Bigjon
23rd September 2010, 01:02 PM
The Hoffman Wire
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor. RevisionistHistory.org
***
AN OPEN LETTER TO ALEX JONES FROM MICHAEL HOFFMAN
Sept. 23, 2010
Dear Alex
Michael Hoffman here. You had me on your show in 2008. Ted Pike has been relentlessly attacking you as an Israeli agent (Sept. 7 and Sept. 9). As recently as Sept. 22 he was referencing a short "YouTube" video clip of what looks like you many years ago arguing in support of Zionism.
Ted Pike's hypocrisy is astonishing. For two years Rev. Pike has relentlessly boycotted all mention of my 1100 page book, "Judaism
Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit." This book is the first major addition to suppressed knowledge of Judaism since Israel Shahak's 1994 work, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years."
Ted Pike is allied with Right-wing Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, who he often praises as a critic of the Left-wing ADL, apparently overlooking the fact that if the Talmud is evil, how can one ally with a rabbinic follower of the Talmud such as Daniel Lapin? Is the ADL more evil than the Talmud? Pike is sending a double-minded message sure to confuse his followers.
Rev. Pike is blind to the fact that both Right wing Talmudic rabbis and Left wing Zionists such as Abe Foxman are two pillars of one occult Judaic temple. Judaism is neither Right wing nor Left wing. It assumes the habiliments of each as the zeitgeist demands. In its essence, Judaism is a shape-shifting phenomenon capable of assuming almost any guise. It uses conservatism, monarchy and capitalism as readily as it has used revolution and Socialism. It was White supremacist in America's Jim Crow era and Black supremacist in the Civil Rights age. At present it is having its greatest subversive success on the American Right.
There is nothing that Daniel Lapin in his current bondage to Talmudic iniquity can do for our movement. Yet Mr. Pike has upheld Lapin as some sort of antithesis of ADL evil (Pike may change his position after today; let us recall his record in this regard as of today, however). On Aug. 10, 2010 Rev. Pike wrote, "As Orthodox rabbis Daniel Lapin and Nachum Shifren testify, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League is in relentless attack against Christian conservatives."
Excuse me Reverend Pike, but could you be so obtuse as to be oblivious to the fact that all Orthodox rabbis are themselves in "relentless attack" on Christianity? What could be the possible significance of singling out the ADL in this regard while building up as allies and whistleblowers two followers of the stinking pile of antichrist filth that is the Babylonian Talmud? Is Rev. Pike really so deranged? In my estimation he is an intelligent and very lucid individual and this makes his double-minded dichotomy -- helpful Orthodox rabbis sounding the alarm about the evil ADL -- all the more suspicious. Why is he engaged in such misdirection?
Rev. Pike makes elementary mistakes concerning Judaism, such as claiming on Sept. 9 that Rabbi Moses Maimonides was a practitioner of the Kabbalah. This is a "mistake" in the sense that, to the best of my knowledge, the only source for that arcane fact concerning Maimonides is Michael Hoffman.
Since Rev. Pike will not source or mention Michael Hoffman or "Judaism Discovered," where does he get the documentation (and by documentation I do not mean not a line from Wikipedia or some other ephemera, but actual
evidence) that allows him to declare that Maimonides was a practitioner of the Kabbalah? That information is so rare I am the only one who has divulged it (to my knowledge). Without my research, making such a statement misleads his audience because, if called upon to prove it, his followers, if they are ignorant of my work --and Rev. Pike has made them ignorant of it --will be unable to demonstrate that Maimonides was a practitioner of the Kabbalah. This sets them up for a fall. Why would Pike engage in such a ruse?
I have watched your July 9, 2008 radio show on YouTube on Israeli nukes.
In general I agree with you, although contrary to your stated view concerning your grandfathers' participation in WWII, I do not believe that Nazi Germany was any threat to the United States of America. I do approve of your denunciation of Israeli nuclear weapons and foreign aid to the Israeli murderers at this URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78BRRMmGWNM&feature=related
I also looked at your website (Sept. 23, 2010) and you have criticisms of Israeli policy linked there.
