PDA

View Full Version : Death of the First Amendment - The Nazification of the United States



mamboni
30th August 2010, 06:44 PM
Death of the First Amendment

The Nazification of the United States

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/196642

Chuck Norris is no pinko-liberal-commie, and Human Events is a very conservative publication. The two have come together to produce an important article, “Obama’s US Assassination Program.”

It seems only yesterday that Americans, or those interested in their civil liberties, were shocked that the Bush regime so flagrantly violated the FlSA law against spying on American citizens without a warrant. A federal judge serving on the FISA court even resigned in protest to the illegality of the spying.

Nothing was done about it. “National security” placed the president and executive branch above the law of the land. Civil libertarians worried that the US government was freeing its power from the constraints of law, but no one else seemed to care.

Encouraged by its success in breaking the law, the executive branch early this year announced that the Obama regime has given itself the right to murder Americans abroad if such Americans are considered a “threat.” “Threat” was not defined and, thus, a death sentence would be issued by a subjective decision of an unaccountable official.

There was hardly a peep out of the public or the media. Americans and the media were content for the government to summarily execute traitors and turncoats, and who better to identify traitors and turncoats than the government with all its spy programs.

The problem with this sort of thing is that once it starts, it doesn’t stop. As Norris reports, citing Obama regime security officials, the next stage is to criminalize dissent and criticism of the government. The May 2010 National Security Strategy states: “We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. . . . This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home.”

Most Americans will respond that the “indispensable” US government would never confuse an American exercising First Amendment rights with a terrorist or an enemy of the state. But, in fact, governments always have. Even one of our Founding Fathers, John Adams and the Federalist Party, had their “Alien and Sedition Acts” which targeted the Republican press.

Few with power can brook opposition or criticism, especially when it is a simple matter for those with power to sweep away constraints upon their power in the name of “national security.” Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan recently explained that more steps are being taken, because of the growing number of Americans who have been “captivated by extremist ideology or causes.” Notice that this phrasing goes beyond concern with Muslim terrorists.

In pursuit of hegemony over both the world and its own subjects, the US government is shutting down the First Amendment and turning criticism of the government into an act of “domestic extremism,” a capital crime punishable by execution, just as it was in Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia.

Initially German courts resisted Hitler’s illegal acts. Hitler got around the courts by creating a parallel court system, like the Bush regime did with its military tribunals. It won’t be long before a decision of the US Supreme Court will not mean anything. Any decision that goes against the regime will simply be ignored.

This is already happening in Canada, an American puppet state. Writing for CounterPunch, Andy Worthington documents the lawlessness of the US trial of Canadian Omar Khadr. In January of this year, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the interrogation of Khadr constituted “state conduct that violates the principles of fundamental justice” and “offends the most basic Canadian standards about the treatment of detained youth suspects.” According to the Toronto Star, the Court instructed the government to “shape a response that reconciled its foreign policy imperatives with its constitutional obligations to Khadr,” but the puppet prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, ignored the Court and permitted the US government to proceed with its lawless abuse of a Canadian citizen.

September 11 destroyed more than lives, World Trade Center buildings, and Americans’ sense of invulnerability. The event destroyed American liberty, the rule of law and the US Constitution.

Paul Craig Roberts was an editor of the Wall Street Journal and an Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. His latest book, HOW THE ECONOMY WAS LOST, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com

Eyebone
30th August 2010, 07:02 PM
Why not say Stalinization?

Stalin started the mind police.

The communists believe in mind control.

Please give Uncle Adolf a rest.

Glass
30th August 2010, 07:03 PM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/chuck-norris-a-shortlist-of-u-s-citizens-specifically-targeted-for-killing/

mamboni
30th August 2010, 07:21 PM
Why not say Stalinization?

Stalin started the mind police.

The communists believe in mind control.

Please give Uncle Adolf a rest.


