PDA

View Full Version : Google: Young will have to change names to escape 'cyber past'



goldmonkey
19th August 2010, 07:04 AM
Young will have to change names to escape 'cyber past' (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/7951269/Young-will-have-to-change-names-to-escape-cyber-past-warns-Googles-Eric-Schmidt.html)
The private lives of young people are now so well documented on the internet that many will have to change their names on reaching adulthood, Google’s CEO has claimed.


Eric Schmidt suggested that young people should be entitled to change their identity to escape their misspent youth, which is now recorded in excruciating detail on social networking sites such as Facebook.

"I don't believe society understands what happens when everything is available, knowable and recorded by everyone all the time," Mr Schmidt told the Wall Street Journal.

In an interview (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704901104575423294099527212.html) Mr Schmidt said he believed that every young person will one day be allowed to change their name to distance themselves from embarrassing photographs and material stored on their friends' social media sites.

The 55-year-old also predicted that in the future, Google will know so much about its users that the search engine will be able to help them plan their lives.

Using profiles of it customers and tracking their locations through their smart phones, it will be able to provide live updates on their surroundings and inform them of tasks they need to do.

"We're trying to figure out what the future of search is," Mr Schmidt said. “One idea is that more and more searches are done on your behalf without you needing to type.

"I actually think most people don't want Google to answer their questions. They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next."

He suggested, as an example, that because Google would know “roughly who you are, roughly what you care about, roughly who your friends are”, it could remind users what groceries they needed to buy when passing a shop.

The comments are not the first time Mr Schmidt has courted controversy over the wealth of personal information people reveal on the internet. Last year, he notoriously remarked: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place."

Earlier this year, Google was condemned by the privacy watchdogs of 10 countries for showing a “disappointing disregard” for safeguarding private information of its users.

In a letter to Mr Schmidt, Britain's Information Commissioner Chris Graham joined his counterparts in countries including Canada, France, Germany and Italy, in raising concerns over its Street View and Buzz social networking services.

chad
19th August 2010, 07:15 AM
only if they post naked pictures of themselves, put up pages of bong photos etc. i think the ones that act responsibly can keep their names just fine.

Saul Mine
19th August 2010, 07:26 AM
There are agencies at several levels of government devoted to assuring that nobody ever escapes their past.

Twisted Titan
19th August 2010, 08:37 AM
If you are retarded enough to WILLFULLY put your first and last name and other pertinent information into a giant data base.

You deserve every calimity that befalls you.

willie pete
19th August 2010, 08:40 AM
...And anything you post on the web NEVER goes away...EVER, it's ALWAYS retrievable

ShortJohnSilver
19th August 2010, 10:36 AM
Advice on name changing from a name-changer ... interesting that when people were googling Schmidt and then posting photos of him and his girlfriend after he dumped his wife, he cried foul.

PatColo
19th August 2010, 10:59 AM
Do you know about Big-Brother's Google's immortal cookie? (http://www.google.com/search?q=google+immortal+year+cookie)


also see:
Anonymizing Google's Cookie (http://www.imilly.com/google-cookie.htm)

SLV^GLD
19th August 2010, 11:17 AM
Why not just block the cookie? I've been doing that on every box I use for years. Every new computer I setup I block the google.com cookie right in the browser black list. For me, the only inconvenience is google safesearch must be turned off for image searches each search. I suppose if it were annoying enough I could toggle the features with a greasemonkey script.