Don't ignore Rev. Pike's hypocrisy, Alex, in the name of "unity." He cares nothing for unity himself, obviously, since he has made you the number one enemy in at least three of his e-mailed columns. If he cared for unity he would not boycott my book when his readers desperately need the facts contained within it to more effectively battle the enemies of Truth. His followers imagine that Rev. Pike would do everything possible to defeat Judaism. Little do they know that he has withheld a mine of information from them. Why has he done this? Who benefits from the boycott of "Judaism Discovered," a book so greatly feared that even Amazon.com banned it for several months, until the grassroots protest and resulting publicity ("Banned by Amazon!") became a net loss for the establishment, and Amazon relented.
Where was Pike when, for months, courageous activists across the anti-Zionist spectrum put aside their differences and publicized Amazon's outrageous and unprecedented ban of of "Judaism Discovered"?
Pike was totally silent. His silent treatment remains in effect as of this writing.
I have not troubled to confront Pike on his various suppressive moves and errors for some years now, since so many people merely respond to such an expose by saying, "we need unity." Furthermore, I am very much occupied at present with my work - writing a book about Maimonides and Kabbalah, and a newsletter on Judaism in the American South. I cannot afford to be sidetracked. Hence, I wish I did not have to engage Rev.
Pike, who, back in the 1980s, inspired many of us with his fine book, "Israel Our Duty, Our Dilemma" (which our company helped to sell and publicize), and a pioneering anti-Talmudic video.
But watching Pike excoriate Jones in three dedicated e-mail columns, as if you were the head of the Sanhedrin, is troubling. I certainly wish you were stronger in certain areas such as Talmudic skullduggery. Like Jesse Ventura you have some growing to do in this regard. But your website does indeed contain pointed criticism of Israeli policies and your relatively more recent YouTube entries reveal your protest of evils like Israeli nukes and the targeting of Iran.
You hosted this writer on your program in 2008, you publicized my work and allowed me to speak freely and at length on any subject I chose, even when I challenged you. Just because you don't hit every high note does not make you the devil incarnate. Your work on the crucially important 9/11 conspiracy has been exemplary. If we can unravel the 9/11 conspiracy before the public, the Cryptocracy will be seriously destabilized.
In consideration of his own considerable failings and questionable dealings, how is it that Ted Pike feels qualified to act as grand inquisitor over Alex Jones, while serving as an enthusiastic booster of Rabbi Daniel Lapin?
Sincerely,
Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org
***
The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com
Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.
Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor. RevisionistHistory.org
***
AN OPEN LETTER TO ALEX JONES FROM MICHAEL HOFFMAN
Sept. 23, 2010
Dear Alex
Michael Hoffman here. You had me on your show in 2008. Ted Pike has been relentlessly attacking you as an Israeli agent (Sept. 7 and Sept. 9). As recently as Sept. 22 he was referencing a short "YouTube" video clip of what looks like you many years ago arguing in support of Zionism.
Ted Pike's hypocrisy is astonishing. For two years Rev. Pike has relentlessly boycotted all mention of my 1100 page book, "Judaism
Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit." This book is the first major addition to suppressed knowledge of Judaism since Israel Shahak's 1994 work, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years."
Ted Pike is allied with Right-wing Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, who he often praises as a critic of the Left-wing ADL, apparently overlooking the fact that if the Talmud is evil, how can one ally with a rabbinic follower of the Talmud such as Daniel Lapin? Is the ADL more evil than the Talmud? Pike is sending a double-minded message sure to confuse his followers.
Rev. Pike is blind to the fact that both Right wing Talmudic rabbis and Left wing Zionists such as Abe Foxman are two pillars of one occult Judaic temple. Judaism is neither Right wing nor Left wing. It assumes the habiliments of each as the zeitgeist demands. In its essence, Judaism is a shape-shifting phenomenon capable of assuming almost any guise. It uses conservatism, monarchy and capitalism as readily as it has used revolution and Socialism. It was White supremacist in America's Jim Crow era and Black supremacist in the Civil Rights age. At present it is having its greatest subversive success on the American Right.
There is nothing that Daniel Lapin in his current bondage to Talmudic iniquity can do for our movement. Yet Mr. Pike has upheld Lapin as some sort of antithesis of ADL evil (Pike may change his position after today; let us recall his record in this regard as of today, however). On Aug. 10, 2010 Rev. Pike wrote, "As Orthodox rabbis Daniel Lapin and Nachum Shifren testify, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League is in relentless attack against Christian conservatives."
