasadena will do allright. i've only been there once. something about it being up on a hill, sort of elevated, a medium sized city.

my concern in Pasadena would be water supply.

( also the fact that, in a TSHTF situation, it would be very difficult to get from Pasadena to the ocean. )

what kind of 10 ounce bar is in the upper right near the gun and the one Amark bar and the First Majestic bar ?


Pasadena has it's own reservoirs and you can get over the mountains pretty easy. And that one bar is neither. ;)

Fortyone
11th August 2010, 07:41 PM
I'm kinda ready, but I live in Pasadena California, and if the "next crisis" creates a SHTF scenario I'm not in bad shape, my concern are the zombies. ;)


this may be terribly naive, but my gut feeling is that Pasadena will do allright. i've only been there once. something about it being up on a hill, sort of elevated, a medium sized city.

my concern in Pasadena would be water supply.

( also the fact that, in a TSHTF situation, it would be very difficult to get from Pasadena to the ocean. )

what kind of 10 ounce bar is in the upper right near the gun and the one Amark bar and the First Majestic bar ?


Pasadena has it's own reservoirs and you can get over the mountains pretty easy. And that one bar is neither. ;)



Pack heavily armed and lots of pre staged water caches, Youll be fine,and out of there within a couple days. You dont need food for a two-three day hike.

mightymanx
11th August 2010, 08:22 PM
Being prepaired in California? To me that is an oxymoron.

Kind of like a Jap living in Hiroshima in 1945 telling me he is ready for the Yankies to attack.

Phoenix
11th August 2010, 10:03 PM
Being prepaired in California? To me that is an oxymoron.


If you don't know what you're talking about, please don't comment.

Most of the land area of California is "rural."

The problems with California are hardly unique. In fact, in some cases, they're better than other areas/states. Shitcago and Houston have most of the same issues as Los Angeles, as do smaller cities with California's smaller cities. Illegals? They're all over the land now, from Minnesota to Georgia, Oregon to Massachusetts. Debt troubles? California is no longer number one on that.

For 20 of California's 58 counties, we're in better shape than most areas of entire states. For another 10-20 counties, about equal to counties outside California.

mightymanx
11th August 2010, 10:52 PM
Being prepaired in California? To me that is an oxymoron.


If you don't know what you're talking about, please don't comment.

Most of the land area of California is "rural."

The problems with California are hardly unique. In fact, in some cases, they're better than other areas/states. sh*tcago and Houston have most of the same issues as Los Angeles, as do smaller cities with California's smaller cities. Illegals? They're all over the land now, from Minnesota to Georgia, Oregon to Massachusetts. Debt troubles? California is no longer number one on that.


For 20 of California's 58 counties, we're in better shape than most areas of entire states. For another 10-20 counties, about equal to counties outside California.


Lets see some of the California problems having lived there.

Water at the mercy of others.

Irrigation at the mercy of others. No irrigation no crops (Delta smelt ring a a bell?)

More zombies per capita (welfare bums) of any state (Detroit is a city.)

Gun laws worst in the country..

Car laws can't own decent SHTF gas/diesel burner without smog controls so any EMP proof type vehicle is a nonstarter

So having first hand knowledge of how dependant on the rest of the country California really is. I stand by my statement.

Joe King
11th August 2010, 11:02 PM
Next crisis?

I'd been under the impression that we've been in a continuous crisis since at least 1913.

mightymanx
11th August 2010, 11:34 PM
I left a while back. (I lived in San Diego county.)

You folks tell yourself what ever you want so you sleep better at night.

But California is the canary in the coal mine. It has been that way for a long long time. 1992 riots were set off by by basicly nothing. If the OC was not ready to burn already the riots would have never started. Imagine the yearly fires with out any aid from government state or federal. Hell they are barely contanable with the help. Rural is great but when the 36 miliion zombies that don't have a nice place like yours come knocking, you have a problem larger than guns and canned food will be able to handle. There will be too many zombies no matter how many kill each other.
Your current density is 217 per square mile and that is not sustainable even if 100% of all California land was able to be farmed.
http://www.mnforsustain.org/calif_food_supply_threatened_pimentel.htm

I personaly I think Washington (current location) is getting too much like California so. I am leaving ASAP for Idaho.

