View Full Version : what is this "neal ptrick harris expecting twins" nonsense?
chad
16th August 2010, 07:47 PM
so far today, i have seen/heard it:
a) on an abc news radio update
b) the front page of cnn
c) the backpage "junk" news section of my local newspaper
d) on the automatic css news feed of about 12 websites i visited
wtf? it's like this topic got the talking points memo from god today.
and while i'm at it, he's not pregnant and "expecting," unless you count "guessing" when the adoption truck will arrive.
normally i could give 2 sh*ts about the homosexual lifestyle, but man, this is ALL OVER today, like pearl harbor got bombed or something.
EE_
16th August 2010, 07:52 PM
It's big news in homosexual Jewish Hollywood.
Doogie Houser and his trouser bouser didn't get where they are without blowing some Jew producer.
MNeagle
16th August 2010, 07:57 PM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/neil-patrick-harris-partner-david-burtka-expecting-twins/
Liquid
16th August 2010, 08:08 PM
Yeah..
chad
16th August 2010, 08:35 PM
shit, my gaydar must not have been working.
Bullion_Bob
16th August 2010, 09:14 PM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/neil-patrick-harris-partner-david-burtka-expecting-twins/
Thread got closed due to discussing having sex with other people's wives. :D
StackerKen
16th August 2010, 10:25 PM
I just gave my 1st smite....guess who got it
Ponce
16th August 2010, 10:28 PM
I only accept semites........... ;D
I was hoping that they would close this thread......last one became stupid.
Liquid
16th August 2010, 10:33 PM
I only accept semites........... ;D
I was hoping that they would close this thread......last one became stupid.
I just gave you your 300th smite Ponce!
I don't like how you judge a thread as stupid, and shut down free speech.
Liquid
16th August 2010, 10:55 PM
And another thing Ponce...posters that close a thread is big peeve of mine.
If you create a thread, that thread is yours. If I post in that thread, it's now my thread and your thread...
Add all the folks who take time to post in that thread...it's everyone's thread! Not just yours.
By you closing it, you stomp on the rest of us.
I vote we turn off the feature of closing threads we create.
Bullion_Bob
16th August 2010, 11:00 PM
http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/571956065_08172010_1.jpg
Publico Pro Se
16th August 2010, 11:21 PM
I'm expecting the continued decline in the state of the Union. It won't be long, folks.
Phoenix
16th August 2010, 11:34 PM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
Ponce
16th August 2010, 11:47 PM
Ken? and everyone..........sorry for what I posted and I took it out......
Ponce<..........banned himself for one week for being stupid.........see you all next Sunday :boohoo
Olmstein
16th August 2010, 11:58 PM
http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/uploads/Thread-Gay-1950s.jpg
Liquid
16th August 2010, 11:59 PM
Ponce<..........banned himself for one week for being stupid.........see you all next Sunday :boohoo
Ponce...hey, that's not right either.
If you ban yourself, by God, I am banning myself!
See you all next Sunday I guess... >:(
EDIT: to add Ponce, your self-banning is a passive aggressive move, and due to comaraderie, you have drawn me into a voluntary self banning as well. That's a sneaky thing to do.
stillwondering
17th August 2010, 01:39 AM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
Our daughter came home today complaining. She is very liberal and open minded. She likes to think the world is a place to accept things as they are and move on. I love her but she, like me, has been learning some very important lessons about certain "stereo-types" that others have warned us about.
So on with the story. She has expressed to me about how "open" many of the students are at school. Apparently, it is not a big deal to like both boys and girls at the same time. It is also not a big deal for the boys to like boys and girls to like girls. (yes, I am sugar-coating this because this is her story)
My dear daughter had an eye opener when she said one of the girls that she knows to like other girls, REALLY likes her. She said that she has made it clear to everyone that if people wanted to live as they do, it is fine, just don't ask her to join in or push it too far into her face. Apparently, this girl came up to her today and was pretty insistent on wanting to try to kiss her. Although my daughter is fairly liberal and tries to let each to their own, she was really upset. She proceeded to tell me how she was NOT OK with this behavior. She was actually pretty upset.
I calmly reminded her of what Dad says about the house... acceptance, tolerance and participation.
What frustrates me is I don't want to go head strong against people but I am not for people shoving it in my face either. So when is enough, enough? I am becoming less and less tolerant. (Husband of mine, do not use this against me!) I am back sliding on my tolerance and realizing it is too late, on a whole.
It is sad, I can go on the high school campus and there seems to be an equal amount of same sex couples hanging on one another and such as there is the traditional couples. I don't remember it being accepted when I went to school. I am not that old!