Excuse me Reverend Pike, but could you be so obtuse as to be oblivious to the fact that all Orthodox rabbis are themselves in "relentless attack" on Christianity? What could be the possible significance of singling out the ADL in this regard while building up as allies and whistleblowers two followers of the stinking pile of antichrist filth that is the Babylonian Talmud? Is Rev. Pike really so deranged? In my estimation he is an intelligent and very lucid individual and this makes his double-minded dichotomy -- helpful Orthodox rabbis sounding the alarm about the evil ADL -- all the more suspicious. Why is he engaged in such misdirection?
Rev. Pike makes elementary mistakes concerning Judaism, such as claiming on Sept. 9 that Rabbi Moses Maimonides was a practitioner of the Kabbalah. This is a "mistake" in the sense that, to the best of my knowledge, the only source for that arcane fact concerning Maimonides is Michael Hoffman.
Since Rev. Pike will not source or mention Michael Hoffman or "Judaism Discovered," where does he get the documentation (and by documentation I do not mean not a line from Wikipedia or some other ephemera, but actual
evidence) that allows him to declare that Maimonides was a practitioner of the Kabbalah? That information is so rare I am the only one who has divulged it (to my knowledge). Without my research, making such a statement misleads his audience because, if called upon to prove it, his followers, if they are ignorant of my work --and Rev. Pike has made them ignorant of it --will be unable to demonstrate that Maimonides was a practitioner of the Kabbalah. This sets them up for a fall. Why would Pike engage in such a ruse?
I have watched your July 9, 2008 radio show on YouTube on Israeli nukes.
In general I agree with you, although contrary to your stated view concerning your grandfathers' participation in WWII, I do not believe that Nazi Germany was any threat to the United States of America. I do approve of your denunciation of Israeli nuclear weapons and foreign aid to the Israeli murderers at this URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78BRRMmGWNM&feature=related
I also looked at your website (Sept. 23, 2010) and you have criticisms of Israeli policy linked there.
Don't ignore Rev. Pike's hypocrisy, Alex, in the name of "unity." He cares nothing for unity himself, obviously, since he has made you the number one enemy in at least three of his e-mailed columns. If he cared for unity he would not boycott my book when his readers desperately need the facts contained within it to more effectively battle the enemies of Truth. His followers imagine that Rev. Pike would do everything possible to defeat Judaism. Little do they know that he has withheld a mine of information from them. Why has he done this? Who benefits from the boycott of "Judaism Discovered," a book so greatly feared that even Amazon.com banned it for several months, until the grassroots protest and resulting publicity ("Banned by Amazon!") became a net loss for the establishment, and Amazon relented.
Where was Pike when, for months, courageous activists across the anti-Zionist spectrum put aside their differences and publicized Amazon's outrageous and unprecedented ban of of "Judaism Discovered"?
Pike was totally silent. His silent treatment remains in effect as of this writing.
I have not troubled to confront Pike on his various suppressive moves and errors for some years now, since so many people merely respond to such an expose by saying, "we need unity." Furthermore, I am very much occupied at present with my work - writing a book about Maimonides and Kabbalah, and a newsletter on Judaism in the American South. I cannot afford to be sidetracked. Hence, I wish I did not have to engage Rev.
Pike, who, back in the 1980s, inspired many of us with his fine book, "Israel Our Duty, Our Dilemma" (which our company helped to sell and publicize), and a pioneering anti-Talmudic video.
But watching Pike excoriate Jones in three dedicated e-mail columns, as if you were the head of the Sanhedrin, is troubling. I certainly wish you were stronger in certain areas such as Talmudic skullduggery. Like Jesse Ventura you have some growing to do in this regard. But your website does indeed contain pointed criticism of Israeli policies and your relatively more recent YouTube entries reveal your protest of evils like Israeli nukes and the targeting of Iran.
You hosted this writer on your program in 2008, you publicized my work and allowed me to speak freely and at length on any subject I chose, even when I challenged you. Just because you don't hit every high note does not make you the devil incarnate. Your work on the crucially important 9/11 conspiracy has been exemplary. If we can unravel the 9/11 conspiracy before the public, the Cryptocracy will be seriously destabilized.
In consideration of his own considerable failings and questionable dealings, how is it that Ted Pike feels qualified to act as grand inquisitor over Alex Jones, while serving as an enthusiastic booster of Rabbi Daniel Lapin?
Sincerely,
Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org
***
The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com
Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.
Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.
--^----------------------------------------------------------------