I am a diehard car guy so California is great in many ways that I love just not for any SHTF senarios.

FunnyMoney
11th August 2010, 11:43 PM
Next crisis?

I'd been under the impression that we've been in a continuous crisis since at least 1913.


There will be nowhere to run and nowhere to hide. I wrote a book explaining that over at GIM1. I would provide the links, but... never mind. It will be the long slow painful road to total slavery or there will be a faster SHTF scenario that will leave only a few places like Alaska and possibly sections of OZ free from total disaster, and those would be eventually overtaken as well during the end game. I'm not sure one way or the other, or something in-between. If history gives any clue, then the slow road has the advantage. TPTB really don't need to speed things up or take any undue risk, they are more than happy with the current 99% and constantly increasing absolute control situation they already have.

Joe King
11th August 2010, 11:57 PM
Next crisis?

I'd been under the impression that we've been in a continuous crisis since at least 1913.


There will be nowhere to run and nowhere to hide. I wrote a book explaining that over at GIM1. I would provide the links, but... never mind. It will be the long slow painful road to total slavery or there will be a faster SHTF scenario that will leave only a few places like Alaska and possibly sections of OZ free from total disaster, and those would be eventually overtaken as well during the end game. I'm not sure one way or the other, or something in-between. If history gives any clue, then the slow road has the advantage. TPTB really don't need to speed things up or take any undue risk, they are more than happy with the current 99% and constantly increasing absolute control situation they already have.
All the slow road does is cause people to get used to it, and to make sure virtually everyone's destitute by the time "end game" arrives.

No, quick is more better because if people aren't used to it, the more likely they'll actually want to do something about it.
i.e. the lose will be fresh in their minds.


As far as the 1913 comment, I personally cannot comprehend how anyone who understands math, as presumably the economic "masterminds" who started us down the path of a multi-generational ponzi-scheme did, cannot see what the end result would be.

I mean, if you are actually in support of your Nation and want to see it succeed, why would you do such a thing? It's crazy.

If I had my way, everyone would simply turn their backs on it and refuse to take out any loans whatsoever.
i.e. force a crash of the fake monetary system they've tried to saddle us with.

Twisted Titan
12th August 2010, 09:46 AM
IM R.A.W. BABY.

READY
AND
WILLING

Ponce
12th August 2010, 10:09 AM
Ca was my home for 30 years 69-01, when I first came there there were no traffic between 9 am and 3 pm but now is bumper to mumper even at 2 am.

Thinking back on it, the only reason that I just to love living in Ca was that I could find all that I needed to work on my ideas and inventions.

WTSHTF Ca will be toast...........if you are white........once the Mex and the bike gangs give you a green flag there is no scape.

Still Barbaro
12th August 2010, 10:49 AM
By Paul Craig Roberts


When Paul Craig Roberts writes, I read; when he speaks, listen.

But what has been telling in the last few week IMO, is that the realistic (and pessimistic) assessments are not just from Roberts, Fabar, Rogers, Schiff, or the PIMCO guy.

These dires assessments are now in the mainstream media. Either mainstreamers have seen the light, or they are jumping on board for credibility.

Book
12th August 2010, 11:10 AM
These dires assessments are now in the mainstream media. Either mainstreamers have seen the light, or they are jumping on board for credibility.



http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/housing-crisis-reaches-full-589653.html

They have been instructed to reduce the economic expectations of the goyim.

zap
12th August 2010, 02:59 PM
Ca was my home for 30 years 69-01, when I first came there there were no traffic between 9 am and 3 pm but now is bumper to mumper even at 2 am.

Thinking back on it, the only reason that I just to love living in Ca was that I could find all that I needed to work on my ideas and inventions.

WTSHTF Ca will be toast...........if you are white........once the Mex and the bike gangs give you a green flag there is no scape.


Well wtshtf and anyone on this board needs a bugout location I got plenty of room, as long as you bring your guns with you.

Ponce
12th August 2010, 03:03 PM
Same here..........your mobile home, your guns, your food..........and your tp ;D