Fortyone
17th August 2010, 03:39 AM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
Our daughter came home today complaining. She is very liberal and open minded. She likes to think the world is a place to accept things as they are and move on. I love her but she, like me, has been learning some very important lessons about certain "stereo-types" that others have warned us about.
So on with the story. She has expressed to me about how "open" many of the students are at school. Apparently, it is not a big deal to like both boys and girls at the same time. It is also not a big deal for the boys to like boys and girls to like girls. (yes, I am sugar-coating this because this is her story)
My dear daughter had an eye opener when she said one of the girls that she knows to like other girls, REALLY likes her. She said that she has made it clear to everyone that if people wanted to live as they do, it is fine, just don't ask her to join in or push it too far into her face. Apparently, this girl came up to her today and was pretty insistent on wanting to try to kiss her. Although my daughter is fairly liberal and tries to let each to their own, she was really upset. She proceeded to tell me how she was NOT OK with this behavior. She was actually pretty upset.
I calmly reminded her of what Dad says about the house... acceptance, tolerance and participation.
What frustrates me is I don't want to go head strong against people but I am not for people shoving it in my face either. So when is enough, enough? I am becoming less and less tolerant. (Husband of mine, do not use this against me!) I am back sliding on my tolerance and realizing it is too late, on a whole.
It is sad, I can go on the high school campus and there seems to be an equal amount of same sex couples hanging on one another and such as there is the traditional couples. I don't remember it being accepted when I went to school. I am not that old!
While I wish no harm on your and Phoenix's child, perhaps this little jolt of reality,is a good thing.
Joe King
17th August 2010, 04:22 AM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
After looking at the definition of the word "accept (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accept)", I have to question how anyone could make you accept anything you don't like.
IMHO, tolerating it is where your sticking point seems to actually be.
Perhaps you should try looking at it like this. Did Noah spend all his time and energy trying to change the opinions/actions/lifestyles of those around him? Or lobby the gov to do it for him?
No. While he may have spoke his opinion, he let others know how he felt by simply choosing not to accept the "norms" of the day into his own life, as he went about the business of doing Gods work.
So there's nothing wrong with letting it be known how one feels, just build your own "Ark" and let others do the same.
It's called Free Will and one person using theirs to impose on someone elses is wrong. No matter what the issue.
It's a form of stealing.
crazychicken
17th August 2010, 05:02 AM
When I went into the Army homosexuality was illegal
It eventually became "optional"
Sure glad I got out before it became "mandatory"
CC
BrewTech
17th August 2010, 09:11 AM
Apparently, this girl came up to her today and was pretty insistent on wanting to try to kiss her.
That is over the line, bordering on assault.
That transcends the issue of homosexuality, and infringes on another's right to be left alone.
Phoenix
17th August 2010, 09:29 AM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
After looking at the definition of the word "accept (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accept)", I have to question how anyone could make you accept anything you don't like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_control
Perhaps you should try looking at it like this. Did Noah spend all his time and energy trying to change the opinions/actions/lifestyles of those around him?
God told Noah to build an Ark, because He was going to slaughter the f@ggots and all the other perverts.
Phoenix
17th August 2010, 09:32 AM
That transcends the issue of homosexuality, and infringes on another's right to be left alone.
Nope. It's the logical progression of the mental illness of homosexuality. TOLERANCE --> ACCEPTANCE --> PARTICIPATION. If you don't follow along, you're a "homophobe."
The clueless want the issue to be solely about the "freedom to 'love'" whereas we realists recognize it's a WAR against ancient, natural values.
Joe King
17th August 2010, 10:11 AM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
After looking at the definition of the word "accept (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accept)", I have to question how anyone could make you accept anything you don't like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_control
C'mon. How are they mind controlling you? Are you that weak?
It's almost as though you're saying that you're afraid you might succumb to it. :o
Acceptance is akin to welcoming something with open arms.
Tolerance is simply acknowledging that others also have a Right to live based on how they see fit. Same as you want for yourself. Not that you have to actively support it.
Perhaps you should try looking at it like this. Did Noah spend all his time and energy trying to change the opinions/actions/lifestyles of those around him?
God told Noah to build an Ark, because He was going to slaughter the f@ggots and all the other perverts.Other than method, how is that any different than this time? Read your Bible lately?
If so, what are you worried about? You come across as though you already know you're gonna come out of all this smelling like a rose.
So what's the problem?