Right on cousin!!!!

madfranks
30th August 2010, 08:26 PM
Most Americans will respond that the “indispensable” US government would never confuse an American exercising First Amendment rights with a terrorist or an enemy of the state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army

At 4:45 p.m., commanded by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, the 12th Infantry Regiment, Fort Howard, Maryland, and the 3rd Cavalry Regiment, supported by six battle tanks commanded by Maj. George S. Patton, Fort Myer, Virginia, formed in Pennsylvania Avenue while thousands of civil service employees left work to line the street and watch the U.S. Army attack its own veterans. The Bonus Marchers, believing the display was in their honour, cheered the troops until Maj. Patton ordered the cavalry to charge them—an action which prompted the civil service spectators to yell, "Shame! Shame!" After the cavalry charged the infantry, with fixed bayonets and adamsite gas, entered the camps, evicting veterans, families, and camp followers.

nunaem
30th August 2010, 08:41 PM
Didn't Walker Texas Ranger endorse Huckleberry? And isn't Human Events neo-'conservative'?

hoarder
30th August 2010, 08:50 PM
Why not say Stalinization?
Why not appropriately say "The Ashkenazification of America"?

MAGNES
30th August 2010, 08:56 PM
Didn't Walker Texas Ranger endorse Huckleberry? And isn't Human Events neo-'conservative'?


It is all Obama, Obama, Obama, ............. , Obama, Obama . LOL !

PCR is one of the best columnists on these issues,
he has been writing and documenting the NeoCons for
years, on freedom erosion, police state, wars,
"nothing American about AEI", names the Jew,
ignored by the media, etc,
BEST ARCHIVE
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/all_columns.htm

Research Feith family, turko mongol commie murderers, Jabotinsky,
all you need to know, Feith and Perle pigs running jihadists ,
even caught blackmailing people and they got off.

http://i33.tinypic.com/2z6igew.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/9rlk3n.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/2rfq5hf.jpg

JDRock
30th August 2010, 09:03 PM
Why not say Stalinization?
Why not appropriately say "The Ashkenazification of America"?


because that would cause people to realize where the nazis came from... :oo--> then they would have to STOP believing what the rabbis tell them to believe about uncle adolph.

philo beddoe
30th August 2010, 09:05 PM
Why not say Stalinization?
Why not appropriately say "The Ashkenazification of America"?


because that would cause people to realize where the nazis came from... :oo--> then they would have to STOP believing what the rabbis tell them to believe about uncle adolph.
What does your rabbi tell you? ;D

Joe King
30th August 2010, 11:06 PM
Why not say Stalinization?

Stalin started the mind police.

The communists believe in mind control.

Please give Uncle Adolf a rest.
I'd say they all suck badly.

As should any liberty-loving human being.

Saul Mine
31st August 2010, 12:36 AM
Na·zi
 /ˈnɑtsi, ˈnæt-/ Show Spelled [naht-see, nat-] Show IPA noun, plural -zis, adjective

–noun
1. a member of the National socialist German Workers' party of Germany, which in 1933, under Adolf Hitler, seized political control of the country, suppressing all opposition and establishing a dictatorship over all cultural, economic, and political activities of the people, and promulgated belief in the supremacy of Hitler as Führer, aggressive anti-Semitism, the natural supremacy of the German people, and the establishment of Germany by superior force as a dominant world power. The party was officially abolished in 1945 at the conclusion of World War II.
2. ( often lowercase ) a person elsewhere who holds similar views.
3. Sometimes Offensive . ( often lowercase ) a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to control a specified activity, practice, etc.: a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; tobacco nazis trying to ban smoking.
http://dictionary.com/


Would Mr. Roberts be kind enough to give examples showing which parts of the government he considers to meet the definition?

Alternately, he might be kind enough to declare that he is making up a new definition for the word, or that he means to use it as a meaningless insult.

In the absence of any such declaration, we must consider "Nazi" to be a hole in the page, and we have no idea what he is talking about.

Joe King
31st August 2010, 02:19 AM
IMHO, the possibility of the Nazification of the United States will come after a collapse. Same as it did in Germany.
i.e. that's when we'll be in the most danger of people actually listening en masse to a Hitler-type who's pumping fascism.

And at that point, this Nation will be dead for real. :'(

Twisted Titan
31st August 2010, 06:53 AM
The executive branch early this year announced that the Obama regime has given itself the right to murder Americans abroad if such Americans are considered a “threat.” “Threat” was not defined and, thus, a death sentence would be issued by a subjective decision of an unaccountable official.


The Threat.......