Log in

View Full Version : Mass amounts of info on the real history of the USA inc. Law cases and History


Ares
25th August 2010, 01:01 PM
http://www.assemblypost.com/uploads/Foundations_of_Freedom_pdf

Save this very informative document!!!!
Phoenix
25th August 2010, 06:16 PM
BE WARNED! It's a MONSTER (25.4 MB) - save it to your desktop, then read it. If you try to open it in your browser, you may stall or even crash it.
Saul Mine
25th August 2010, 06:53 PM
Misdirection
A fourth choice also exists: and it is expressed by people trying to fix the de facto corporate government. Any group trying to control or take over the Corporation known as the UNITED STATES amounts to a hostile takeover. This makes these people hostile enemy combatants and targets for the corporate government as they are not shareholders of this corporation.

I don't understand why they titled that "Misdirection". It is in fact the first and biggest problem faced by anybody trying to correct anything: the regime is going to attack with full force. Ruby Ridge and Waco were not just bungled law enforcement efforts. The corporation was protecting itself from lethal threats.
Phoenix
25th August 2010, 07:10 PM
This document in the OP is a valuable read. I don't agree with all of it's "sovereign citizen" conclusions, but it gets people to thinking about their relationship to the government, which is always good.

Read it for edification, not for a battle plan.
Joe King
25th August 2010, 07:35 PM
This document in the OP is a valuable read. I don't agree with all of it's "sovereign citizen" conclusions, but it gets people to thinking about their relationship to the government, which is always good.

Read it for edification, not for a battle plan.


Speaking of that, just the other day I was down at the local police station conversing with officer friendly and he actually used the words "Sovereign Right" when referring to me traveling about upon the public easement within a lane of traffic.
Those were his exact words.
I was not expecting him to say that and I'll admit that it took me a bit by surprise.

So how is it that a non-sovereign has sovereign Rights?

Anyone else ever heard such a thing from an officer?

The more I hear about the whole issue it leads me to think there's at least some truth to it. I'm also sure there's dis-info mixed in with it too, in order to trip people up who don't/won't do their homework.

btw, thanks for the warning but that pdf opened in my broweser just fine. ;)