Live your life the way you want, teach your children what you want, let your voice be heard. But don't expect gov to enforce the things you believe while not enforcing what others believe also. Equal protection under the law etc etc etc.
i.e. gov shouldn't be a part of anyones "belief" system. Especially not ours.
sirgonzo420
17th August 2010, 10:15 AM
You must ACCEPT - not just tolerate - f@ggotry. And eventually they want us all to PARTICIPATE.
After looking at the definition of the word "accept (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accept)", I have to question how anyone could make you accept anything you don't like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_control
Perhaps you should try looking at it like this. Did Noah spend all his time and energy trying to change the opinions/actions/lifestyles of those around him?
God told Noah to build an Ark, because He was going to slaughter the f@ggots and all the other perverts.
I think there was plenty of kinky shit going down on that Ark...
Remember Noah getting all pissed off because one of his boys "uncovered his nakedness"?
What was that all about?
chad
17th August 2010, 10:21 AM
didn't noah's daughters get him drunk and try and do him?
StackerKen
17th August 2010, 10:23 AM
Ken? and everyone..........sorry for what I posted and I took it out......
Ponce<..........banned himself for one week for being stupid.........see you all next Sunday :boohoo
Ponce Your apology is accepted and all is forgiven.
No need for any Bans
sirgonzo420
17th August 2010, 11:18 AM
didn't noah's daughters get him drunk and try and do him?
No, that was Lot and his daughters.
And they DID do him and got pregnant.
Noah's boy "uncovered his father's nakedness", a phrase which was used in Leviticus (I think) to allude to sleeping with the wife of one's father (i.e. a "motherfucker").
However in the Noah story, his other boys come in with their eyes closed to "cover their father's nakedness", so maybe Ham had some form of sex with a drunk Noah or something...
That's why I wanted Phoenix's input. He's a bible man.
:)
StackerKen
17th August 2010, 11:41 AM
A straightforward reading of the text is that Ham saw his naked father, left him that way, and gossiped about it to his two brothers.
sirgonzo420
17th August 2010, 11:46 AM
A straightforward reading of the text is that Ham saw his naked father, left him that way, and gossiped about it to his two brothers.
.... and then Noah cursed Ham and his son Canaan (who had nothing to do with it).
StackerKen
17th August 2010, 12:57 PM
A straightforward reading of the text is that Ham saw his naked father, left him that way, and gossiped about it to his two brothers.
.... and then Noah cursed Ham and his son Canaan (who had nothing to do with it).
Yeah...I don't understand that myself....But here are some possible explanations I found online.
The phrase "the father of Canaan" has already appeared twice in this brief narrative, so the term might have been abbreviated and the damnation in verse 25 really means "Cursed be [the father of] Canaan."
Possibly Canaan was a participant with Ham in the offense against Noah, but the details were omitted on grounds of delicacy (and because the full story was known to the earliest readers from oral tradition). There is no textual evidence for or against this interpretation.
or
Ham had sex on the Ark, contrary to God's command, and Canaan was conceived from that disobedience. The notion that sex was prohibited on the Ark arises from Gen 7:7 quoted above. Thus, the punishment of Ham was not just for ridiculing Noah, but also for direct disobedience, and the punishment was also visited on the child conceived contrary to God's command.
or
We moderns consider that each person is responsible for himself, but the earliest biblical stories (and many cultures today) view the family as a unit. The sin of one is the sin of all, and punishing one is punishing all. So, cursing Ham's son is the same as cursing Ham. Since Ham's offense was lack of respect for or humiliation of his father, there is some nasty irony that the punishment involves lack of respect for or humiliation of his son.
Maybe that is how it worked back then.... :dunno
stillwondering
17th August 2010, 11:39 PM
While I wish no harm on your and Phoenix's child, perhaps this little jolt of reality,is a good thing.
I do not take it as anyone wishing harm on her. I welcome a little bit of an eye opener. Unfortunately, I have had a few eye openers myself in the last year or so on my outlook on life. I still sit back and shake my head. Wouldn't it be nice if all of life was innocent and there was just this big happy sun in the sky with no cares in the world? Oh wait, skin cancer, never mind... :-\
BrewTech
18th August 2010, 08:47 PM
That transcends the issue of homosexuality, and infringes on another's right to be left alone.
Nope. It's the logical progression of the mental illness of homosexuality. TOLERANCE --> ACCEPTANCE --> PARTICIPATION. If you don't follow along, you're a "homophobe."
The clueless want the issue to be solely about the "freedom to 'love'" whereas we realists recognize it's a WAR against ancient, natural values.
Dude. I try to at least somewhat agree with you and...
Are you actually disagreeing with me on what I've said?
That transcends the issue of homosexuality, and infringes on another's right to be left alone.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.