PDA

View Full Version : Florida city denies permit for 9/11 Quran burning



Apparition
18th August 2010, 07:39 PM
GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Officials in a Florida city have denied a burn permit for a church that is seeking to burn copies of the Quran on Sept. 11.

Interim Fire Chief Gene Prince said on Wednesday that the open burning of books is not allowed under Gainesville's burning ordinance.

The Dove World Outreach Center drew international attention after announcing a plan to burn copies of the Islamic holy text on church grounds to mark the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Prince says the church will be fined if the burning is held.

In an e-mail sent out on Wednesday, the church said, "City of Gainesville denies burn permit — BUT WE WILL STILL BURN KORANS."

The Gainesville church made headlines last year after distributing T-shirts that said, "Islam is of the Devil."

Information from: The Gainesville Sun, http://www.gainesvillesun.com

Source: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4qiOIPISetSVPDByC90nxCTL0vAD9HM7I1O0


Didn't the SCOTUS case of Texas v. Johnson prohibit this type of censorship bullsh*t a long time ago?

As much as I disagree with their actions, the fact that they need a permit to destroy their own private properties is despicable and a blatant violation of the 1st Amendment.

Hopefully, they'll sue and maybe prevail.

BrewTech
18th August 2010, 07:52 PM
What they are doing is idiotic, and not helping sh*t, but if it's their own property they are destroying, then I say let them go for it.

If I don't approve, how can I expect people to leave me alone when I want to burn a dozen bibles wrapped in an american flag?

;D

^^^ (supposed to prove a point through shocking humor)

Stop Making Cents
18th August 2010, 07:55 PM
I'd gladly throw a Quran in the fire, and wipe my ass with it first for good measure. :D

willie pete
18th August 2010, 08:03 PM
GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Officials in a Florida city have denied a burn permit for a church that is seeking to burn copies of the Quran on Sept. 11.

Interim Fire Chief Gene Prince said on Wednesday that the open burning of books is not allowed under Gainesville's burning ordinance.

The Dove World Outreach Center drew international attention after announcing a plan to burn copies of the Islamic holy text on church grounds to mark the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Prince says the church will be fined if the burning is held.

In an e-mail sent out on Wednesday, the church said, "City of Gainesville denies burn permit — BUT WE WILL STILL BURN KORANS."

The Gainesville church made headlines last year after distributing T-shirts that said, "Islam is of the Devil."

Information from: The Gainesville Sun, http://www.gainesvillesun.com

Source: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4qiOIPISetSVPDByC90nxCTL0vAD9HM7I1O0


Didn't the SCOTUS case of Texas v. Johnson prohibit this type of censorship bullsh*t a long time ago?

As much as I disagree with their actions, the fact that they need a permit to destroy their own private properties is despicable and a blatant violation of the 1st Amendment.

Hopefully, they'll sue and maybe prevail.


Don't know the SCOTUS case, but if Gainesville has an ordinance contrary to a SCOTUS ruling, the ordinance is illegal

PatColo
18th August 2010, 08:10 PM
Damn Scary Moozlem Towelhead Apologists! :oo-->


Interview w/FL Pastor planning ‘Burn a Koran Day’ (audio- excellent!) (http://gold-silver.us/forum/religion-and-philosophy/interview-wfl-pastor-planning-burn-a-koran-day-(audio-excellent!))


Were America Attacked by Scary Moozlems on 9/11? (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10142)

by David Ray Griffin

Much of America's foreign policy since 9/11 has been based on the assumption that it was attacked by Scary Moozlems on that day. This assumption was used, most prominently, to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is now widely agreed that the use of 9/11 as a basis for attacking Iraq was illegitimate: none of the hijackers were Iraqis, there was no working relation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, and Iraq was not behind the anthrax attacks. But it is still widely believed that the US attack on Afghanistan was justified. For example, the New York Times, while referring to the US attack on Iraq as a "war of choice," calls the battle in Afghanistan a "war of necessity." Time magazine has dubbed it "the right war." And Barack Obama says that one reason to wind down our involvement in Iraq is to have the troops and resources to "go after the people in Afghanistan who actually attacked us on 9/11."

The assumption that America was attacked by Scary Moozlems on 9/11 also lies behind the widespread perception of Islam as an inherently violent religion and therefore of Scary Moozlems as guilty until proven innocent. This perception surely contributed to attempts to portray Obama as a Scary Moozlem, which was lampooned by a controversial cartoon on the July 21, 2008, cover of The New Yorker.

As could be illustrated by reference to many other post-9/11 developments, including as spying, torture, extraordinary rendition, military tribunals, America's new doctrine of preemptive war, and its enormous increase in military spending, the assumption that the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were attacked by Scary Moozlem hijackers has had enormous negative consequences for both international and domestic issues.1

Is it conceivable that this assumption might be false? Insofar as Americans and Canadians would say "No," they would express their belief that this assumption is not merely an "assumption" but is instead based on strong evidence. When actually examined, however, the proffered evidence turns out to be remarkably weak. I will illustrate this point by means of 16 questions.

1. Were Mohamed Atta and the Other Hijackers Devout Scary Moozlems?
more... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10142)



aww jeez looky there, every time I check that number gets bigger, 1,254 licensed architects & engineers (http://ae911truth.org) now calling the official 9/11 CT a fraud! ;D


http://www.ae911truth.net/flash/wtc7ani2.swf

http://www.ae911truth.org/images/explo2.jpg


Meanwhile, the REAL 911 PERPS' (http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/the-zionist-elephant-in-the-room/msg2940/#msg2940) banks & synagogues are peppered liberally around ground zero...

Phoenix
18th August 2010, 09:19 PM
I hope they proceed anyways. I'd add at least one volume of the Talmud, if I was nearby.

willie pete
19th August 2010, 09:21 AM
I wonder if any of the members own land OUTSIDE the city limits? looks like the ordinance only addresses burning inside the city limits